Group Presentation Feedback

Group: _Group 2____________________________

Rate each of the following areas:

Concept being Score Points

evaluated 8-10 5-7 3-4 0-2
Introduction The case was The case was The case was The case was
introduced clearly introduced in a introduced but it introduced, but
and concisely in a manner that the was somewhat the dilemma was
manner that led to dilemma could be difficult to unclear. 10
clear understandingdeduced with a understand the
of the dilemma. degree of facets of the
understanding. dilemma.
Organization The presentation The presentation had There were The presentation
Was the was well organized, organizing ideas but minimal signs of lacked
presentation well well prepared and could have been much organization or organization and
organized and easy to follow. stronger with better preparation. had little
10
easy to follow? preparation. evidence of
preparation or
logical
sequence.
Application of Presenters applied Some, but not all, Some The presentation
Framework the selected presenters were able information by contained little to
framework to the to apply the selected some presenters no valuable
Was framework case, demonstrating framework to the case as they material on
supported? exceptional with a fair amount of attempted to application of a
knowledge of the knowledge of the apply the framework by the
Did presenters material. Presenters material. Presenters framework was group or it was
explain the demonstrated that demonstrated that confusing, or it extremely
framework in a the framework was framework was was difficult to confusing and/or
10
manner that fully supported as an somewhat supported understand how difficult to follow.
supported its appropriate tool for as an appropriate tool the framework Presenters failed
application to the resolution of the for resolution of the was an to demonstrate
dilemma? selected case. selected case. appropriate tool that framework
for resolution of was an
the selected appropriate tool
case. for resolution of
the selected
case.
Verbal Presenters were all Presenters were Presenters were Presenters 10
Techniques very confident in mostly confident with not consistent demonstrated
Did the delivery. their presentation. with the level of little evidence of
presenters speak Presentation was However, the preparedness but planning prior to
clearly? Was it interesting and presentation was not had some strong presentation.
obvious the engaging. as engaging as it moments. Presenters
material had Preparation was very could have been. Some mumbled/spoke
been rehearsed? evident. Presenters Presenters’ voices presenters’ quietly.
Were slides (if used clear voices. were clear and voices were low Presenters read
used) free of audible. and audience from notes
errors? had difficulty and/or made no
 hearing eye contact.
presentation.
Collaboration The teammates The teammates The teammates The teammates
Did you have a appeared to share a appeared to have appeared to have did not appear to
sense that strong sense of collaborated most of collaborated have
everyone had collaboration, the time. It seemed somewhat on collaborated
contributed to the supporting all parts like everyone did planning and/or either in planning
presentation? Did of the presentation. It some work, but some presenting. or presenting the
10
everyone seem was evident that all people were carrying However, it application of the
well versed in the of the group the presentation. seemed as framework to the
material? members contributed though certain selected case.
equally to the people did not do
presentation. as much work as
others.
Total

Additional Comments:

 What is one thing that you learned from this presentation?

 What is one thing the group did well?
 What is one suggestion to help them improve future presentations?
 Any other additional comments?

- Group work, on time submission very important

- Submitting work
- Need to submit work earlier than due date in order to fix any errors
- None