115 views

Uploaded by hjbjflaefaifnaerf

Financial Management

- PRESTON UNIVERSITY.docx
- 11_mini case
- FMA F2
- Effective Business Presentations With PowerPoint Data Analysis Chicago to Atlanta Route
- pfi_internalratesguidance1_210307
- 04. PMP Course_Integration Management V2
- SONA RAI_1116484_ACC511_TASK2Week10.docx
- Ragas 355 Points
- Doleh, Sufian Ch_10 P23 Build a Model
- 335 Points
- Cost Benefit Analysis
- Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria
- 04HDM 4EconomicAnalysisConcepts2008!10!22
- 02 - Project Appraisal & Analysis
- PM Book Corrections
- Baby Food
- Sample Questions - Chapters 10 and 11
- Componenets of a Feasibilty Report
- Internal Rate of Return - Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia
- Cases

You are on page 1of 12

105. Baker's Supply imposes a payback cutoff of 3.5 years for its international investment

projects. If the company has the following two projects available, should it accept either of

them?

B. Accept Project A but not Project B

C. Accept Project B but not Project A

D. Both Project A and B are acceptable but you can only select one project

E. Reject both Projects A and B

PaybackB = 3 + [($61,000 - $16,500 - $26,300 - $15,600)/$4,900 = 3.53 years

The firm should reject both projects.

AACSB: Analytic

Bloom's: Analysis

Difficulty: Basic

Learning Objective: 08-01 Summarize the payback rule and some of its shortcomings.

Section: 8.2

Topic: Payback period

106. You're trying to determine whether or not to expand your business by building a new

manufacturing plant. The plant has an installation cost of $26 million, which will be depreciated

straight-line to zero over its three-year life. If the plant has projected net income of $2,348,000,

$2,680,000, and $1,920,000 over these three years, what is the project's average accounting

return (AAR)?

A. 11.69 percent

B. 14.14 percent

C. 15.08 percent

D. 17.82 percent

E. 19.21 percent

AACSB: Analytic

Bloom's: Analysis

Difficulty: Basic

Learning Objective: 08-02 Discuss accounting rates of return and some of the problems with them.

Section: 8.3

Topic: Average accounting return

107. What is the IRR of the following set of cash flows?

A. 12.93 percent

B. 14.90 percent

C. 15.81 percent

D. 16.33 percent

E. 17.78 percent

The IRR is the rate that makes the NPV equal zero.

AACSB: Analytic

Bloom's: Analysis

Difficulty: Basic

Learning Objective: 08-03 Explain the internal rate of return criterion and its associated strengths and weaknesses.

Section: 8.4

Topic: Internal rate of return

108. What is the NPV of the following set of cash flows at a discount rate of zero percent? What

if the discount rate is 15 percent?

A. -$41,700; -$8,665.07

B. -$41,700; $1,208.19

C. $0; $1,208.19

D. $2,500; $1,208.19

E. $2,500; -$8,665.07

AACSB: Analytic

Bloom's: Analysis

Difficulty: Basic

Learning Objective: 08-04 Evaluate proposed investments by using the net present value criterion.

Section: 8.1

Topic: Net present value

109. Chestnut Tree Farms has identified the following two mutually exclusive projects:

A. 8.28 percent or less

B. 8.28 percent or more

C. 9.33 percent or more

D. 9.55 percent or less

E. 9.55 percent or more

AACSB: Analytic

Bloom's: Analysis

Difficulty: Basic

Learning Objective: 08-03 Explain the internal rate of return criterion and its associated strengths and weaknesses.

Section: 8.4

Topic: NPV Profile

110. Jefferson International is trying to choose between the following two mutually exclusive

design projects:

The required return is 12 percent. If the company applies the profitability index (PI) decision

rule, which project should the firm accept? If the company applies the NPV decision rule, which

project should it take? Given your first two answers, which project should the firm actually

accept?

A. Project A; Project B; Project A

B. Project A; Project B; Project B

C. Project B; Project A; Project A

D. Project B; Project A; Project B

E. Project B; Project B, Project B

The firm should select project A because the PI rule should not be applied to mutually exclusive

projects.

AACSB: Analytic

Bloom's: Analysis

Difficulty: Basic

Learning Objective: 08-04 Evaluate proposed investments by using the net present value criterion. and 08-06 Calculate the profitability index

and understand its relation to net present value.

Section: 8.1 and 8.5

Topic: Net present value and profitability index

111. Consider the following two mutually exclusive projects:

Whichever project you choose, if any, you require a 14 percent return on your investment. If you

apply the payback criterion, you will choose investment _____, if you apply the NPV criterion,

you will choose investment _____; if you apply the IRR criterion, you will choose investment

____; if you choose the profitability index criterion, you will choose investment ____. Based on

your first four answers, which project will you finally choose?

A. A; B; A; A; B

B. A; A; B; B; A

C. A; A; B; B; B

D. B; A; B; A; A

E. B; A; B; B; A

PaybackB = ($23,000 - $11,600 - $11,200)/$12,500 = 2.02 years

The company should select Project A based on net present value. Payback ignores some cash

flows and the time value of money. Neither the internal rate of return nor the profitability ratio

are reliable methods when projects are mutually exclusive.

AACSB: Analytic

Bloom's: Analysis

Difficulty: Basic

Learning Objective: 08-01 Summarize the payback rule and some of its shortcomings.; 08-03 Explain the internal rate of return criterion and its

associated strengths and weaknesses.; 08-04 Evaluate proposed investments by using the net present value criterion. and 08-06 Calculate the

profitability index and understand its relation to net present value.

Section: 8.1, 8.2, 8.4, and 8.5

Topic: Comparing investment criteria

112. Textiles Unlimited has gathered projected cash flows for two projects. At what interest rate

would the company be indifferent between the two projects? Which project is better if the

required return is above this interest rate?

A. 11.76 percent; A

B. 12.49 percent; A

C. 12.49 percent; B

D. 13.15 percent; A

E. 13.15 percent: B

AACSB: Analytic

Bloom's: Analysis

Difficulty: Basic

Learning Objective: 08-03 Explain the internal rate of return criterion and its associated strengths and weaknesses.

Section: 8.4

Topic: Net present value profile

113. Quattro, Inc. has the following mutually exclusive projects available. The company has

historically used a 4-year cutoff for projects. The required return is 11 percent.

The payback for Project A is ____ while the payback for Project B is _____. The NPV for

Project A is _____ while the NPV for Project B is _____. Which project, if any, should the

company accept?

A. 3.92 years; 3.64 years; $780.85; $1,211.48; accept both Project A and B

B. 3.92 years; 3.79 years; -$211.60; $1,211.48; accept Project B only

C. 3.92 years; 3.79 years; $780.85; -$7,945.93; accept Project A only

D. 4.06 years; 3.64 years; $780.85; $1,211.48; accept both Project A and B

E. 4.06 years; 3.79 years; -$211.60; -$7,945.93; reject both projects

Payback B = 3 + ($125,000 - $38,600 - $33,400 - $31,200)/$27,500 = 3.79 years

AACSB: Analytic

Bloom's: Analysis

Difficulty: Basic

Learning Objective: 08-01 Summarize the payback rule and some of its shortcomings. and 08-04 Evaluate proposed investments by using the net

present value criterion.

Section: 8.1 and 8.2

Topic: Payback and net present value

114. Miller and Sons is evaluating a project with the following cash flows:

The company uses a 10 percent interest rate on all of its projects. What is the MIRR of the

project using the reinvestment approach? The discounting approach? The combination

approach?

A. 8.46 percent; 7.29 percent; 8.59 percent

B. 8.46 percent; 7.38 percent; 8.61 percent

C. 8.54 percent; 7.29 percent; 8.61 percent

D. 8.54 percent; 7.38 percent; 8.59 percent

E. 8.54 percent; 8.23 percent; 8.61 percent

Reinvestment approach:

Discounting approach:

Combination approach:

- PRESTON UNIVERSITY.docxUploaded byAnonymous JZlybX890T
- 11_mini caseUploaded bymayk1234
- FMA F2Uploaded byFloyd Dalton
- Effective Business Presentations With PowerPoint Data Analysis Chicago to Atlanta RouteUploaded byIgnacio
- pfi_internalratesguidance1_210307Uploaded byEunice Yew
- 04. PMP Course_Integration Management V2Uploaded byNoor Rahman Sahak
- SONA RAI_1116484_ACC511_TASK2Week10.docxUploaded bySyed Bilal Ali
- Ragas 355 PointsUploaded byVenkata Yadavalli
- Doleh, Sufian Ch_10 P23 Build a ModelUploaded bysadoleh
- 335 PointsUploaded byreddysham4u
- Cost Benefit AnalysisUploaded byAditya Anwar
- Net Present Value and Other Investment CriteriaUploaded byDanzyll John Quiogue
- 04HDM 4EconomicAnalysisConcepts2008!10!22Uploaded byGopalan Kathiravan
- 02 - Project Appraisal & AnalysisUploaded byHamza Khwaja
- PM Book CorrectionsUploaded byellie<3
- Baby FoodUploaded bybig john
- Sample Questions - Chapters 10 and 11Uploaded byLouina Yncierto
- Componenets of a Feasibilty ReportUploaded byXainab Saeed
- Internal Rate of Return - Wikipedia, The Free EncyclopediaUploaded byOluwafemi Samuel Adesanmi
- CasesUploaded byluqmanforu
- monooUploaded byHerlambang Satriadi
- Maritime ManagementUploaded byshital_vyas1987
- 92059_analisis Investasi Firman CahyadiUploaded byFirman Cahyadi
- ch5Uploaded byAniket Phadnis
- Project Mgt_fm-.docxUploaded bysimmi33
- Capital Budgeting Decisions—Part iUploaded byKarlovy Dalin
- The Investment DetectiveUploaded byManas Das
- Capital Budgeting 2Uploaded byCarla Carreon
- CFO Simulation Report_Q6-Q9Uploaded byChiraroj Angsumalee
- Finance_KEOWN_CH9.pdfUploaded byMarwan Yasser

- Arome Bakery 071205 (1)Uploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- CH04TB.docUploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- 基于网絡時代下的人工智能發展分析_李宁Uploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- DDM Method AssumptionsUploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- LW3902 Assignment 11-12BUploaded byashtarbangash
- 開始遊日本 說日語Uploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- GDPUploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- ch20sUploaded byRand Al-akam
- Hybrid Financing:Uploaded byAhsan
- w04DemoUploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- Assignment Cover SheetUploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- IRAC Method to Answer Problem-style QuestionsUploaded byAhmad Syafiq Mohd Amin
- Review Questions & Answers - Lecture 5Uploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- w03DemoUploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- w02DemoUploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- Sem B - Quiz 1 StatisticsUploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- Chapter 04Uploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- In-class Exercise_Lecture 13Uploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- Lecture 6Uploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- 2016 Unit 12_answersUploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- Chapter #6Uploaded byam_lunatic
- Auditing-test-bank-chapter-1.docUploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- Chapter #16Uploaded byreadscribdnow3
- Principles of Marketing Test Bank Chp 1Uploaded byBad idea
- Auditing Test Bank Chapter 9Uploaded byMohammadYaqoob
- KEEP Platform User GuideUploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- Wernimont(1972)Uploaded byhjbjflaefaifnaerf
- Poe 4 FormulasUploaded bymissinu
- Chapter #14Uploaded byKishore Reddy

- Construction Accounting and Financial ManagementUploaded bySon Go Han
- Current Topiclist Mrunal DecW1 to JanW2Uploaded bySingaravelan Gnanavel
- Business CaseUploaded byMichael Johns
- BRAC BANK Limited (Financial Analysis)Uploaded byMoinul Ahsan
- Navita Annual Report 2009Uploaded byChinmaya Sreekaran
- FIN 440_Case 5Uploaded bySamiul21
- Role of Central BankUploaded byChowdhury Mahin Ahmed
- Claremont COURIER 11-25-16Uploaded byPeter Weinberger
- Results-Based Career Success by Naing Moe Aung, Project DecisionUploaded byNaing Moe Aung
- Controlling Class 1Uploaded bySamn Jhon
- Advance Tax -Uaz472eUploaded byManish Patel
- Senario and SensivityUploaded bySushil Kumar Jangir
- Financial PLANUploaded byJames Gichuru
- Scam - Sahara (Final) 190516.pdfUploaded byVinoth Kumar
- SHY Week 1 Assignment SolutionUploaded byhy_saingheng_7602609
- PD 477Uploaded byRak Nopel Taro
- India Financial Sector ReformsUploaded byYogesh Kumar
- Guide to Section 80 Deductions.pdfUploaded byshivamswarup
- in re LIBOR antitrust - 2d Circuit opinion.pdfUploaded byMark H. Jaffe
- CH 12 Powerpoint a334 (1)Uploaded byThi
- Property OutlineUploaded bycwoodistheman
- Transpo CasesUploaded byJean Torres
- Intelligent Investor Presentation-BostonUploaded byFavio C. Osorio Polar
- Ibusiness Plan Draft FinalUploaded byHifz Ur Rehman Awan
- The IASB and the Standard Setting ProcessUploaded byJess
- The Personal Property Securities Act and IP: a simpler way?Uploaded byOscar R. Paredes Fernández
- IGNOU SOLVED ASSIGNMENT ECO - 02 _2014-15 Ignouassignmentguru.blogspot.comUploaded byNandanUpamanyu
- HDFC Banking and PSU Debt Fund KIM April 2016 11052016Uploaded bygaurav rajput
- Oxfam Cargill reportUploaded byMinnesota Public Radio
- Knollwood – Lake Bluff Joint Fire / EMS Concept ProposalUploaded byJonah Meadows