Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4.0 INTRODUCTION
meaning that both federal as well as state governments have control over forestry
India as early as 300 BC. The Maurya kingdom recognized the importance of
forests, and the first emperor of the dynasty, Chandragupta, appointed an officer to
look after the forests (FAO, 2012). The forest policy is a complex balance between
economic, social and political objectives in an environment where the forests and
the institutions continuously change (Kant, 2003). The forest policy in India
changed over a period of time. The arrival of British and their perception about
forest resources created enormous change in the forest cover, forest resources and
the rights of tribal people in India. The forest management and conservation
practices in India are dissimilar in different period and it is primarily divided into
two periods namely (i) colonial and (ii) post-colonial period for analysing the
discussions include a variety of topics like timber supply, sale and pricing, forest
deforestation, forest ownership, property rights and policy reforms (Kant, 2003).
During colonial rule in India, the forest policy gave much importance to
was assumed by the colonial powers and this period records a march towards
centralization and the forests came under the control of the state. Huge quantity of
natural resources were exploited in the name of development, however the reality
behind this was commercial exploitation by the state. The colonial British
Administration realized the international demand for timber and potential monetary
benefits from the forests, strict rules were enforced by compulsion to bring all
these forests under the state control. The over exploitation of forest resources
during British Administration marked a new phase in the use of forest produce in
India. Most of the policies during the colonial period have a custodial attitude and
they gave much importance to the forests than the dependent people (Balaji, 2002).
Between 1800 and 1947 India witnessed rigorous policy interventions in forest
management and there was much debate within the colonial bureaucracy on the
subject of forest versus people. Since 1855, the establishment of railway network
required large quantities of wood for sleepers and low cost engine fuel, and the
In 1855, Lord Dalhousie framed the Forest Charter which leads regulation of
wasteland by changing its status into government property in India. This was
forest conservation in the later period. The Forest Charter of 1855 put the Indian
interventions which were paternalistic, radical and previously untried. These forest
initiatives, born in India, spread to other British colonies and the United States of
America.
Lord Dalhousie’s new forest policies greatly expanded British authority over
the land and people of India. British India’s forest administrators feared the
The organized forestry activity began in 1864, when the Imperial Forest
establish its control over forests, by various legislations with the help of German
Forester Dietrich Brandis, who was brought to look into the process of forest
resource management in India (Mishra, 1999). The Indian Forest Act, 1865 was
Brandis argued about the influence of forest on climate, rainfall, and irrigation
sources as a strong tool to the imposition of state control over forests. The property
rights regime changed with the first Forest Policy Statement of Colonial British
Government.
Forest Department (FD) to meet their timber and revenue demands. The
requirements (Kumar and Kant, 2005). The Indian Forest Act, 1865 was declared
In India, by the Forest Act of 1878, the British Administration acquired the
sovereignty of all wastelands which by definition included forests. This Act also
enabled the administration to demarcate reserved and protected forests. The local
rights were refused in the case of protected forests while some privileges which
were given to the local people by the government which can be taken away are
anytime. This Act classified the forests into three – reserved forests, protected
forests and village forests. It was attempted to regulate the collection of forest
imprisonment and fines were imposed in this policy to establish the state control
over forests.
The Forest Policy 1894, the first formal policy in India gave much
convert the open forests into agricultural land for enhancing the revenue earning of
the state. Forests are treated as a source of revenue to the state and not to meet the
In this policy, the forests were divided into four classes. The first class
generally situated in hill slopes and essential to protect the cultivated plains from
landslides and they played a conservation role for the benefit of cultivated plains
and assured revenue to the state. The second class of forests consisted of valuable
timber trees like devadharu (Cedrus deodara), sal (Shorea robusta) and teak
and sal are promoted and artificial regeneration of teak was developed. The third
class of forests as per the classification under this policy meant for minor forests,
which yields low quality timber, fuelwood and fodder and for meeting the demands
of local people. Finally, the fourth class covered the pastures and grazing lands, the
local people were allowed to use them with restrictions (Balooni and Singh 2007).
This Act impacted the life of forest dependent communities. The penalties
and procedures given in this Act aimed to extend the state’s control over forests as
well as diminishing the status of people’s rights to forest use. The village
communities were alienated from their age-old symbiotic association with forests.
Further amendments were also made to restrain the local use of forests mainly by
continuing till date. Since 1974 the Independent India formulated policies for
forest conservation and management. These policies were formulated with national
interest and changes were brought about in the forest cover of the country.
the over exploitation of forests. There are three forest policies after independence,
Indian Forest Policy, 1952, National Commission on Agriculture, 1976 and Indian
Forest Policy, 1988. The Indian Forest Policy, 1952 was a simple extension of
colonial forest policy. However it became conscious about the need to increase the
forest cover to one-third of the total land area. At that time maximum annual
revenue from forests is the vital national need. The two World Wars, need for
defence, developmental projects such as river valley projects, industries like pulp,
existence in 1952, the use of forest by adjoining village communities was relatively
Forests are classified as protected forests, national forests, village forests and
tree lands according to this policy with distinct uses. The protected forests are
preserved for maintaining physical and climatic conditions and the commercial
forests are to meet the demand from defence and communication industry. The
forest dependent community can extract the produce of village forests for domestic
uses.
FD. In 1952, new national forest policy did make some deviations from the
colonial forest policy of 1894; however, these changes could not percolate down to
the operational levels (Kumar and Kant, 2005). In 1953, the Indian government
The Forest Conservation Act, 1980 serves to check the diversion of forest
land for non-forestry purposes has become the cornerstone for conservation of
forests (SFR, 2011). The Forest Conservation Act, 1980 stipulated that the central
deforestation, conserve biodiversity and save wildlife. Though this Act provides
greater hope towards forest conservation it was not successful in its target. It
resulted in increased deforestation and loss of biodiversity and wildlife because the
rural population ignored the regulations and continued to use the forests for their
survival.
Indian Forest Policy, 1988 is the second forest policy after independence of
India and first forest policy which recognized the role of local people in forest
livelihood (Behera and Engel, 2006). The ultimate objective of this forest policy is
of forests as a natural heritage. The National Forest Policy in 1988 made a very
Community based forest management can be an effective tool for improving rural
management on July 1, 1990 which laid down broad guidelines for an institutional
arrangement involving the local people to jointly protect and manage the forest
resources in return for benefits from it (Singh, 2008). The village committees in
association with the FD will manage specific forest blocks. Forest protection is the
dense forests are degraded and increase in open forests. The qualitative loss will
occur to the forest wealth and quantitatively there is no change in forest cover if it
is left as unnoticed. The forest policies should aim at increasing the forest cover to
33 percent of the geographical area of the country without compromising the area
TABLE 4.1
From table 4.1 it is evident that there is not much variation in the share of
dense forests in India. However, there are slight variations in the share of dense
forests in forest area from 1997. It is steadily increasing from 2005 and provides
India.
Figure 4.2 Change in dense and open forest cover in India
TABLE 4.2
BUDGET ALLOCATION FOR FORESTRY UNDER
FIVE YEAR PLANS
Forestry Outlay (in Percentage in
Plan
million rupees) Total Outlay
First Plan (1951-56) 76 0.32
Second Plan (1956-1961) 212 0.47
Third Plan (1961-1966) 458 0.61
Annual Plan (1966-1969) 419 0.63
Fourth Plan (1969-1974) 894 0.56
Fifth Plan (1974-1979) 2088 0.53
Annual Plan (1979-1980) 683 0.54
Sixth Plan (1980-1985) 6924 0.71
Seventh Plan (1985-1990) 18519 1.09
Annual Plan (1990-1991) 6299 0.97
Annual Plan (1991-1992) 7831 1.08
Eighth Plan (1992-1997) 40820 0.94
Ninth Plan (1997-2002) 68228 --
Source: FAO, 2003.
budgetary allocation from the plan outlay. However, the allocation is less than one
TABLE 4.3
4.3 SUMMARY
It is evident that the people’s interests were made subservient to the state’s
commercial interests with regard to forests in the colonial period. Colonial forest
management paid much attention to maximum output of quality timber for export
and sleepers for expanding railways. British Administration used to project from
the fear of deforestation on the climate and irrigation to extent state control over
the forest and they never gave due importance to the climatic impact of
talking about preservation of forests on the other and continuously focused the
(Kumar, 2010).
showed by colonial forest policies and strengthened the state power by legislative
measures. Then the drive switched over to industrial wood production. Diversion
forests (Bhat et al, 2001). The JFM implies a historical shift towards
1988.
References
19.Forests and Evolution of the Modern World, State of the World’s Forests,
FAO, 2012, p.19.