Professional Documents
Culture Documents
d2 r d 2 xi
m = F (r) or, in component form, m = Fi (r). (1)
dt2 dt2
If the values of the six dynamical variables (x1 , x2 , x3 , ẋ1 , ẋ2 , ẋ3 ), are given at
some initial instant of time t0 , and the force F (r) is known, Eq. (1) can be
solved (in principle), to find the values of these variables at any later instant
of time t > t0 . We say that the instantaneous state of the particle is specified
by the values of these six variables, namely, three coordinates and three velocity
components. Why is the state of the particle given by six dynamical variables
rather than just the three coordinates? Because Eq. (1) are three, in general
coupled, second-order differential equations in time. Therefore we need to
specify the initial values of the coordinates (x1 , x2 , x3 ) of the particle as well as
its velocity components (ẋ1 , ẋ2 , ẋ3 ), in order to obtain a unique solution at all
subsequent instants of time.
Instead of using the velocity components one may use the momentum com-
ponents. Note that the equations of motion Eq. (1) can be equivalently written
as
dr p dp
= , = F (r). (2)
dt m dt
The differential equations are now first-order but there are now six in general
coupled differential equations. Integrating each of these gives the six arbitrary
constants that can be associated with the initial conditions of three initial position
components and three initial momentum components. Writing given higher-order
differential equations in terms of first order differential equations by introducing
other dynamical variables (such as momentum above) is a general and useful
1
technique for further analysis. Also note that although we have indicated F (r)
as the force it can at this be dependent time or velocity/momentum. For ex-
ample the case of the forced and dampled harmonic oscillator requires such a
generalization.
Using the momentum instead of velocity may seem a decorative move, but its
significance cannot be overestimated and leads to the view of classical mechanics,
in the absence of dissipation, as an incompressible flow in an abstract but
physically crucial space which we now introduce. It is very convenient to imagine
that the six dynamical variables (r, p) or more explicitly (x1 , x2 , x3 , p1 , p2 , p3 )
constitute a space called the phase space of the system. The instantaneous
state of the system is then given by a point in this phase space. As time
progresses, the variables change in accordance with Eq. (2). The initial point in
phase space traces out a path called the phase trajectory of the particle.
We emphasise strongly once again that the initial values of both xi and pi
must be specified independently, in order to obtain a unique solution to the
equation of motion. Only after solving Eq. (2) with the specified initial values,
do we get xi (t) and pi (t) as a function of t. Different initial conditions lead, in
general, to different phase trajectories. The complete set of phase trajectories of
the particle is called its phase portrait.
All these ideas can be carried over to more complicated systems. For instance,
a system consisting of N particles requires 3N coordinate components to specify
the locations of all the particles. Together with the 3N corresponding velocities,
or momenta, there are 6N dynamical variables. Each phase trajectory of the
system is a one-dimensional curve in a 6N -dimensional phase space.
A rigid body requires only 6 independent coordinates to specify its location
in space: 3 to specify the location of its centre of mass, and 3 to specify its
orientation with respect to any fixed set of coordinate axes. The phase space of a
rigid body is therefore 12-dimensional, no matter how many particles it is made
up of.
2
p
D
A
3
time taken to traverse the closed curve once. We will use this fact in what
follows.
The general nature of phase trajectories even for a single particle in 6 dimen-
sional phase space can be very complex, with a combination of orbits that are
periodic and those that are non-periodic, with the latter sometimes dominating.
The non-periodic phase trajectories can be so complicated and appear to be so
irregular that they are sometimes called “chaotic”, a topic that is “out of syl-
labus”, but which you can learn about in more advanced and specialized courses.
We now turn to the simplest case when the phase space is two-dimensional and
where there can be non-periodic motion, but no chaos!
dx d2 x dx
m 2
= F (x), (4)
dt dt dt
and realize that 2
dx d2 x
1d dx
= . (5)
dt dt2 2 dt dt
It would be nice if the RHS of Eq. (4) too can be written as a derivative of time.
Towards this end define a function V (x) such that
dV (x)
F (x) = − . (6)
dx
Note that this can always be done for any function F (x) as V (x) is nothing but
(the negative) its integral. Therefore
d dx d dx
− V (x) = − V (x) = F (x). (7)
dt dt dx dt
4
Using Eq. (5) and Eq. (7) in Eq. (4) yeilds
2 !
d 1 dx
m + V (x) = 0. (8)
dt 2 dt
Thus the quantity within the brackets must be a constant, independent of time,
but dependent on initial conditions. Denoting this as E, we get
2
1 dx
m + V (x) = E. (9)
2 dt
If the initial speed is x˙0 and initial position is x0 then
1
E = mx˙0 2 + V (x0 ). (10)
2
Although the position and speed with change with time, the combination in
Eq. (9) will remain the same. The physical interpretation of the E is that it is
the total energy, while of course the first term in the kinetic energy and V (x) is
the potential energy. The somewhat odd negative sign in the definition of V (x)
is to ensure that the total energy is defined as the sum of these two quantities.
The simple harmonic oscillator has the potential function V (x) = kx2 /2, while
the simple pendulum has the potential
Z Z
V (θ) = − F (θ)dθ = (mg/l) sin θdθ = −(mg/l) cos θ + C = (mg/l)(1 − cos θ).
(11)
Here C is a constant of integration chosen so that at θ = 0, when the pendulum
is at the bottom of its circular path, the potential energy is zero. Notice that
as we want to treat uniformly different problems with the equation in Eq. (net-
wononedim), we have taken F (θ) = −(mg/l) sin θ which differs from the force
acting on the pendulum which is lF (θ) and the potential V (θ) differs from the
potential energy by the factor l2 , that is the actual potential energy is l2 V (θ).
We will see what happens in higher dimensions later, but suffices to mention
here that the existence of a potential energy function places much stricter con-
ditions on the force and these are called conservative forces. Also note that if
the force is a also a function of time, say F (x, t), while it is possible to define a
time dependent potential energy V (x, t) such that
∂V (x, t)
F (x, t) = − ,
∂x
the sum of the kinetic and this potential energy is not a constant: the time
varying potential energy renders the total energy a variable. For example, the
forced harmonic oscillator with the force
5
admits the potential energy
1
V (x, t) = kx2 − xF0 cos ωt. (13)
2
With general potentials and time dependent forces, motion in one-dimension
could itself be complex, for example a forced pendulum could become “chaotic”.
We therefore concentrate on the case when the force is not explicity dependent
on time, the autonomous case. The conservation of energy, which we have shown,
is actually sufficient to “solve” the problem of such one-dimensional motion in
the following sense. The phase space in this case has just two dimensions. The
equation Eq. (9) can be written using momentum instead of speed as
1 2
p + V (x) = E. (14)
2m
This represents a curve in the (x, p) phase plane, which is nothing but the phase
trajectory. Of course, to find x(t) explicitly as a function of t, we do have to solve
the equation of motion.
6
The equilibrium point at (θ∗ = π, θ̇∗ = 0) corresponds to the pendulum being
at rest at the bottom, while the two equilibirum points at (θ∗ = π, θ̇∗ = 0) and
(θ∗ = −π, θ̇∗ = 0) are really one and the same and correspond to the pendulum
being at rest in the inverted position.
It is important to note that equilibrium states refer to states or points
in phase space, and not merely in coordinate space. For example, in the
case of linear harmonic oscillator, if x = 0 but ẋ 6= 0, we do not have a state of
equilibrium – rather, we merely have an instant at which the oscillator is passing
through the centre of oscillation. In all the systems we shall consider, however,
the total energy will be of the form in Eq. (9), or equivalently the equations of
motion will be of the form Eq. (15). Hence states of equilibrium automatically
correspond to points in phase space at which
1. all velocities (or momenta) are zero, together with the condition that
We shall therefore occasionally omit stating the former condition explicitly when
referring to states of equilibrium, but this is to be implicitly understood.
If the state of equilibrium corresponds to a minimum of V (x), say at some
point x = x∗ , it is easy to see that the force −dV /dx in the immediate neigh-
bourhood of this point, on both sides of it, is always directed towards this point.
When displaced slightly from x = x∗ , the particle will tend to return to this point.
(Hence the term, “restoring” force.) We then have a state of stable equilib-
rium at x = x∗ , p = p∗ = 0. The point x∗ = 0, p∗ = 0 (i.e., the origin) in the
phase plane of the simple harmonic oscillator is an example of such a state.
If the state of equilibrium x = x∗ corresponds to a maximum of V (x), it
is again easy to see that the force −dU/dx in the immediate neighbourhood of
x = x∗ is directed away from this point on either side of it. An infinitesimal
displacement from x = x∗ therefore causes the particle to move away from this
point. Therefore x = x∗ , p = p∗ = 0 is a state of unstable equilibrium.
The “inverted parabola” potential V (x) = −(1/2)kx2 (where k > 0 as before)
provides a simple example of this situation. No periodic motion is possible in
such a potential. In this case the origin in the phase plane (x = 0, p = 0) is a
state of unstable equilibrium.
Another important example is the simple pendulum where it follows that
(θ∗ = 0, p∗ = 0) is a stable equilibrium point, while (θ∗ = π, p∗ = 0) or (θ∗ =
−π, p∗ = 0) is an unstable equilibrium point.
Now consider a general potential V (x), with a simple extremum (either a
minimum or a maximum) at the point x = x∗ . Expanding V (x) in a Taylor
series about x = x∗ we have, correct to second order in (x − x∗ ),
V 00 (x∗ )
V (x) = V (x∗ ) + (x − x∗ ) V 0 (x∗ ) + (x − x∗ )2 + ··· (16)
2!
7
VHxL
x
-3 -2 -1 1 2 3
-1
-2
-3
-4
8
VHxL
20
10
x
-3 -2 -1 1 2 3
-10
-20
Figure 3: The cubic potential V (x) = x3 with a point of inflection at the origin.
Dynamically a stationary particle at the origin is unstable.
9
VHxL
6 ¥ ¥
4
L
3
x
1 2 3 4
potential (Fig. ( 4)) shows immediately that the force is directed towards x = 0
at points to the right of it, but away from x = 0 at points to its left. Hence x = 0
behaves like a minimum of the potential for small displacements to its right, but
like a maximum for small displacements to its left. Stable equilibrium, however,
is obtained only if there is a restoring force for a small displacement in
each and every direction. It is thus clear that inflection points can only lead
to unstable equilibrium states in the one-dimensional case.
Apart from free motion, neutral equilibrium is possible in one-dimensional
motion only if we allow non-smooth potentials. One common model used in
physics for many situtaions is that of a particle that is free to move in some
region, but when it hits the boundary of the region it experiences an infinite
potential that it is unable to penetrate. One dimensional “wells”, studied in
first courses on quantum mechanics is of this kind with the particle say bouncing
freely between two walls, see Fig. (5). In this case all states with p = 0 are states
of neutral equilbrium. Higher dimensional generalizations of such potentials are
also very useful and well studied, for example in two dimensions, you may think
of a billiard table.
10
Using p = m dx/dt leads to
dx p
m = ± 2m(E − V (x)). (24)
dt
The two signs of momentum or velocity imply that for a give position and en-
ergy there are two possible directions of motion with the same magntitude of
momentum.
The ± sign above may seem more like a minor irritant than an important
feature. Not only is periodic motion possible because of this, it is also responsible
for any type of non-monotonic behavior in the coordinate x(t) or momentum p(t)
as a function of time t. Indeed if only one sign say + sign is chosen, then dx/dt ≥ 0
for all time and x(t) can only increase with time, and if the sign is always −, it
can only decrease all the time: but with the signs switching at the turning points,
x(t) can be non-monotonic and lead to periodic orbits as well.
Say in some time interval p > 0, and the particle goes from x0 at time t0 to
x1 at time t1 . Then we have as a consequence of the above that
Z t1 Z x1 r
dx p m dx
m = 2m(E − V (x)), or dt = p . (25)
dt t0 x0 2 (E − V (x))
This in principle solves the problem as it tells us how to find the position at a later
time from a knowledge of the initial position. Note that the initial momentum
is implicitly specified through the energy. The integral may not be solvable in
terms of known standard mathematical functions, but the problem is considered
solved or “integrated”.
When V (x) = E, the momentum vanishes and the particle “turns” and these
turning points are important. If there are two solutions to the equation V (x) = E,
then these two turning points are such that the particle performs oscillations
between these at energy E. These oscillations are not in general “harmonic”,
but are periodic oscillations nevertheless. See the figure where the turning points
are marked as A and B for some trajectory whose energy is indicated by the
horizontal line. Let the coordinates here be xA and xB . Then the time to go
from A to B is Z xB r
m dx
TA→B = p . (26)
xA 2 (E − V (x))
Note that the time to go from B back to A, the “return journey” is
Z xA r
m −dx
TB→A = p = TA→B . (27)
xB 2 (E − V (x))
The momentum is negative on this part and we take the negative sign in Eq. (23).
Thus the time to go on the return journey, actually any segment of it, is equal
11
VHxL
4
A
B
3
x
-2 -1 1 2
Figure 6: Example of a potential energy graph with the horizontal line indicating
a specific energy for which the turning points are marked A and B.
to that of the forward. Thus the time period of the periodic motion is
Z xB r
m dx
T =2 p . (28)
xA 2 (E − V (x))
12
The integral in the final equation is just a numerical constant(≈ 1.31). The point
to note is the dependence of T on the total energy. It decreases with increasing
energy, or equivalently amplitude xB .
Example 3: The (not so simple?) simple pendulum: While the small angle
approximation leads to simple harmonic motions, large amplitude oscillatons are
far from simple harmonic. Recall that the equation of motion is
d2 θ g
+ sin θ = 0,
dt2 l
and the energy equation is
2
1 2 dθ
ml + mgl(1 − cos θ) = mgl(1 − cos θ0 ), (31)
2 dt
where θ0 is the maximum angle to which the pendulum rises, in other words it is
the amplitude. Thus the time period is
s Z s Z
2l θ0 dθ 2l θ0 dθ
T = √ =2 √ . (32)
g −θ0 cos θ − cos θ0 g 0 cos θ − cos θ0
It is left as an exercise for you to check that in the small angle approximation
cos θ ≈ 1 − θ2 /2, the above leads to the well-known result for the time period
of small oscillations. As cos θ is large for small amplitude oscillations, we would
like to go to some quantity that is small for small oscillations. Hence use cos A =
1 − 2 sin2 (A/2) for both the cosines to get
s Z θ0
l 1 dθ
T =2 s . (33)
g sin(θ0 /2) 0 sin2 (θ/2)
1−
sin2 (θ0 /2)
Now change variable according to sin x = sin(θ/2)/ sin(θ0 /2). Note that RHS is
less than or equal to 1 in modulus and hence x is real. The time period of the
simple pendulum can then be written as
s Z
π/2
l dx
T =4 p , (34)
g 0 1 − κ2 sin2 x
where κ = sin(θ0 /2) is the only parameter and depends on the amplitude. It is
easy to derive the small angle approximation from this by simply setting κ = 0.
However this simplified form for the time period is also exactly evaluated as an
elliptic integral of the first kind. This is not an “elementary function” but
is a well-studied and important mathematical function which arose historically
13
T
T0
8
0 Θ0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Figure 7: The scaled ptime period of a simple pendulum (T /T0 , where T is the
period, and T0 = 2π l/g) as a function of the amplitude θ0 . It starts from
1, which is the small angle approximation and increases goes to infinity as the
amplitude approaches π.
from the problem of determining the perimeter of an ellipse (hence the “elliptic”).
In fact the definition of the complete elliptic integral K(κ) is
Z π/2
dx
K(κ) = p , (35)
0 1 − κ2 sin2 x
and hence the time period of the simple pendulum is given exactly by
s
l
T =4 K (sin(θ0 /2)) . (36)
g
Of course this maybe considered to be of little use, as we may not know the
properties of K(κ). Fortunately it is well tabulated and used. Consider the
dimensionless ratio T /T0 where T0 is the small oscillation period:
r
T T g 2
= = K (sin(θ0 /2)) . (37)
T0 2π l π
Fig. (7) shows T /T0 as a function of the initial angle when 0 ≤ θ0 ≤ π. The
horizontal line at 1 is the small angle approximation. It is quite clear that for
larger angles the period substantially deviates from the small angle approximation
and increases to infinity as the amplitude tends to π. Note that in contrast
14
to the quartic oscillator whose period decreased with amplitude or energy, here
the period diverges all the way to infinity!
This is due to the existence of the unstable equilibrium point at θ0 = π. Indeed
we have seen earlier that motion near this unstable equilibrium point will have
solutions that are either exponentially increasing or decreasing with time. But we
can do better: we can solve exactly the equation of motion for a pendulum that
has the same energy as the equilibrium point, which is 2mgl. Actually there are
three distinct trajectories having this same energy: one that is exactly at
the equilibrium point, whose initial energy is all potential. This does not change,
it is alwatys at θ = π and p = 0. Other two are “dynamic” ones, which at
some time is at the bottom, θ = 0, with all the energy 2mgl being kinetic. The
distinction between these two dynamic orbits is the sense of rotation, one is going
clockwise, while the other anticlockwise. That these are really two and not one
should become clear soon. These dynamic trajectories can be exactly solved for
as follows.
The orbits which have just enough energy to reach the top (E = 2mgl), will
be such that 2
1 2 dθ
ml + mgl(1 − cos θ) = 2mgl, (38)
2 dt
or 2
1 2 dθ
ml = mgl(1 + cos θ) = 2mgl cos2 (θ/2). (39)
2 dt
Taking the positive squareroot corresponds to the pendulum moving upwards in
the anticlockwise sense and gives
r
dθ g
=2 cos(θ/2). (40)
dt l
This can happily be integrated, and let us take the time t = 0 at the bottom of
the orbit, that is θ(0) = 0, then (fill in the details)
√
θ(t) = 4 tan−1 (et g/l ) − π. (41)
Indeed this satisfies the initial condition, but more importantly it shows that as
t → ∞, θ(t) → π, and for all other times the angle is less than π. Thus the
orbit asymptotically approaches the equilibrium point. The fact that it
does not reach it in a finite time is also a consequence of the no intersection rule
we have mentioned earlier: The equilibrium point (π, 0) is itself an orbit and
cannot be intersected by another. The third orbit with this energy corresponds
to taking the negative squareroot and leads to the solution
√
θ(t) = 4 tan−1 (e−t g/l ) − π, (42)
which approaches −π asymptotically. Thus we have solved for all the three types
of motion for energy E = 2mgl and seen that the dynamic orbits take an infinite
15
time to reach the equilibrium point. It is now reasonable that for orbits that have
slightly smaller energy than 2mgl there will be oscillations but with very large
periods.
While we have explicitly integrated the large amplitude orbit that corresponds
to E = 2mgl, we cannot do so for any other energy exactly using ele-
mentary functions. Also notice that at this special energy there are really no
oscillations. This singular orbit separates two types of motion: those with energy
less than 2mgl, which oscillate as usual (referred to sometimes as ”librations”),
and those with energy greater than 2mgl, which rotate fully in either clockwise
or anticlockwise directions (referred to as ”rotations”). Thus the dynamic orbits
with E = 2mgl are called separatrices.
For energies that are different from 2mgl the exact solutions are in terms of
Jacobi elliptic functions which are fascinating doubly periodic functions of a
complex variable in general, but is outside the scope of this course. Suffice to say
that the Jacobi elliptic functions generalize both the trignometric functions as well
as the hyperbolic functions, and appear as solutions to a very broad number of
nonlinear differential equations including that of the quartic oscillator mentioned
previously! Thus we see that the simple pendulum has in it a rich source of a
lot of new behaviours, when compared to the simple harmonic oscillator, and
indeed any perturbations or modifications of the pendulum often render it very
”nonsimple”.
These results helps illustrate a very important fact:
• Except for the simple harmonic motion, the time period of pe-
riodic motion generally depends on the total energy (or, equiva-
lently, on the amplitude of oscillation).
16
The phase trajectories for a given energy E are horizontal straight lines with
p = constant. There are two such lines for every energy E, with positive and
negative momenta. The physical interpretations are evident. These phase space
H0, 0L x
Figure 8: A few phase space trajectories for the case of free motion. The thick
line at p = 0 is filled with neutrally stable equilibrium points. The sense of flow
in time is indicated by the arrows.
17
that these equilibrium points are neutral in character. Shifting a particle with
zero momentum from “here” to “there” renders it still sitting in the new position.
Hence unlike simple harmonic motion, the period is dependent on the energy and
is proportion to E −1/2 and decreases with energy. The interval with p = 0, 0 ≤
x ≤ L is an interval of neutral fixed points.
3 3
p p
2 2
p= 2mE p= 2mE
1 1
x x
0 0
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
-1 -1
L
-3 -3
While phase space and the “conjugate” variables (x, p) form the gateway from
classical to modern physics, such as quantum mechanics, statistical mechanics
and so on, it is perhaps easy to point out here one simple application without
18
going into details. Consider the simple phase space trajectory of a paticle in well
shown the right Fig. (9).
Let A be the area enclosed by the phase space trajectory, the area of the
shaded rectangle whose width√is the length of the well
√ or the distance between the
walls, L and the breadth is 2 2mE. Thus A = 2L 2mE. Quantum mechanics
asserts that such areas cannot take any possible value, but must be an integer
multiple of h, Planck’s constant. This leads to
√ n2 h2
2L 2mE = nh, or E = , n = 1, 2, · · · . (46)
8mL2
Exactly the same result is obtained from Schrodinger’s equation, that the energy
is quantized as above. Historically Bohr first used such a scheme to derive levels
of the hydrogen atom, more than 10 years before Schrodinger developed equations
that go by his name. Bohr was motivated to consider the area in phase space as
it has a classical dynamics significance as an action that does not change under
small perturbations of the system. While we will study a slightly different action
later on, the exact details of the connection between Schrodinger equation and
the Bohr approach is outside the scope of this course. Note that dimensionally
Planck constant is same as that of area of phase space.
19
as looking at the first quadrant where x, p > 0 we see that dx/dt > 0 and
dp/dt < 0, thus the position increases, while the momentum decreases and hence
the sense of motion must be clockwise. This is consistent with the other three
quadrants as well, as you may now check. All phase trajectories in this example
4 p
x
-4 -2 2 4
-2
-4
Figure 10: Some phase space trajectories of a harmonic oscillator. These are
ellipses and the center is the stable fixed point. The sense of flow in time is
indicated by the arrows.
are closed and hence represent periodic motion. The point (x = 0, p = 0) is the
only equilibrium or fixed point and is stable. The period has already been
calculated above and is independent of energy.
The area enclosed by a phase space orbitp is the√area of an ellipse with half
axes
p a and b and is therefore A = π a b = π 2E/K 2mE = 2π E/ω where ω =
K/m is the angular frequency. Thus Bohr’s rule applied here gives 2πE/ω =
nh or En = nh̄ω, where n is an integer, En denotes corresponding energy and
h̄ = h/(2π). This is very close to the exact quantum energies given by En =
(n + 1/2)h̄ω. The missing “zero-point” energy given by h̄ω/2 is considered to
be a quantum effect that is not captured by this approximation. Classically we
emphasize that all the energies are allowed and each phase space trajectory is an
ellipse for the harmonic oscillator.
20
6.4 The simple pendulum phase space
1.0
Rotations Librations
0.5
-Π Π
-3 -2 -1 1 2 3
-0.5
-1.0
Figure 11: A few phase space trajectories of the simple pendulum. The two ends
at θ = ±π are to be identified with each other. There is a stable fixed point at
(00) and an unstable one at (π, 0). The dynamic orbits with energy 2mgl are
marked by thicker lines. Trajectories insides these are oscillations or “librations”
and have energy < 2mgl, while those outside have energy > 2mgl and undergo
rotations.
21
earlier, when E < 2mgl there are oscillations or “librations”. For small ampli-
tudes when cos θ ≈ 1 − θ2 /2 the energy equation is approximately an ellipse, but
strictly speaking it is not, and with increasing amplitude it most certainly is not.
The phase space curves have no special geometric names.
Unstable fixed
point
0.5
Anticlockwise swing
-3 -2 -1 1 2 3
-Π Π
Clockwise swing
-0.5
Figure 12: Just the three orbits with energy E = 2mgl are shown. The first are
the fixed points at (±π, 0) which is just one point and corresponds to teh pen-
dulum being upright and still. Another the upper curve has positive momentum
and corresponds to a pendulum that swings anticlockwise and takes an infinite
time to reach the fixed point. The third is the lower curve and corresponds to a
clockwise swing. Notice that these orbits seem to intersect, but do not as they
never reach the fixed point. Eq. (51) gives the form of these curves.
For example the orbits with exactly the energy E = 2mgl are given by the
curves p
pθ = ±2ml gl cos(θ/2) (51)
The positive sign corresponds to the anticlockwise swing of the pendulum that
asymptotically reaches the unstable equilibrium point at (π, 0), while the negative
sign to the clockwise swing of the same nature. Fig. (12) shows and discusses
these in detail.
22