You are on page 1of 2

PANDUAN TELAAH ARTIKEL PENELITIAN DIAGNOSIS

SECTION 1: INTERNAL VALIDITY


In a well conducted diagnostic study… In this study this criterion is (berikan tanda
‘V’ pada pilihan yang sesuai).
1.1 The spectrum of patients is representative of the Well covered(hal.19) Not addressed
patients who will receive the test in practice. Adequately addressed Not reported
Poorly addressed Not applicable
1.2 Selection criteria are clearly described. Well covered(hal.19) Not addressed
Adequately addressed Not reported
Poorly addressed Not applicable
1.3 The reference standard is likely to classify the condition Well covered Not addressed
correctly. Adequately addressed Not reported
Poorly Not applicable
addressed(hal.19)
1.4 The period between reference standard and index test Well covered(abstrak) Not addressed
is short enough to be reasonably sure that the target Adequately addressed Not reported
condition did not change between the two tests. Poorly addressed Not applicable
1.5 The whole sample, or a random selection of the sample, Well covered(result) Not addressed
received verification using a reference standard of Adequately addressed Not reported
diagnosis. Poorly addressed Not applicable

1.6 Patients received the same reference standard Well covered(19.tabel) Not addressed
regardless of the index test result. Adequately addressed Not reported
Poorly addressed Not applicable
1.7 The reference standard was independent of the index Well covered(19) Not addressed
test (i.e. the index test did not form part of the Adequately addressed Not reported
reference standard). Poorly addressed Not applicable
1.8 The execution of the index test was described in Well covered(19) Not addressed
sufficient detail to permit replication of the test. Adequately addressed Not reported
Poorly addressed Not applicable
1.9 The execution of the reference standard was described Well covered(19) Not addressed
in sufficient detail to permit replication of the test. Adequately addressed Not reported
Poorly addressed Not applicable
1.10 Index test results were interpreted without knowledge Well covered(tabel) Not addressed
of the results of the reference standard. Adequately addressed Not reported
Poorly addressed Not applicable
1.11 Reference standard results were interpreted without Well covered(tabel) Not addressed
knowledge of the results of the index test. Adequately addressed Not reported
Poorly addressed Not applicable
1.12 Uninterpretable or intermediate test results are Well covered Not addressed
reported. Adequately addressed Not reported
Poorly addressed Not applicable
1.13 An explanation is provided for withdrawals from the Well covered Not addressed
study. Adequately addressed Not reported
Poorly addressed Not applicable
Section 2: OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE STUDY
2.1 How reliable are the conclusions of this study? Widal: - (LR= not
Code ++, +, or - helpful)
2.2 Were the same clinical data available when test results were interpreted as YA, kriteria
would be available when the test is used in practice? responden sama
dgn kriteria di
skenario
2.3 Notes. Summarise the authors conclusions. Add any comments on your own assessment of the
study, and the extent to which it answers your question.

The following section is provided for non-SIGN users of this checklist and is being developed to conform to
the standards set by the Guidelines International Network Evidence Tables Working Group.
Members of SIGN guideline groups do not need to complete this section.

Section 3: Description OF THE STUDY


PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY (tuliskan jawaban pada kolom sebalah kanan pertanyaan).
3.1 How many patients are included in this study? 80 sampel
Please indicate number of patients included, with inclusion/exclusion criteria used
to select them.
3.2 What is the prevalence (proportion of people with the disease being tested for) Tidak dijelaskan
in the population from which patients were selected?
3.3 What are the main characteristics of the patient population? Fever, suspect
Include all relevant characteristics – e.g.age, sex, ethnic origin, comorbidity, typhoid,
disease status, community/hospital based bradycardi,
headeache,
myalgia, chills,
rigor,

You might also like