4 views

Uploaded by lukhman

- Module C-Laminar Flat Plate Flow
- CHAPTER 6
- Effect of Longitudinal Velocity of the Particle of the Dusty Fluid with Volume Fraction in the Incompressible Fluid
- annurev-fluid-122414-034434.pdf
- RANSE Calculations of Laminar-To-Turbulent Transition-Flow Around Sailing Yacht Appendages
- Boundary Layer Theory
- Memorias del profesor Dudley Brian Spalding 2019.pdf
- 2012
- Boudayer Layer Group 1 Mtech 15 17
- Design of a Supersonic Nozzle
- Boundary-Layer Theory by H. Schlichting, Seventh Edition
- Turbulent Flow in Curved Elbow
- 7
- Korea 2014ugm Turbulence Models
- Jh 3616111616
- Mechanics of Fluids 2 Marks (ALL-Units)
- Ensayos Tunel de Viento
- 730_1
- 1990_Prince & Blanch_Bubble coalescence and break-up in air-sparged bubble columns.pdf
- FM-Lec-2

You are on page 1of 9

com

Email : info@learncax.com

LearnCAx, CAx education division

Centre for Computational Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Pune, India

Before getting into the details of the turbulent models, let us first discuss an

important concept known as 𝒚+ and know how it is related to turbulence modeling,

mesh generation process and its effect to the CFD end result. It is important to know

about the concept of wall 𝑦 + or in general how the flow behaves near the wall, as it

is on the basis of 𝑦 + , the turbulence models are generally selected for solutions. The

behavior of flow near the wall is a complicated phenomenon and to distinguish the

different regions near the wall, the concept of wall 𝑦 + has been formulated. Thus

𝑦 + is a dimensionless quantity and is the distance from wall measured in terms of

viscous lengths.

Why we need 𝒚+ ?

One of the prime reasons for the need of 𝑦 + is to distinguish different regions near

the wall or in the viscous region, but how exactly it helps in turbulence modeling or

in general CFD modeling essentially needs to be well understood. Let us try to

explain this with an example. Imagine a fisherman using fishing net, a grid kind of

structure to trap fishes. Now if he is trying to catch medium sized fishes the grids in

the net he might use are supposed to be somewhat big, but if he is trying to trap

even small sized fishes then the grid size of the net should be small enough to

capture those. In this case even the large fishes are also captured. Similarly getting

back to our case if we intend to resolve the effects near the wall i.e., in the viscous

sub layer then the size of the mesh size should be small and dense enough near the

wall so that almost all the effects are captured. But in some cases if the wall effects

are negligible then there is option of including semi-empirical formulae to bridge

1

Dr. Ganesh Visavale (ganesh@cctech.co.in), LearnCAx, Centre for Computational Technologies Pvt. Ltd

1 Akshay Residency, 50 Anand Park, Aundh, Pune – 411007, India © Copyrights : www.LearnCAx.com

Web : www.learncax.com

Email : info@learncax.com

between the viscosity affected region and fully turbulent region and in this case the

mesh size need not be small or dense enough near the wall i.e., coarse mesh works

sufficiently in this case.

Considering the first case i.e., near wall modeling it is well-known that the mesh

size should be small enough. However, one may wish to know exactly how small ?

Thus, here comes the concept of 𝑦 + and based on its value the first cell height can

be calculated. Also the near wall regions are meshed using the calculated first cell

height value with gradual growth in the mesh so that most of the effects are

captured avoiding heavy mesh count.

Let us now look at the 𝑦 + concept i.e., what exactly it is, in more detail. However,

before that let us revisit the concept of boundary layer, especially turbulent

boundary layer.

In a flow bounded by a wall, different scales and physical processes are dominant in

the inner portion near the wall, and the outer portion approaching the free stream.

These layers are typically known as the inner and outer layers. Considering the flow

over a smooth flat plate the boundary layer can be distinguished into two types

namely; laminar boundary layer and turbulent boundary layer. Typical boundary

layer structure over a flat plate is shown in the figure below. In between the laminar

and turbulent boundary layer there is a transition region. Typically for flow over a

flat plate the transition usually occurs around 𝑅𝑒 ≈ 5 × 105 .

Since we have discussed about the turbulent flow characteristics in our previous

blog, Introduction to Turbulence, we shall not get into greater detail here and

directly discuss about the turbulent boundary layer. From the above figure it can be

seen that in turbulent boundary layer region flow near the wall has been analyzed

in terms of three layers:

The outer layer, or defect layer, where large scale turbulent eddy shear

dominates

1 Akshay Residency, 50 Anand Park, Aundh, Pune – 411007, India © Copyrights : www.LearnCAx.com

Web : www.learncax.com

Email : info@learncax.com

logarithmic variation

A still clear image of the above phenomena is shown below:

where 𝑈0 is the free stream velocity and 𝛿 is the boundary layer thickness, 𝑦 is the

vertical distance measured from the wall. Turbulent boundary layers are usually

described in terms of several non-dimensional parameters. The boundary layer

thickness, 𝛿 is the distance from the wall at which viscous effects become negligible

and represents the edge of the boundary layer.

Now let us discuss more about the above said regions. Owing to the presence of the

solid boundary the flow behavior and turbulent structure are considerably different

from free turbulent flows. Dimensional analysis has greatly assisted in correlating

the experimental data. In turbulent thin layer flows a Reynolds number based on

length scale 𝐿 in the flow direction 𝑅𝑒𝐿 is always very large. This implies that inertia

forces are greater than viscous forces at these scales. If we consider Reynolds

number on a distance y away from the wall Re y= U0y/υ, we see that if the value of

𝑦 is of the order of 𝐿 the above argument holds well. Inertia force dominates far

away from the wall. As 𝑦 is decreased to zero, the Reynolds number based on 𝑦 also

decreases to zero. Just before 𝑦 reaches zero there will be a range of values of 𝑦

for which 𝑅𝑒𝑦 is of the order 1. At this distance from the wall and closer, the viscous

forces will be equal in the order of magnitude to the inertia forces or large. To

conclude, in flows along solid boundaries there is usually substantial region of

inertia dominated flow far away from the wall and a thin layer within which viscous

effects are important.

Near to the wall the flow is influenced by the viscous effects and independent of

free stream parameters. However the mean flow velocity depends on 𝑦 (distance

from the wall), ρ (fluid density), 𝜇 (viscosity) and τw (wall shear stress).

1 Akshay Residency, 50 Anand Park, Aundh, Pune – 411007, India © Copyrights : www.LearnCAx.com

Web : www.learncax.com

Email : info@learncax.com

Linear sub-layer :

At the solid surface the fluid is stationary and the turbulent eddying motion

must also stop very close to the wall. The fluid very close to the wall is

dominated by viscous shear in absence of the turbulent shear stress effects

(𝑦 + < 5) and it can be assumed that the shear stress is almost constant and

equal to the wall shear stress 𝜏𝑤 throughout the layer.

Thus we have;

𝜕𝑈

𝜏(𝑦) = 𝜇 ≅ 𝜏𝑤

𝜕𝑦

Applying boundary conditions & manipulations we obtain:

𝑢+ = 𝑦 +

Now as can be seen from the expression above to be a linear, the fluid layer

adjacent to the wall is called as linear sub layer.

Log-law layer :

At some distance from the wall and outside the viscous sub-layer (30 < 𝑦 + <

500) a region exists where viscous and turbulent effects are both important.

Within this inner region the shear stress is assumed to be constant and equal

to wall shear stress and varying gradually with distance from the wall. The

relationship between 𝑦 + and 𝑢+ in this region is given as:

1 1

𝑢+ = ln 𝑦 + + 𝐵 = ln 𝐸 𝑦 +

𝑘 𝑘

where 𝑘, 𝐵 and 𝐸 are constants whose values are determined from

measurements. As the relationship between 𝑦 + and 𝑢+ is logarithmic, the

above expression is known as log-law and the layer where 𝑦 + takes the values

between 30 and 500 is known as log-law layer.

Outer layer:

According to experimental studies it is found that the log-law is valid in the

𝑦

range 0.2 < 𝛿 < 0.2 and for higher values of 𝑦 the defect law is referred,

whereas in the overlap region the log-law and velocity defect law (law of

wake) are equal. Tennekes and Lumley (1972) proposed the following

logarithmic law for identifying the matched overlap region.

𝑈𝑚𝑎𝑥 − 𝑈 1 𝑦

= 𝑙𝑛 + 𝐴

𝑢𝜏 𝑘 𝛿

Buffer layer:

In the buffer layer, between 5 and 30 wall units, neither law holds, such that:

For 5<𝑦 + <30; 𝑢+ ≠ 𝑦 +

1

𝑢+ ≠ ln 𝑦 + + 𝐵

𝑘

With the largest variation from either law occurring approximately where the two

equations intercept, at y+=11. That is, before 11 wall units the linear

approximation is more accurate and after 11 wall units the logarithmic

Web : www.learncax.com

Email : info@learncax.com

units.

Schematic diagram of the above laws or in general law of wall is shown below. The

near-wall modeling significantly impacts the fidelity of numerical solutions,

inasmuch as walls are the main source of mean vorticity and turbulence. After all,

it is in the near-wall region that the solution variables have large gradients, and the

momentum and other scalar transports occur most vigorously. Therefore, accurate

representation of the flow in the near-wall region determines successful predictions

of wall-bounded turbulent flows.

The k-ε models, the RSM, and the LES model are primarily valid for turbulent core

flows (i.e., the flow in the regions somewhat far from walls). Consideration

therefore needs to be given as to how to make these models suitable for wall-

bounded flows. The Spalart-Allmaras and k-ω models were designed to be applied

throughout the boundary layer, provided that the near-wall mesh resolution is

sufficient. The two approaches are schematically shown below.

Web : www.learncax.com

Email : info@learncax.com

computational resources, because the viscosity-affected near-wall region, in which

the solution variables change most rapidly, does not need to be resolved. The wall

function approach is popular because it is economical, robust, and reasonably

accurate. It is a practical option for the near-wall treatments for industrial flow

simulations.

The wall function approach, however, is inadequate in situations where the low-

Reynolds-number effects are pervasive in the flow domain in question, and the

hypotheses underlying the wall functions cease to be valid. Such situations require

near-wall models that are valid in the viscosity-affected region and accordingly

integrable all the way to the wall.

From above discussion it is clear that the placement of the first node in our near-

wall inflation mesh is very important.

From above image we need to be careful to ensure that our 𝑦 + values are not so

large that the first node falls outside the boundary layer region. If this happens,

then the Wall Functions used by our turbulence model may incorrectly calculate the

flow properties at this first calculation point which will introduce errors into our

pressure drop and velocity results.

Web : www.learncax.com

Email : info@learncax.com

Firstly, we should calculate the Reynolds number for our model based on the

characteristic scales of our geometry.

From the definition of 𝑦 +

𝜌𝑈𝜏 ∆𝑦 𝑦+. 𝜇

𝑦+ = → ∆𝑦 =

𝜇 𝜌𝑈𝜏

where 𝑈𝜏 is shear velocity. The target 𝑦 + value and fluid properties are known

a priori, so we need to calculate the frictional velocity as given above.

The wall shear stress, 𝜏𝑤 can be calculated from skin friction

coefficient,𝐶𝑓 such that:

1

𝜏𝑤 = 𝐶𝑓 𝜌𝑈0 2

2

Thus to calculate ∆𝑦 we need to know 𝐶𝑓 , there are empirical formulae to

calculate 𝐶𝑓 which are given below.

For internal flows: 𝐶𝑓 = 0.079 ∙ 𝑅𝑒 −0.25

For external flows: 𝐶𝑓 = 0.058 ∙ 𝑅𝑒 −0.2

Thus with all these inputs we can insert the values in the above equation to

calculate ∆𝑦.

When considering simple flows and simple geometry, we might find this correlation

is highly accurate. However, when considering complex geometry, refinement in

the boundary layer may be required to ensure the desired 𝑦 + value is achieved. In

such cases re-mesh has to be done or else mesh adaption techniques have to be used

to achieve the required value across the entire model.

Thus we have learnt that the wall function approach and 𝑦 + value required is

determined by the flow behavior and the turbulence model being used. If you have

an attached flow, then generally we can use a Wall Function approach, which means

a larger initial 𝑦 + value, smaller overall mesh count and faster run times. If one

expects flow separation and knows that the accurate prediction of the separation

point can have an impact the result, then it would be advised to resolve the

boundary layer all the way to the wall with a finer mesh. Unfortunately, as the

𝑦 + value is dependent on the local fluid velocity which varies across the wall

significantly for most industrial flow applications, it is not possible to know the exact

𝑦 + prior to running an initial simulation. For this reason, it is important that one

gets into the habit of checking the 𝑦 + values as part of normal post-processing to

ensure to be in the valid range for the problem flow physics and turbulence model

selection.

References:

http://www.computationalfluiddynamics.com.au/tips-tricks-turbulence-

wall-functions-and-y-requirements/

http://www.computationalfluiddynamics.com.au/tips-tricks-cfd-estimate-

first-cell-height/

INTRODUCTORY LECTURES on TURBULENCE Physics, Mathematics and

Modeling by J. M. McDonough

Web : www.learncax.com

Email : info@learncax.com

http://www.bakker.org/dartmouth06/engs150/11-bl.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_the_wall

Web : www.learncax.com

Email : info@learncax.com

your needs. It has range of FREE and PREMIUM courses

which is designed to meet the industry requirements.

All the courses are self-contained with video lectures,

quiz, assignments and projects. Every course comes

with FAQs and discussion forums where you can get

answers to all your questions. Each course contains live

assistance from LearnCAx faculty where faculties will

guide you through online sessions and desktop sharing.

knowledge through articles. This includes best

practices, advance techniques, and recent

development in respective field. LearnCAx is backed

with strong industrial consultancy team. This team does

projects for industries. As LearnCAx main focus is “from

academics to industry”, blogs gives us an opportunity

to share details about our industrial work. It’s not only

about what is done, but also about how the project is

done. The objective is to give student’s more

knowledge about industrial project so that they feel

connected to the industry.

with experts is an inevitable part of every learning

process. LearnCAx faculty conducts webinars to share

the knowledge with you. Let it be knowhow of

software, introduction to a particular topics or

discussing fundamentals of a subject, all webinars are

targeted towards sharing the knowledge and getting

feedback about what your training needs are? Webinar

is also a place for our consultancy team to share their

work with you. All these live sessions would give an

opportunity to you to talk to the experts in the domain.

1 Akshay Residency, 50 Anand Park, Aundh, Pune – 411007, India © Copyrights : www.LearnCAx.com

- Module C-Laminar Flat Plate FlowUploaded bySandeep Kadiam
- CHAPTER 6Uploaded byHarris Effendi
- Effect of Longitudinal Velocity of the Particle of the Dusty Fluid with Volume Fraction in the Incompressible FluidUploaded byinventionjournals
- annurev-fluid-122414-034434.pdfUploaded byflowh_
- RANSE Calculations of Laminar-To-Turbulent Transition-Flow Around Sailing Yacht AppendagesUploaded bykokahoby
- Boundary Layer TheoryUploaded bySharanjeet Kaur
- Memorias del profesor Dudley Brian Spalding 2019.pdfUploaded byAnonymous a7EsJT592
- 2012Uploaded byGurunath Epili
- Boudayer Layer Group 1 Mtech 15 17Uploaded byshuklahouse
- Design of a Supersonic NozzleUploaded byPandel
- Boundary-Layer Theory by H. Schlichting, Seventh EditionUploaded byColtonThomas
- Turbulent Flow in Curved ElbowUploaded bytuanpham
- 7Uploaded byisele1977
- Korea 2014ugm Turbulence ModelsUploaded byVictor Solis Brevis
- Jh 3616111616Uploaded byAnonymous 7VPPkWS8O
- Mechanics of Fluids 2 Marks (ALL-Units)Uploaded byrajapraty
- Ensayos Tunel de VientoUploaded byRamiro Pinto
- 730_1Uploaded byPreetiJoshi
- 1990_Prince & Blanch_Bubble coalescence and break-up in air-sparged bubble columns.pdfUploaded byGuilherme Antunes
- FM-Lec-2Uploaded bySerious Black
- Special Question BankUploaded byAKHIL HARI
- Redesign of a transition piece of a gas turbine combining geometries from an original transition piece and one optimized by the genetic algorithm methodUploaded byJorge Luis Valdivia Paredes
- J&K Pre 2012 (Civil Engg.)Uploaded byCgpscAspirant
- Compares FLUENT and CFX SolutionsUploaded byasimbuyuk
- SupportUploaded byjsdhilip
- Quiz-07.pdfUploaded byMohammed Ibrahim
- VenturiUploaded byAnurag Kumar
- Slip Flow and Magneto-NANOFLUID over an Exponentially Stretching Permeable Sheet with Heat Generation/AbsorptionUploaded byInternational Journal of Engineering Inventions (IJEI)
- 2011-060Uploaded byDeepak Sudan
- Fluid Mechanics (experiment)Uploaded bysimple-CE-stud

- a trialUploaded bylukhman
- keModel.pdfUploaded bylukhman
- TO-DRAW-A-CIRCLE.pdfUploaded bylukhman
- 15.1workUploaded bylukhman
- trials 11Uploaded bylukhman
- LUKHMAN.docxUploaded bylukhman
- cd3380.pdfUploaded byAriel Visperas Veloria
- _timExe.txtUploaded bylukhman
- Composite CareersUploaded bylukhman
- Composite CareersUploaded bylukhman
- New Microsoft Word Document.docxUploaded bylukhman
- A TECHNICAL NOTE ON RECENT TRENDS IN THE WORLDWIDE CAR FABRICATING INDUSTRY AND SUGGESTIONS FOR DEVELOPING NATIONS.docxUploaded bylukhman
- Wall y+strategy for dealing with wall bounded turbulents flows.pdfUploaded bymatteo_1234
- l.docxUploaded bylukhman
- TEST test.docxUploaded bylukhman
- Lesson PlanUploaded bylukhman
- TrialUploaded bylukhman
- TEST.docxUploaded bylukhman
- Paper to Talk.originalUploaded byVasu Kodaganti
- syllabusUploaded bylukhman
- tamil books.pdfUploaded byPackirisamy Neelagandam
- NEW.docxUploaded bylukhman
- Tactics CourseUploaded byF.A. Buenaventura
- Tactics CourseUploaded byF.A. Buenaventura
- TestUploaded bylukhman
- Mechanical BasicsUploaded bylukhman
- How To Present a Paper - Speaker GuideUploaded byCallighan

- Curved Bar NodesUploaded byfitg10
- RiGID PAVEMENT DESIGN 20-7-09.pptUploaded byMa Srinu
- 1 Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Nuclear Piping Considering Variation of Seismic Loading 2002 International Journal of Pressure Vessels AnUploaded byEric Chien
- Angkur Dan Base Plate Support Apparatus Jayapura SkylandUploaded byFikri
- Support CalculationUploaded bySanjeet Tirkey
- Calibration of CPT in SandUploaded byqwesrt
- IntroductionUploaded byKiran Koraddi
- Stress Corrosion Cracking of A723 Steel Pressure Vessel Two Case StudiesUploaded bylitao2314
- ASTM G39-99 (2016)Uploaded bycenando
- PhD Dissertation Martin Diehl_High-Resolution Crystal Plasticity SimulationsUploaded byOmar Al-Abri
- maks.pdfUploaded byKalambilYunus
- Best Practices in Compressor and Gas-Engine MountingUploaded byzhangj5
- A Tricycle Turns Turtle a Case Study in Defective Engineering Design 1986 Design StudiesUploaded byVivi Barquero
- Gent-1980.pdfUploaded byPorto Gee
- FlangedJointsUploaded byAnjani Prabhakar
- api4frevision3Uploaded byvictor
- 1st semUploaded byM Pradeep Kumar
- Mit2 080jf13 Probset 1Uploaded byahmadomar89
- ME 2254 — STRENGTH OF MATERIALS april.may 2011.bakUploaded byPunitha Kumar
- Design of Self - Supporting Dome RoofsUploaded byzatenne
- Tensile TestingUploaded bybrintopv
- shear wall 8Uploaded byGrantHerman
- Bruhn - and - Supplement.pdfUploaded byMihai Pop
- DRDO Mechanical Engineering Question paper.pdfUploaded byAjay Kumar Verma
- Self-healing MaterialsA Review of Advances in MaterialsUploaded byjro84
- 04 Torsion TestUploaded byGarry Gautama
- Earthquake Testing ReportUploaded byLampard Chen
- ARMA-91-1115_Comparison of Direct Shear and Hollow Cylinder Tests on Rock JointsUploaded bycastille1956
- Soete Poster: The VierendeelUploaded bydonari
- MechanicalUploaded byNikhil Aggarwal