Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
The Indian occupied Kashmir is bearing the brunt of multiple assaults – on its nature, character and
identity. The latest coming on top of other attacks, is the one on Article 35A, which is a provision in the
Indian Constitution that grants the legislature to define state subjects, among other things. Supreme
Court of India has admitted a writ petition against the Article 35A filed by a BJP / RSS proxy NGO. This
is alarming, abrogation of Article 35 A flows from the very nature of the ruling dispensation in India- the
far right, Hindu nationalist party, the BJP and its allied sister organizations , the RSS and the VHP. These
forces’ ideological tour de force is Hindutva or political Hinduism which not only subverts the previous
“Idea of India” but seeks to replace it with a majoritarian, political Hinduism. Kashmir and assimilating it
into the broader Indian Union is central to this. It was a given that when the BJP attained and occupied the
highest pedestals of power in India , that it along with its proxies would seek to demolish the structures
that accorded a special status to Jammu and Kashmir- especially the issue of property rights which
ultimately will lead to demographic change in occupied territory.
Ahmar Bilal Sofi, President International Law society puts it like this, ‘’After failing to curb the peoples
resistance against its illegal occupation through military repression and military war-fare, Indian has
launched a Law-fare, real agenda appears to be assimilationist where Jammu and Kashmir is sought to
be “fully integrated” with the Indian
1
BACKGROUND
Article 49 of Geneva Convention (1949) states
that “individual or mass forcible transfers, as
well as deportations of protected persons
from occupied territory to the territory of
the occupying power or to that of any other
country, occupied or not, are prohibited,
regardless of their motive.”
2
INDIAN DESIGNS The government of India and state
government of Indian Occupied Kashmir,
Indian desire to change the demography which is a coalition of PDP and BJP made
of the Indian occupied Kashmir has been certain decisions and also initiated some
operational since its occupation of the steps to archive its nefarious designs which
Jammu and Kashmir. It started with the include:
physical elimination of Muslim population in
Jammu in 1947 followed by Indian military 1. Manipulation of Census reports
oppression in Kashmir valley killing and
targeting Muslim youth and manipulation 2. Attempt to abrogate Article 370 of Indian
of census figures and other coercive Constitution which provides special
measures. Failing to regard and respect its status to Jammu Kashmir (already
obligations under United Nations resolutions, eroded)
Government of India started tempering with
the constitution and other legal matters to 3. To abrogate article 35/A of Constitution
integrate occupied territory with the Indian of Jammu Kashmir.
Union against the will of the people. At some
occasions, Indian government was forced to 4. Implementation of Securitization and
retreat under public pressure. Government of Reconstruction of Financial Assets
India led by right wing extremist Mr. Narender
and Enforcement of Security Interest
(SARFAESI) Act-2002,
4
It is important to put it on record that during for the disputed state. If BJP succeeds in
the constitution making of Indian, and having revoking this article, the state subject law
regard to the indefinite and uncertain position would cease to exist in the state and the
of the state in the matter of accession, protection given to the people under different
coupled with ground realties and Resolutions political agreements would be abolished
of United Nations, special provision was and Jammu Kashmir would be targeted for
incorporated in the constitution of India settlement of non-Kashmiris.
under article 370. The founding fathers
of the constitution, in view of the peculiar To achieve its objective of converting Muslim
position of the state accepted the position majority state into Hindu majority state, it
that the constitution which was being made has passed and implemented number of
cannot be made applicable to the state of legislations in Jammu and Kashmir and
Jammu and Kashmir. But a mechanism can has initiated proxy judicial activism through
be provided to enable the government of the affiliated NGOs.
state to run its affairs till the issues are finally
decided and settled. Therefore, none of the COLLECTION OF STATISTICAL ACT 2017
provisions of the constitution of Indian dealt Recently, BJP in the Centre has proposed to
with the state of Jammu and Kashmir, except introduce a bill in the Indian Parliament to
370. extend the jurisdiction of the collection of
Statisticas Act 2008 to IOK. The proposal has
TO ABROGATE ARTICLE 35/A OF been approved by the PM Narendra Modi in
CONSTITUTION OF JAMMU KASHMIR. Union Cabinet last week. If BJP is successful
That after the entire constitution of India in extending the Jurisdiction of this Act to
was made applicable to all the territories IOK, the center will be able to manipulate
comprised in Union of India, the president with satistics of IOK which also includes its
of India exercising his powers under article demography. With this, the BJP led center
370 passed the 1st constitutional Application government will achieve two objectives, one
order i.e. The constitution (Application to breakthrough in diluting the special status of
Jammu and Kashmir) order, 1950. It was IOK and secondly, control over all statistics
followed by the constitution (Application to of IOK.
Jammu Kashmir) order1954. It is under this IMPLEMENTATION OF SECURITIZATION AND
order that Article 35-A was incorporated in RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS
the Application order for the state. The bare AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST
perusal of the constitution of India would show (SARFAESI) ACT-2002,
that the constitutional Application orders
The surreptitious implementation of
deal with the, making provisions for the return
Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial
of the permanent residents of the state who
Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest
migrated to the territories including Pakistan
(SARFAESI) Act-2002, which allows banks to
under permit for settlement and provide
auction mortgaged properties of defaulters to
constitutional protection to the law relating
anyone, is an “attempt to weaken Article 370.
to permanent residents of the state, their
In theory this law is meant to aid the recovery
special rights and privileges, employment
of debts but in practical is a back-door
under the government, acquisition of
acquisition of property by non-Kashmiris in
immovable property, settlement in the state,
Jammu and Kashmir which will open a flood
scholarships.
gate for the settlement of non-Kashmiris in
The BJP government and its cronies are the Indian occupied Kashmir. Work has been
bent upon to revoke Article 35/A which will started on the implementation of SARFAESI
bring end to the state subject law in Jammu act and banks have issued notices to bank
Kashmir and will have serious repercussions defaulters.
5
IMPLEMENTATIONS OF GOODS AND by Indian authorities is clear contravention of
SERVICES TAX (GST) the state’s special position and is an attempt
to integrate the state further into the Indian
The application of Goods and services Tax Union.
(GST) in Jammu Kashmir by BJP government
is another violation of “Spirit of Autonomy” TO GIVE STATE SUBJECT STATUS TO WEST
enjoyed by the state by virtue of Article 370 –PAKISTAN REFUGEES
of the constitution. Jammu Kashmir enjoyed
special Powers of levying, collecting, and Grant of state subject to the West Pakistan
implementing taxes by its own agencies refugees in Indian occupied Jammu Kashmir
or department and by applying GST these is yet another attempt to change the
powers have been and now it would be demography of state. Some 6000 thousand
prerogative of Indian occupation government Hindu families at the time of partition chose
to deal the tax matters. The application of GST, to cross through the borders of Jammu and
Kashmir. These Hindu migrants were settled
in the districts of Samba and Kathua keeping
in mind to change the demography of these
areas. These migrants have already occupied
the properties of Muslims who were forced
to migrate to other side of the ceasefire
line in Azad Kashmir. Successive Indian
governments tried to grant them citizenship
rights by violating state subject laws but
failed to do so because of the resistance from
local population.
7
Indian army is in legal and illegal possession TO ALLOT LAND TO INDIAN INDUSTRIALISTS
of 10,00,000 Kanals (125000 acres) land, all OUTSIDE INDUSTRIAL AREAS UNDER A
of which is behind the iron curtains and there LEASE AGREEMENT FOR 99 YEARS TO GIVE
is obviously no information available with the CONTROL OF ECONOMY OF STATE IN THE
civil administration. HANDS OF NON-STATE SUBJECT HINDU
FUNDAMENTALS.
8
“The land grab is justified in myriad forms: in the name of bringing
employment and welfare under the broad rubric of “development”,
‘national’ security, land for military’s living, recreation, training,
rehabilitation of displaced people, relief for pilgrims etc.
So in Kashmir, despite constitutionally guaranteed
“state subject hood”, land grab remains the
state’s policy. Land Occupation could
not erase the desire for Azadi”
Gautam Navlakha
People’s Union for Democratic Rights, Delhi