SOIL STABILIZATION USING LIGNIN AND BIO-ENZYMES

SIT1 AIM1 NADIA BINTI MOHD YUSOFF

A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the

requirement for the award of the Degree of
Master of Civil Engineering

Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia

APRIL 2015
 ABSTRACT

Common stabilization techniques for soils to improve strength and durability

properties often rely on cement, lime, fly ash, and asphalt emulsion. Stabilization of
soil with terrazyme and lignin is a very new method to improve the geotechnical
properties of the soil. Terrazyme are liquid additives, which act on the soil to reduce
the voids between soil particles and to minimize the absorbance of water to the soil
particles to maximize compaction. The effectiveness of terrazyme and lignin depends
on the types of soil and the amount of stabilizer used. In this present study, the
effectiveness of terrazyme and lignin in stabilizing the different types of soils was
investigated through laboratory investigations. Each of the additives tested were
designed to mix with the soil to improve the texture, increase strength and reduce swell
characteristic. Laterite, kaolin and peat were used as the base soil to investigate the
geotechnical properties and treated with variable enzyme dosages. The results
presented herein were analyzed in terms of Unconfmed Compressive Strength (UCS)
testing. The strength parameter of the stabilized soil has been evaluated after curing
periods of 0,7, 15,21 and 30 days. Changes in California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value
were monitored after mixing the soil with 2% and 5% additives. The laboratory tests
showed, for laterite the higher dosage of both lignin and terrazyme gave higher
maximum dry density (MDD) and decreased the optimum moisture content (OMC).
Meanwhile for kaolin and peat, both additives did not produced significant effect on
both the MDD and the OMC. Then for strength properties, 2% lignin and terrazyrne
showed the best improvement in strength tests over a 30-day curing period. The CBR
value for stabilized laterite were founded that terrazyme gave a higher CBR value than
lignin. Meanwhile for kaolin, 2% terrazyme gave the higher CBR value among other
treated kaolin. Lastly for peat, 2% dosage of lignin and terrazyme were found
effective, after gave a higher CBR value. But, after comparing stabilized peat and
kaolin with the control sample, it can be concluded that lignin and terrazyme is not
suitable to use for stabilizing peat and kaolin.

Keyword: Laterite, Kaolin, Peat, Terrazyme, Lignin, Unconfined Compressive Test,

California Bearing Ratio
 vii

ABSTRAK

Teknik penstabilan tanah menggunakan bahan tambah seperti simen, kapur,

fly ash, dan asfalt emulsi sering digunakan untuk kaedah penstabilan tanah.
Penstabilan tanah dengan terrazyme dan lignin adalah satu kaedah yang sangat baru
dan dapat meningkatkan ciri-ciri geoteknik tanah. Terrazyme adalah bahan tambah
cecair, yang bertindak ke atas tanah untuk mengurangkan lompang di antara zarah-
zarah tanah dan mengurangkan kadar serapan air pada zarah tanah untuk
memaksimumkan pemadatan. Keberkesanan Terrazyme dan Lignin bergantung
kepada jumlah bahan tarnbah yang digunakan. Di daIam kajian ini, keberkesanan dua
bahan tambah dalam menstabilkan tanah telah diuji melalui ujian makmal. Dua jenis
bahan tambah yang digunakan daIam kajian ini ialah Terrazyme dan Lignin. Setiap
satu daripada bahan tambahan diuji dengan mencampurkan bahan tambah tersebut
bersama dengan tanah untuk meningkatkan tekstur, meningkatkan kekuatan. Laterite,
kaolin dan tanah gambut telah digunakan sebagai tanah asas untuk mengkaji ciri
geoteknikal. Keputusan yang dibentangkan di sini dianalisis dari segi Ujian Terkurung
Mampatan (UCT). Kekuatan parameter tanah yang stabil telah dinilai selepas
pengawetan tempoh 0, 7, 15, 21 dan 30 hari. Perubahan Nisbah Galas California
(CBR) juga dinilai selepas mencampurkan tanah dengan 2% dan 5% bahan tambah.
Keputusan ujian pemadatan menunjukkan untuk tanah laterite, dos yang lebih tinggi
daripada lignin dan terrazyme memberikan keturnpatan kering maksimum yang lebih
tinggi (MDD) dan kandungan lembapan optimum telah berkurang (OMC). Sementara
itu, bagi kaolin dan tanah gambut, kedua-dua bahan tambahan tidak menghasilkan
kesan yang besar ke atas MDD dan OMC. Kemudian untuk sifat-sifat kekuatan , 2 %
lignin dan terrazyme menunjukkan peningkatan terbaik dalarn ujian kekuatan untuk
tempoh 30 hari tempoh pengawetan. Nilai CBR untuk laterit yang di stabilkan oleh
terrazyme memberikan nilai CBR yang lebih tinggi daripada lignin. Sementara itu,
bagi kaolin , 2 % terrazyme memberikan nilai CBR yang lebih tinggi daripada 2%
lignin,2% terrazyme dan 5% terrazyme. Akhir sekali untuk tanah gambut ,2 % dos
lignin dan terrazyme didapati berkesan , selepas memberikan nilai CBR yang tinggi.
Tetapi, selepas membandingkan keputusan ujian CBR tanah gambut dan kaolin
dengan sarnpel kawalan, dapat disimpulkan bahawa lignin dan terrazyme tidak sesuai
digunakan untuk menstabilkan tanah gambut dan kaolin .
 REFERENCES

Abass, I. K. (2013). Studying some of the Geotechnical Properties of Stabilized Iraqi

Clayey Soils. Journal of Engineering and Technology,Vo1. 3 1, Part (A), No.
6,pp.1117-1130
Abbas, A. J., & Cabili, J., (20 12). The Feasibility of Jackfruit Peeling as a binder to
whiteware plastic mass (A. Heterophylla). Research Paper MSU-Iligan
Institute of Technology.
Addo, J. Q., Sanders, T. G., & Chenard, M. (2004). Road Dust Suppression: Effect
on Maintenance Stability, Safely and the Environment, Phases 1-3 (No. MPC
Report No. 04- 156).
Adinugroho, W. C., Suryadiputra, I. N. N., Saharjo, B. H., & Siboro, L.,
(2005). Manual for the control offire in peatlands andpeatland forest. wahyu
catur adinugroho.
Agarwal, P., & Kaur, S. (2014). Effect of Bio-enzyme stabilization on unconfined
compressive strength of expansive soil. International Journal of Research in
-Engineering and techno log^, pp 3 0-3 1.
America e1ements.com (20 15j, Kaolin. Retrieved November 17,2014 from,
http://www.americanelements.com/Kaolin.html
Amu, 0. 0. & Salami, B. A., (2010). Effect of common salt on some engineering
Properties of Eggshell Stabilized Lateritic Soil. Asian Research Publishing
Network (ARPN).Vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 64-73.
Ashuro, T., (2010). Performance of Unconventional Soil Stabilizers in Stabilization
of Sub-standard Materialsfor Road Subgrade and Subbase. Addis Ababa
University, Ethiopia; Degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering Thesis.
Baghini, M. S., Ismail, A., Karim, M. R. B., Shokri, F., & Firoozi, A. A. (201'4).
Physical and mechanical properties of carboxylated styrene-butadiene
emulsion-modifiedPortland cement used in road base construction. Retrieved
April 22,2014 from htt~://downloads.hindawi.com/iournals/tswi/raa517053.~df
Bartley, P. A., (201 1). Experimental Investigation of the Sand-Stabilization
Potential ofa Plant Derived Biomass. M.S. Thesis. Kansas State University.
Bhattacharja, S., Bhatty, J.I. (2003). Comparative performance of the Portland
cement and lime stabilization of moderate to high plasticity soils, Portland
cement association.
Bhuvaneshwari, S., Robinson, R. G., & Gandhi, S. R. (2005). Stabilization of
expansive soils using fly ash. Fly Ash India, 8,5-1.
Boobathiraja. S., Balamurugan. P., Dhanheer. M., & Adhikari. A., (2014). Study on
Strength of Peat Soil Stabilised with Cement and Other Pozzolanic Materials.
International Journal of Civil Engineering Research, ISSN 2278-3652 Volume
5, Number 4 (2014), pp. 43 1-438.
Bose, B. (2012). Geo-engineering properties of expansive soil stabilized with fly
ash. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 17, 1339-1353.
Brandon, T. L., Brown, J. J., Daniels, W. L., Defazio, T., Fliz, G. M., Mitchell, J. K.,
Musselman, J., & Forsha, C., (2009). Rapid stabilization/ polymerization of
wet clay soils. Reportfor Air Force research L a b o r a t o ~USA.
;
BS 1377, Part 1 (1990). Stabilized materials for civil engineering purposes-General
requirements, sampling, sample preparation and test on material before
stabilization. British Standards Institution, London. UK.
BS 1377, Part 2 (1990). Soil for civil engineering purposes-Classification test.
British Standards Institution, London. UK.
BS 1377, Part 3 (1990). Soil for civil engineering purposes-Chemical and
electrochemical test. British Standards Institution, London. UK.
BS 1377, Part 5 (1990). Cornpres~ibility~permeability
and durability test. British
Standards Institution, London. UK.
Bujang, B. H., Sina, K., A m , P., & Maassowneh, B. (201 1). State of an art review
of peat: General perspective. International Journal ofPhysical Sciences,6(8),
1988-1996.
Calbinder. (2001). Calbinder facts. Retrieved from July, 14, 2014, from
httr~://www.calfresno.com/calbinder.html
Cenciani, K., Freitas, S., Critter, S. A. M., & Airoldi, C. (20 11). Enzymatic activity
measured by microcalorimetry in soil amended with organic residues.Revista
Brasileiru de Ci&nciudo Solo, 35(4), 1167-1178.