Professional Documents
Culture Documents
*
Adm. Case No. 5737. October 25, 2004.
_______________
* SECOND DIVISION.
212
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016127d19f4c7684424a003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 1/10
1/24/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 441
RESOLUTION
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.:
213
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016127d19f4c7684424a003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 2/10
1/24/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 441
You are asking for my inhibition and yet you want me to rule on
his appearance x x x x x x.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016127d19f4c7684424a003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 3/10
1/24/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 441
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016127d19f4c7684424a003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 4/10
1/24/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 441
216
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016127d19f4c7684424a003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 5/10
1/24/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 441
_______________
217
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016127d19f4c7684424a003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 6/10
1/24/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 441
For aside from informing the parties the reason for the decision to
enable them to point out to the appellate court the findings with
which they are not in agreement, in case any of them decides to
appeal the decision, it is also an assurance that the judge, or the
Board of Governors in this case,2
reached his judgment through
the process of legal reasoning.
_______________
2 Id., p. 412.
3 Id., pp. 412-413.
4 Rollo, p. 9.
218
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016127d19f4c7684424a003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 7/10
1/24/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 441
_______________
219
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016127d19f4c7684424a003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 8/10
1/24/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 441
ring to the prohibition for judges and other officials or employees of the
superior courts or of the Office of the Solicitor General from engaging in
private practice] has been interpreted as customarily or habitually
holding one’s self out to the public, as a lawyer and demanding payment
for such services. x x x.
_______________
220
——o0o——
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016127d19f4c7684424a003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 10/10