You are on page 1of 3

GARCIA, Thriza Czarina Q.

- SPL2 Dean Rico Paolo Quicho


Civil Procedure
Section SPL-2
READING ASSIGNMENT
I. INTRODUCTION
1. Article VIII (Sections 1 and 5) of the 1987 Philippine Constitution
2. Batas Pambansa Bilang 129, as amended by Republic Act No. 7691
3. Republic Act No. 7902 (Expanding the Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals)
4. Republic Act 7691 (Expanding the Jurisdiction of the Lower Courts)
5. Supreme Court Circular No. 09-94
6. Supreme Court Circular No. 21-99
7. Republic Act No. 8369
8. Supreme Court Circular No. 11-99, in relation to R.A. No. 8369
9. Republic Act 9285 (CIAC), Sections 35 and 39
10. Republic Act No. 8799
CASES:
1. City of Manila vs. Judge Grecia-Cuerdo, et. al.,
GR No. 175723, Feb. 4, 2014
2. Medical Plaza Makati Condominium Corp. vs. Robert Cullen,
GR No. 181416, Nov. 11, 2013
3. Sandoval vs. Caneba,
190 SCRA 77 (1991)
4. Magpale vs. CSC,
215 SCRA 398 (1992)
5. De Murga vs. Chan,
G.R. No. L-24680, October 7, 1968
6. Editha Padlan vs. Elenita and Felicisimo Dinglasan
GR No. 180321, March 20, 2013
7. Quesada vs. DOJ,
500 SCRA 454
8. Lumbuan vs. Ronquillo,
G.R. No. 155713, May 5, 2006
9. People vs. Cawaling,
293 SCRA 267 (1998)
10. Zamora vs. Heirs of Carmen,
G.R. No. 146195, November 18, 2004

Other Matters:
1. 1991 Revised Rule on Summary Procedure Section 1(a)
2. Rule of Procedure for Small Claims Sections 2 and 4
3. Section 4, Presidential Decree 1606, as amended
4. Presidential Decree 1083
5. Katarungang Pambarangay Law: P.D. 1508; RA 7160 Section 399 to 422, Book 3, Title 1, 6. Chapter 7
Articles 9, 21, 26-28 and1157 of the New Civil Code
GARCIA, Thriza Czarina Q. - SPL2 Dean Rico Paolo Quicho

II. GENERAL PROVISIONS (RULE 1, SECTIONS 1 TO 6)


CASES:
1. Tamano vs. Ortiz,
291 SCRA 584
2. Domagas vs. Jensen,
448 SCRA 663
3. Yu vs. Pacleb,
580 SCRA 197
4. Cabutihan vs. Landcenter Construction,
383 SCRA 353
5. Citizen Surety vs. Melencio-Herrera,
38 SCRA 369
6. Go vs. UCPB,
G.R. No. 156187, 442 SCRA 264
7. Gochan vs. Gochan,
372 SCRA 356
8. Manchester Development Corp. vs. CA,
149 SCRA 562
9. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd. vs. Asuncion,
170 SCRA 274
10. Tacay vs. RTC of Tagum,
180 SCRA 433
11. Ayala Corp. vs. Madayag,
181 SCRA 687
12. Negros Oriental Planters Association vs. Hon. Presiding Judge of Negros,
575 SCRA 575
13. Heirs of Bertuldo Hinog vs. Melicor,
455 SCRA 460 (2005)

III. CAUSE OF ACTION (RULE 2, SECTIONS 1 TO 6)


CASES:
1. Juana Complex Homeowners, et. al. vs. Fil-Estate Land,
GR No. 152272, March 5, 2012
2. Del Rosario vs. Far East Bank and Trust Company,
G.R. No. 150134, October 31, 2007
3. Progressive Development Corp. vs. CA,
301 SCRA 367 (1999)
4. Joseph vs. Bautista,
170 SCRA 540 (1989)
5. Flores vs. Mallare-Phillipps,
144 SCRA 277 (1986)
GARCIA, Thriza Czarina Q. - SPL2 Dean Rico Paolo Quicho

IV. PARTIES TO CIVIL ACTIONS (RULE 3, SECTIONS 1 TO 22)


CASES:
1. Rayo vs. Metrobank,
539 SCRA 571 (2007)
2. Comm. Domingo vs. Scheer,
421 SCRA 468 (2004)
3. Domingo vs. Carague,
456 SCRA 450 (2005)
4. Pacana-Contreras vs. Rovila Water Supply,
GR No. 168979, Dec 2, 2013
5. Juana Complex Homeowners, et. al. vs. Fil-Estate Land,
GR No. 152272, March 5, 2012
6. Mathay vs. Consolidated Bank,
58 SCRA 559 (1974)
7. Newsweek vs. IAC,
142 SCRA 171 (1986)
8. Oposa vs. Factoran,
224 SCRA 792 (1993)
9. Heirs of Bertuldo Hinog vs. Melicor,
455 SCRA 460 (2005)
10. De la Cruz vs. Joaquin,
464 SCRA 576 (2005)
11. Spouses Algura vs. City of Naga,
506 SCRA 81
12. White vs. City of Manila,
576 SCRA 416, January 20, 2009

V. VENUE OF ACTIONS
CASES:
1. Dacoycoy vs. IAC,
G.R. No. 74854, April 2, 1991
2. Diaz vs. Adiong,
219 SCRA 631 (1993)
3. Phil. Banking Corp. vs. Tensuan,
228 SCRA 385 (1993)
4. Unimasters Conglomeration, Inc. vs. CA,
267 SCRA 759 (1997)
5. Anita Mangila vs. Court of Appeals,
387 SCRA 162 (2002)
6. Hyatt Elevators vs. Goldstar Elevators,
G.R. No. 161026, October 24, 2005
7. Nocum vs. Tan,
470 SCRA 639 (2005)
8. Spouses Lantin vs. Lantion,
499 SCRA 718 (2006)

You might also like