You are on page 1of 5

NOTE

Kuncharoen et al., Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017;67:37–41


DOI 10.1099/ijsem.0.001566

Achromobacter aloeverae sp. nov., isolated from the root of Aloe


vera (L.) Burm.f.
Nattakorn Kuncharoen,1 Yuki Muramatsu,2 Chiyo Shibata,2 Yuki Kamakura,2 Yasuyoshi Nakagawa2 and
Somboon Tanasupawat1,*

Abstract
Two Gram-staining-negative, strictly aerobic, rod-shaped bacteria, designated strains AVA-1T and AVA-2, were isolated from
the root of Aloe vera (L.) Brum.f. derived from Chachoengsao Province, Thailand. The strains contained cytochrome oxidase
and catalase activities. They grew in 4 % (w/v) NaCl, at a pH range of 6.0–9.0 (optimally at pH 7) and at 20–42  C (optimally at
30–37  C). The major isoprenoid quinone was ubiquinone with eight isoprene units (Q-8). The major fatty acids were C16 : 0
and C17 : 0 cyclo. On the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, the strains represent a species belonging to the genus
Achromobacter and are closely related to Achromobacter xylosoxidans NBRC 15126T (98.80 %), Achromobacter insolitus LMG
6003T (98.64 %), Achromobacter aminicus LMG 26690T (98.59 %), Achromobacter pulmonis LMG 26696T (98.58 %) and
Achromobacter insuavis LMG 26845T (98.58 %). The DNA G+C content of strain AVA-1T was 66.5 mol%. The novel strains had
low DNA–DNA relatedness values with related type strains. On the basis of the phenotypic and genotypic data obtained, the
strains clearly represent a novel species, for which the name Achromobacter aloeverae sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain
is strain AVA-1T (=LMG 29108T=NBRC 111463T=PCU 352T=TISTR 2383T).

The genus Achromobacter, of the family Alcaligenaceae in Strains, AVA-1T and AVA-2 were isolated from a root of
the class b-Proteobacteria, was proposed by Yabuuchi and Aloe vera (L.) Burm.f. collected from Chachoengsao Prov-
Yano [1] and originally contained a single type species, Ach- ince, Thailand. The root was washed with tap water and
romobacter xylosoxidans. Yabuuchi et al. [2] transferred sonicated at 150 W. The surface sterilization method modi-
some species of the family Alcaligenaceae, such as Alcali- fied of Hallmann et al. [13] was used. The surface-sterilized
genes ruhlandii [3], Alcaligenes piechaudii [4] and Alcali- root was crushed with 2 ml Ringer’s solution in a sterile
genes denitrificans [5], to the genus Achromobacter based on mortar. The solution and the crushed root were spread on
a polyphasic taxonomic study. At the time of writing, 16 Starch Casein Agar medium [14] supplemented with 50 mg
species with validly published names belong to the genus l 1 of cycloheximide and 25 mg l 1 of penicillin and incu-
Achromobacter: Achromobacter xylosoxidans [6], Achromo- bated at 30  C for 1 week. Cultures of strains AVA-1T and
bacter ruhlandii and Achromobacter piechaudii [2], Achro- AVA-2 (=NBRC 111779) were obtained and they were sub-
mobacter denitrificans [7], Achromobacter insolitus and cultured on Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA, Difco) at 30  C. The cul-
Achromobacter spanius [8], Achromobacter marplatensis tures were preserved in tryptic soy broth (TSB, Difco) with
[9], Achromobacter animicus, Achromobacter mucicolens, 20 % (v/v) glycerol at 20  C and in ampoules as freeze-
Achromobacter pulmonis and Achromobacter spiritinus [10], dried cells.
Achromobacter insuavis, Achromobacter aegrifaciens, Achro-
mobacter anxifer and Achromobacter dolens [11] and Achro- Cell morphology was examined using cells grown on TSA at
mobacter sediminum [12]. In this article two strains are 30  C for 2 days. The Hucker and Conn [15] modification
described, AVA-1T and AVA-2, which are based on a poly- method was used for Gram staining. Flagella staining was
phasic taxonomic approach to their classification, represen- performed as previously described [16]. The morphology of
tatives of a novel species, Achromobacter aloeverae sp. nov., the cells was observed using a light microscope (Olympus
a seventeenth species of the genus Achromobacter. CH-2). Phenotypic characteristics (including catalase and

Author affiliations: 1Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330,
Thailand; 2NITE Biological Resource Center (NBRC), National Institute of Technology and Evaluation (NITE), 2-5-8 Kazusakamatari, Kisarazu, Chiba
292-0818, Japan.
*Correspondence: Somboon Tanasupawat, somboon.t@chula.ac.th
Keywords: Alcaligenaceae; b-proteobacteria; Achromobacter; plant root.
The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strains AVA-1T and AVA-2 are LC094463 and LC147657,
respectively.
Two supplementary figures are available with the online Supplementary Material.

001566 ã 2017 IUMS Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by


IP: 202.251.200.28
37
On: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 06:38:36
Kuncharoen et al., Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017;67:37–41

oxidase activities, and the ability to hydrolyse starch, casein, shaker at 30  C for 2 days. Isoprenoid quinones were
gelatin and Tweens 20, 40 and 80) were determined accord- extracted by the method of Collins et al. [18] and were ana-
ing to standard methods [17]. DNase activity was tested by lyzed by HPLC. For cellular fatty acid analysis, strains
using DNase agar (Difco). Anaerobic growth was tested by AVA-1T, AVA-2 and related type strains were cultivated on
incubating cultures on TSA plates in anaerobic jars with an NBRC medium no. 802 (Wako Pure Chemical Industries)
AnaeroPack-Anaero (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical). The pH agar plates [composed of (l 1) 10 g polypeptone, 2 g yeast
range for growth was evaluated in buffers at pH 4.0–9.0 (at extract, 1 g MgSO4.7H2O and 15 g agar; pH 7.0], at 25  C
intervals of 1 pH unit) using the following buffer system: for 24 h. The quantitative analysis of cellular fatty acid com-
acetate buffer (4.0–5.0), phosphate buffer (pH 6.0–7.0) and position was carried out by using gas chromatography,
Tris-HCl (pH 8.0–9.0). The temperature range for growth according to the instructions of the Microbial Identification
was tested on TSA plates at 20, 30, 37, 40, 42 and 45  C. The System (MIDI) Sherlock system version 6.0 [19, 20].
effects of NaCl were investigated in TSB with different con-
The genomic DNA of strains AVA-1T and AVA-2 was
centrations of NaCl present (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 %, w/v). The
extracted and purified from cells grown on TSA plates
activity of constitutive enzymes and other physiological
according to the method of Saito and Miura [21]. The DNA
properties were determined after growth on TSA (Difco) at
G+C content was determined by HPLC [22]. DNA–DNA
30  C for 2 days using the API 20NE and API ZYM systems
relatedness was determined in microplates according to the
(BioMerieux), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
method of Ezaki et al. [23]. The amplification of 16S rRNA
Freeze-dried cells for the chemotaxonomic analysis of genes was carried out with two primers (20F: 5¢-AGTTT-
strains AVA-1T, AVA-2 and related type strains were GATCCTGGCTC-3¢ and 1530R: 5¢-AAGGAGGTGATC-
obtained from cultures grown in TSB on an incubating CAGCC-3¢) [24] and the PCR products were sequenced

Table 1. Differential phenotypic characteristics of strains AVA-1T, AVA-2 and closely related type strains
Strains: 1, AVA-1T; 2, AVA-2; 3, Achromobacter xylosoxidans NBRC 15126T; 4, Achromobacter insolitus LMG 6003T; 5, Achromobacter animicus LMG
26690T; 6, Achromobacter pulmonis LMG 26696T; 7, Achromobacter insuavis LMG 26845T. All data are from this study. +, Positive reaction; w, weakly
positive reaction; , negative reaction.

Characteristics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Motility + + + + + +
Growth at 40  C + + + + +
Growth at 42  C + + + + +
Growth in 5 % (w/v) NaCl +
Anaerobic growth + + +
Hydrolysis of:
Tween 20 + +
Tween 80 + +
API 20NE
Nitrate reduction + + + + +
Glucose fermentation W

Assimilation of:
L-Arabinose + +
Capric acid + +
D-Glucose + + + +
D-Mannose +
D-Mannitol + +
Phenylacetic acid + + + + +
API ZYM
Alkaline phosphatase + + + + +
a-Chymotrypsin W W

Esterase (C 4) + + + + + +
Esterase Lipase (C 8) + +
Lipase (C 14) + +
Naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase + +
Trypsin + +
Valine arylamidase + + W W

DNA G+C content (mol%) 66.5 66.5 66.8 66.6 65.7 66.8 68.5

Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by


IP: 202.251.200.28
38
On: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 06:38:36
Kuncharoen et al., Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017;67:37–41

Table 2. Cellular fatty acid compositions (% of totals) of strain AVA-1T, AVA-2 and closely related type strains
Strains: 1, AVA-1T; 2, AVA-2; 3, Achromobacter xylosoxidans NBRC 15126T; 4, Achromobacter insolitus LMG 6003T; 5, Achromobacter animicus LMG
26690T; 6, Achromobacter pulmonis LMG 26696T; 7, Achromobacter insuavis LMG 26845T. All data are from this study. Values are percentages of total
fatty acids. –, Not detected.

Fatty acid 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

C12 : 0 0.21 0.23 0.37 0.61 0.58 0.44 0.64


C14 : 0 0.52 0.42 2.12 4.22 4.63 5.41 2.87
C16 : 0 33.73 33.99 33.71 30.14 33.09 37.45 33.07
C17 : 0 0.38 0.34 0.7 1.21 0.46 – 1.44
C18 : 0 4.48 4.53 2.70 2.66 1.52 0.52 2.33
C12 : 0 2OH 2.54 2.56 2.52 2.10 2.23 2.47 2.27
C14 : 0 2OH – – 1.79 – – – 1.36
C16 : 0 2OH 3.53 3.60 0.36 – – – –
C16 : 0 3OH 0.23 0.22 0.38 0.51 – 0.27 0.40
C17 : 0 cyclo 10.52 9.27 7.05 7.08 8.26 2.48 6.99
Summed Feature 2* 7.28 7.58 8.04 7.92 7.55 7.09 8.01
Summed Feature 3† 27.28 28.65 28.50 28.91 31.69 36.58 29.03
Summed Feature 8‡ 8.11 8.12 10.77 13.43 9.46 6.60 10.54

*Summed Feature 2 contained unknown 10.928, C14 : 0 3OH/C16 : 1 iso I.


†Summed Feature 3 contained C16 : 1!7c/C16 : 1!6c.
‡Summed Feature 8 contained C18 : 1!7c or C18 : 1!6c.

(Macrogen, Seoul, Korea) by using universal primers [25]. DDBJ databases employing CLUSTAL_X [26]. Phylogenetic
The 16S rRNA gene sequence was multiply aligned with trees were reconstructed by using the neighbour-joining
selected sequences obtained from the GenBank/EMBL/ [27], maximum-parsimony [28] and maximum-likelihood

T
90 Achromobacter marplatensis B2 (EU150134)
89 Achromobacter spiritinus LMG 26692T (HE613447)
Achromobacter piechaudii ATCC 43552T (AB010841)
97 Achromobacter spanius LMG 5911T (AY170848)
Achromobacter animicus LMG 26690T (HE613448)
0.005
59 Achromobacter mucicolens LMG 26685T (HE613446)
Achromobacter aegrifaciens LMG 26852T (HF586507)
Achromobacter insuavis LMG 26845T (HF586506)
Achromobacter insolitus LMG 6003T (AY170847)
62 Achromobacter anxifer LMG 26857T (HF586508)
Achromobacter dolens LMG 26840T (HF586509)
93
Achromobacter denitrificans DSM 30026T (Y14907)
65
Achromobacter ruhlandii ATCC 15749T (AB010840)
95 Achromobacter pulmonis LMG 26696T (HE798552)
Achromobacter xylosoxidans NBRC 15126T (CP006958)
AVA-1T (LC094463)
100 AVA-2 (LC147657)
Achromobacter sediminum DSM 27279T (KC986352)
Taylorella equigenitalis ATCC 35865T (X68645)

Fig. 1. Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree, based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, showing the relationships between AVA-1T, AVA-2
and closely related type strains of species of the genus Achromobacter. Bootstrap values (>50 %), based on 1000 replications, are given
at the branching nodes. Taylorella equigenitalis ATCC 35865T was used as an out group. Bar, 0.005 substitutions per nucleotide
position.

Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by


IP: 202.251.200.28
39
On: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 06:38:36
Kuncharoen et al., Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017;67:37–41

[29] methods in the program MEGA 6.0 [30]. The confidence In addition, the novel strains could be differentiated from
values of the nodes were evaluated by using the bootstrap Achromobacter xylosoxidans NBRC 15126T, Achromobacter
resampling method with 1000 replicates [31]. aminicus LMG 26690T, Achromobacter pulmonis LMG
26696T, Achromobacter insuavis LMG 26845T and Achro-
Cells of strains AVA-1T and AVA-2 were Gram-staining-
mobacter insolitus LMG 6003T in terms of their biochemi-
negative, aerobic, motile rods with peritrichous flagella.
cal and growth characteristics as well as their motility
Colonies were cream, circular (1.0–2.0 mm in diameter),
(Table 1). On the basis of the phenotypic and chemotaxo-
convex and opaque with entire margins after growth on nomic characteristics as well as the genotypic data
TSA for 2 days at 30  C. Results for oxidase and catalase described above, strains AVA-1T and AVA-2 are distinct
were positive. Tween 20 and Tween 40 were hydrolysed, from species of the genus Achromobacter with validly pub-
but not starch, casein, gelatin, DNA or Tween 40. The lished names. Therefore, these two strains should be viewed
novel isolates did not grow under anaerobic conditions, but as representatives of a novel species of the genus Achromo-
they did grow in the presence of 4 % (w/v) NaCl. The pH bacter, for which the name Achromobacter aloeverae sp.
range for growth was 6.0–9.0, with an optimum pH for nov. is proposed.
growth of 7.0. The optimum temperature for growth was
30–37  C. Detailed physiological and biochemical properties
are shown in Table 1 and given in the species description. DESCRIPTION OF ACHROMOBACTER
ALOEVERAE SP. NOV.
Analysis of the chemotaxonomic characteristics showed
that strains AVA-1T and AVA-2 contained Q-8 as the major Achromobacter aloeverae (a.lo.e.ve¢rae. N. L. gen. n. of Aloe
ubiquinone. The predominant fatty acids were C16 : 0 vera (L.) Burm.f., from which the type strain was isolated).
(33.73–33.99 % of the totals), C17 : 0 cyclo (9.27–10.52 % of Cells are Gram-staining-negative, aerobic, non-spore form-
totals) and summed feature 3 of C16 : 1!7c/C16 : 1!6c (27.28– ing rods (0.8–1.22.5–3.0 µm), which are motile with perit-
28.65 %). Strains AVA-1T, AVA-2 and all type strains richous flagella. Colonies are cream, circular (1.0–2.0 mm in
showed the same fatty acid profiles, whereas distinct differ- diameter), convex and opaque with entire margins after
ences in the relative amounts of C14 : 0, C17 : 0., C18 : 0, C14 : 0 incubation at 30  C on Tryptic Soy agar medium for 2 days.
2OH and C16 : 0 2OH could be observed. They were different Positive for oxidase and catalase enzymes. Growth is
to the most closely related strain, Achromobacter xylosoxi- observed in 4 % (w/v) NaCl, at a pH range of 6.0–9.0 (opti-
dans NBRC 15126T, with respect to the presence of C14 : 0, mum pH 7.0) and at 20–42  C (optimum 30–37  C). No
C14 : 0 2OH and C16 : 0 2OH (Table 2). The DNA G+C con- growth is seen at 45  C and in 5 % (w/v) NaCl. In API 20
tent of strains AVA-1T and AVA-2 was 66.5 mol%, which NE tests, urease, indole production and assimilation of cit-
was in the range of species of the genus Achromobacter with rate are positive. Nitrate reduction, glucose fermentation, b-
validly published names (Table 1). galactosidase, hydrolysis of arginine, esculin and gelatin,
Almost complete 16S rRNA gene sequences of strain AVA- and the assimilation of D-glucose, L-arabinose, D-mannose,
D-mannitol, N-acetylglucosamine, D-maltose, potassium
1T (1419 nt) and AVA-2 (1409 nt) were compared with the
16S rRNA gene sequences of all members of the genus Ach- gluconate, carpric acid, adipic acid, L-malate and phenylace-
romobacter. The highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similari- tic acid are negative. In the API ZYM system, alkaline phos-
ties were with Achromobacter xylosoxidans NBRC 15126T phatase, esterase lipase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), esterase
(98.80 %), Achromobacter insolitus LMG 6003T (98.64 %), lipase (C14), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, tryp-
Achromobacter aminicus LMG 26690T (98.59 %), Achromo- sin, acid phosphatase and naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydro-
bacter pulmonis LMG 26696T (98.58 %) and Achromobacter lase are positive. Cysteine arylamidase, a-chymotrypsin,
a-galactosidase, b-galactosidase, b-glucuronidase, a-gluco-
insuavis LMG 26845T (98.58 %). The phylogenetic trees
sidase, b-glucosidase, N-acetyl-b-glucosamidase, a-manno-
based on 16S rRNA gene sequences using neighbour-joining
sidase and a-fucosidase are negative. The predominant
(Fig. 1), maximum-likelihood (Fig. S1, available in the
ubiquinone is Q-8. The predominant fatty acids are C16 : 0,
online Supplementary Material) and maximum-parsimony
C17 : 0 cyclo and summed feature 3 of C16 : 1!7c/C16 : 1!6c.
(Fig. S2) algorithms show that strains AVA-1Tand AVA-2
form a tight cluster with type strains of species of the genus The type strain, AVA-1T (=LMG 29108T=NBRC 111463T
Achromobacter. Strains AVA-1T and AVA-2 exhibited =PCU 352T=TISTR 2383T), was isolated from Aloe vera
86.1 % DNA–DNA relatedness with each other. Strain from Thailand. The DNA G+C content of the type strain is
AVA-1T showed low levels of DNA–DNA relatedness to 66.5 mol%.
Achromobacter xylosoxidans NBRC 15126T (33.6 %), Achro-
mobacter insolitus LMG 6003T (19.7 %), Achromobacter
aminicus LMG 26690T (22.1 %), Achromobacter pulmonis Funding information
LMG 26696T (29.9 %) and Achromobacter insuavis LMG This research was supported by Grant for International Research Inte-
gration: Research Pyramid, Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund
26845T (30.7 %). These values were lower than the 70 % cut (GCURP_58_01_33_01), Chulalonglorn University.
off level for assigning strains to the same species [32] and
indicated that strains AVA-1T and AVA-2 are members of a Conflicts of interest
novel species. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by


IP: 202.251.200.28
40
On: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 06:38:36
Kuncharoen et al., Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017;67:37–41

References 19. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of


1. Yabuuchi E, Yano I. Achromobacter gen. nov. and Achromobacter Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI
xylosoxidans (ex Yabuuchi and Ohyama 1971) nom. rev. Int J Syst Inc; 1990.
Bacteriol 1981;31:477–478. 20. K€
ampfer P, Kroppenstedt RM. Numerical analysis of fatty acid
2. Yabuuchi E, Kawamura Y, Kosako Y, Ezaki T. Emendation of patterns of coryneform bacteria and related taxa. Can J Microbiol
genus Achromobacter and Achromobacter xylosoxidans (Yabuuchi 1996;42:989–1005.
and Yano) and proposal of Achromobacter ruhlandii (Packer and 21. Saito H, Miura KI. Preparation of transforming deoxyribonucleic
Vishniac) comb. nov., Achromobacter piechaudii (Kiredjian et al.) acid by phenol treatment. Biochim Biophys Acta 1963;72:619–629.
comb. nov., and Achromobacter xylosoxidans subsp. denitrificans
(Rüger and Tan) comb. nov. Microbiol Immunol 1998;42:429–438. 22. Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB. Precise measure-
ment of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-
3. Packer L, Vishniac W. Chemosynthetic fixation of carbon dioxide performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989;
and characteristics of hydrogenase in resting cell suspensions of 39:159–167.
Hydrogenomonas ruhlandii nov. spec. J Bacteriol 1955;70:216–223.
23. Ezaki T, Hashimoto Y, Yabuuchi E. Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic
4. Kiredjian M, Holmes B, Kersters K, Guilvout I, Deley J. Alcaligenes acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as
piechaudii, a new species from human clinical specimens and the an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioiso-
environment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1986;36:282–287. topes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial
5.. Ruger H-J, Tan TL. Separation of Alcaligenes denitrificans sp. nov., strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989;39:224–229.
nom. rev. from Alcaligenes faecalis on the basis of DNA base com- 24. Suriyachadkun C, Chunhametha S, Thawai C, Tamura T,
position, DNA homology, and nitrate reduction. Int J Syst Bacteriol Potacharoen W et al. Planotetraspora thailandica sp. nov., isolated
1983;33:85–89. from soil in Thailand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009;59:992–997.
6. Yabuuchi E, Oyama A. Achromobacter xylosoxidans nov. sp. from 25. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E and Good-
human ear discharge. Jpn J Microbiol 1971;15:477–481. fellow M (editors). Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics.
7. Coenye T, Vancanneyt M, Cnockaert MC, Falsen E, Swings J et al. Chichster: Wiley; 1991. pp. 115–148.
Kerstersia gyiorum gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel Alcaligenes faecalis-like 26. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG.
organism isolated from human clinical samples, and reclassification The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple
of Alcaligenes denitrificans Rüger and Tan 1983 as Achromobacter sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids
denitrificans comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003;53:1825–1831. Res 1997;25:4876–4882.
8. Coenye T, Vancanneyt M, Falsen E, Swings J, Vandamme P. Achro- 27. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for
mobacter insolitus sp. nov. and Achromobacter spanius sp. nov., from reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987;4:406–425.
human clinical samples. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003;53:1819–1824.
28. Kluge AG, Farris JS. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of
9. Gomila M, Tvrzov a L, Teshim A, Sedlacek I, Gonz alez-Escalona N anurans. Syst Zool 1969;18:1–32.
et al. Achromobacter marplatensis sp. nov., isolated from a pentachlo-
rophenol-contaminated soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011;61:2231– 29. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maxi-
2237. mum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981;17:368–376.
10. Vandamme P, Moore ER, Cnockaert M, de Brandt E, Svensson- 30. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6:
Stadler L et al. Achromobacter animicus sp. nov., Achromobacter molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol
mucicolens sp. nov., Achromobacter pulmonis sp. nov. and Achro- 2013;30:2725–2729.
mobacter spiritinus sp. nov., from human clinical samples. Syst 31. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach
Appl Microbiol 2013;36:1–10. using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985;39:783–791.
11. Vandamme P, Moore ER, Cnockaert M, Peeters C, Svensson- 32. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O et al.
Stadler L et al. Classification of Achromobacter genogroups 2, 5, 7 International committee on systematic bacteriology. report of the
and 14 as Achromobacter insuavis sp. nov., Achromobacter aegrifa- ad hoc committee on the reconciliation of approaches to bacterial
ciens sp. nov., Achromobacter anxifer sp. nov. and Achromobacter systematic. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987;37:463–464.
dolens sp. nov., respectively. Syst Appl Microbiol 2013;36:474–482.
12. Zhang Z, Fan X, Gao X, Zhang XH. Achromobacter sediminum sp.
nov., isolated from deep subseafloor sediment of South Pacific
Gyre. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014;64:2244–2249.
13. Hallmann J, Berg G, Schulz B. Isolation procedures for endophytic Five reasons to publish your next article with a
microorganisms. In: Schulz B, Boyle C and Sieber T (editors). Microbiology Society journal
Microbial Root Endophytes. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2006. pp.
299–319. 1. The Microbiology Society is a not-for-profit organization.
2. We offer fast and rigorous peer review – average time to
14. Küster E, Williams ST. Media for the isolation of Streptomycetes: first decision is 4–6 weeks.
starch casein medium. Nature 1964;202:928.
3. Our journals have a global readership with subscriptions
15. Hucker GJ, Conn HJ. Method of gram staining. Tech Bull N Y St held in research institutions around the world.
Agric Exp Sta 1923;93:3–37. 4. 80% of our authors rate our submission process as
16. Forbes L. Rapid flagella stain. J Clin Microbiol 1981;13:807–809. ‘excellent’ or ‘very good’.
17. Barrow GI, Feltham RKA, Feltham RKA. Cowan and Steel’s Manual 5. Your article will be published on an interactive journal
for the Identification of Medical Bacteria, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cam- platform with advanced metrics.
bridge University Press; 1993.
Find out more and submit your article
18. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of at microbiologyresearch.org.
menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen
Microbiol 1977;100:221–230.

Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by


IP: 202.251.200.28
41
On: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 06:38:36

You might also like