Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Whole Class
Students Assessment Margin Shape Blade Veins Stem Total
Student 1 Pre-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
+ Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Student 2
Student 2 has been out due to illness.
Student 3 Pre-Assessment 0 1 1 1 1 4
* Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Student 4 Pre-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Student 5 Pre-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Student 6 Pre-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Student 7 Pre-Assessment 0 0 1 1 1 3
- Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Student 8 Pre-Assessment 0 0 1 1 1 3
Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Student 9 Pre-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Student 10 Pre-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
The graph informs me that my students understand the information in the lesson. My students
can call upon previously learned knowledge to identify different parts of leaves. They are also able to
understand that each leaf, though different, has margins, shapes, blade, stem and veins. All nine of my
students who have completed the lesson can identify the different parts on each of the leaf rubbings
Subgroups
Learning Goal: The student will call upon prior knowledge to verbally identify parts of the leaf.
COYNE 3
This combined graph shows that the girls were more verbal when recalling information to
identify the different parts of the leaf. Below is a break down between each of the two categories.
Boys
Student 1 Pre-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
+ Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Student 2
Student 2 has been out due to illness.
Student 7 Pre-Assessment 0 0 1 1 1 3
- Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Student 8 Pre-Assessment 0 0 1 1 1 3
Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
COYNE 4
Girls
Student 3 Pre-Assessment 0 1 1 1 1 4
* Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Student 4 Pre-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Student 5 Pre-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Student 6 Pre-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Student 9 Pre-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Student 10 Pre-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
COYNE 5
Individual
Student 1 Pre-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
+ Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
Student 7 Pre-Assessment 0 0 1 1 1 3
- Post-Assessment 1 1 1 1 1 5
+ high achieving student
When finding a class average for overall class understanding and growth, it is important to look
at both the highest achieving student and the lowest achieving student. Every student in the class will
fall somewhere along the spectrum between these two students. It is important to review and analyze
the data from the whole range of the classroom. This lets the teacher know where students are in
understanding the lesson. When specifically looking at the individual students it is important to look at
the highest achieving student to know what went right in the lesson to recreate it or modify it to help
other students. It is important to look at the lowest achieving student to understand where the learning
did not work for this student and how to modify it to better help this student and other students
Student 1 represents the highest achieving student. This student is the highest achieving student
because they verbally answered all questions asked to the whole class during the pre-assessment,
correctly handled the materials by using the pincer grasp for the during-assessment and can identify the
different categories on their rubbings for the post-assessment. This student mastered this lesson.
Student 7 represents the lowest achieving student. This student is the lowest achieving student
because they did not verbally answer all the questions asked to the whole class during the pre-
assessment, they correctly handled the materials by using the pincer grasp for the during-assessment,
and can identify the different categories on their rubbings for the post-assessment. This student