Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By
of each proposition will help and guide us in our analysis of the entire argument.
that would lead one to evaluate whether there is logical coherence between and
One of the essential things that one has to consider is the meaning that an
see something in what an artist portrays that is far from what the artist is trying to
“say.” Hence, one has to be on guard all the time concerning the language we
use and at the same time, be extra wary about the content of what we are
person’s knowledge and understanding of the matter. For instance, one person
other hand, one can argue against it. If a person simply says that “I love red
color” or asserts that “There is a new mall,” these propositions are non-
argumentative. Yet, one says that “Death penalty is a justifying circumstance for
argumentation, let us first have the basic working knowledge on how to treat and
the entire argument. Every proposition has the following elements -- a subject
term, a predicate term and a copula. It is very easy to identify these elements. A
subject term is the point under discussion; it is the central focus or the main idea
term.
A predicate term tells or describes something about the main idea (or
term and the predicate term. Generally, it is the verb “to be” that is displayed or
not be declared in its standard form using the verb “to be.” An example of which
is “Some people enjoy horror movies.” This can be restated in its standard form
of the proposition, quality of the proposition, symbol and quantity of the predicate.
In terms of its elements, the subject term in each of the propositions given
One easy way to determine the quantity of the proposition (or extension
universal quantifiers are “all,” “every,” “no,” “no one,” “nobody,” “nothing,” “none,”
refers to only one. Nouns, personal pronouns, collective nouns and nouns
universities” it implies that “Every class or category of UST is one of the oldest
universities.” This can be further illustrated through the proposition “They are
attributed to the universal proposition “All (they) of them are active participants in
the discussion.” The universal and singular propositions have, therefore, the
same extension.
or less than the whole, or something indefinite. The use of indefinite pronouns is
the most commonly used particular quantifiers such as many, several, most, few,
almost all, not all, some, part, etc. The use of numbers also signifies that the
quantity of a proposition is particular. Hence, from the given examples above, the
first two propositions are universal in quantity and the last two propositions are
particular.
determine the quality of the proposition. Whenever the predicate term accepts
something of the subject term, the quality of the proposition is affirmative. If the
predicate term rejects or denies something of the subject term, the quality of the
and the third propositions are “affirmative,” and the second and the last
Once the proposition has already been analyzed based on its quantity and
quality, one can already determine the symbol because it is where the symbol of
a proposition is grounded.
SYMBOLS OF PROPOSITIONS
they are different in quality. A and I propositions share the same quality which is
affirmative, while E and O propositions share the same quality which is negative.
Of course these symbols are not vowels as seen in the English language!
A, E, I, and O symbols came from the Latin words “AffIrmo” which means
to deny.
But, be reminded that in terms of extension, the universal and singular
propositions have the same extension. This is the reason why they have the
same symbols. Determine now the symbol of the propositions given above.
symbolized as A since the quantity is universal and the quality is affirmative. “No
universal and the quality is negative. The third proposition “Several movie
and the quality is affirmative. The fourth proposition “Not all commentators are
negative.
Do not be confused with this particular quantifier “not all” with a universal
quantifier. You might be misled to believe that since you see the word “all”
therefore, the quantity of the proposition is universal. Such quantifier “not all” is
the same or equivalent to “some are not” which means that the quantifier “not all”
The quantity of the predicate is entirely different from the quantity of the
Affirmative Particular
Negative Universal
You must have noticed that in the first example, the quantity of the
proposition is singular. But since the quality of the proposition is affirmative, the
referred to. Therefore, the proposition is particular in quantity. Since the quality of
universal. It has no relation with the quantity of the proposition. In some cases,
the quantity of the proposition may be the same or different from the quantity of
the predicate. In the first place, the quantity of the predicate has nothing to do
quantity because the quality of the proposition is affirmative. The quantity of the
predicate “conscious act” is negative since the proposition “No involuntary act is
The same principle is used in the second and fourth examples given
universal in quantity but they are different in quality. The same symbols are used
In the first two examples, the quantity of the propositions is universal. The
first example: " All government officials are natural-born citizens” has an
The propositions symbolized by I and O are both particular but they are
also different in quality. A and I propositions are both affirmative in quality. E and
O propositions are both negative in quality. You can have your own distinct way
to remember how to analyze propositions. Perhaps you can best remember the
Universal
A E
Affirmative Negative
I O
Particular
Remember that “Practice leads you to perfection.” In order to achieve this goal, it
propositions. You can see different ways and means to express oneself though
UNIVERSAL PROPOSITIONS
PARTICULAR PROPOSITIONS