You are on page 1of 47

MC2010:

The Critical Shear Crack Theory as a mechanical


model for punching shear design and its
application to code provisions

Prof. Dr Aurelio Muttoni


Dr Miguel Fernández Ruiz

École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland

0
Introduction

Load test 1908 Load test 1909

Robert Maillart (1872-1940) Claude A. P. Turner (1869 –1955)

1
Introduction

2
Introduction

Bluche,
Switzerland,
1981
Geneva, Switzerland, 1976

Cagliari, Italy,
2004

Wolverhampton, UK, 1997


3
Introduction

Design based on empirical formulas


without taking into account size-
effect
No shear reinforcement, no integrity
reinforcement
Brittleness

Gretzenbach, Switzerland, 2004

4
Introduction

200%

180% With punching shear


reinforcement
160%

140%

120%

Force
100%

80% Without punching shear reinforcement

60%

40%

20%
Jonen, Switzerland, 2007 0%
0% 100% 200% 300% 400%
(Photo courtesy HALFEN AG, Switzerland)
Deformation capacity

Need for a mechanical model for slabs


without and with shear reinforcement

5
Introduction

1. Development of a mechanical model:


the Critical Shear Crack Theory

2. Extensive validation by testing

6
The CSCT: experimental verification in Lausanne

120
102
100

80
Number of tests

60

40
28

20
7
3 1
0
125 250 320 400 500
Thickness [mm]

7
The CSCT: experimental verification in Lausanne

120
102
100

80
Number of tests

60

40
28

20
7
3 1
0
125 250 320 400 500
Thickness [mm]

8
The CSCT: experimental verification in Lausanne

120
102
100

80
Number of tests

60

40
28

20
7
3 1
0
125 250 320 400 500
Thickness [mm]

9
The CSCT: experimental verification in Lausanne

120
102
100

80
Number of tests

60

40
28

20
7
3 1
0
125 250 320 400 500
Thickness [mm]

10
The CSCT: experimental verification in Lausanne

120
102
100

80
Number of tests

60

40
28

20
7
3 1
0
125 250 320 400 500
Thickness [mm] Total #: 141 tests

11
Fundamentals of the CSCT Walraven J.C. 1981, Fundamental Analysis of
Aggregate Interlock, Journal of the Structural
Division, Vol. 107, No. 11, pp. 2245 – 2270.

extreme
parameters

12
Fundamentals of the CSCT

theoretical model based


on aggregate interlock

simplified failure
criterion

Muttoni A., 2008, Punching shear strength of reinforced concrete slabs without
transverse reinforcement, ACI Structural Journal, V. 105, No 4, pp. 440-450
13
Fundamentals of the CSCT: punching shear design

Load-rotation curve
VR
Average
Characteristic Failure criterion
yR

Muttoni A., 2008, Punching shear strength of reinforced


concrete slabs without transverse reinforcement, ACI
Structural Journal, V. 105, No 4, pp. 440-450
14
Physical model: application to non-symmetrical cases (moment transfer)

Shear field and shear forces


along control perimeter

Evaluation of w accounting
for transfer moment (msd)

15
Physical model: application to non-symmetrical cases (moment transfer)
MC 2010 EC 2

16
Physical model: application to non-symmetrical cases (moment transfer)

Vocke, H, 2002, Zum Durchstanzen von Flachdecken


im Bereich von Rand- und Eckstützen, PhD. thesis,
University of Stuttgart, 228 p.

17
Physical model: application to non-symmetrical cases (moment transfer)

Vocke, H, 2002, Zum Durchstanzen von Flachdecken


im Bereich von Rand- und Eckstützen, PhD. thesis,
University of Stuttgart, 228 p.

18
Physical model: application to bridge deck slabs

Vaz Rodrigues, R., Fernández Ruiz, M., Muttoni, A., 2008,


Punching shear strength of R/C bridge cantilever slabs,
Engineering Structures, Elsevier, Vol. 30, No. 11, pp. 3024-3033
Avg: 1.07; CoV: 13%
19
Physical model: application to shear-reinforced slabs

Fernández Ruiz, M., Muttoni, A., 2009, Applications of the


critical shear crack theory to punching of R/C slabs with
transverse reinforcement, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 106, No. 4,
2009, pp. 485-494

20
Physical model: application to shear-reinforced slabs (2nd failure mode)

21
Physical model: application to shear-reinforced slabs (2nd failure mode)

22
Physical model: application to shear-reinforced slabs

Fernández Ruiz, M., Muttoni, A., Kunz, J., 2010,


Strengthening of flat slabs against punching shear
using post-installed shear reinforcement, ACI
Structural Journal, Vol. 107, No. 4, pp. 434-442
23
Physical model: application to shear-reinforced slabs (3rd failure mode)

24
Physical model: application to shear-reinforced slabs

Fernández Ruiz, M., Muttoni, A., 2009,


Applications of the critical shear crack theory
to punching of R/C slabs with transverse
reinforcement, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 106,
No. 4, 2009, pp. 485-494

25
Physical model: retrofitting

26
Physical model: retrofitting

27
Physical model: retrofitting

28
Physical model: fibre-reinforced concrete

29
Physical model: fibre-reinforced concrete

Voo, J.Y.L. and Foster, S.J., 2004, Tensile Fracture of Fibre


Reinforced Concrete: Variable Engagement Model, Sixth
Rilem Symposium on Fibre Reinforced Concrete (FRC),
Varenna, Italy, 20-22 September, pp. 875-884

30
Code provisions
MC-2010: 8 pages (with commentary)

31
Code provisions
MC-2010: 8 pages (with commentary)

EC-2: 10 pages

32
NMC-Calculation of Load-rotation curve: Levels-of-Approximation approach

Assessment of existing
structures, design of
special cases
Typical design

Preliminary design

Schertenleib P., Muttoni A., Schwartz J., 2003, Pièces comprimées,


Documentation SIA, D 0182 Introduction à la norme SIA 262,
Zürich, Switzerland, pp. 67-77
33
NMC: Levels-of-Approximation approach

http://ibeton.epfl.ch/MC2010Punching

Level I of approximation
34
NMC: Levels-of-Approximation approach

Level II of approximation

35
36
Conclusions

• The CSCT is grounded on a consistent mechanical model and


has been checked against extensive experimental data

• The accuracy of the mechanical parameters can be


progressively refined in various levels of approximation

• The theory can be easily adapted to unusual cases, providing


the designer with a clear understanding of the structural
behaviour

• The CSCT can be consistently used to investigate and to design


shear-reinforced and fibre-reinforced slabs

• The theory can be implemented efficiently into design codes

37
Coefficient ke

38
Influence of transfer moments

Vd M d ,i  Vd  ei
m sd  
8 2  bs

39
Fibre-reinforced concrete

40
CSCT vs. other codes (1/2)

41
CSCT vs. other codes (2/2)

42
Crushing strength (1/2)

43
Crushing strength (2/2)

44
Influence of column size

45
Slabs with punching shear reinforcement (crushing of concrete struts)

MC-90, EC-2

46

You might also like