This document is meant to provide guidance on the key areas of the IFC Performance Standards (2012) and AMDAL

The IFC Performance Standards have been summarised in this document, and the full IFC Performance Standards a
and detailed understanding/explanation are located here:
http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/e280ef804a0256609709ffd1a5d13d27/GN_English_2012_Full-Document.pdf?M

Note the IFC Performance Standards also make reference to IFC Environmental, Health & safety (EHS) Guidelines t
http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/Topics_Ext_Content/IFC_External_Corporate_Site/IFC+Sustainability/Sustainab
+Health,+and+Safety+Guidelines/

The AMDAL guidelines are the Regulation of the State Minister of the Environmental No. 16 and No. 17 Year 2012

Application
IFC PS Title
LSB, Saumlaki Masela Block
1 Assessment & Management of
Social and Environmental Risks and
Impacts
2 Labor and Working Conditions

3 Resource Efficiency and Pollution

Prevention
4 Community, Health, Safety and
Security
5 Land Acquisition and Involuntary
Resettlement
6 Biodiversity Conservation and
Sustainable Management of Living
Natural Resources
7 Indigenous Peoples
8 Cultural Heritage

IFC EHS Guidelines

Standards (2012) and AMDAL.

IFC Performance Standards and Guidance Notes for a full

h_2012_Full-Document.pdf?MOD=AJPERES

h & safety (EHS) Guidelines that are located here:

/IFC+Sustainability/Sustainability+Framework/Environmental,

o. 16 and No. 17 Year 2012

Application
Integration Yard, Batam Kupang Port
IFC Performance Standards Alignment

Performance Standard 1: Assessment and Management of

Environmental
Objectives: and Social Risks and Impacts
• To identify and evaluate environmental and social risks and impacts of the project.
• To adopt a mitigation hierarchy to anticipate and avoid, and where avoidance is not possible, minimize, and where residual impacts rem
compensate/offset for risks and impacts to workers, Affected Communities, and the environment.
• To promote improved environmental and social performance of clients through the effective use of management systems.
• To ensure that grievances from Affected Communities and external communications from other Stakeholders are responded to and man
appropriately.
• To promote and provide means for adequate engagement with Affected Communities throughout the project cycle on issues that could
affect them and to ensure that relevant environmental and social information is disclosed and disseminated.

Compliance Status
Scope /
Para. Requirements Project
Reference
Data review
6 Policy Has the client established an overarching
policy defining the environmental and
social objectives and principles that
guide the project to achieve sound
environmental and social performance?
Does the policy indicate who, within the
client's organisation, will ensure
conformance with the policy and be
responsible for its execution? Has the
policy been communicated to all levels
of the organisation?

4 to 12 Identification of Has the client established and

Risks and Impacts maintained a process for identifying
environmental and social risks and
impacts of the project that is
appropriate to the type, scale and
location of the project?

3
4 to 12 Identification of Has the client established and
Risks and Impacts maintained a process for identifying
environmental and social risks and
impacts of the project that is
appropriate to the type, scale and
location of the project?

Is the scope of the risks and impacts

identification process consistent with
good international industry practice?
Has it considered all relevant E&S
impacts, including the requirements of
Performance Standard 1 to 8?

4
Has the risks and impacts identification
process considered the emissions of
GHG, the relevant risks associated with a
changing climate and the adaptation
opportunities, and potential
transboundary effects, such as air
pollution, or pollution of international
waterways?

Where the project involves specifically

identified physical elements, aspects and
facilities that are likely to generate
environmental and social impacts,
- did the identification or risks and
impacts take into account the findings
and conclusions of related and
applicable plans, studies, or assessments
prepared by relevant government
authorities or other parties directly
related to the project and its area of
influence?
- The area of influence maybe:
The area that is likely to be affected by
the project, impacts from unplanned but
predictable developments caused by the
project that may occur later, indirect
impacts on biodiversity or ecosystem
services, associated facilities that would
not be constructed or expanded without
the project, and cumulative impacts
from the project and from other
existing, planned or reasonably defined
developments.

5
not be constructed or expanded without
the project, and cumulative impacts
from the project and from other
existing, planned or reasonably defined
developments.

In the event of risks and impacts in the

project's area of influence resulting from
a third party's actions, has the client
addressed those risks and impacts in a
manner commensurate with the client's
control and influence over the third
parties, with due regard to conflict of
interest?

Where the project identifies specifically

identified physical elements, aspects and
facilities that are likely to generate
environmental & social impacts the
identification of risky and impacts has
taken into account findings and studies
prepared by government authorities on
the area of influence. 6
 Where the project identifies specifically
identified physical elements, aspects and
facilities that are likely to generate
environmental & social impacts the
identification of risky and impacts has
taken into account findings and studies
prepared by government authorities on
the area of influence.

Where individuals or groups are

identified as disadvantaged or
vulnerable, has the client proposed and
implemented differentiated measures so
that adverse impacts do not fall
disproportionately on them and they are
not disadvantaged in sharing
development benefits and
opportunities?

13 to Management Has the client established management

16 Programs programes, that describe mitigation and
performance improvement measures
and actions that address the identified
environmental and social risks and
impacts of the project?

7
 Does the mitigation hierarchy to address
identified risks and impacts favour the
avoidance of impacts over minimization,
and, where residual impact remain,
compensation/offset, wherever
technically and financially feasible?

Where the identified risks and impacts

cannot be avoided, has the client
identified mitigation and performance
measures and established corresponding
actions to ensure the project will
operate in compliance with applicable
laws and regulations, and meet the
requirements of Performance Standards
1 through 8?

Does the level of detail and complexity

of the management program and the
priority of the identified measures and
actions commensurate with the project's
risks and impacts, and also take account
of the outcome of the engagement
process with Affected Communities as
appropriate?

17 to Organizational Has the client established, maintained

19 Capacity and and strengthened as necessary an
Competency organisational structure that defines
roles, responsibilities, and authority to
implement the ESMS?

Are specific personnel, with clear lines of

responsibility and authority, designated?

Are key environmental and social

responsibilities well defined and
communicated to the relevant personnel
and to the rest of the client's
organisation?

Does the personnel within the client's

organisation with direct responsibility
for the project's environmental and
social performance have the knowledge,
skills, and experience to perform their
work?

8
 Are the process of identification of risks
and impacts, which consist of an
adequate, accurate and objective
evaluation and presentation, prepared
by competent professionals?

20 to Emergency Does the ESMS establish and maintain

21 Preparedness an emergency preparedness and
and Response response system so that the client will
be prepared to respond to accidental
and emergency situations in a manner
appropriate to prevent and mitigate any
harm to people and/or the
environment?

Is the emergency preparedness and

response activities periodically reviewed
and revised, as necessary, to reflect
changing conditions?

Does the client assist and collaborate

with the potentially Affected
Communities and the local government
agencies in their preparations and
respond effectively to emergency
situations?

Does the client document its emergency

preparedness and response activities,
resources, and responsibilities, and
provides appropriate information to
potentially Affected Community and
relevant government agencies?

22 to Monitoring and Has the client established procedures to

24 Review monitor and measure the effectiveness
of the management program, as well as
compliance with any related legal and/or
contractual obligations and regulatory
requirements?

Does the client consider involving

representatives from Affected
Communities to participate in
monitoring activities?

9
 If the project has significant impacts has
the client retained external experts to
verify monitoring information? Is the
monitoring commensurate with the
nature of the environmental & social
risks and impacts?

Does the client use dynamic

mechanisms, such as internal
inspections and audits, to verify
compliance and progress toward the
desired outcomes?

Does the client implement corrective

and preventive actions, and follow up on
these actions in upcoming monitoring
cycles to ensure their effectiveness?

If the project has significant impacts has

the client retained external experts to
verify monitoring information? Is the
monitoring commensurate with the
nature of the environmental & social
risks and impacts?

Does the senior management in the

client organisation receive periodic
performance reviews of the
effectiveness of the ESMS, based on
systemic data collection and analysis?

25 to Stakeholder Has the client developed and

33 Engagement implemented a Stakeholder Engagement
Plan and identified stakeholders?

10
Does the stakeholder engagement plan
include differentiated measures to allow
the effective participation of those
identified as disadvantaged or
vulnerable?

If stakeholder engagement relies heavily

on community representatives have
efforts been made to verify that those
persons do in fact represent the views of
the communities they represent and
also to faithfully communicate the
results of consultations to their
constituents?

Does the client provide Affected

Communities with access to relevant
information on
i) the purpose, nature, and scale of the
project
ii) the duration of proposed project
activities
iii) any risks to and potential impacts on
such communities and relevant
mitigation measures
iv) the envisaged stakeholder
engagement process
v) the grievance mechanism

Does the client undertake a process of

consultation in a manner that provides
the Affected Communities with
opportunities to express their views on
project risks, impacts and mitigation
measures, and allows the client to
consider and respond to them?

11
Is it a two way process that begins early
in the process of the identification of
environmental and social risks and
impacts and continues on an ongoing
basis as risks and impacts arise; based
on the prior disclosure of relevant,
transparent, objective, meaningful and
easily accessible information which is in
a culturally appropriate local language(s)
and format and is understandable to
Affected Communities; is inclusive
engagement on those directly affected
as opposed to those not directly
affected; free of external manipulation,
interference, coercion, or intimidation;
and allow meaningful participation,
where applicable. Is it also
documented?

For projects with potentially significant

adverse impacts on Affected
Communities, does the client conduct an
Informed Consultation and Participation
(ICP) process?

Have the measures to minimise risks to

and adverse impacts on the Affected
Communities and informed those
affected on how their concerns have
been considered?

For projects with adverse impacts to

Indigenous Peoples, does the client
engage them in a process of ICP and in
certain circumstances obtain their Free,
Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC)?

Does the client collaborate with the

responsible government agency when
the stakeholder engagement is the
responsibility of the host government?

12
34 to External Does the client implement and maintain
35 Communications a procedure for external
and Grievance communications that includes methods
Mechanisms to
i) receive and register external
communications from the public
ii) screen and assess the issues the
issues raised and determine how to
address them
iii) provide, track, and document
responses
iv) adjust the management program

Is the clients making publicly available

periodic reports on their environmental
and social sustainability?

36 Ongoing Does the client provide periodic reports

Reporting to to the Affected Communities that
Affected describe progress with implementation
Communities of the project Action Plans on issues that
involve ongoing risk to or impacts on
Affected Communities and on issues that
the consultation process or grievance
mechanism have identified as a concern
to those Communities?

If the management program results in

material changes in or additions to the
mitigation measures or actions
described in the Action Plans on issues
of concern to the Affected Communities,
are the updated relevant mitigation
measures or actions communicated to
them?

Are the frequency of these reports

proportionate to the concerns of
Affected Communities but not less than
annually?

13
minimize, and where residual impacts remain,
nt.
use of management systems.
er Stakeholders are responded to and managed

hout the project cycle on issues that could potentially

isseminated.

Compliance Status
Project
Limitations/Gaps

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
IFC Performance Standards Alignment

Performance Standard 3: Resource Efficiency and Pollution Prevention

Objectives:
• To avoid or minimise adverse impacts on human health and the environment by
avoiding or minimizing pollution from project activities.
• To promote more sustainable use of resources, including energy and water.
• To reduce project-related GHG emissions.

Compliance Status
Scope /
Para. Requirements Project
Reference
Data review
4 to 5 General Does the client
Requirements consider ambient
conditions and
apply technically
and financially
feasible efficiency
and pollution
prevent principles
and techniques that
are best suited to
avoid, or where
avoidance is not
possible, minimize
adverse impacts on
human health and
the environment for
the life-cycle of the
project?

25
26
27
• Does the client
refer to EHS
Guidelines or other
internationally
recognised sources
when evaluating
and selecting
resource efficiency
and pollution
prevention and
control techniques
for the project
choosing the more
stringent of the
national standards 28
or those within the
EHS Guidelines?
Note: The correct
• Does the client
refer to EHS
Guidelines or other
internationally
recognised sources
when evaluating
and selecting
resource efficiency
and pollution
prevention and
control techniques
for the project
choosing the more
stringent of the
national standards
or those within the
EHS Guidelines?
Note: The correct
EHS Guidelines
should be referred
to, this includes the
General Guidelines
in additional to all
the relevant sector
related EHS
Guidelines.

29
 • Where less
stringent measures
have been applied,
has the client made
a full and detailed
justification for any
proposed
alternatives in the
environmental and
social risks and
impacts assessment
process?

6 to 9 Resource Has the client

Efficiency considered
alternatives and
implemented
technically and
financially feasible
and cost-effective
options to improve
efficiency in the
consumption of
energy, water and
other resources
(including material
inputs)? Has the
client benchmarked
against data where
available?

30
Has the client
considered
alternatives and
technically and
financially feasible
and cost effective
options to reduce
project related GHG
emissions in the
design and
operation of the
Project?

Is the quantification
of GHG emissions
conducted by the
client annually in
accordance with
internationally
recognised
methodologies and
good practice if the
emissions over
25,000 tonnes of
carbon dioxide
equivalent per
annum annually?

Has the client

adopted measures
that avoid or reduce
water usage so that
the project's water
consumption does
not have significant
adverse impacts on
others including
water conservation
measures,
alternative water
supplies, offsets,
and alternative
project locations.

31
 water conservation
measures,
alternative water
supplies, offsets,
and alternative
project locations.

10 to Pollution • Does the client

17 Prevention avoid the release of
pollutants or, when
avoidance is not
feasible, minimize
and/or control the
intensity and mass
flow of their
release?

• Is there historical
land or groundwater
contamination and
any responsibility
for the client to
remediate?

32
• When addressing
potential adverse
project impacts on
existing ambient
conditions, does the
client consider
factors, for example
i) existing ambient
conditions
ii) the finite
assimilative capacity
of the environment
iii) existing and
future land use
iv) the project's
proximity
• Does thetoclient
areas of
importance to
avoid the generation
biodiversity
of hazardous and
v) the potential for
non-hazardous
cumulative impacts
waste materials, and
with uncertain
when cannot be
and/or
avoided,irreversible
will reduce
consequences
the generation of
waste, and recover
and reuse waste in a
manner that is safe
for human health
and the
environment?

• Does the client

have hazardous
waste disposal
undertaken by third
parties, if so are
they able to confirm
they are reputable,
appropriately
licensed and has the
client reviewed
whether the
disposal sites are
being operated to
acceptable
standards?

33
• Does the client
avoid the
manufacture, trade,
and use of
chemicals and
hazardous materials
subject to
international bans
or phase-outs due
to their high toxicity
to living organisms,
environmental
persistence,
potential for
bioaccumulation, or
potential for
depletion of the
ozone layer? Has
the client
considered less
hazardous
substances to be
used in manufacture
as alternatives?

• Does the client,

where appropriate,
formulate and
implement an
integrated pest
management (IPM)
and/or integrated
vector management
(IVM) approach
targeting
economically
significant pest
infestations and
disease vectors of
public health
significance?

34
• Does the client
select chemical
pesticides that are
low in human
toxicity, that are
known to be
effective against the
target species, and
that have the
minimal effects on
non-target species
and the
environment?

• Does the client

design its pesticide
application regime
to i) avoid damage
to natural enemies
of the target ii)
avoid the risks
associated with the
development of
resistance in pests
and vectors
and if avoidance is
not possible,
minimize?

• Does the client

purchase, store, use,
manufacture, or
trade in products
that fall in WHO
Recommended
Classification of
Pesticides by Hazard
Class Ia or Ib?

• Does the client

not purchase, store,
use, manufacture,
or trade in Class II
pesticides unless
the project has
appropriate controls
on manufacture,
procurement, or
distribution and/or
use of these
chemicals?

35
Compliance Status
Project
Limitations/Gaps

36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
IFC Performance Standards Alignment

Performance Standard 4: Community Health, Safety, and Security

Objectives:
• To anticipate and avoid adverse impacts on the health and safety of the Affected Community
during the project life from both routine and non-routine circumstances.
• To ensure that the safeguarding of personnel and property is carried out in accordance with
relevant human rights principles and in a manner that avoids or minimises risks to the Affected
Communities.
Compliance Status
Scope /
Para. Requirements Project
Reference
Data review
IV.5 – Community Does the client design, N/A
IV.11 Health and construct, operate, and
Safety decommission the structural
elements or components of
the project in accordance
with good international
industry practice (GIIP)
including the EHS Guidelines
favouring avoidance of risks
over minimization, taking into
consideration safety risks to
third parties or Affected
Communities?

Has the client has structural N/A

components designed and
constructed by competent
professionals, and where
there are high risk items, e.g.
dams, ash ponds etc. in high
risk areas, engaged
experienced third party
specialists to review them
throughout the life of the
project?

Does the client avoid or Soil baseline covers soil quality and
minimise the potential for lithology
community exposure to
hazardous materials and
substances that may be
released by the project?

47
released by the project?

Surface water quality was measured in

several parameters which are physico-
chemical parameters, major anions and
cations, nutrients, total and dissolved
metals, human disease-causing bacteria,
hydrocarbons and pesticides;

- Groundwater quality baseline, well

depth and wells' locations have been
provided;
- Groundwater met government
standard for some parameters such as:
TDS, boron, faecal/ coliform, total
hardness, PCB or BTEX chemicals.

- Baseline (2014) 10 sampling site in

Saumlaki Bay in November 2013 and
April 2014 to cover sea water ambient
impact from Saumlaki LSB;
- AMDAL (2014) 8 sampling site in
Saumlaki Bay in November 2011 and
April 2012.

Does the client avoid or The communities natural resources

minimise the potential for management and land use were
community exposure to discussed in the Social Baseline Volume
hazardous materials and IV at the regional and village level as
substances that may be follows:
released by the project? - access and rights of ownership,
including land rights and marine tenure;
- land and resources used by the
communities within the area including
plantation land, forest land, and marine
resources; and
- access to and use of water resources.

Regional and village level community

health secondary data is provided i.e.
frequency of diseases in the region and
villages. In addition the following
environmental health data is available:
- health facilities;
- health medical personnel;
- clean water; and
- basic sanitation.

48
Does the client identify the Refer PS 6
risk and impacts from the
project to ecosystem services,
including degradation of
natural resources such as
quality, quantity and
availability of freshwater, or
impacts/risk that may result
in community health-related
risks and impacts.
Does the client avoid or
minimise the potential for
community exposure to
water-borne, water-based,
water-related, and vector-
borne diseases, and
communicable diseases that
could result from project
activities, taking into
consideration differentiated
exposure to and higher
sensitivity of vulnerable
groups?
- surface water quality was measured in
several parameters which are physico-
chemical parameters, major anions and
cations, nutrients, total and dissolved
metals, human disease-causing bacteria,
hydrocarbons and pesticides;
- groundwater quality baseline, well
depth and wells' locations have been
provided;
- soil baseline only covers soil quality
and lithology
The following information related to
community health was discussed in the
Social Baseline Volume IV:
- Community sources of clean water at
the village level including wells and main
springs that provide most of Olilit
community’s water. These are located
several kilometres away from the
proposed LSB area. A few households in
the southern neighbourhood areas (RTs)
of West Olillt village receive piped water
from the district government water
company (PDAM).
- Health services and infrastructure are
also discussed at the regional and
district level.
- Vulnerability has also been identified at
the village level, categorized into:
children, disabled/ handicapped, marital
status, gender, and poverty levels.
49
 Does the client avoid or
minimise transmission of
communicable diseases that
may be associated with the
influx of temporary or
permanent project labour?

Does the client document its

emergency preparedness and
response activities, resources,
and responsibilities, and
disclose appropriate
information to Affected
Communities, relevant
government agencies, or
other relevant parties?

IV.12 - Security Does the client assess risks

IV.14 Personnel posed by its security
arrangements to those within
and outside the project site
when it retains direct or
contracted workers to provide
security to safeguard its
personnel and property?

50
Does the client assess, and
document, risks arising from
the project's use of
government security
personnel deployed to
provide security services?

Has the client made inquires

that security personnel have
not been implicated in past
abuses, have been trained
adequately in the use of force
(including if appropriate
firearms) and appropriate
conduct, and compliance with
laws?

If the project involves

operating moving equipment
on public
roads/infrastructure, has the
client sought to prevent
occurrence of
incidents/accidents?

Does the client consider and,

where appropriate,
investigate all allegations of
unlawful or abusive acts of
security personnel, take
action to prevent recurrence,
and report unlawful and
abusive acts to public
authorities?

51
Compliance Status
Project
Limitations/Gaps
N/A

N/A

- WBG EHS Guidelines requirement

information about soil erosion during
construction and decommissioning;
- Chapter of Soil doesn’t mention about
soil erosion, soil conservation and soil
erosion rate in proposed project area;
- there is no soil taxonomy map in the
document.

52
 - There is no information about total
water consumption by LSB and water
availability for community (EHS
requirements on effective use of
resources, Community Health and
Safety);
- Need additional data on baseflow and
water balance (topography, hydrology,
hydrogeology and meteorology
completed in ESB Vol II (2014)).

Data sufficient

Village level health data provided in the

Social Baseline Volume IV was obtained
from secondary information. There is a
lack of primary data concerning
community health status, concerns, and
habits.

53
N/A

- There is no information about total

water consumption by LSB and water
availability for community (EHS
requirements on effective use of
resources, Community Health and
Safety);
- Need additional data on baseflow and
water balance (topography, hydrology,
hydrogeology and meteorology
completed in ESB Vol II (2014)).

- WBG EHS Guidelines requirement

information about soil erosion during
construction and decommissioning;
- Chapter of Soil doesn’t mention about
soil erosion, soil conservation and soil
erosion rate in proposed project area;
- there is no soil taxonomy map in the
document.

Assessment on potential exposure to

specific group of communities on water-
borne, water-based, water-related, and
vector-borne diseases, and
communicable diseases resulting from
project activities would be difficult to
undertake as information on
environmental sanitation conditions at
the village level, as well as community
health concerns on specific vulnerable
groups potentially affected by the
Projects are lacking.

54
55
56
IFC Performance Standards Alignment

Performance Standard 5: Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement

Objectives:
• To avoid, and when avoidance is not possible, minimize displacement by exploring alternative project
designs.
• To avoid forced eviction.
• To anticipate and avoid, or where avoidance is not possible, minimize adverse social and economic
impacts from land acquisition or restrictions on land use by
i) providing compensation for loss of assets at replacement cost and
ii) ensuring that resettlement activities are implemented with appropriate disclosure of information,
consultation, and the informed participation of those affected.
• To improve, or restore, the livelihoods and standards of living of displaced persons.
• To improve living conditions among physically displaced persons through the provision of adequate
housing with security of tenure at resettlement sites.

Compliance Status
Scope /
Para. Requirements Project
Reference
Data review
8 Project Design Has the client considered
feasible alternative project
designs to avoid or
minimize physical and/or
economic displacement,
while balancing
environmental, social and
financial costs/benefits,
paying particular attention
to impacts on the poor and
vulnerable?

9 Compensation When displacement

and Benefits for cannot be avoided, has the
Displaced client offered displaced
Persons persons/communities
compensation for loss of
assets at full replacement
cost, and provided
assistance to improve or
restore standards of living
or livelihoods?

57
 Are standards for
compensation transparent
and applied consistently to
all communities and
persons affected by the
displacement?

Where livelihoods of
displaced persons and
land-based, or where land
is collectively owned, does
the client offer land-based
compensation where
feasible?

Does client provide

opportunities to displaced
persons/communities to
derive appropriate
development benefits
from project?

10 Community Does the client engage

Engagement with Affected
Communities, including
host communities, through
the process of stakeholder
engagement described in
PS 1?

11 Grievance Has the client established a

Mechanism grievance mechanism
consistent with PS 1 as
early as possible in the
project development
phase?

Does grievance mechanism

include recourse
mechanism designed to
resolve disputes in an
impartial manner?

58
12 to Resettlement Has client carried out a
16 and Livelihood socio-economic survey to
Restoration identify displaced persons,
Planning and and determine eligibility
Implementation for compensation and
assistance, and discourage
opportunistic settlers?

If there are no host

government procedures,
has client established a
cut-off date for eligibility,
and has information
regarding cut-off date been
well documented and
disseminated?

59
In cases where affected
persons reject
compensation offers that
meet the requirements of
this Performance Standard
and, as a result,
expropriation or other
legal procedures are
initiated, has the client
explored opportunities to
collaborate with the
responsible government
agency and, if permitted by
agency, play an active role
in resettlement planning,
implementation and
monitoring?

Has client established

procedures to monitor and
evaluate the
implementation of
Resettlement Action Plan
or Livelihood Restoration
Plan and took corrective
action as necessary?
Where there are significant
involuntary resettlement
risks, has the client
retained competent
resettlement professionals
to provide advice and
review monitoring of
resettlement?

If resettlement has been

completed, it is necessary
to commission an external
completion audit of the
Resettlement Action Plan
or Livelihood Restoration
Plan to assess if the
adverse impacts of resettle
have been addressed. Has
this been completed by
competent professionals
and do the results show
outcomes against agreed
objectives?

60
 If the exact nature or
magnitude of the land
acquisition or restrictions
on land use related to a
project are unknown due
to the stage of a project,
has the project developed
an outline Resettlement
and/or Livelihood
Restoration Framework
outlining general principles
compatible with this
Performance Standard?

17-24 Displacement In the case of physical

displacement, will the
client develop a
Resettlement Action Plan
(RAP) that covers, at a
minimum, the applicable
requirements of the
Performance Standard
regardless of the number
of people affected? Is the
RAP designed to mitigate
against negative impacts of
displacement, identify
development
opportunities, develop a
resettlement budget and
schedule and establish
entitlements of all
categories of affected
persons.

Will the plan compensate

full replacement cost for
land and other assets lost?

Does the RAP provide

particular attention to the
poor and vulnerable?

61
Has the client documented
all transactions to acquire
land rights, as well as
compensation measures
and relocation activities?

If people are required to

move to another location,
has the client
i) offered choices among
feasible resettlement
options, including
adequate replacement
housing or cash
compensation where
appropriate; and
ii) provided relocation
assistance suited to the
needs of each group of
displaced persons?

Where new resettlement

sites are completed do
they provide improved
living conditions?

In the case of physical

displacement, has the
client offered the choice of
replacement property of
equal or higher value,
security of tenure,
equivalent of better
characteristics, and
advantages of location or
cash compensation where
appropriate?

62
 Have there been any
forced evictions that have
been carried out not in
accordance with applicable
law and the requirements
of this Performance
Standard?

25 to Economic Has the client developed a

29 Displacement Livelihood Restoration Plan
to compensate affected
persons and/or
communities and offer
other assistance that meet
the objectives of
Performance Standard?

Has the Livelihood

Restoration Plan
established the
entitlements of affected
persons and/or
communities and ensured
that these are provided in
a transparent, consistent,
and equitable manner?

Are the economically

displaced persons who
face loss of assets or
access to assets
compensated for such loss
at full replacement cost?

For people who are

economically displaced,
has a Livelihood
Restoration Plan been
developed? Does it
include entitlements of
affected
people/communities and
ensure that it is provided
in a transparent, consistent
and equitable manner?

63
Have those who have been
economically displaced
been compensated for the
loss of assets or access to
assets at full replacement
cost? Including, transition
costs, equipment
relocation, replacement
assets (including land), and
infrastructure, and takes
account of those with legal
claims to land and the
requirements of those
without legal claims to
land?

Have the economically

displaced people been
provided with
opportunities to improve,
or at least restore, their
means of income earning
capacity, production levels
and standards of living?

Are the economically

displaced persons whose
livelihoods or income
levels are adversely
affected provided with
opportunities to improve,
or at least restore, their
means of income-earning
capacity, production levels,
and standard of living?

Has transitional support

been provided as
necessary to all
economically displaced
persons?

64
30 to Private Sector Has the client collaborated
32 Responsibilities with the responsible
Under government agency, to the
Government- extent permitted by the
Managed agency, to achieve
Resettlement outcomes that are
consistent with
Performance Standard?

Has the client prepared a

Supplemental
Resettlement Plan if
resettlement measures do
not meet the relevant
requirements of
Performance Standard?

Does the Supplemental

Resettlement Plan include
at a minimum
i) identification of affected
people and impacts
ii) a description of
regulated activities
iii) the supplemental
measures to achieve the
requirements of
Performance Standard that
is permitted by the
responsible agency and
implementation time
schedule
iv) the financial and
implementation
responsibilities of the
client in the execution of
its Supplemental
Resettlement Plan

65
Has the client developed
an Environmental and
Social Action Plan if the
current measures do not
meet the requirement of
Performance Standards
(that may include
additional compensation
for lost assets and
additional efforts to
restore lost livelihoods
where applicable)?

66
 IFC Performance Standards Alignment
Performance Standard 6: Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Living
Natural Resources
Objectives:
• To protect and conserve biodiversity.
• To maintain the benefits from ecosystem services.
• To promote the sustainable management of living natural resources through the adoption of
practices that integrate conversation needs and development priorities.

Compliance Status
Scope /
Para. Requirements Project
Reference
Data review
9 to 10 Protection and Has a mitigation hierarchy Project has a sound understanding of
Conservation of been considered only after baseline Terrestrial biodiversity
Biodiversity appropriate avoidance, conditions such that initial conclusions
minimization, and restoration regarding the application of IFC PS 6 and
measures have been applied? the need for offsets or mitigations inline
with the expectatons of If PS 6 can be
formed.

Notwithstanding gaps in the current

data and recommendations for further
survey specific to the LSB site have been
made within the Baseline Study
framework.

If a biodiversity offset is to be N/A

designed and implemented,
has it been designed (and
implemented) to achieve
measurable conservation
outcomes that result in no net
loss of biodiversity and
preferably a gain in biodiversity
(although a net gain is required
in critical habitats)? Has the
biodiversity offset involved
appropriate qualified experts?

67
11 to 1 Modified Habitat Has the client minimised
impacts on such biodiversity
and implement mitigation
measures as appropriate?
Modified habitats have been identified
as being relatively common within the
terrestrial survey areas. These occur
mostly as a result of agricultural
practices of local communities. Project
has a sound understanding of baseline
biodiversity conditions such that the
presence of, and location of modified
and natural habitats is relatively well
understood.
The project is yet to confirm a preferred
site or undertake an impact assessment
(upon which appropriate mitigation
measures will be based). Following this
is will be possible to confirm to what
extent the project is impacting modified
v natural habitats.
ESB VOL III presented modify habitat in
project area (Olilit) is coconut plantation
ANDAL (2014) mention, some plantation
in Olilit such as cassava, peanut,
tomatoes, banana and teak (pohon jati)
plantation
ESB Vol III (2014) observed seaweed
farming in the coastal waters near
vellages at Lermatang, Saumlaki, Adaut
and Kore coastline.
ESB Vol III (2014) observed several
fishing platforms in Saumlaki Bay and
Adaut Bay area
68
13 to Natural Habitat Has the client converted or
15 degraded natural habitats only
when the following has been
demonstrated?
i) no other viable alternatives
within the region exist for
development of the project on
modified habitat
ii) consultation has established
the views of stakeholders,
including Affected
Communities, with respect to
the extent of conversion and
degradation; and
iii) any conversion of
degradation is mitigated
according to the mitigation
hierarchy
Natural resources use and management
by the community is discussed in the
Social Baseline Volume IV at the regional
and village level in the AMDAL
(community use of land and marine
resources). The Social Baseline Volume
IV has more updated information at the
proposed LSB as well as in the other
villages which ave beenidentified as
potentially traversed by the Project
vehicle/ vessel. In addition, the PCDP
identifies key stakeholders that would be
consulted as part of this process. The
PCDP sets out a high level process of
how the Project would consult/disclose.
ESB VOL III (2014) reported, the type of
natural habitat in Saumlaki West are
beach vegetation and mangrove.
Mangrove habitat information were
explain in the report.
Project has a sound understanding of
modifled and natural habitat presence
and maps vegetation communities
within the project area.
The project is yet to confirm the LSb
footprint or undertake an impact
assessment (upon which appropriate
mitigation measures will be based).
Folliwng this is will be possible to
confirm to what extent the project is
impacting modifled v natural habitats.
`- ANDAL (2014) describe there are 3
species of sea grass in Sumlaki Bay
- ANDAL (2014) also used CNOOC data
on 2009, Marine and Fisheries of Local
Agency on 1997 and 2007 to describe
sea grass condition on around Saumlaki
Bay
69
 `- ANDAL (2014) identified coral reef
community in several area but not in
Saumlaki Bay where jetty proposed
location planned
- ESB Vol III (2014) identified coral reef
habitat in West Saumlaki covering
Saumlaki Bay, Matakus Island and
Nustabun Island

ANDAL (2014) mention marine

mammals species around Tanimbar
Island based on secondary data (Khan,
2005; CII, 2007)
- field observation on November 2011
only found 1 species
ESB Vol III (2014) mention, that Saumlaki
East, Saumlaki West are potential habitat
for dugong and turtle

ESB Vol III (2014) mentions:

- some turtle nesting accurs along the
eastern facing beaches of the Olilit area.
- 19 days obervations (20 May to 9 June
2014) reported 4 turtles species but not
in West Saumlaki

Have the following actions N/A

been done to achieve no net
loss of biodiversity?
i) avoiding impacts on
biodiversity through the
identification and protection of
set-asides.
ii) implementing measures to
minimise habitat
fragmentation, such as
biological corridors.
iii) restoring habitats during
operations and/or after
operations.
iv) implementing biodiversity
offsets.

70
16 to Critical Habitat Does client avoid The ESB ESB Vol III (2014) makes initial
19 implementing project activities conclusions regarding the presence of
in areas of critical habitat critical habitat and confirms that it is a
unless all of the following are relevant consideration for the Project.
demonstrated: there are no For example ESB Vol III (2014) presented
viable alternatives, no mangrove as critical habitat while IUCN
measurable adverse impacts listed species were recorded during flora
on ability of critical habitat to and fauna surveys.
support established population It is not confirmed if critical habitat is
of species for which it was directly impacted as a result of the
established, there is no Project. As such the relevance of the PS
reduction in population of any will be confirmed as part of the Impact
critically endangered or assessment.
endangered species, a robust
appropriately designed and
long term biodiversity
monitoring and evaluation
program is integrated into the
client's management program.

`- ESB Vol III (2014) determined critical

habitat in Saumlaki Bay as nearshore
areas were identified as supporting
habitat for critically endangered species
such as the Hawksbill Turtle. The coastal
areas of Samlaki bay also triggered
potential critical habitat owing to,
potential habitat for Migratory
species and congregatory species
(Criterion 3) and Criterions 4 and 5
(owing to potential presence of coral
reef)

In such cases where the client

is able to meet the
requirements above, has the
project's mitigation strategy
been described in a
Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP)
and designed to achieve net
gains of the biodiversity values
for which the critical habitat
was designated? Has, or will,
the client demonstrate through
assessment that critical habitat
requirements will be
adequately mitigated?

71
 20 Legally Protected If project is in a legally
and protected area, does client:
Internationally - Demonstrate that the
Recognised Areas proposed development in such
areas is legally permitted?
- Act in manner consistent
with defined protected area
management plans?
- Consult protected area key
stakeholders?
- Implement additional
programs to promote/enhance
consertavion aims?

21 to Invasive Alien Does the client avoid

23 Species intentional introduction of new
alien species unless this is
carried out in accordance with
the existing regulatory
framework, or subject to a risk
assessment?

Does client avoid deliberate

introduction of alien species
with high risk of invasive
behaviour or any known
invasive species, and exercise
diligence to prevent accidental
or unintended introductions?

72
24 to Management of Where a project is likely to
25 Ecosystem adversely impact ecosystem
Services services, as determined by the
risks and impacts identification
process, has the client
conducted a systemic review to
identify priority ecosystem
services?

Where a project is likely to

adversely impact ecosystem
services, as determined by the
risks and impacts identification
process, has the client
conducted a systemic review to
identify priority ecosystem
services?

With respect to impacts on

priority ecosystem services of
relevance to Affected
Communities and where client
has direct management control
or significant influence over
such ecosystem services, are
the adverse impacts avoided?

If the impacts are unavoidable,

has the client minimised them
and implemented mitigation
measures that aim to maintain
the value and functionality of
priority services?

26 to 2 Sustainable Where applicable and feasible,

Management of does the client locate land-
Living Natural based agribusiness and
Resources forestry projects on unfrosted
land or land already
converted?

Does the client who is engaged

in such industries manage
living natural resources in a
sustainable manner, through
the application of industry-
specific good management
practices and available
technologies?

73
Are the globally, regionally, or
nationally recognised
standards for sustainable
management of living natural
resources
i) objective and achievable
ii) founded on a multi-
stakeholder consultative
process
iii) encourage step-wise and
continual improvements
iv) provide for independent
verification or certification
through appropriate
accredited bodies for such
standards

If the client has not yet

obtained independent
verification or certification to
such standards, has the client
conducted a pre-assessment of
its conformity to the applicable
standards and taken actions to
achieve such verification or
certification over an
appropriate period of time?

74
 In the absence of a relevant
and credible global, regional or
national standard for the
particular living natural
resource in the country
concerned, has the client
i) commit to applying good
international industry
operating principles,
management practices, and
technologies
ii) actively engage and support
the development of a natural
standard, where relevant,
including studies that
contribute to the definition
and demonstration of
sustainable practices

30 Supply Chain Has the client adopted systems

and verification practices as
part of the ESMS to evaluate
its primary suppliers when
purchasing primary production
(especially but not exclusively
food and fibre commodities)?

Do the systems and verification

practices:
i) identify where the supply is
coming from and the habitat
type of this area?
ii) provide for an ongoing
review of the client's primary
supply chain?
iii) limit procurement to those
suppliers that can demonstrate
that they are not contributing
to significant conversion of
natural and/or critical
habitats?
iv) require actions to shift the
client's primary supply chain
over time to suppliers that can
demonstrate that they are not
significantly adversely
impacting these areas?

75
Compliance Status
Project
Limitations/Gaps
No specific gaps identified regarding this
PS expectation. Application of the
mitigation hierarchy to be confirmed as
project footprint and impacts to
terrestrial biodiversity are assessed.

N/A

76
While vegetation and habitat surveys
have been completed and mapping
provided, only the mangrove community
is described in detail within ESB VOL III
(2014). Furthermore, while species lists
are provided, it is uncertain which
species occur in certain communities

Habitats have been mapped however

the project is yet to confirm the LSB
design and as such it is still unsure to
what extent natural habitats will be
disturbed by the project.

77
Data sufficient

While vegetation and habitat surveys

have been completed and mapping
provided, only teh mangrove community
is described in detail within ESB VOL III
(2014). Furthermore, while species lists
are provided, it is uncertain which
species occur in certain communities

Habitats have been mapped however

the project is yet to confirm the LSB
design and as such it is still unsure to
what extent natural habitats will be
disturbed by the project.

- 1997 - 2009 data is considered old to

describe the current actual condition of
sea grass;
- The new data on 2014 only explains
the number of sea grass species.

78
AMDAL (2014) coral reef community
identified in several areas but not in
Saumlaki Bay where jetty proposed
location planned.

No data on exact location, presence,

condition/health of coral
assemblages/communities specific to
proposed jetty and planned dredged
areas

- Limited information on sea turtle

nesting, marine mammals, especially for
Dugong dugong;
- It is suspected that additional
secondary data may exist.

N/A

79
While the discrete management unit
upon which critical habitat assessments
will be made has been defined, no
mapping of critical habitat has yet been
developed. The mapping of identified
critical habitat areas will be crucial to
supporting the impact assessment and
confirming if critical habitat will be
affected by the Project (either directly or
indirectly). This will then be used to
understand the potential need for
mitigation measures or offsets.

This will help to define exactly where

habitats such as seagrass and corals are
located. As well as location terrestrial
critical habitats (if present).

80
81
82
83
84
IFC Performance Standards Alignment

Performance Standard 7: Indigenous Peoples

Objectives:
• To ensure that the development process fosters full respect for the human rights, dignity, aspirations,
culture, and natural resource-based livelihoods of Indigenous Peoples.
• To anticipate and avoid adverse impacts of projects on communities of Indigenous Peoples, or when
avoidance is not possible, to minimise and/or compensate for such impacts.
• To promote sustainable development benefits and opportunities for Indigenous Peoples in a culturally
appropriate manner.
• To establish and maintain an ongoing relationship based on Informed Consultation and Participation (ICP)
with the Indigenous Peoples affected by a project throughout the project's life-cycle.
• To ensure the Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) of the Affected Communities of Indigenous
Peoples when the circumstances described in this Performance Standard are present.
• To respect and preserve the culture, knowledge and practices of Indigenous Peoples.

Compliance Status
Scope /
Para. Requirements Project
Reference
Data review
8 to 9 Avoidance of Has the client identified, through an
Adverse Impacts environmental and social risks and
impacts assessment process, all
communities of Indigenous Peoples
within the project area of influence who
may be affected by the project, as well
as the nature and degree of the
expected direct and indirect economic,
social, cultural (including cultural
heritage), and environmental impacts on
them?

Has adverse impacts on Affected

Communities of Indigenous Peoples
been avoided where possible?

85
 If adverse impacts are unavoidable, has
the clients minimised, restored, and/or
compensated for these impacts in a
culturally appropriate manner
commensurate with the nature and
scale of such impacts and the
vulnerability of the Affected
Communities of Indigenous Peoples?

Are the client's proposed actions

developed with the ICP of the Affected
Communities of Indigenous Peoples and
contained in a time-bound plan, such as
an Indigenous Peoples Plan, or a broader
community development plan with
separate components for Indigenous
Peoples.

10 to Participation Has the client involved Indigenous

12 and Consent Peoples' representative bodies and
organisations, as well as members of the
Affected Communities of Indigenous
Peoples and provided sufficient time for
Indigenous Peoples' decision-making
processes?

Has there been a process of Free Prior

and Informed Consent (FPIC) that has
engaged external experts and
established good faith negotiation
between the client and Affected
Communities of Indigenous Peoples.
Has the client documented:
i) the mutually accepted process
between the client and Affected
Communities of Indigenous Peoples
ii) the evidence of agreement between
the parties as the outcome of the
negotiations

86
13 to Impacts on If client proposes to locate the project
14 Lands and on traditional or customary lands under
Natural use and adverse impacts can be
Resources expected, does the client:
Subject to - Document its efforts to avoid or
Traditional minimize area of proposed land?
Ownership or - Document its efforts to avoid or
Under minimize impacts on natural resources
Customary Use and natural areas of importance to
Indigenous People?
- Identify and review all property
interests and traditional resource uses
prior to purchasing or leasing land?
- Assess and document the Affected
Communities of Indigenous Peoples'
resource use without prejudicing any
Indigenous Peoples' land claim?
- Ensure that Affected Communities of
Indigenous Peoples are informed of their
land rights under national law, including
any national law recognising customary
use rights?
- Offer Affected Communities of
Indigenous Peoples compensation and
due process in the case of commercial
development of their land and natural
resources, together with culturally
appropriate sustainable development
opportunities?

15 Relocation of Has the client considered feasible

Indigenous alternative project designs to avoid the
Peoples from relocation of Indigenous Peoples from
Lands and communally held lands and natural
Natural resources subject to traditional
Resources ownership or under customary use?
Subject to
Traditional
Ownership or
Under If such relocation is unavoidable, has the
Customary Use client obtained FPIC before proceeding
with project?

16 to Critical Cultural Has priority been given to avoid impacts

17 Heritage on critical cultural heritage that is
essential to the identity and/or cultural,
ceremonial, or spiritual aspects of
Indigenous Peoples lives?

87
If impacts on critical cultural heritage are
unavoidable, has the client obtained the
FPIC of the Affected Communities of
Indigenous Peoples?

When a project proposes to use the

cultural heritage including knowledge,
innovations, or practices of Indigenous
Peoples for commercial purposes, has
the client informed the Affected
Communities of Indigenous Peoples of
i) their rights under national law
ii) the scope and nature of the proposed
commercial development
iii) the potential consequences of such
development, and
iv) obtain their FPIC?

Has the client ensured fair and equitable

sharing of benefits from
commercialisation of such knowledge,
innovation, or practice, consistent with
the customs and traditions of the
Indigenous Peoples?

88
18 to Mitigation and Has the client and the Affected
20 Development Communities of Indigenous Peoples
Benefits identified mitigation measures in
alignment with the mitigation hierarchy
in PS 1 as well as opportunities for
culturally appropriate and sustainable
development benefits?

Has the client ensured the timely and

equitable delivery of agreed measures to
the Affected Communities of Indigenous
Peoples?

Have the determination, delivery and

distribution of compensation and other
benefit sharing measures to the Affected
Communities of Indigenous Peoples
taken account of the laws, institutions,
and customs of these communities as
well as their level of interaction with
mainstream society?

21 to Private Sector Where the government has a defined

22 Responsibilities role in the management of Indigenous
Where Peoples issues in relation to the project,
Government is has the client collaborated with the
Responsible for responsible government agency, to the
Managing extent feasible and permitted by the
Indigenous agency, to achieve outcomes that are
Peoples Issues consistent with the objectives of this
Performance Standard?

89
Has the client prepared a plan that will
address the relevant requirements of
this Performance Standard? The client
may need to include:
i) the plan, implementation, and
documentation of the process of ICP and
engagement and FPIC where relevant
ii) a description of the government-
provided entitlements of affected
Indigenous Peoples
iii) the measures proposed to bridge any
gaps between such entitlements, and
the requirements of this Performance
Standards, and
iv) the financial and implementation
responsibilities of the government
agency and/or the client.

90
Compliance Status
Project
Limitations/Gaps

91
92
93
94
95
96
IFC Performance Standards Alignment
Performance Standard 8: Cultural Heritage
Objectives:
• To protect cultural heritage from the adverse impacts of project activities and support its preservation.
• To promote the equitable sharing of benefits from the use of cultural heritage.
Scope /
Para. Requirements
Reference
6 to 7 Internationally Has the client identified and
Recognized protected cultural heritage by
Practices ensuring that internationally
recognised practices for the
protection, field-based study,
and documentation of cultural
heritage are implemented?
Where the risk and
identification process
determines that there is a
chance of impacts to cultural
heritage, has the client
retained competent
professionals to assist in the
identification and protection of
cultural heritage?
Compliance Status
Project
Data review
The AMDAL included intangible cultural heritage
information e.g. language and customise. Tangible
cultural heritage was also identified in proximity to
the LSB proposed area in Olilit. Also cultural norm and
practices at the village level in Saumlaki, Oililit,
Sifnana, Lermatang, Bomaki, Lat Dalam, and Matakus
are available. However the baseline indicates there
are no sites of cultural sensitivity identified within the
perimeter of the LSB site, though there is a keramat
area not far from one of its boundaries. This site,
named Wempusuk, is located some 150 metres to the
south east of the south eastern most boundary point
of the quadrant of land proposed for the LSB site.
The closest water source to the proposed LSB site is
also located in a functioning well. It was said there
were human bones at this site but none were
observed by the field team nor any evidence of
graves. There is also a cave in the limestone here,
inhabited by swifts.
No customary codes will be violated as long as people
avoid the keramat. To prevent any complaints in
respect to this area small customary rites involving
betelnut (sirih pinang), and libations of sopi spirit and
appropriate prayers should be made on behalf of any
personnel working near this area for the first time by
a village customary elder (tua tua adat). The
presentation at the site of a small betelnut offering
will probably be sufficient to satisfy local customary.
N/A
97
8 Change Find Has the client developed N/A
Procedures provisions for managing
chance finds through a chance
find procedure which will be
applied in the event that
cultural heritage is
subsequently discovered?

Does the chance find N/A

procedure include provisions
for not disturbing any chance
find until an assessment by
competent professionals is
made and actions consistent
with the requirements of this
Performance Standard are
identified?

9 Consultation Where a project may affect The PCDP states INPEX will align with IFC PS8 and
cultural heritage, did the client national laws related to cultural heritage. It has also
consult with Affected previously consulted with regency level cultural
Communities within the host heritage related government agencies.
country who use, or have used
within living memory, the
cultural heritage for
longstanding cultural
purposes?

98
 Has the client consulted with N/A
the Affected Communities to
identify cultural heritage of
importance, and to incorporate
into the client's decision-
making process the views of
the Affected Communities on
such cultural heritage?

Has consultation also involved N/A

the relevant national or local
regulatory agencies that are
entrusted with the protection
of cultural heritage?

10 Community Does the client allow N/A

Access continued access to the
cultural site or will provide an
alternative access route,
subject to overriding health,
safety, and security
considerations?

11 Removal of Where the client has N/A

Replicable encountered tangible cultural
Cultural Heritage heritage that is replicable and
not critical, has the client
applied mitigation measures
that favour avoidance?

99
Cultural Heritage

Where avoidance is not N/A

feasible, has the client applied
a mitigation hierarchy as
follows:
i) minimise adverse impacts
and implement restoration
measures, in situ, that ensure
maintenance of the value and
functionality of the cultural
heritage, including maintaining
or restoring any ecosystem
processes needed to support it
ii) where restoration in situ is
not possible, restore the
functionality of the cultural
heritage, in a different
location, including the
ecosystem processes needed
to support it
iii) the permanent removal of
historical and archaeological
artefacts and structures is
carried out according to
internationally recognised
practices done by competent
professionals

iv) only where minimisation of N/A

adverse impacts and
restoration to ensure
maintenance of the value and
functionality of the cultural
heritage are not feasible, and
where the Affected
Communities are using the
tangible cultural heritage for
long-standing cultural
purposes, compensate for loss
of that tangible cultural
heritage.

100
12 Removal of Non- If removal is likely to result in N/A
Replicable irreparable damage or
Cultural Heritage destruction of the cultural
heritage, where the following
conditions met before
removing any nonreplicable
cultural heritage?
i) there are no technically or
financially feasible alternatives
to removal
ii) the overall benefits of the
project conclusively outweigh
the anticipated cultural
heritage loss from removal
iii) any removal of cultural
heritage is conducted using the
best available technique

101
13 to Critical Cultural Has the client removed, N/A
15 Heritage significantly altered, or
damaged critical cultural
heritage?

Where impacts on critical The PCDP states INPEX will align with IFC PS1 and 8
cultural heritage are and national laws related to cultural heritage. It has
unavoidable, has the client also previously consulted with regency level cultural
used a process of Informed heritage related government agencies.
Consultation and Participation
of the Affected Communities
and which used a good faith
negotiation process that
results in a documented
outcome?

Where a proposed project is As identified in the Limitation of the Social Baseline

located within a legally Volume IV, the site selection has not been finalised.
protected area or a legally Therefore the baseline presented to date does not
defined buffer zone, has the detail in-depth critical cultural heritage issues.
client
i) complied with defined
national or local cultural
heritage regulations or the
protected area management
plans?
ii) consulted the protected
area sponsors and managers,
local communities and other
key stakeholders on the
proposed project?, and
iii) implemented additional
programmes, as appropriate,
to promote and enhance the
conservation aims of the
protected area?

16 Project's Use of Has the client informed these N/A

Cultural Heritage communities of
i) their rights under national
law
ii) the scope and nature of the
proposed commercial
development
iii) the potential consequences
of such development

102
Before proceeding with such N/A
commercialisation, has the
client
i) entered into a process of ICP
and used a good faith
negotiation process that
results in a documented
outcome?
ii) provided for fair and
equitable sharing of benefits
from commercialisation of
such knowledge, innovation, or
practice, consistent with their
customs and traditions?

103
mpliance Status
Project
Limitations/Gaps
Identification of Cultural Heritage
Importance.

N/A

104
N/A

N/A

The existing PCDP does not have specific

engagement plan/ consultation and
disclosure plan for to address issues on
cultural heritage importance.

105
N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

106
N/A

N/A

107
N/A

108
N/A

The existing PCDP does not have specific

engagement plan/ consultation and
disclosure plan to address issues on
cultural heritage importance nor does it
specifically discuss historical ICP on
cultural heritage.

No detail on legally protected areas or

legally defined buffer zones.

N/A

109
N/A

110