The document compares different international relations theories on various dimensions such as level of analysis, key actors, views of human nature, and perspectives on change and cooperation. Classical realism and neorealism focus on the individual level and international system, respectively, while liberalism, neoliberalism, and constructivism have a more multi-level analysis. Theories also differ in their views of human nature, possibilities of cooperation, and prospects for change in the international system.
The document compares different international relations theories on various dimensions such as level of analysis, key actors, views of human nature, and perspectives on change and cooperation. Classical realism and neorealism focus on the individual level and international system, respectively, while liberalism, neoliberalism, and constructivism have a more multi-level analysis. Theories also differ in their views of human nature, possibilities of cooperation, and prospects for change in the international system.
The document compares different international relations theories on various dimensions such as level of analysis, key actors, views of human nature, and perspectives on change and cooperation. Classical realism and neorealism focus on the individual level and international system, respectively, while liberalism, neoliberalism, and constructivism have a more multi-level analysis. Theories also differ in their views of human nature, possibilities of cooperation, and prospects for change in the international system.
Classical Realism Neorealism Liberalism Neoliberalism Individual level Global system Some individual (e.g. Global system level Individual level in State level, (human nature) [Mansbach and John Stuart Mill) and [Mansbach and transmission of ideas emphasizing [Mansbach and Rafferty 2008, p. 41] some on state level Rafferty 2008, p. 41] and identities dominant economic Level of Rafferty 2008, p. 41] (e. g. Immanuel [Mansbach and system analysis Kant) Rafferty 2008, p. 41] [Mansbach and [Mansbach and Rafferty 2008, p. 41] Rafferty 2008, p. 41] Sovereign states International system States, international Individuals, states, Individuals, [e.g. Kegley and institutions, global non-state actors nongovernmental Wittkopf 2011, p. 32] corporations. organizations, Key actor(s) [Kegley and Wittkopf transnational 2011, p. 47] networks. [Kegley and Wittkopf 2011, p. 47] Aggressive and Benign, perfectible, Malleable, changes Benign and selfish, cannot be harmony of interest behavior to reflect perfectible under improved, cannot be is possible. changing norms in socialism, greed and Human perfect. [Mansbach and society. selfishness without nature [Mansbach and Rafferty 2008, p. 41] [Mansbach and socialism. Rafferty 2008, p. 41] Rafferty 2008, p. 41] [Mansbach and Rafferty 2008, p. 41] Various. Survival, for both [Kegley and Wittkopf offensive and Primary state 2011, p. 35] defensive realism. objective [Kegley and Wittkopf 2011, p. 35] Don’t matter much, A big problem, and may be preferable. can be reformed Nature and [Kegley and Wittkopf through strong consequences 2011, p. 43] international of anarchy institution. [Kegley and Wittkopf 2011, p. 43] Pessimistic, war can Optimistic, wars can Indeterminate, Optimistic: wars are be managed but not be prevented by depends upon the the result of class eliminated. Policies reforms, e.g. free ideas that take root conflict, and can be World view should enhance trade, economic and attract eliminated by the power. development, widespread support. end of capitalism and [Mansbach and welfare, and [Mansbach and introduction of Rafferty 2008, p. 41] democracy. Policies Rafferty 2008, p. 41] classless society. should enhance Policies should justice. enhance equality. [Mansbach and Rafferty 2008, p. 41] Key features of Key features of Key features of Key features of global politics are global politics are global politics are global politics are permanent, evils mutable, moving to a mutable though mutable. such as war and positive direction. change is impeded [Mansbach and poverty cannot be [Mansbach and by material factors, Rafferty 2008, p. 41] eliminated. Rafferty 2008, p. 41] only evolution of Change [Mansbach and ideas and resulting Rafferty 2008, p. 41] change in identities and interests can modify material factors. [Mansbach and Rafferty 2008, p. 41] Individuals are International Individuals and states Possible, because Indeterminate, Socialist and naturally cooperation is can cooperate to international depending on which capitalist states competitive. possible, but will be overcome collective cooperation will ideas become cannot cooperate. [Mansbach and difficult to sustain. problems. reduce selfishness. dominant and the [Mansbach and Cooperation Rafferty 2008, p. 42] [Kegley and Wittkopf [Mansbach and [Kegley and Wittkopf response to such Rafferty 2008, p. 42] 2011, p. 43] Rafferty 2008, p. 42] 2011, p. 43] ideas. [Mansbach and Rafferty 2008, p. 42] Elitist, diplomacy Public diplomacy, Crucial in forming Public opinion should be conducted applauds public intersubjective reflects class in secrecy by opinion as an consensus regarding perceptions and professional obstacle to war. norms and ideas, to interests, dominant Public diplomats. Public [Mansbach and create collective economic class in opinion opinion is ill-formed Rafferty 2008, p. 42] identity. society. and short-sighted. [Mansbach and [Mansbach and [Mansbach and Rafferty 2008, p. 42] Rafferty 2008, p. 42] Rafferty 2008, p. 42] Leaders serve the States exist to serve National interest is States serve the interests of the state. the interests of based on national interests of the Focus is mainly on individuals. Free identity, what states dominant economic National great powers. trade and human make of it. class in the society. interest International rights are key [Mansbach and Economic institutions are regardless of state Rafferty 2008, p. 42] imperialism and suspect as they may interests. dominance over the pursue interests [Mansbach and ‘periphery’ of poor other than those of Rafferty 2008, p. 42] states. the states. [Mansbach and [Mansbach and Rafferty 2008, p. 42] Rafferty 2008, p. 42] States must be International Support international Institutions are Indeterminate. Support International independent, organizations are organizations as important and will [Mansbach and transnational autonomous, and arenas for states to encouraging peace change patters of Rafferty 2008, p. 42] institutions created institutions free to act without compete for to overcome international politics. by socialist societies. and limits of sovereignty. influence. collective dilemmas. [Kegley and Wittkopf [Mansbach and organizations [Mansbach and [Kegley and Wittkopf [Mansbach and 2011, p. 43] Rafferty 2008, p. 42] Rafferty 2008, p. 42] 2011, p. 43] Rafferty 2008, p. 42] Tend to ignore the Focus on society and Intense focus on Focus on society, role of society. relations among society as the source especially on [Mansbach and people rather than of ideas and relations between Society Rafferty 2008, p. 43] state bureaucracies. identities. classes rather than [Mansbach and [Mansbach and on government. Rafferty 2008, p. 43] Rafferty 2008, p. 43] [Mansbach and Rafferty 2008, p. 43] Actors do and should There are areas Indeterminate. Focus on relative seek relative gain where participants [Mansbach and gains of socialists rather than the can all profit or lose Rafferty 2008, p. 43] compared to absolute gain. (variable-sum games) capitalists. [Mansbach and and there are others [Mansbach and Rafferty 2008, p. 43] in which the gain Rafferty 2008, p. 43] Relative and made by one actor is absolute gain equivalent to the loss of other (zero-sum game). Actors are more concerned about absolute gains. [Mansbach and Rafferty 2008, p. 43] Military and Security is the Human security Security is less Indeterminate. Human security economic security primary issue. consists of far more important than [Mansbach and consists of far more are the principle [Kegley and Wittkopf than military economic welfare. Rafferty 2008, p. 43] than military issues, support for 2011, p. 43] security. [Kegley and Wittkopf security, should large defense [Mansbach and 2011, p. 43] involve economic Security budgets and Rafferty 2008, p. 43] equality and opposition to free fulfillment of basic trade which can material needs. render countries less [Mansbach and independent. Rafferty 2008, p. 43] [Mansbach and Rafferty 2008, p. 43] Protect sovereign Institutional reforms Activists who autonomy and deter through promote progressive rivals through democratization, ideas and encourage military open markets, and states to adhere to Approach to preparedness and international law and norms for peace alliances. organization. appropriate [Kegley and Wittkopf [Kegley and Wittkopf behavior. 2011, p. 47] 2011, p. 47] [Kegley and Wittkopf 2011, p. 47] Anarchy, self-help, Collective security, Ideas, images, shared national interest, reciprocity, knowledge, relative gains, international identities, discourses, balance of power regimes, complex and persuasion Central [Kegley and Wittkopf interdependence, leading to new concepts 2011, p. 47] transnational understandings and relations normative change [Kegley and Wittkopf [Kegley and Wittkopf 2011, p. 47] 2011, p. 47]