Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ralph Deiparine
Byron Tulod
I. Background
The issue stemmed from the need in recent times to open new ingress and egress routes,
due to the increasing vehicle traffic that is passing through Commerce Ave. AAV has 3 gates
along Commerce Ave, which means the ingress and egress of residents are clearly and
greatly affected. In and around late 2015, Ayala Alabang Village Association (AAVA) passed a
resolution to occupy and construct 2 new gates: one in San Jose Gate, and the other along
Champaca St., which exits directly to Daang Hari road. However, residents along those areas
complained that the opening of the gates would compromise their privacy, security and
comfort, and complained before the HLURB. The agency sided with the complainants,
averring that the AAVA resolution was baseless, since the acts constituted acts ultra vires.
Subsequently, HLURB issued a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) on the resolution of the AAVA.
This did not deter the latter, however, to continue the construction of the gates. This
prompted the developer, Ayala Land Inc. (ALI) to file an injunction before the Muntinlupa
RTC, for the stoppage of use of the constructed gates. The RTC grants the injunction,
brushing aside AAVA’s contention that HLURB has jurisdiction over the case, with the court
holding that since the complainant is ALI (the developer) and not the subdivision owners,
the courts do indeed has jurisdiction, and not the HLURB. A year later, in 2016, in a move
that surprised both the AAV residents for and against the opening of San Jose gate, Filinvest
constructed a perimeter wall on their side, causing the proposed gateway to become a
dead-end. Such move, according to affected parties, is a clear sign that Filinvest is not
interested in any offer of the Barangay Ayala Alabang to buy the land that will form the
completed gateway into Filinvest City. Such move is also seen as the response by Filinvest of
the BAA’s pronouncement of expropriating the Filinvest side of the San Jose gate.
Based on existing news reports on the matter, AAVA and many of the residents are
supporting the opening of San Jose gate. Their main reason is that with the increasing
vehicular traffic within Commerce Ave., their ingress and egress are affected negatively.
This is due to AAV having all 3 existing gates located along Commerce Ave.
The concerns of the supporting AAV residents are real: our team experienced
numerous instances of traffic jams along Commerce avenue not only while looking for
research materials on this report, but also during the times where the individual
members were plying the route due to the normal course of our schedules (the
members of the group also use Commerce ave. as a primary route out of Alabang area
and into the adjacent cities like Las Piñas and Parañaque). The residents who support
AAVA wanted to have an alternate access route to their subdivision without having to
resort to going through the already congested Commerce Ave, and they found that
opening both the San Jose and Champaca gates would greatly help their ingress and
egress.
References:
https://www.scribd.com/document/8414515/Gated-Communities-and-Property-Values
http://www.philstar.com/business/2015/11/25/1525530/ayala-land-stops-use-aav-gates
http://business.inquirer.net/218492/biz-buzz-right-of-way-shakedown
http://www.dilg.gov.ph/legal-opinions/Request-for-a-legal-opinion-on-the-validity-of-Ordinance-No-12-
01-Series-of-2016-of-Barangay-Ayala-Alabang-Muntinlupa-City/776
http://business.inquirer.net/203704/biz-buzz-neighborly-advice