Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. a) False. Just because the risk of financial distress stays the same doesn’t necessarily have
to mean that the expected costs should stay unchanged. When the appetite for
debt/equity ratio of a company grows larger the level of direct costs in case of a
bankruptcy increases, thus, leaving the stockholders with a smaller (if any) residual cash
flow, which should result in an increase in the expected rate of return demanded by
stockholders.
b) False. The company cannot always provide positive NPV investments, thus there are
times when the stockholders are worse off when contributing capital to their firm.
2. Operating income: 0,6M, market value of assets (all equity financed) V=5M
With the information given we can calculate the new return on equity:
𝐷
𝑟𝐸 = 𝑟𝐴 + ∗ (𝑟𝐴 − 𝑟𝐷 )
𝐸
1
𝑟𝐸 = 0,12 + ∗ (0,12 − 0,08)
4
𝑟𝐸 = 0,13
c) 𝛽𝑖 = 1,2
d)
𝐷
𝛽𝐸 = 𝛽𝑖 + ∗ (𝛽𝑖 − 𝛽𝐷 )
𝐸
1
𝛽𝐸 = 1,2 + ∗ (1,2 − 0,3)
4
𝛽𝐸 = 1,425
a) Under the current (all equity) capital structure my cash flow will be:
1000
𝐶𝐹 = 2𝑀 ∗ = 4000 (€)
500 000
12𝑀
Now there are only = 0,3𝑀 shares left
40
1000
𝐶𝐹 = ∗ 1,44𝑀 = 4 800 (€)
300 000
𝑥 ∗ 1,44𝑀 = 4000
𝑥 ≈ 0,278% of the shares
d) It is irrelevant for the firm to do a capital restructuring which the stockholder could do
on his own.
4. a) 𝑉𝑢𝑛𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑑 = 10𝑀
𝑇𝐶 = 20%
𝑃𝑉(𝑏𝑎𝑛𝑘𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑡𝑐𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠)
= 0,3 ∗ 10𝑀 = 3𝑀
𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑎𝑛𝑘𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑡𝑐𝑦
𝑃𝑉(𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑡 𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑𝑠) = 𝐷 ∗ 𝑟𝐷
When bankruptcy costs are excluded the value of the firm for its respective debt-to-assets
ratio is:
Present value
Value of the firm (bankruptcy
Debt/Assets of debt shields,
costs excluded), M
M
0,0 0 10
0,1 0,2 10,2
0,2 0,4 10,4
0,3 0,6 10,6
0,4 0,8 10,8
0,5 1 11
0,6 1,2 11,2
0,7 1,4 11,4
0,8 1,6 11,6
b) When bankruptcy costs are incuded we can subtract the present value of bankruptcy
costs from the respective company value (before bankruptcy costs) for different debt-
to-assets scenarios to obtain the value of the firm (after bankruptcy costs):
10
9.5
9
8.5
8
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
Debt(Assets
When bankruptcy costs are excluded, the firm holds 80% debt of its assets to obtain
the optimal capital structure. In this way the present value of the debt shields is
maximized and in the absence of costs of financial distress the high amount of debt
doesn’t harm the firm’s overall valuation.
However, when bankruptcy costs are included, the optimal capital structure for the
firm is to hold debt level at 30% of its assets’ value. With any higher debt levels the
firm’s value will decrease as a result of higher bankruptcy costs.
a) Value of Taranga:
b)
𝑟𝐴 = 𝑟𝑓 + 𝛽𝐴 (𝑟𝑚 − 𝑟𝑓 )
𝑟𝐴 − 𝑟𝑓 0,08 − 0,02
𝛽𝐴 = 𝛽𝐸 = = = 1,5
𝑟𝑚 − 𝑟𝑓 0,06 − 0,02
40 160
c) 𝐷 = (200) ∗ 𝑉 = 0,2𝑉 𝐸 = (200) ∗ 𝑉 = 0,8𝑉
(i) New rate of return for equity:
𝐷
𝑟𝐸 = 𝑟𝐴 + ∗ (𝑟𝐴 − 𝑟𝐷 )
𝐸
0,2𝑉
𝑟𝐸 = 0,08 + ∗ (0,08 − 0,02) = 0,095
0,8𝑉
202,02𝑀
− 1 = 0,0101 = 1,01%
200𝑀
(ii)
New value of Taronga:
200,8𝑀
− 1 = 0,004 = 0,4%
200𝑀
Book values in total and market values for equity, debt and in total for Micron Technology,
SunDisk and STEC:
We can calculate the levered beta for assets by using the formula:
𝐸 𝐷
𝛽𝐿 = ∗ 𝛽𝐸 + ∗ 𝛽𝐷 ∗ (1 − 𝑇𝑐 )
𝑉 𝑉
𝛽𝑈 = 𝛽𝐸
We can also work out the equity returns with the formula:
𝑟𝐸 = 𝑟𝑓 + 𝛽𝐸 ∗ 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑢𝑚
Implementing these formulas, we can calculate the levered and unlevered betas for equity
and assets and equity returns for each company:
1,25 + 1,36 + 1
𝛽𝐴 = ≈ 1, 2033
3
𝑟𝐸 = 𝑟𝑓 + 𝛽𝐸 ∗ 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑢𝑚
𝑟𝐸 = 0,037 + 1,2033 ∗ 0,06
𝑟𝐸 ≈ 0,1092
𝐸 𝐷
𝑊𝐴𝐶𝐶 = 𝑟𝐸 ∗ + 𝑟𝐷 ∗ ∗ (1 − 𝑇𝑐 )
𝑉 𝑉
𝑊𝐴𝐶𝐶 ≈ 9,74%