Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Charges
(,IT554.I
Case 2:14-cr-00558-SDW Document 77 Filed 01/19/18 Page 2 of 9 PageID: 223
that a guilty plea in this matter is not entered for any reason
or the judgment of Conviction entered as a result of this guilty
plea does not remain in full force and effect, defendant agrees
that any dismissed charges and any other charges that are not
timebarred by the applicable statute of limitations on the date
this agreemei is signed by Michael Sorrentiio may be commenced
against him, notwithstanding the expiration of the limitations
period after Michael Sorrentino signs the agreement
Sentencing
2
6177554j
Case 2:14-cr-00558-SDW Document 77 Filed 01/19/18 Page 3 of 9 PageID: 224
resti tutio n t
amoun shall be paid according to a plan established
by the Court. The Court will order Michael Sorrentino to pay
restitution to the IRS, either directly as part of the sentence
or as a condition of supervised release. The IRS will use the
resti tutio n orde as the basis for a civil assessment.
r See 26
U.S.C. § 6201 (a) (4). Michael Sorrentino does not have the right
to challenge the amount of this assessment. See 26 U.S.C. §
6201 (a) (4) (C)
. Neither the existence of a restitution payment
schedule nor Michael Sorrentino’s timely payment of restitution
according to that schedule will preclude the IRS from
administrative collection of the restitution—based assessment,
including levy and distraint under 26 U.S.C. § 6331.
Stipulations
of APpea] and P
quences
ation Conse
ns
rProvi5io
5
(,177554
Case 2:14-cr-00558-SDW Document 77 Filed 01/19/18 Page 6 of 9 PageID: 227
UI
a: Li
U UI [I) UI
o ii U
rI Li
UI IL UI UI
10 (ELi In
jUI
UI UI El UI. :4
FE UI C) .3 I)
Li •g)ai
UI >1 1-) ° 4.4 1W
(El UI UI Li \NL 0 0
Li
UI UI UI
UI
UI
U °c? i
‘V
Li
UIw
UI a) UI UI
U
0
FE cn
4:( Li
/ I UI UI UI
UI 4? UI UI 44 UI \‘ I UI Eli UI El UI
aH
‘.
UI UI UI UI \/4;ID / H UI ‘ UIUJç)
UI UIH H Un o UI crj
UI UI UI UI 4? Li UI UI UI
ElI UI El El
UI FE UI
El UI
4 UI
1 !
Li V \,‘Li
Li CE rl
4? UI> H
raw
UI
ai ci UI
4\
UI N
HUI fr Li44, ‘
H V UI UI
UI UI
F UI Sq H H aIx
UI (1UI % CIUI
4
5’ UI
UI
UI U UI
!t4 LI
Nt In’
4? (1144 44
4’ UI
Li (4 nI H UI
rI V UI
UI Wi ID rl rl
N
UI Ip UI U Li
LiQ UI
UI Cl UI UI ‘LI
4? UI C) 4?
rl ‘44 UI
LiLI UIUI
UIUI 4
rDr H
UI ElUIli UI
U V UI El I,
uUI44 > U H
UI 44 UI LI Li UI
Li UI H H
UI Cl UI UI V UI H UI
UI UI UI UI Si UI ID .zCl
UI UIHØI UI :0
UI Li 4: UI Cli :44 :0
:4?
UI UI Li U
UI UI UI UI UI LI, UI
b
11
En UI j 4?
UIUI V N QIl4
(lIE!)
UI’ 0 UI UI UI o (Li UI cn
UI Cli Li UI UI ow
UI H UI0 40 4? U’ H
IL) rUI [Li (1) H Cli 11)
h UI UI — Li UI U
Ii UI UI H Mi 0 444
CI 4? UI V Li UI UI 4? tdUI
U UI UI rI ol rI UI (Cl ‘H UI
d UI a. 0 .1!) UI
•TH.
Case 2:14-cr-00558-SDW Document 77 Filed 01/19/18 Page 7 of 9 PageID: 228
Date:
Michael Sorrentino
Date:
E. Klingeman, Esq.
7
(l7554j
Case 2:14-cr-00558-SDW Document 77 Filed 01/19/18 Page 8 of 9 PageID: 229
Schedule A
3. The parties agree that the intended tax loss for tax
evasion for 2011 is $123,913, which results in a Base Offense
Level of 16, pursuart to U.S.S.G. §5 2Tl.1(a) (1) and 2T4.1(F).
8
I(177554.l
Case 2:14-cr-00558-SDW Document 77 Filed 01/19/18 Page 9 of 9 PageID: 230
9
16177554.1