Dqa Tooloct Dec

District led Data quality assessment:Data Verification Assessment tool
Name of Site
Subcounty
District
Indicator 1 Indicator 2 Indicator 3 Indicator 4
Pecentage of PMTCT mothers alive and on

Indicators Reviewed: treatement 12 months afer initiation
(PMTCT_RET)
HTS PMTCT STAT and PMTCT ART TX New and TX Curr
Number of individuals who Number of individuals who Number of pregnant women Number of pregnant Number of HIV-positive Number of new clients Number of clients on Number of eMTCT Number of eMTCT
received HIV Test results tested HIV positive (HTC _ Pos) newly tested for HIV this women tested HIV+ for pregnant women started on ART at this ART (TX_CURR) mothers started on mothers in the cohort
(HTC_TST) pregnancy & known HIV status 1st time this intiated on ART for facility (TX_NEW) ART in this clinic- alive and on ART
before 1st ANC pregnancy( TRR) at any EMTCT& those already Original cohort
Variables Reviewed: (PMTCT_STAT) visit including & those on ART before 1st ANC
who knew status before (ART-K)
1st ANC( TRRK) (PMTCT_ART)
(PMTCT_Pos)
Primary Validation: Primary data source (Registers) vs Site Report in DHIS2
Cross-Check 1: Primary data source (onsite HMIS reports for the quarter) vs secondary data source (Site DHIS2 report for the quarter)
Reporting Period Verified:
Assessment Team: Name Health Facility/Insititution Cell Phone Signiture Date
Primary contact:
Include health workers

interacted with at the health
facility
Data Verification Assessment Sheet - Service Delivery S
HTS
Indicator Reviewed:
Date of Review:
Reporting Period Verified: July-September 2017
Part 1: Data Verifications
HTS
A - Documentation Review:
Number of Number of
individuals who individuals who
received HIV Test tested HIV positive
Review availability and completeness of all indicator results (HTC_TST) (HTC _ Pos)
data sources for the selected reporting period.
Variable 1
Review available data sources for the reporting period

being verified. Are all necessary data sources available
1 for review? (Y/N)
Variable 3
Briefly Comment as appropriate
Indicator 1 Page 2
If no, determine how this might have affected reported

numbers.
Variable 1
Are all available data sources complete (essentil data

fields)?
Variable 2
2 Briefly Comment as appropriate

numbers.
Review the data sources: Is information available Variable 1
covering the period under review

Variable 2
3

numbers.
Indicator 1 Page 3
HTS
B - Recounting reported Results:
Number of Number of
Recount results from data source, compare the verified received HIV Test tested HIV positive
numbers to the service delivery site reported numbers results (HTC_TST) (HTC _ Pos)
and explain discrepancies (if any).
Enter the number of clients reported by the site during

4 the reporting period from the site summary report
(DHIS2). [A]
Recount the number of clients during the reporting

5
period by reviewing the data source (Register(s)). [B]
Calculate the ratio of reported to recounted

6 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
numbers. [A-B/B]%
Variable 1
For each indicator / variable

What are the reasons for the discrepancy (if any)
7 observed (i.e., data entry errors, arithmetic errors,
missing data source, other)? Indicator 1 Page 4
For each indicator / variable Data Verification Assessment Sheet - Service Delivery S
7 observed (i.e., data entry errors, arithmetic errors, Variable 2
missing data source, other)?
C - Cross-check reported results with other data sources:

Cross-checks can be performed by examining separate inventory records during the reporting period to see if these numbers corroborate the repor
cards and verifying if these patients were recorded in the unit registers. To the extent relevant, the cross-checks should be performed in both directio
Treatment Cards).
CROSS-CHECK 1: Cross-check primary data source site HTS
summary report (onsite HMIS report) with secondary
data source (reports from DHIS2). (If cross-checks are
Number of Number of
different from the planned cross-check, i.e. the cross-checks
entered on the Information page, specify the cross-checks
received HIV Test tested HIV positive
performed in the comment cells to the right.)
results (HTC_TST) (HTC _ Pos)

1.1 the reporting period from the site DHIS2 report(A)

1.2 the reporting period from the site summary report
(onsite HMIS report) (B)
Calculate % difference for cross check 1: Variable 1

observed (i.e., data entry errors, arithmetic errors,
1.3 missing data source, other)? (A-B/B)% #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Indicator 1 Page 5
Calculate % difference for cross check 1:
1.3 missing data source, other)? (A-B/B)% #DIV/0! Data#DIV/0!
Verification Assessment Sheet - Service Delivery S
Variable 2
Indicator 1 Page 6
ent Sheet - Service Delivery Site
COMMENTS
Indicator 1 Page 7
Indicator 1 Page 8
COMMENTS
Indicator 1 Page 9
numbers corroborate the reported results. Other cross-checks could include, for example, randomly selecting 20 patient
d be performed in both directions (for example, from Patient Treatment Cards to the Register and from Register to Patient
ment Cards).
COMMENTS
Indicator 1 Page 10
Indicator 1 Page 11
Data Verification Assessment Sheet - Service
PMTCT STAT and PMTCT ART

Indicator Reviewed:
Date of Review:

Number of pregnant Number of pregnant Number of HIV-positive

women newly tested for women tested HIV+ for pregnant women intiated
HIV this pregnancy & 1st time this on ART for EMTCT&
known HIV status before pregnancy( TRR) at any those already on ART
Review availability and completeness of all indicator 1st ANC visit including & those before 1st ANC (ART-K)
data sources for the selected reporting period. (PMTCT_STAT) who knew status before (PMTCT_ART)
1st ANC( TRRK)
(PMTCT_Pos)
Variable 1

being verified. Are all necessary data sources available Variable 2
1 for review? (Y/N)

Variable 3
indicator 2 Page 12

numbers.
Variable 1
Are all available data sources complete (essentil data Variable 2

fields)?

Variable 3

numbers.
Briefly Comment as appropriate Variable 2
3 Variable 3

numbers.
indicator 2 Page 13

Number of pregnant Number of pregnant Number of HIV-positive

women newly tested for women tested HIV+ for pregnant women intiated
HIV this pregnancy & 1st time this on ART for EMTCT&
Recount results from data source, compare the verified known HIV status before pregnancy( TRR) at any those already on ART
numbers to the service delivery site reported numbers 1st ANC visit including & those before 1st ANC (ART-K)
and explain discrepancies (if any). (PMTCT_STAT) who knew status before (PMTCT_ART)
1st ANC( TRRK)
(PMTCT_Pos)

(DHIS2). [A]

5

6 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
numbers. [A-B/B]%
Variable 1

7 observed (i.e., data entry errors, arithmetic errors, indicator 2 Page 14
For each indicator / variable Variable 2
missing data source, other)? Variable 3

Cross-checks can be performed by examining separate inventory records during the reporting period to see if these numbers corroborate the repo
these patients were recorded in the unit registers. To the extent relevant, the cross-checks should be performed in both directions (for ex
CROSS-CHECK 1: Cross-check primary data source site PMTCT STAT and PMTCT ART
summary report (onsite HMIS report) with secondary
data source (reports from DHIS2). (If cross-checks are Number of pregnant Number of pregnant Number of HIV-positive
different from the planned cross-check, i.e. the cross-checks women newly tested for women tested HIV+ for pregnant women intiated
entered on the Information page, specify the cross-checks HIV this pregnancy & 1st time this on ART for EMTCT&
performed in the comment cells to the right.) known HIV status before pregnancy( TRR) at any those already on ART
1st ANC visit including & those before 1st ANC (ART-K)
(PMTCT_STAT) who knew status before (PMTCT_ART)
1st ANC( TRRK)
(PMTCT_Pos)


indicator 2 Page 15
observed (i.e., data entry errors, arithmetic errors, Variable 2
1.3 missing data source, other)? (A-B/B)% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Variable 3
indicator 2 Page 16
COMMENTS
indicator 2 Page 17
indicator 2 Page 18
COMMENTS
indicator 2 Page 19
orroborate the reported results. Other cross-checks could include, for example, randomly selecting 20 patient cards and verifying if
oth directions (for example, from Patient Treatment Cards to the Register and from Register to Patient Treatment Cards).
COMMENTS
indicator 2 Page 20
indicator 2 Page 21
Indicator Reviewed: TX New and TX Curr
Date of Review:
TX New and TX Curr
Number of new clients Number of clients on
started on ART at this ART (TX_CURR)
facility (TX_NEW)
Review availability and completeness of all indicator
Variable 1

1 for review? (Y/N)
Variable 2
Indicator3 Page 22

numbers.
Variable 1

fields)?
Variable 2

numbers.

Variable 2
3

numbers.
Indicator3 Page 23

TX New and TX Curr
Number of new clients Number of clients on
started on ART at this ART (TX_CURR)
Recount results from data source, compare the verified facility (TX_NEW)
numbers to the service delivery site reported numbers

(DHIS2). [A]

5

6 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
numbers. [A-B/B]%
Variable 1

missing data source, other)? Indicator3 Page 24
For each indicator / variable Data Verification Assessment Sheet - Service Delivery S

Treatment Cards).
CROSS-CHECK 1: Cross-check primary data source site
summary report (onsite HMIS report) with secondary TX New and TX Curr
data source (reports from DHIS2). (If cross-checks are Number of new clients Number of clients on
different from the planned cross-check, i.e. the cross-checks started on ART at this ART (TX_CURR)
entered on the Information page, specify the cross-checks facility (TX_NEW)
performed in the comment cells to the right.)



Indicator3 Page 25
Calculate % difference for cross check 1:
1.3 missing data source, other)? (A-B/B)% #DIV/0! Data #DIV/0!
Verification Assessment Sheet - Service Delivery S
Variable 2
Indicator3 Page 26
COMMENTS
Indicator3 Page 27
Indicator3 Page 28
COMMENTS
Indicator3 Page 29
ment Cards).
COMMENTS
Indicator3 Page 30
Indicator3 Page 31
Data Verification and System Assessment Sheet - Service Deliver
Service Delivery Site:
Health District: Health Sub_District
A) New and relapsed TB cases detected/Notified during the Jul-Sept 2015

Variable 1: Total New & relapsed PTB cases -Bacteriologically Confirmed (BC)
Indicator Reviewed: Variable 2: Total New & relapsed PTB cases -Clinically Diagnosed (CD)
Variable 3: Total New & relapsed EPTB cases - (BC /CD)
Date of Review:
Reporting Period Verified: Jul -Sept, 2015
Check the Answer that applies

- Yes Completely
- Partly COMMENTS
Component of the M&E System - Not at All (Please provide detail for each response
- Not Applicable Detailed responses will help guide strengthe
Part 2. Systems Assessment
I - M&E Structure, Functions and Capabilities to handle HIV/TB information

Is the responsibility for recording TB service delivery information in the Yes - completely
Registers clearly assigned to the relevant staff?
(Briefly describe who & how the TB registeris filled at this site) Partly
1
No - not at all
N/A
Part 2_Systems Assessment Page 32


Are there processes in place to ensure that data compilation and reporting Yes - completely
is completed in the event that the responsible staff is not available to do
the job (e.g. shared duties, a team approach etc.)? Partly
2 (Briefly describe forTB register,)
No - not at all
N/A
Are there designated staff responsible for reviewing periodic reports prior Yes - completely
to submission to the next level?
(Note that the reviewer can be from any level - Health Facility, sub-district, Partly
3 district or national levels)
No - not at all
N/A
Does the Health facility receive regular feedback on the quality of their
Yes - completely
submitted reports?
(Specify persons, frequency and form of providing the feedback) Partly
4
No - not at all
N/A
Does the health facility receives regular TB supportive supervisory visits
Yes - completely
from district and/or national level staff and/or other Organisation
according to the guidelines? Partly
5 (…If yes, specify the team that provided the support supervision and date
for the last visit (month and year (mm/yyyy))) No - not at all
N/A


Are the person(s) responsible for collecting and reporting TB data trained/
oriented in data collection & reporting? Yes - completely
(In the comments section specify:
1) if the site has an HMIS/Records person, 2) if the records person assists Partly
6
with TB reporting, No - not at all
3) if the site has a training / orientation plan for new staff in data
collection) N/A
II- Understanding of Indicator Definitions and Reporting Guidelines

Has the site been provided with the National written M&E guidelines for its sub-
reporting level on …
……….what should be recorded in the source documents/registers. Yes - completely
(probe and comment on whether the data collection team at the site
understands the questions/variables to be filled in the various source Partly
7 documents/registers)
No - not at all
N/A
……….,what should be included on the HMIS quarterly report.
Yes - completely
(probe and comment on whether the data collection team at the site
understands how the HMIS 106a quarterly summary reports are compiled) Partly
8
No - not at all
N/A

Service Delivery Site: N/A

……...… to whom the reports should be submitted.
Yes - completely
Partly
9
No - not at all
N/A
……… when the reports are due. Yes - completely
Partly
10
No - not at all
N/A
……… incase of errors, does the site know how to communicate and Yes - completely
effect changes in a report that was previously submitted to the district.
(in the comment section briefly describe the process used at the site) Partly
11
No - not at all
N/A
Are the written instructions provided adequate to ensure standardized Yes - completely
recording and reporting of TB data.
Partly
12
No - not at all
N/A


Do the facility staff understand how to derive the variables for the the Yes - completely
indicator "New and relapsed TB cases detected /Notified " in the register
and HMIS 106a report Partly
13
No - not at all
N/A
III - Availability of Data-collection Tools and Reporting Forms for TB
sevices
Does the Health facility have the national HMIS forms/tools to be used at
their reporting level?
(In the comment section explain if the following MOH tools are currently Yes - completely
available at the site -- HMIS 096a: TB Register; 2)HMIS 106a: Health Unit Partly
Quarterly Report, Presumptive TB regsisterTB Case managment; HMIS 089D
16 Intensified TB case finding guide, HMIS 089E TB client card (specify version No - not at all
where possible)
N/A
…If yes, are the standard forms/tools consistently used at the Health
Yes - completely
facility?
(probe and list reasons incase standard forms/tools are not used consistently) Partly
17
No - not at all
N/A


If there are multiple organizations that are implementing activities under
the TB services at the site, do they use the national reporting forms and Yes - completely
follow the same reporting timelines?. Partly
18 (Name the organization/ Implementing Partners in the comment section
and tools used if different) No - not at all
N/A
Are there sufficient stocks of blank primary data collection tools/ /registers
Yes - completely
and summary HMIS forms at the facility.
(Enquire and comment on when the existing stock of TB registers & HMIS Partly
19 summary forms are expected to run out -estimate based on list of tools
provided in #16 above) No - not at all
N/A
Does the site have a regular refill program of the TB Tools when they are
used up? Yes - completely
(Enquire where and how the site gets these refills)
Partly
20
No - not at all
N/A
Do the Primary data collection tools / registers have all the relevant
questions/variables needed to compile the HMIS 106a reports? Yes - completely
(Enquire about how the staff obtain the various answers needed in the
compilation of the said reports) Partly
21
No - not at all
N/A

IV- Data Management Processes

Does the established patient recording and reporting system allow Yes - completely
tracking of unique individuals within and across Service Delivery Points to
avoid double counting at this site? Partly
22 (e.g. can a patient with a clinical diognoses of supected TB in the HIV Clinic be
tracked through to the special TB unit)? No - not at all
N/A
Are there data quality controls in place for ensuring compilation of Yes - completely
accurate quarterly (HMIS 106a) reports (e.g. controls for detection of data
inconsistencies; incomplete /incorrect TB Reporting, missing data & Partly
23 transcription errors)?
No - not at all
N/A
Does the site have computerized TB data and/ reports
(If yes, specify what data is computerized and the computer packages Yes - completely
used) Partly
24
No - not at all
N/A
Ask only where applicable, For computerised sites are there quality
controls in place for when data from Registers/paper-based forms are Yes - completely
entered into a computer to ensure the accuracy of data entry (e.g. edit Partly
and/or logic checks, post-data entry verification, etc.).
25 (In the comment section, briefly explain the data quality controls and also
No - not at all
enquire about their computerized data backup program)
N/A


Confidentiality of patients information: Is the patient data maintained Yes - completely
according to national confidentiality guidelines?
Partly
26
No - not at all
N/A
Are there SOPs/ Job Aids/Guidelines that describe how site documents Yes - completely
should be handled and archived clearly written and accessible to all staff ?
Partly
27
No - not at all
N/A
If yes, are the staff aware and using the above SOPs/ Job Yes - completely
Aids/Guidelines?
(Briefly explain, and also enquire if the site has the latest TB Guidelines) Partly
28
No - not at all
N/A
Is the data archiving/storage system at the site adequate?
Yes - completely
(Assess data storage, security and ease of accessibility & retrieval of TB
site records (e.g. filing cabinets, storage rooms etc.) Partly
29
No - not at all
N/A


Is the HMIS 106a report submitted in a timely manner? Yes - completely
(Enquire and observe if the 'April - June 2015' quarterly reports was compiled
and ask to see copy, cross check on the date of compilation) Partly
30
No - not at all
N/A
V - Use of data for decision making

Is there evidence of TB data use at the site? Yes - completely
(check for evidence of data analysis & reporting other than the official
reports e.g. charts, graphs, maps, etc. (ask to see if not displayed)? Partly
31
No - not at all
N/A
Have the TB services staff been trained in data analysis and Yes - completely
interpretation?
(Probe for trainings done and duration) Partly
32
No - not at all
N/A
Is there a staff at the site who takes lead in analysis and interpretation of Yes - completely
TB data?
Partly
33
No - not at all
N/A


Is the analyzed TB data / results presented / disseminated to other
Yes - completely
information system stakeholders in a timely manner so that the
information can be used to inform decisions? Partly
34 (Probe about examples of target audiences for the data e.g. Health Unit
administration, sub county council, HSD, DHT &IPs) No - not at all
N/A
Are there any programmatic decisions taken by the service delivery site Yes - completely
based on analyzed TB data / results.
(Ask to see example) Partly
35
No - not at all
N/A

ssessment Sheet - Service Delivery Site
Health Sub_District
d TB cases detected/Notified during the Jul-Sept 2015 qtr

& relapsed PTB cases -Bacteriologically Confirmed (BC)
& relapsed PTB cases -Clinically Diagnosed (CD)
& relapsed EPTB cases - (BC /CD)
COMMENTS
(Please provide detail for each response
Detailed responses will help guide strengthening measures. )










Data Verification and System Assessment Sheet - Service Deli
Pecentage of PMTCT mothers alive and on treatement 12 months afer initiation (P

Indicator Reviewed:
Date of Review:

A - Documentation Review: treatement 12 months afer initiation
(PMTCT_RET)
Number of eMTCT Number of eMTCT
mothers started on ART mothers in the cohort
in this clinic-Original alive and on ART
Review availability and completeness of all indicator cohort
Variable 1

1 for review? (Y/N)
Variable 2
Indicator4 Page 52

numbers.
Variable 1

fields)?
Variable 2

numbers.

Variable 2
3

numbers.
Indicator4 Page 53

B - Recounting reported Results: treatement 12 months afer initiation
(PMTCT_RET)
Number of eMTCT Number of eMTCT
mothers started on ART mothers in the cohort
Recount results from data source, compare the verified in this clinic-Original alive and on ART
cohort
numbers to the service delivery site reported numbers

(DHIS2). [A]

5

6 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
numbers. [A-B/B]%
Variable 1

missing data source, other)? Indicator4 Page 54
For each indicator / variable Data Verification and System Assessment Sheet - Service Deli

Treatment Cards).
CROSS-CHECK 1: Cross-check primary data source site Pecentage of PMTCT mothers alive and on
summary report (onsite HMIS report) with secondary treatement 12 months afer initiation
data source (reports from DHIS2). (If cross-checks are (PMTCT_RET)
different from the planned cross-check, i.e. the cross-checks Number of eMTCT Number of eMTCT
entered on the Information page, specify the cross-checks mothers started on ART mothers in the cohort
performed in the comment cells to the right.) in this clinic-Original alive and on ART
cohort



Indicator4 Page 55
observed (i.e., data entry errors, arithmetic errors, Data Verification and System Assessment Sheet - Service Deli
Variable 2
Indicator4 Page 56
sessment Sheet - Service Delivery Site
ent 12 months afer initiation (PMTCT_RET)
COMMENTS
Indicator4 Page 57
Indicator4 Page 58
COMMENTS
Indicator4 Page 59
ment Cards).
COMMENTS
Indicator4 Page 60
Indicator4 Page 61
Indicator Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Total
HTS
Number of individuals who received HIV

Test results (HTC_TST) -
Number of individuals who tested HIV
positive (HTC _ Pos) -
Number of pregnant women newly

tested for HIV this pregnancy & TRR&TR -
known HIV status before 1st ANC TRRK
(PMTCT_STAT) &TRK
HIV+ for 1st time this TRR
pregnancy( TRR) at any visit
TRR+
including & those who knew status
before 1st ANC( TRRK)
(PMTCT_Pos) TRRK -
new on
Number of HIV-positive pregnant ART
women intiated on ART for
EMTCT& those already on ART
before 1st ANC (ART-K) Already
(PMTCT_ART) on ART -
TX New and TX Curr
Number of new clients started on ART at this
facility (TX_NEW) -
Number of clients on ART (TX_CURR) -
Pecentage of PMTCT mothers alive and on treatement 12 months afer initiation

(PMTCT_RET)
Original Cohort
Transfer In
Transfer Out
Net current cohort
Alive on ART
Dead
Lost
LTFU
Stopped
Data Verification and System Assessment Sheet - Service Delivery Site
Health District: Health Sub-District:
Recommendations
Based on the findings of the systems’ review and data verification at the service site, please describe four key challenges to the data quality identified and recom
strengthening measures, with an estimate of the length of time the improvement measure could take. These should be discussed with the site staff.
Action Point Timeline Responsible Person(s)

Identified Weaknesses (Specific activites on improving TB/HIV services)
(When do you hope to achieve (Person/organisation that will be
this) responsible for accomplishing this task)
3
4
entified and recommended
staff.
Resources
(What is required in order to
achieve carry out agreed upon,
activities)
Data Verification and System Assessment Sheet - Service Delivery Site
Health District: Health Sub-District:
Part 3: General Observations & Notable Good M&E Practices at Site
i) General Observations about Site
1
2
3
4
ii) Notable Good M&E Practices at Site:
1
2
3
4
ce Delivery Site
-District:
TB Services DQA Dara Validation Tool
Percentage Deviation
Secondary Data of DHIS2 Report from
Primary Data Source Source Reported Joint Count
(Registers) & (HMIS Summary Onsite DQA Joint Quarterly Outputs (DHIS2-Joint Count)/Site Comments - Deviation of HMIS
Indicator Data variables Data for Aggregation Reports) Period Count in the DHIS2 Joint Count Report at site from Joint Count
New and relapsed TB HMIS 096a: Health HMIS 106a: Health Jul-Sept 2015
cases Total New & relapsed Unit TB register Unit Quarterly
detected/Notified PTB cases Column 10 P-BC & Report
during the Jul-Sept -Bacteriologically Column 11(N & R)
2015 qtr Confirmed (BC)
HMIS 096: Health HMIS 106a: Health Jul-Sept 2015

Unit TB register Unit Quarterly
Column 10 P-CD & Report
Column 11(N & R)
Total New & relapsed

PTB cases -Clinically
Diagnosed (CD)
TB Services DQA Dara Validation Tool
Percentage
Deviation of HMIS
Report at site from
HMIS 106a Joint Count
Quarterly (HMIS-Joint
Summary Report at Count)/site Joint Comments - Deviation of HMIS
Indicator Site Count Report at site from site Joint Count
New and relapsed TB
cases
detected/Notified
during the Jul-Sept
2015 qtr

Dqa Tooloct Dec

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Dqa Tooloct Dec

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

District led Data quality assessment:Data Verification Assessment tool

Pecentage of PMTCT mothers alive and on

Primary Validation: Primary data source (Registers) vs Site Report in DHIS2

Reporting Period Verified:

Assessment Team: Name Health Facility/Insititution Cell Phone Signiture Date

Include health workers

Reporting Period Verified: July-September 2017

Part 1: Data Verifications

Review available data sources for the reporting period

If no, determine how this might have affected reported

Are all available data sources complete (essentil data

If no, determine how this might have affected reported

Briefly Comment as appropriate

If no, determine how this might have affected reported

Part 1: Data Verifications

Enter the number of clients reported by the site during

Recount the number of clients during the reporting

Calculate the ratio of reported to recounted

For each indicator / variable

C - Cross-check reported results with other data sources:

Enter the number of clients reported by the site during

Enter the number of clients reported by the site during

Calculate % difference for cross check 1: Variable 1

PMTCT STAT and PMTCT ART

Reporting Period Verified: July-September 2017

Part 1: Data Verifications

PMTCT STAT and PMTCT ART

Number of pregnant Number of pregnant Number of HIV-positive

Review available data sources for the reporting period

Briefly Comment as appropriate

If no, determine how this might have affected reported

Are all available data sources complete (essentil data Variable 2

2 Briefly Comment as appropriate

If no, determine how this might have affected reported

Briefly Comment as appropriate Variable 2

If no, determine how this might have affected reported

Part 1: Data Verifications

PMTCT STAT and PMTCT ART

Number of pregnant Number of pregnant Number of HIV-positive

Enter the number of clients reported by the site during

Recount the number of clients during the reporting

Calculate the ratio of reported to recounted

For each indicator / variable

C - Cross-check reported results with other data sources:

Enter the number of clients reported by the site during

Enter the number of clients reported by the site during

Indicator Reviewed: TX New and TX Curr

Reporting Period Verified: July-September 2017

Part 1: Data Verifications

Review available data sources for the reporting period

If no, determine how this might have affected reported

Are all available data sources complete (essentil data

If no, determine how this might have affected reported

Briefly Comment as appropriate

If no, determine how this might have affected reported

Part 1: Data Verifications

B - Recounting reported Results:

Enter the number of clients reported by the site during

Recount the number of clients during the reporting

Calculate the ratio of reported to recounted

For each indicator / variable

C - Cross-check reported results with other data sources:

Enter the number of clients reported by the site during

Enter the number of clients reported by the site during