Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Technology Issue
Standardization Fundamentals
For Flow Cytometry
Measurements
NL-10854A
CellResearch.v3.final.qxd:Cellular Research 9/26/07 11:47 AM Page 2
Calendar of Events
SEPTEMBER
Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Immunologie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 5-8, Heidelberg, Germany
European Congress of Clinical Cell Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 6-8, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Australasian Flow Cytometry Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 17-19, Melbourne, Australia
European Society for Domestic Animal Reproduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 19-23, Celle, Germany
ASBMB ComBio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 22-26, Sydney, Australia
European Biotech Crossroads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 26-28, Lille, France
VHL Symposium: Cytometrie en Morfologie in de Dagelijkse Praktijk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 27, Zwolle, The Netherlands
Great Lakes International Imaging and Flow Cytometry Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 28-30, Windsor, ON, Canada
IFCC / Beckman Coulter: Frontiers in Rare Event Analysis and Multiplex
Characterization of Proteins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 28-30, Bremen, Germany
OCTOBER
Club Hématopoïèse et Oncogénèse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . October 7-10, Giens, France
Clinical Cytometry Society . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . October 7-9, Washington, DC
American Society for Histocompatibility & Immunogenetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . October 8-12, Minneapolis, MN
Biotechnica . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . October 9-11, Hannover, Germany
Association Française de Cytométrie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . October 10-12, Clermont-Ferrand, France
Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Zytometrie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . October 10-13, Regensburg, Germany
World Congress on Regenerative Medicine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . October 17-19, Leipzig, Germany
Turkish-US Cytometry Workshop . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . October 25-28, Istanbul, Turkey
NOVEMBER
Signal Transduction Society . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . November 1-3, Weimar, Germany
Japanese Society of Immunology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . November 20-22,Tokyo, Japan
Workshop Stammzelltransplantation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . November 22-23, Frankfurt / Main, Germany
Société Française d'Immunologie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . November 26-29, Lyon, France
Swiss Cytometry Society . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . November 29-30, Bern, Switzerland
Association Française des Sciences et Techniques de l'Animal de Laboratoire . . . . . . . . . . . November 28-30, Reims, France
DECEMBER
Australasian Society of Immunology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 2-6, Sydney, Australia
American Society of Hematology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 8-11, Atlanta, GA
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 11-15, Yokohama, Japan
Indo-US Cytometry Workshop . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 17-22, Lucknow, India
Annual Meeting, Dutch Society for Immunology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 20-21, Noordwijkerhout,
The Netherlands
CellResearch.v3.final.qxd:Cellular Research 9/26/07 11:47 AM Page 3
Inside
2 Solutions and News
Calendar of Events
4 Improved Accuracy and Dynamic
Range through Patented Digital
Signal Processing
7 Fundamentals of Standardization
for Flow Cytometric Measurements
9 High throughput Analysis of Cell Count
Cellular Research is published by and Viability by Quanta™ SC MPL:
Beckman Coulter, Inc. for our customers. A Comparison Study of Data Obtained
Our mission is to provide research from Vi-CELL! XR
professionals with current
industry information and solutions. 11 Quanta Systems Resource Guide
We value your feedback.
To submit articles, suggestions, or
So how does this high resolution flow cytometry What is the significance of the number and
provide accurate and reproducible results? width of the channels and how does it impact
High resolution data translates into more the accuracy of my data and the dynamic
available channels to put the data into when range?
representing the actual input signal on the Figure 3 illustrates the mapping of 20-bit and
histogram or dot plot. Sufficient ADC resolution 18-bit data to a log scale. Each decade has an
is important because of the wide dynamic range increasing number of channels in which to place
of biological systems. Therefore, in order to see data, with a maximum resolution of 1,048,575
the negative and positive events on the same channels for the 20-bit data. Notice that the
plot, the system requires at least 4 decades of 18-bit data, which has been converted to 18 bits
usable dynamic range. As mentioned, good using a 14-bit ADC and a 16x multiplier, has a
accuracy between the ADC output and log maximum resolution of 262,144 channels5 ; ten
channel display over 4 decades requires a times less per decade than the 20-bit data.
-to-digital-converter
system with at least 20-bit resolution. On a
system with lower resolution there are fewer
numbers of channels to distribute the data into.
As such, each channel represents a larger
change in input signal, making it difficult to
resolve small changes in fluorescence intensity.
This is easier to see in the lower decades of a
log signal display. Figure 2 shows an example of
data with different bit resolution and graphically
exhibits what impact the resolution has on the
display of the data.4 Figure 3.
Fewer channels in the lower decades, combined
with intrinsic background noise, make it more
difficult to accurately measure small changes in
signal or fluorescence intensity.
On a system which provides 20-bit resolution,
one is able to obtain very accurate data (<1%
Error*) across the complete dynamic range.
Figure 4A illustrates superior accuracy across
all decades on the log histogram of the Beckman
Coulter FC500 cytometer. It uses the patented
20-bit DSP technology, providing a quantitative,
Figure 2.
usable dynamic range for biological responses
In the first decade, the channel width is wider of 4 decades. Figure 4B shows the accuracy for
for all the signal traces because there are fewer a system that has 18-bit resolution. In this case,
channels available. In this simplified example, the % Error* does not fall below 1% until the
the 10-bit trace only displays 2 channels
in the first decade, the 14-bit trace appears
choppy, which is commonly represented as
“Picket Fencing” in some log displays. However,
the 20-bit signal has sufficient channels to
display highly accurate data in this decade. In
decades 2 & 3, the data smoothes out somewhat
because there are more channels available to
distribute data into. In the 4th decade, the data Figure 4A. Figure 4B.
from all three signals coincide as the number of Figures 4A and 4B display the % Error* across the input
channels is sufficient. voltage range of 0—10 volts. The vertical dotted red line on the
20-bit display represents the crossover point used in the
Beckman Coulter patented electronic switching method which
improves the accuracy of the data in the lower end of the log
display. The horizontal dotted red line on the 18-bit display
represents the 5% Error mark.
* % Error based on simulated best case data with zero noise and zero offset.
second decade, leaving less than 3 decades of So, high resolution digital data improves the
usable dynamic range for the analysis of any type accuracy of my data and provides 4 decades
of quantitative biological response. Note the of usable dynamic range.
y-axis scales are adjusted to accommodate the Yes, high resolution 20-bit digital data, available
displayed values. on Beckman Coulter systems, produces results
Let’s look at some data plots to see how with minimal error (<1% error) across the usable
resolution and accuracy affect the data. 4 decade dynamic range. Therefore, accurate
Figure 5A displays 20-bit data from 3 µm measurement of a biological response, that has
fluorescent particles. The voltage has been ad- greater than a 3 log shift in expression, requires
justed to put these particles in each of the 4 a system which can provide sufficient resolution
decades. Notice the narrow peaks in all 4 plots over this dynamic range.
which exemplify the high accuracy shown across REFERENCES
all 4 decades. Alternatively, 18-bit data (Figure 5B) 1. Shapiro H. Practical Flow Cytometry, 4th Ed. Page 214.
collected using the same fluorescent particles 2. Snow C. Cytometry Part A 2004 57A:63-69.
exhibits acceptable resolution in the upper 3. Auer B, et. al. Patent 5,367,474, issued November 1994.
decades of the log display; however the increased 4. Wood JCS. Resolution Requirements for the Digitization
measurement error in the lower decade is of Flow Cytometry Data. 2006 Abstract 266, ISAC XXIII
noticeable and may affect the data collected in International Conference.
this area of the histogram. 5. BD FACSDiVa Option White Paper. 2002 Becton
Dickinson and Company.
Figure 5A.
Figure 5B.
STANDARDIZATION
Essential Characterizations
Precision (Alignment / Fluidics)
Precision (instrument alignment and fluidics
performance) may be determined by running
brightly fluorescent beads such as Flow-Check™
Fluorospheres. Brightly fluorescent beads
ensure that photon statistics do not make a Figure 2: “Bead March” (using FL1 as an example) produced by
significant contribution to fluorescence gradual increasing voltages (A to E histograms from 1st to 5th charts)
variability1,5. The HPCV (Half peak CV) should be over the dynamic range of the instrument using IMMUNO-BRITE™
within the range stated by the instrument Fluorospheres.
STANDARDIZATION
Conclusion
Practical Standardization Program
Establishing and maintaining a flow cytometer in a
way to assure optimal system performance is
based on the three fundamental characteristics of
precision, accuracy, and sensitivity. These can be
addressed in a laboratory standardization program
by following these steps:
Figure 3. Ratio of fluorescence intensities of the two beads plotted against voltage
(left chart) and the %CV plotted against voltage (right chart). The PMT begins to
1. Precision: monitor HPCVs of brightly
demonstrate a nonlinear response at the inflection point on either chart. In the case fluorescent beads daily.
of the example instrument, this inflection point is at around 400 V for all PMTs. 2. Accuracy: establish the PMT response when
the instrument is received and after
Sensitivity replacement of a PMT or major changes to
Characterization of the sensitivity of a flow the instrument.
cytometry system addresses the question of how 3. Sensitivity: determine the sensitivity of an
well an instrument is able to resolve dim instrument monthly and after any major
populations from each other and from modifications to the instrument.
background. The measure of molecules of
equivalent soluble fluorophore (MESF) provides
a means of translating sensitivity into a directly
measurable unit. Sensitivity can be described in
terms of two factors – the detection efficiency
(Q) and the background light level (B). The
detection efficiency is the number of
photoelectrons produced per molecule of
fluorochrome. Since both Q and B influence the
spread or standard deviation of the fluorescence
peak, analysis of Q and B provide a predictive
method for estimating the overlap, and therefore
resolution, between fluorescent peaks. Q and B
values are determined empirically by using a set
of at least two dim beads and a bright fluor-
escence calibrator bead. The CVs of the dim
beads are measured using the linear scale for
fluorescence intensity. The fluorescence of the
dim beads is converted from intensity units to Figure 4: Sensitivity threshold determination using Spherotech
MESF using the calibrator bead and the CVs of SPHERO™ Rainbow Calibration Particles.
the dim beads are then converted to SD2 using
the formula :
1
REFERENCES
SD2 = (MESF)2 x (CVdim2 – CVbright2) 1. Hoffman RA, Wood JCS. Current Protocols in Cytometry.
New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2007.
A linear regression is performed correlating the 2. Wood JCS. Fundamental flow cytometer properties
SD2 (y-values) to the MESF (x-values) to obtain governing sensitivity and resolution. Cytometry 1998
the detection efficiency (Q) and the background 33:260-266.
light level (B). 3. Chase ES, Hoffman RA. Resolution of dimly fluorescent
particles: a practical measure of fluorescence sensitivity.
Once the Q and B values – conveniently Cytometry 1998 33:267-279.
calculated using a dedicated spreadsheet – 4. Schwartz A, Fernández-Repollet E, Vogt R, Gratama JW.
that represent adequate resolution for the system Standardizing flow cytometry: construction of a
have been established, they may be monitored standardized fluorescence calibration plot using matching
over time using a Levey-Jennings plot to ensure spectral calibrators. Cytometry 1996 26:22-31.
system performance. 5. Shapiro HM. Practical Flow Cytometry Fourth Edition.
New York: Wiley-Liss; 2003.
A typical presentation of an alternative method,
which measures threshold but not resolution, is To read complete article please go to
depicted in Figure 4. www.beckmancoulter.com/cell-lab
Cell count and viability are commonly determined surface, and pipetted into a 96-well poly-
using hemocytometry or automatic instrumen- carbonate plate (Axygen Scientific) at 100
tation such as Vi-CELL. These methods use !L/well. PI (Invitrogen) at a final concentration
Trypan Blue dye exclusion to distinguish viable of 2 !g/mL was added into each well by using
from non-viable cells under an optical the automatic Well Prep function of the Quanta
microscope or CCD camera. Flow cytometry SC MPL. The sample was mixed by redispensing
technology employs DNA-intercalating molecules 6 times at high speed before data acquisition.
that fluoresce by interacting with a nucleic acid Viability was assessed based on the PI
basis. Distinction between viable and non-viable fluorescence signal on the FL3. Additional
cells results from the fact that the intact cell instrument settings are summarized in Table 1.
membrane is impermeable to intercalating
Total Count 10,000
molecules such as propidium iodide (PI) or
7-Amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD), whereas Run Volume 50
compromised membrane is not, opening the Peak Count 1,000,000
path to cellular DNA. The Quanta SC MPL, an Time 0
advanced, high throughput flow cytometer, uses Concentration Value Yes (Counting Time:
PI or 7-AAD to distinguish viable cells from non- 10 sec. Start Time: 5 sec.)
viable ones. Table 1. Stop Sample Criteria.
Quanta SC MPL Protocol. Cell culture samples To determine if the Quanta SC MPL can be
were mixed with EDTA at a final concentration of employed for the 96-well high-throughput format
10 mM, to minimize cell adhesion to the well of cell counts and viability, a CHO cell sample
Figure 1. Linearity and correlation of viable cell count (A) and viability (B; n = 4) using
the Quanta SC MPL and the Vi-Cell XR with a CHO cell sample with 90% viability.
Figure 2. Linearity and correlation of viable cell count (A) and viability (B) using the
Quanta SC MPL and the Vi-Cell XR with a CHO cell sample with ~50% viability.
Thousands of reagents.
www.beckmancoulter.com/eStore
Infinite possibilities.
Genomics Proteomics Cell Analysis Centrifugation Lab Tools Particle Characterization Bioseparation Lab Automation
Simplify . Automate . Innovate
PAID
Brea, CA 92822-8000 U.S.A.