Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Advantages
Cost Effective
As the task of assignment ogf random number to different items of population is over,
the process is half done. This process saves cost and time to a great extent. We can take
any number of samples from this process.
Involves lesser degree of judgment
While assigning the number to an item of the population, the person assigns it in a
random trend that makes the process of probability sampling more effective and more
accurate.
Comparatively easier way of sampling
Probability sampling does not involve any complex and long process. Thus this is an
easier way for sampling.
Less time consuming
This process is a simple and short process. This takes lesser time to complete. The saved
time can be used for analysis and interpretation.
Can be done even by non- technical persons
Assignment of Random number can be done by any kind of person after a short briefing
as this does not involve any lengthy, complex and crucial process
Sample representative of population
Probability Sampling uses random numbers which ensures that the samples vary as
much as the population itself.
Disadvantages
Chances of selecting specific class of samples only
If a surveyor is appointed to survey about any data relating to family members, there is
likely chances that s/he will develop a trend of starting to number from the eldest
member to the youngest and numbers will be only increasing or decreasing only. In this
case, only oldest or the latest generations will be taken as samples.
Redundant and monotonous work
As the surveyor is asked to do a repetitive job to assign the numbers and to take the
information, there is likely chances that the surveyor suffers from monotony and the
effectiveness of the system will be reduced.
Simple random sampling
Advantages
Better chances that the sample represents the whole population
Simple Random Sampling uses random numbers which ensures that the samples vary as
much as the population itself.
Can be concluded in shorter time duration
This process is simple and short. It takes lesser time to complete. The saved time can be
used for analysis and interpretation.
Costs less money
Once the task of assignment of random number to different items of population is done
the process is half done. This process saves cost and time to a great extent and its
simplicity ensures that we do not have to spend too many resources on the sampling
process itself. We can take any number of samples from this process.
Involves lesser degree of judgment
While assigning the random number to an item of the population, the person assigns the
number in a random sequence that means the process is unbiased as it doesn't involve
the judgement of the person performing the sampling.
Comparatively easier way of sampling
Probability sampling does not involve any complex and long process. Thus this is an
easier way for sampling.
Can be done even by non- technical persons too
Assignment of Random number can be done by any kind of person after a short briefing
as this does not involve any lengthy, complex and crucial process
Disadvantages
Risks of selecting samples from a few variations only
The surveyor or more correctly, the sampler might be distributing the random numbers
based on rules of thumb which will render the sampling ineffective e.g. If a surveyor is
appointed to survey about any data relating to family members, there is likely chances
that s/he might develop a trend of starting to number from the eldest member to the
youngest and numbers will be only increasing or decreasing only. In this case, only
oldest or the latest generations will be taken as samples.
Redundant and monotony
As the surveyor is asked to do a repetitive job to assign the numbers and to take the
information, there is likely chances that the surveyor suffers from monotony and the
effectiveness of the system will be blurred.
Simple random sampling is an effective, low resource consuming method of sampling that
can be used in a variety of situations as a reliable sampling method. With the advent of
computers, the problems associated with this method can be even reduced because a
computer can be used to generate the samples based on an algorithm that generates the
random numbers.
Advantages:
easier than Stratified Random Sampling and more effective than Simple Random
Sampling
You do not need to classify data in Systematic Random Sampling as in
Stratified Random Sampling. And it is more effective than Simple Random Sampling as
it avoids judgment.
Cost Effective
Stratification would cost lots of resources. Thus Systematic Random Sampling is more
effective than others.
Avoids Judgments
It involves probability to a greater extent. So, judgments are avoided. Once the first
sample is chosen, the role of the judgment finishes.
Less Time Consuming
It does not cost the time for stratification nor it leaves any doubt on reliability.
Higher degree of Control
We can control the sample size, first sample and other means of control to complete the
process. Thus the level of control is always higher.
Disadvantages:
Size of the population may not be known before the sampling starts
Suppose that we want to survey on the brand of cigarette that the smokers want. We
may not know how many of the population smoke or all the brands of the cigarettes
available in the market.
Assumption that the population is uniform may not always prove to be true
We can not say that the population is enough uniform. Sometimes it can also be true
that the exceptional items appear on the portion of population that are taken as samples.
This makes the system defunct.
Stratified random sampling
Advantages:
Stratified Random Sampling provides better precision as it takes the samples
proportional to the random population.
Stratified Random Sampling helps minimizing the biasness in selecting the samples.
Stratified Random Sampling ensures that no any section of the population are
underrepresented or overrepresented.
As this method provides greater precision, greater level of accuracy can be achieved
even by using small size of samples. This saves resources.
Disadvantages:
Stratified Random Sampling requires more administrative works as compared with
Simple Random Sampling.
It is sometimes hard to classify each kind of population into clearly distinguished
classes.
Stratified Random Sampling can be tedious and time consuming job to those who are
not keen towards handling such data.
Non probabilistic
Quota sampling
Advantages:
Quota Sampling is widely adopted these days because of its many benefits. Some of the
advantages are stated below:
Quota Sampling is an economic process. It saves time and money both at the same time
by giving us important information about how many samples of each group we need to
collect
The extra information speeds up the sampling process
We can get a high level of accuracy because quota sampling is scientific with a well
defined process
Disadvantages:
Nothing can have only positive aspects. Quota Sampling also has its pros and cons. As this
process sets criteria to choose samples, disadvantages are mainly due to its non-random
nature. Some of the disadvantages are as follows: