You are on page 1of 6

Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Conference on Information and Communication Technologies (ICT 2013)

Mitigation of Nonlinear Effects Using Uniform


Power Transmission in Coherent OOFDM Systems
G.Gaswin Kastro M.Palanivelan Sheila Anand
M.E Communication Systems Associate Professor, Dep. of ECE Dean (Research) Computer Studies,
Rajalakshmi Engineering College Rajalakshmi Engineering College Rajalakshmi Engineering College,
Chennai, India Chennai, India Chennai, India,
kastrog7@gmail.com palanivelan.m@rajalakshmi.edu.in sheila.anand@rajalakshmi.edu.in

Abstract—We investigate the high peak power resulting (DDO-OFDM) and coherent-optical OFDM (CO-OFDM).
from the transmission of orthogonal frequency division DDO-OFDM is realized by sending the optical carrier along
multiplexing (OFDM) signals through optical fiber. High peak- with the OFDM band so that direct detection with a single
to-average power ratio (PAPR) which is a major drawback of photodiode can be used at the receiver to convert the optical
OFDM can make worse the nonlinearities experienced in
field back into the electrical field. In a CO-OFDM system,
optical fibers. Phase modulation instead of intensity
modulation is adopted to keep the amplitude of optical power the optical carrier is phase modulated at the transmitter and
within the fiber uniform. To effectively combat the high peak the receiver is realized by coherent detection with a local
power that results from the addition of number of subcarriers oscillator synchronized with the optical LASER source.
of OFDM in time domain, we apply Reduced Complexity Max Coherent optical OFDM (CO-OFDM) offers the ultimate
Norm (RCMN) technique which is a distortion less PAPR performance in spectral efficiency, polarization or chromatic
reduction scheme. The proposed technique offers 3.7dB dispersion tolerance and receiver sensitivity. In both DDO-
reduction in PAPR. OFDM and CO-OFDM external modulation of the LASER
source is employed commonly.
Keywords—Optical OFDM; Peak-to-average power ratio;
Phase modulation; RCMN.
Though OFDM has many advantages, one major
drawback of OFDM is the high peak-to-average power ratio
I. INTRODUCTION (PAPR) in the time domain. Moreover, because the
The orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) nonlinear effects in the transmission links are proportional
is a modulation and multiplexing technique, which is widely to the instantaneous signal power, a large PAPR will cause
used in wireless communication systems. Orthogonal strong nonlinear impairments degrading the transmission
frequency division multiplexing is a multicarrier modulation performance. For design simplicity and low-cost operation,
technique where a wideband signal is divided into a set of the optical intensity modulation (IM) of OFDM signals is
independent narrow band orthogonal signals, each at a commonly employed for signal generation and detection in
different frequency band. The advantage of multicarrier optical transmission systems. However, after propagating
modulation lies mainly in the fact that in the presence of through cascaded spans of standard single-mode fibers
channel selective frequency fading only a small part of the (SSMFs) and erbium-doped fiber amplifiers (EDFAs), the
data is lost whereas in single carrier systems, the whole data high PAPR of OFDM waveforms can induce an
stream is affected. OFDM is robust against narrowband accumulated effect of large nonlinear distortions at some
interference because such interference affects only a small peak signal power levels.
percentage of the subcarriers. OFDM is being used in
different applications including Wi-Fi, Wi-Max, Digital In section II we have discussed the existing methods to
Video Broadcasting Television (DVB-TV), and in the new reduce PAPR and to overcome the fiber non-linearities. In
next generation of mobile systems, Long-Term Evolution section III the proposed system that is capable of reducing
(LTE). the non-linearities by reducing PAPR and adopting phase
modulation will be discussed. The simulation of the design
Rapid advances in the field of high-speed digital signal using VPI and the obtained results will be discussed in
processing have recently enabled the use of orthogonal section IV and finally the conclusion is presented in section
frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) for fiber-optic V.
applications. A number of researches have shown that
OFDM is also a promising technology for optical II. RELATED WORK
communications. Optical OFDM (O-OFDM) [1-4] has CO-OFDM has been proposed as a system that requires
shown extreme robustness to fiber chromatic dispersion and no chromatic dispersion compensation [5]. The OFDM
polarization mode dispersion (PMD). The Optical OFDM signal is said to be resistant to chromatic dispersion
has additional advantage of achieving high spectral experienced in the fiber. Chromatic dispersion in optical
efficiency. For fiber optic transmission systems, OFDM channel is equivalent to the frequency selective fading that
comes in two types, namely direct-detected optical OFDM

978-1-4673-5758-6/13/$31.00 © 2013 IEEE 583


Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Conference on Information and Communication Technologies (ICT 2013)

occurs in wireless channels. Moreover CO-OFDM is said to electromagnetic fields, any dielectric medium behaves like a
be an excellent candidate for long-haul transmission system non-linear medium. Fundamentally the origin of non-
because it has superior performance in terms of optical linearity lies in an-harmonic motion of bound electrons
signal to noise ratio (OSNR) requirements, PMD tolerance under the influence of an applied field. Nonlinear effects in
and spectral efficiency. PAPR which is a major drawback of optical fibers occur due to (1) changes in the refractive
OFDM makes it highly sensitive to non-linearities in the index of the medium with optical intensity and, (2) inelastic
optical fiber. Several techniques had been introduced before scattering phenomenon in fiber. The power dependence of
to reduce the PAPR in conventional OFDM systems. In [6] the refractive index of fiber is responsible for the Kerr-
some of the important techniques to reduce PAPR had been effect. Depending upon the type of input signal, the Kerr-
discussed. Amplitude clipping and filtering, Selected nonlinearity manifests itself in three different effects such as
Mapping (SLM) and Partial Transmit Sequence (PTS) were SPM, XPM and FWM. At high power level, the inelastic
known to be the common methods for PAPR mitigation. scattering phenomenon can induce stimulated effects such
There are also various other PAPR reduction techniques as SBS and SRS. The intensity of scattered light grows
such as Tone Injection, Tone Reservation, Interleaving exponentially if the incident power exceeds a certain
Technique etc. In [7] some of these PAPR reduction threshold value. The difference between Brillouin and
techniques had been applied to the optical OFDM systems. Raman scattering is that the Brillouin generated phonons
In [8-9] clipping and predistortion are introduced to the (acoustic) are coherent and give rise to a macroscopic
radio frequency OFDM transmitter to compensate the acoustic wave in the fiber, while in Raman scattering the
nonlinearity effect introduced by the optical in- phonons (optical) are incoherent and no macroscopic wave
phase/quadrature modulator. Though clipping the OFDM is generated. Except for SPM and CPM, all nonlinear effects
signal is the simplest, low complex technique to reduce provide gains to some channel at the expense of depleting
PAPR, it results in signal distortion and therefore not power from other channels. SPM and CPM affect only the
considered as an effective technique. High signal clipping phase of signals and can cause broadening of the spectrum,
ratio will introduce some deleterious side effects, such as which leads to increased dispersion. The effective refractive
increase in error bit rate and growth of in-band and out-of- index ( neff ) of a nonlinear medium can be expressed in
band radiation [10]. Electronic predistortion requires a
feedback path from receiver to transmitter to optimize the terms of the input power ( P ) and effective core area of
transmitted waveform; so it cannot cope with rapid channel fiber ( Aeff ) as,
variations and the signal cannot be recovered at points
between the transmitter and receiver [11]. SLM and PTS are
distortionless techniques and works better than distortion P
neff = nl + nnl (1)
based techniques. Aeff
Though when the PAPR is supressed, amplitude
fluctuations caused by Intensity modulation may make the Where nl and nnl represents the refractive index when the
transmitted optical sigal sensitive to the fiber non-linearities optical fiber is experiencing linear and nonlinear conditions
[12-15]. Phase modulation Instead of Intensity modulation is respectively. So the non-linearity in the fiber places a
an effective way to modulate the optical signal. Using this constraint on the maximum optical power that can be
technique, the signal changes the phase of the modulated launched into the fiber. Though the optical power launched
lightwave and maintains the uniform optical power. Thus by into the fiber is chosen to be below the desired threshold, the
reducing the PAPR by adopting a distortionless technique PAPR resulting from the OFDM signal may exacerbate the
and maintaining uniform optical power within the fiber by non-linearities in the fiber [16-19]. Moreover the commonly
adopting phase modulation, the effects of non-linearity is followed intensity modulation may result in optical power
highly mitigated in CO-OFDM systems. fluctuation within the fiber and thus makes worse the fiber
non-linearities. The transmitter and receiver block diagrams
III. PROPOSED SYSTEM of the proposed system is shown in the Fig. 1 and Fig. 2
In fiber optic communication systems, linear impairments respectively.
are due to fiber loss, Chromatic dispersion (CD) and
Polarization mode dispersion (PMD). Optical power loss
due to light propagation inside the fiber results from
absorption and scattering and it can be easily compensated
by optical amplifiers. CD and PMD are the main linear
impairments for optical communication systems. Major
degrading effects due to fiber non-linearity are Self-phase
modulation (SPM), Cross phase modulation (XPM), Four
wave mixing (FWM), Stimulated Brillioun Scattering (SBS)
and Stimulated Raman Scattering (SRS). For intense Fig. 1. Proposed OFDM transmitter

978-1-4673-5758-6/13/$31.00 © 2013 IEEE 584


Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Conference on Information and Communication Technologies (ICT 2013)
reception of optical signal is done using photodetector.
Before photodetection the received optical signal is
combined with a local oscillator LASER source which is
synchronized with the LASER source used at the transmitter
side. The detected optical signal is then demodulated using
OFDM decoder that performs the reverse operation of the
OFDM coder discussed above.

Fig. 2. Proposed OFDM receiver

The first few blocks of the transmitter block diagram


corresponds to the OFDM coder. In O-OFDM the OFDM
signal is electrically generated and then modulated using a
LASER source before transmission through the optical fiber.
The binary data is first mapped to QAM or QPSK symbols
and then arranged for IFFT operation. After IFFT the
subcarriers should be checked for high PAPR. We
incorporate RCMN which is a distortionless linear PAPR
reduction technique [20]. The operation of the RCMN
technique is illustrated in the Fig.3 and Fig.4.

Fig. 4. flow diagram of the RCMN algorithm at the receiver

IV. SIMULATION RESULTS


The simulation was carried out using Virtual Photonics
Integrated (VPI) which is a powerful tool that allows
simulating a wide range of optical transmission designs. VPI
is hierarchically organised. This allows an easier
management of the modules taking part in a simulation, as
they can be treated independently or as a group when
necessary. The VPI modules can be classified into three
levels such as the universe, galaxy and star. A star
represents a unique module with a specific function which
cannot be subdivided into other modules. A galaxy can be
described as a second level module formed by a set of
interconnected stars (or even other galaxies). In order to be
Fig. 3. Flow diagram of the RCMN algorithm at the transmitter implemented on a universe, a galaxy must contain at least
one input or output port. The universe is the only module
After the PAPR is suppressed the symbols are converted
that can be executed by the user. It represents the whole
to analogue form using DAC. Now this signal is externally
simulation scenario, and it can consist of a combination of
modulated using a LASER source. The direct modulation of
a laser is cheap and also easy to adapt to low cost interconnected stars and galaxies. The parameters of each
applications for moderated distances or transmission rates. module can be set or adjusted using the Parameter Editor
However, for advanced applications involving high data rates Window (PEW). Before beginning the simulation the
or long distance links, external modulation is a good parameters of VPI has to be carefully chosen, the failure of
solution. Since we are proposing phase modulation to reduce this may cause errors. Since generation of subcarriers
the nonlinearities in the fiber we phase modulate the optical includes IFFT algorithm at the transmitter side and its
source, where the optical source is a continuous wave detection includes FFT algorithm at the receiver side, VPI
LASER. After phase modulation the optical signal works better when the sample rate and time window
containing the OFDM signal is launched into the fiber. The parameters are set such that they are in powers of 2.

978-1-4673-5758-6/13/$31.00 © 2013 IEEE 585


Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Conference on Information and Communication Technologies (ICT 2013)

Fig. 5. VPI simulation design

The various parameters associated with the simulation is applied phase modulation for reducing the fiber
given in the Table I. nonlinearities we externally modulate a continuous wave
LASER source using an ideal phase modulator. The LASER
TABLE I source operates at 193.1THz. This modulated optical signal
SIMULATION PARAMETERS is now launched into standard single mode fiber of 10 loops
with each loop contributing 100Kms of length. Each loop
Fiber Length 1000 Km can be assisted with an optical amplifier and an optical filter
Fiber Attenuation 0.2dB/Km to produce a better signal constellation. We have chosen
single mode fiber because the non-linear effects are low
Bit Rate 10 Gbps compared to the multimode fiber.
Modulation 4-QAM
At the receiver side the optical signal is detected
Number of FFT carriers 64 using a photodetector. A suitable type of photodetector can
be chosen using the PEW of VPI. Before the optical signal
Cyclic Prefix 20%
is detected, the signal from the fiber is combined with a
local oscillator laser diode synchronized with the optical
Fig.5 shows the universe schematic of the source and this is for the purpose of coherent detection. The
simulation setup. It consists of four galaxies named as detected signal is then downconverted using the
ofdmcoder, ofdmdecoder, up_converter and downconverter downconverter module and then fed to the OFDM decoder
as shown in the figure. An important feature of VPI is galaxy which performs the reverse process of the OFDM
Cosimulation, which we have exploited in our simulation. coder. The demodulated signal can be numerically plotted
The PRBS module provides binary bits at the rate of 10GHz by using the NumericalAnalyzer1D_vtms module and the
as input to the ofdm_coder galaxy. The ofdm_coder galaxy optical and electrical signals at various points can be viewed
includes a cosimulation module that interfaces a matlab and analysed using SignalAnalyzer_vmts module.
program with VPI. This matlab program is coded to
generate OFDM signal and also implements the PAPR Fig.6 shows the received constellation obtained by
reduction scheme within the code. After the IFFT operation plotting the I and Q components of the received signal.
is performed the resulting complex values are checked for Since we have used 4-QAM symbol mapping we have got
high PAPR using the RCMN technique. The output of the four ideal points in the constellation. Fig.7 shows the optical
OFDM coder is then upconverted to 7.5GHz by the power spectrum after the LASER source is externally
upconverter galaxy. This upconverted OFDM signal is then modulated by the optical phase modulator. The frequency
externally modulated using a LASER source. Since we have values (in GHz) in the x axis are relative to 193.1 THz, so

978-1-4673-5758-6/13/$31.00 © 2013 IEEE 586


Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Conference on Information and Communication Technologies (ICT 2013)

this is the real frequency for the 0 Hz value in the graph. The Optical Signal to Noise Ratio (OSNR) is plotted against
This will also be the frequency for the optical carrier signal, the fiber length and is shown in the Fig.8.
which is separated by a 5 GHz gap from both the suppressed PAPR plot
lower sideband (left in the graph) and the optical OFDM 1
signal centred at 7.5 GHz from the optical carrier. Original
0.9 RCMN

0.8

CCDF (P r[P A P R> P A P R0])


0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PAPR0 [dB]

Fig. 6. Received constellation Fig. 9. CCDF plot of RCMN with original values

To compare and evaluate the PAPR optimization


performance, extensive simulations have been performed
based on RCMN algorithm using MATLAB. At CCDF of
0.5 the proposed scheme offers 7.5 dB and RCMN with 3.8
dB. Therefore PAPR reduction of 3.7 dB is obtained.
V. CONCLUSION
Coherent Optical Orthogonal Frequency Division
Multiplexing (CO-OFDM) system has proved to be an
effective system that mitigates chromatic dispersion. When
the RCMN technique is incorporated with the system the
possibility of optical power fluctuation in fiber is largely
reduced. Phase modulation tends to keep the optical power
the same along the fiber and thus reducing the effects of
fiber nonlinearities. The possibility of intensity modulated
optical signal exacerbating the PAPR is thus eliminated. The
proposed PAPR reduction technique offers 3.7dB reduction.
Fig. 7. Modulated power spectrum Further this work can be extended into applying various
modulation schemes and different number of subcarriers.
REFERENCES
[1] Bao H, Shieh W. Transmission simulation of coherent optical OFDM
signals in WDM systems. Opt Express 2007;15:4410–8.
[2] Sander L. Jansen, Itsuro Morita, Tim C. W. Schenk, Noriyuki Takeda,
and Hideaki Tanaka “Coherent Optical 25.8-Gb/s OFDM
Transmission Over 4160-km SSMF”, in Journal of lightwave
technology, VOL. 26, NO. 1, January 1, 2008.
[3] Xiaojun Liang, Wei Li, Weidong Ma, Kai Wang “A simple peak-to-
average power ratio reduction scheme for all optical orthogonal
frequency division multiplexing systems with intensity modulation
and direct detection”, in 31 August 2009 / Vol. 17, No. 18 / Optics
express 15614.
[4] Huynh Vo Trung Dung, Hakjeon Bang, Chang-Soo Park and Seungil
Myong, “PAPR Reduction using PTS with Low Computational
Complexity in Coherent Optical OFDM Systems”, in IEEE 2012.
[5] Shu-Hao Fan, Jianjun Yu, and Gee-Kung Chang ,“Optical OFDM
Fig. 8. OSNR plot Scheme Using Uniform Power Transmission to Mitigate Peak-to-

978-1-4673-5758-6/13/$31.00 © 2013 IEEE 587


Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Conference on Information and Communication Technologies (ICT 2013)
Average Power Effect Over 1040 km Single-Mode Fiber”, in VOL. 2, [13] Y. Ma, W. Shieh and X. Yi ,“Characterisation of nonlinearity
No. 9/September 2010/ J. Optical communication network. performance for coherent optical OFDM signals under influence of
[6] Seung Hee Han , Jae Hong Lee, “An overview of peak-to-average PMD”, in electronics letters 16th August 2007 Vol. 43 No. 17.
power ratio reduction techniques for multicarrier transmission”, in [14] Hao Yao-hong , Huang Wei-wei , HU Wei , Jiang Peng ,“Fiber
IEEE Wireless Communications , April 2005. Nonlinearity Mitigation in Long-haul Coherent Optical OFDM”, in
[7] Bernhard Goebel, Stephan Hellerbrand, Norman Haufe, Norbert IEEE 2010.
Hanik, “PAPR Reduction Techniques for Coherent Optical OFDM [15] Christian Weber, Johannes K. Fischer, Christian-A. Bunge, and Klaus
Transmission”, in ICTON 2009. Petermann, “Electronic Precompensation of Intrachannel
[8] Yan Tang, Keang-Po Ho, and William Shieh , “Coherent Optical Nonlinearities at 40 Gb/s”, in IEEE photonics technology letters, Vol.
OFDM Transmitter Design Employing Predistortion”, in IEEE 18, No. 16, August 15, 2006.
Photonics technology letters, Vol. 20, NO. 11, June 1,2008. [16] Arthur James Lowery ,“Fiber nonlinearity pre- and post-
[9] Robert I. Killey, Philip M. Watts, Vitaly Mikhailov, Madeleine Glick, compensation for long-haul optical links using OFDM”, in 1 October
and Polina Bayvel , “Electronic Dispersion Compensation by Signal 2007 / Vol. 15, No. 20 / Optics express 12965.
Predistortion Using Digital Processing and a Dual-Drive Mach– [17] Xiang Liu and Robert W. Tkach ,“Joint SPM Compensation for
Zehnder Modulator”, in IEEE photonics technology letters, Vol. 17, Inline-Dispersion-Compensated 112-Gb/s PDM-OFDM
NO. 3, March 2005. Transmission”, in OSA/OFC/NFOEC 2009.
[10] Zhongpeng Wang, Mingwei Wu, Dingfei Ge,“Hartley Precoding [18] Zhiyuan Huang, Juhao Li, Su Zhang, Fan Zhang, Zhangyuan
Reduction PAPR for Optical Direct Detection OFDM Systems”, in Chen,“Investigations of SPM Suppression by PAPR Reduction in
IEEE 2012. Coherent Optical OFDM Systems”, in SPIE-OSA-IEEE/ Vol. 7632
[11] Brendon J. C. Schmidt, Arthur James Lowery and Jean Armstrong, 763217-1.
“Experimental Demonstrations of Electronic Dispersion [19] Yanir London , Dan Sadot , “Analysis of Nonlinearity of Mach-
Compensation for Long-Haul Transmission Using Direct-Detection Zehnder Modulator in Coherent Optical OFDM in the Presence of
Optical OFDM”, in Journal of lightwave technology, VOL. 26, NO. PAPR”, in 2010 IEEE 26-th Convention of Electrical and Electronics
1, January 1, 2008. Engineers in Israel.
[12] Jair A. L. Silva, Adolfo V. T. Cartaxo, and Marcelo E. V. Segatto ,“A [20] M. Palanivelan and Sheila Anand, “Reduced Complexity Max Norm
PAPR Reduction Technique Based on a Constant Envelope OFDM based PAPR Optimization in OFDM systems”, in E-ISSN:2224-2864,
Approach for Fiber Nonlinearity Mitigation in Optical Direct- issue 5, volume 11, May 2012.
Detection Systems”, in J. Opt. Commun. netw./Vol. 4, NO. 4/April
2012.

978-1-4673-5758-6/13/$31.00 © 2013 IEEE 588

You might also like