Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Auditors typically divide financial statements into components in order to manage the audit
o A component can be:
a financial statement account or,
a transaction cycle
o Related types (or classes) of transactions are part of the same cycle
Entity level controls e.g. supervision controls and information technology general controls affect
multiple or all transaction cycles.
Auditor will document, evaluate and test entity level prior to working with individual cycles.
Why?
Transaction Cycles used in our text
o Keep closely related types of transactions in the same segment:
Sales and receipts –e.g.. sales, returns, cash receipts and uncollectable accounts.
Acquisition and payment.
Payroll and personnel –payroll transactions and accrued payroll.
Inventory and warehousing.
Capital acquisition and repayment.
o Auditor to understand relationships but treat each cycle separately during the audit.
o See pages 6-8 in lecture notes for illustrative figures
AUDIT ASSERTIONS
Those charged with governance of an entity are responsible for ensuring that the financial
statements provide a fair presentation of the entity and its operations
Definition
o Assertions are statements regarding the recognition, measurement, presentation, and
disclosure of items included in the financial statements
Example:
o EG Land at December 31 balance $ 2,500,000 in balance sheet.
Accuracy and Valuation –at COST or NRV in CAD
Completeness–all assets classified as land have been included in the balance
Classification and understandability–all assets have been classified and
appropriately presented and described
Occurrence, rights and obligations –company owns land and transactions have
occurred.
Significance
o Management make assertions about each account and related note disclosures
o When assessing the risk of material misstatement and designing audit procedures,
auditors use assertions for:
transactions,
account balances
presentation and disclosures
o Transaction based assertions focus on the transactions that took place during the period
as opposed to the account balance (at financial year end), for example, in the audit of
inventory the audit will focus o purchases and sales transactions
o Presentation and disclosure assertions relate to all items included in the financial
statements to ensure they are presented and disclosed appropriately.
o The auditor searches to ensure that all items that should have been disclosed are
included.
o The auditor also checks that disclosed items represent events and transactions that
have occurred, that they are recorded at the appropriate amount, and described
accurately.
AUDIT EVIDENCE
Evidence is:
o the information that an auditor uses when arriving at their opinion on the fair
presentation of their client’s financial statements (CAS 500)
The auditor must gather sufficient appropriate evidence to support their opinion
o Sufficiency relates to quantity of evidence
o Appropriateness relates to quality of evidence
o Audit risk affects the quantity and quality e.g. if the auditor sets audit risk at 2%, the
auditor is willing to accept a low risk of an incorrect opinion.
Therefore, more audit evidence related to the risk of material misstatement
needs to be accumulated.
High-risk account => SUBSTANTIVE audit approach
Audit Risk Inherent Risk Control Risk Detection Risk Evidence
High High Low More
External confirmations
o Auditor requests third party to confirm matter in confirmation letter, including:
Banks: confirm cash balances, securities, loans
Creditors: confirm amount owed, terms, by client
Debtors: confirm amount owed to client
Others: confirm description and quantity of assets held
o Examples:
Accounts receivable confirmations
Auditor selects accounts based on: Materiality, Age, & Location
Primary assertion being tested is existence as well as rights and
obligations.
Valuation and allocation assertion is not satisfied.
Two types of confirmations:
o 2 types of confirmations:
Negative form: reply if information incorrect
Hard to interpret non-response
Positive form: reply in all circumstances –superior
evidence
Cannot know how well other party checked
their records –auditor will perform other
procedures to test valuation
Bank confirmation
Request for information directly from the bank. Confirms:
o Asset is recorded at the correct amount (valuation)
o Asset in the client’s name (rights) / Loans are owed
(obligations)
o Liabilities are included in the balance sheet (completeness)
Documentary evidence
o Invoices, suppliers’ statements, bank statements, minutes of meetings, correspondence,
legal agreements
o Can be internally or externally generated
o Auditor can:
Verify information in client’s records to supporting external documents to
confirm existence, rights and obligations, or
Trace from documents to client’s records to confirm classification, accuracy,
completeness
Representations—Audtor can request a third party to provide written representation
o Legal letter is sent by client to its lawyers to complete and return direct to auditor
Can include opinions on legal matters, details of disagreements with client etc.
(CAS 501)
o Management representation letter contains acknowledgement of management’s
responsibilities for financial statements, undertaking about legal compliance,
confirmation of effectiveness of internal controls (CAS 580)
Auditor still needs to gather other evidence
Verbal evidence
o Auditor documents key discussions with client management and staff
o Used to gain understanding of internal controls; corroborate other evidence
Computational evidence
o Auditor checks mathematical accuracy; re-adding, can include complex re-calculations,
verifying formulae
Physical evidence
o Gathered by inspecting assets to assess condition (existence) to reconcile to client’s
records (completeness)
Electronic evidence
o Includes data held on client’s computer, emails to auditor, and scans.
o No paper trail –transactions are initiated and stored electronically.
o Auditor needs to consider the internal controls in place, including the quality of client’s
computer system when assessing reliability of this evidence –remember general and
application controls
Corroboration:
o Auditor is seeking evidence to corroborate client’s recorded transactions and balances.
o Greater corroboration is provided by more persuasive evidence.
Evidence types vary in persuasiveness.
o Evidence from least to most persuasive—Evidence obtained from a source outside the
entity is more reliable than that obtained within:
Evidence generated internally by client
Includes records of cheques sent, copies of invoices and statements
sent to customers, purchase orders, company documentation regarding
policies and procedures, contracts, minutes of meetings, journals,
ledgers, trial balances, spreadsheets, worksheets, reconciliations,
calculations and computations
Could be held in paper or electronic form
Least persuasive because it is possible that client could manipulate or
omit this type of evidence
Evidence generated externally, held by client
Includes supplier invoices and statements, customer orders, bank
statements, contracts, lease agreements, tax assessments
Originals are more persuasive than photocopies
More persuasive than internally generated evidence because it is
produced by third parties
o But still possible that client could omit or tamper with evidence
Externally generated evidence send direct to auditor
Includes bank confirmations, accounts receivable confirmations,
correspondence with client’s lawyers, expert’s valuations
Most reliable type of evidence because it is independent of client
o Client has no opportunity to alter evidence
More reliable when external party is considered to be more reliable,
trustworthy, & independent of client
Which of the following are considered external? (also see pg 168 for examples of internally
generated evidence)
Vendor’s invoices
General ledgers—internal
Bank statements (held by client)
Bank confirmations (externally generated and sent directly to auditor)
Cancelled payroll cheques—internal
Payroll time cards—internal
Minutes of board meetings—internal
Signed lease agreements (held by client)
Auditor may engage expert to help in audit when auditor does not possess required skills and
knowledge to assess item
o Expert could be member of audit team, audit firm, client, or independent
o CAS 620 provides guidance
Is expert required?
Determining scope of work for expert
Selecting expert –assessing objectivity, capability of expert
Assessing work of expert
Auditor is responsible for drawing conclusions
Evidence Decisions
o 1—Which risks could result in a risk of material misstatement? Remember assertions?
o 2—Nature –which audit procedures to use
What is an audit procedure?
The detailed instruction for the collection of a particular type of audit
evidence that is to be obtained at some time during the audit.
Actual task that you do to obtain evidence with respect to an audit
objective.
Specific in terms of WHEN,WHAT,HOW
o Example of a procedure:
WHEN: During the interim audit
HOW: Obtain the cash disbursement report
WHAT: For outstanding cheques, compare the payee
name, amount and date with the cash disbursement
report.
o 3—Extent –what sample size to select for a given procedure
What sample size to select for a given procedure? In other words –“how many
do I look at?”
The size selected will vary depending upon:
The sampling method chosen
The type of tests (test of controls vs. test of details)
Amount of assurance to be obtained from the test
Professional judgement and the practices of the PA firm will also assist in
determining the sample size
o 4—Selection –which particular items to select from the population
o 5—Timing–when to perform the procedures
Timing can vary from early in the accounting period to after it has ended
Occurrence: During the interim audit, obtain the October bank
reconciliation……..for a randomly selected sample of 40 outstanding
cheques.
Need to consider timing of test of controls versus tests of details which normally
happen later during the audit
Assessing need to use an expert. Consider:
Knowledge of audit team
Significance and complexity of item being assessed
Availability of appropriate alternative corroborating evidence
o The less knowledge held by audit team, the greater risk of material misstatement and
less corroborating evidence available, the more likely that an expert is required
Scope of work to be carried out
o Auditor must set nature, timing, and extent of work
o Use written instructions covering issues expert will report on, and how work will be
used by auditor
Assessing competence and capability of expert
o Consider expert’s qualifications, membership in professional body, reputation in the
field, experience
Assessing objectivity of expert
o More objective if not connected to client
Assessing the expert’s report
o Report should be understandable to non-expert
o Include process, assumptions, data used by expert
o Auditor considers consistency with other information
Responsibility for the conclusion
o Auditor responsible for quality of evidence of expert’s work
Group engagement partner responsible for signing audit report, but may use other auditors,
especially for remote locations
o Consider capacity of component auditors to undertake the work (CAS 600)
o Component auditor’s work must be to same standard as group engagement partner
Objectivity
Gathering sufficient, appropriate evidence
DRAWING CONCLUSIONS
Does the auditor have sufficient, appropriate evidence on which to base conclusions?
o CAS 500
Does evidence address significant risks faced by the client?
o CAS 315
Form an audit opinion and report
WORKING PAPERS
Auditor must document each stage of the audit in working papers (CAS 230)
o Provides evidence of work completed, details evidence gathered to support opinion
o Include in a working paper:
Client name, audit period
Title describing contents of paper, file reference
Details identifying preparer/reviewer and work dates
Cross references to other documents
Permanent file
o Client information and documentation that apply to more than one audit
E.g., client address, key personnel, long term contracts
Main accounting policies, results of prior audits
Copies of prior period financial statements
Current file
o Client information and documentation that apply to current audit
Evidence gathered for this audit