Republic of the Philippines

NATIONAL POLICE COMMISSION

PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE
NABAS POLICE STATION
Poblacion. Kalibo, Aklan
nabaspnp@yahoo.com
Tel Nrs: (036) 268-2100/0939-916-7000

NAVINVEST
January 7, 2018

CERTIFICATION

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

THIS IS TO CERTIFY that as per record in the Blotter Sheet of this station with Blotter
Entry Number 060407-20181-00059 dated January 7, 2018 the following records/events are
as follows:
:
ALLEGED THEFT INCIDENT – That at around 3:00 in the afternoon of January 5,
2018 a certain Kris Zaldivar, Filipino, male, single, 30 years old, owner of Kati-kati
Construction and Supply, and a resident of Poblacion, Nabas, Aklan, together with Danyel
Patilla y Perez, Filipino, male, married, 31 years old, born on August 3, 1986, Foreman of
Kati-kati Construction and Supply, and a resident of Poblacion, Kalibo, Aklan, personally
appeared at this station and requested to put into record that some Electriv wires which were
place at the Construction Site of Katol Hospital, Poblacion, Nabas, Aklan was stolen by Buko
Martin,Filipino, male, married, 33 years old, Mason of Kati-kati Construction, and a resident
of Poblacion, Kalibo, Aklan. Initial investigation disclosed that, at around 11:00 in the morning
of same date, when the Danel Patilla arrived at the construction site, he found the suspect
taking with him, some of the electric wires., the reporting person, did not however
approached the suspect, thinking that he was just arranging the same, thus he left. However
upon heading back to the site at around 12:00 noon, he could no longer found the said electric
wires, believed to be carted away by the suspect. Case under follow-up investigation.
Received and recorded by PO3 Dixardo Palomo, Desk Officer/Investigator.

THIS CERTIFICATION is being issued to form as an integral part of this referral for
appropriate filing in court.

Prepared by:

DIXARDO PALOMO
Police Officer 3
Police Investigator
Noted by:

JOSEFINO NERON
Police Senior Inspector
Officer-in-Charge
 Republic of the Philippines
NATIONAL POLICE COMMISSION
PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE
NABAS POLICE STATION
Poblacion. Kalibo, Aklan
nabaspnp@yahoo.com
Tel Nrs: (036) 268-2100/0939-916-7000

NAVINVEST
January 7, 2018

CERTIFICATION

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

THIS IS TO CERTIFY that as per record in the Blotter Sheet of this station with Blotter
Entry Number 060407-20181-00067 dated January 7, 2018 the following records/events are
as follows:
:
FOLLOW-UP INVESTIGATION (ICOW ALLEGED THEFT INCIDENT 060407-
20181-00059 – That at around 4:00 in the afternoon of January 6, 2018 a certain Kris
Zaldivar, Filipino, male, single, 30 years old, owner of Kati-kati Construction and Supply, and
a resident of Poblacion, Nabas, Aklan, together with Danyel Patilla y Perez, Filipino, male,
married, 31 years old, born on August 3, 1986, Foreman of Kati-kati Construction and Supply,
and a resident of Poblacion, Kalibo, Aklan, accompanied by SPO4 Kuratong Baleleng and
PO1 Bart Simpson of Kalibo Police Station, personally appeared at this station and requested
to put into record that some of the Electric wires which were stolen at the Construction Site
of Katol Hospital, Poblacion, Nabas, Aklan was recovered by the Danyel Patilla with the
assistance of Kalibo Police at the residence of the suspect Buko Martin,Filipino, male,
married, 33 years old, Mason of Kati-kati Construction, and a resident of Poblacion, Kalibo,
Aklan. It was disclosed by the reporting person that at around 2:00 in the afternoon of January
6, 2018, he went to Kalibo Police Station to seek for assistance to verify the stolen items from
the suspect, and upon arrival thereat, the reporting person positively identified an electric wire
used as laundry line with in the vicinity of the suspect’s hose, as part of the said stolen item.
Case is for appropriate filing in court. Received and recorded by PO3 Dixardo Palomo, Desk
Officer/Investigator.

THIS CERTIFICATION is being issued to form as an integral part of this referral for
appropriate filing in court.

Prepared by:

DIXARDO PALOMO
Police Officer 3
Police Investigator
Noted by:

JOSEFINO NERON
Police Senior Inspector
Officer-in-Charge
Republic of the Philippines)
Province of Aklan- - - - - - -) S. S.
Municipality of Nabas- - - -)

COMPLAINT AFFIDAVIT

The undersigned Complainant, KRIS ZALDIVAR, Filipino, male, single, 30 years old,
owner of Kati-kati Construction and Supply, and a resident of Poblacion, Nabas, Aklan,
accuses BUKO MARTIN, Filipino,male, married, of legal age and a resident of Poblacion,
Kalibo, Aklan, of THEFT, committed as follows, to wit:

That on or about 11:00 in the morning of January 5, 2018 in the Construction site of
Katol Hospital, located at Poblacion, Nabas, Aklan, Philippines, the said accused did then
and there , willfully, unlawfully, feloniously, with intent of gain and by means of deception,
without the consent of the owner therof, take, steal, and carry away, Electric wires belonging
to KatiKati Construction.

The undersigned executed this affidavit to attest the truthfulness of the foregoing facts
and to support the filing of Criminal Case against Buko Martin for crime of THEFT.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereto affixed my signature this 8th day of Jauary 2018.

KRIS ZALDIVAR
(Offended Party)
VIN:0407-0031B-D1345PGH50000-4
Date Issued: January 10, 2010
Valid until:

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 8th day of January 2018, at Kalibo, Aklan
Philippines by affiant who was satisfactorily proven to me his identity indicated below his
name-affiant is known to me and known to be the same person who executed the foregoing
affidabit. I hereby certify that i have personally examined the affiant and i am satisfied that he
has freely executed the foregoing affidavit and the allegation contained are fully understood
by her/him.

Maria Khristianie Rubias-Refendor

Prosecutor I

WITNESSES:

Danyel Patilla
Republic of the Philippines)
Province of Aklan- - - - - - -) S. S.
Municipality of Nabas- - - -)

COMPLAINT AFFIDAVIT

The undersigned Complainant, KRIS ZALDIVAR, Filipino, male, single, 30 years old,
owner of Kati-kati Construction and Supply, and a resident of Poblacion, Nabas, Aklan,
accuses MURO AMI, Filipino,male, married, of legal age and a resident of Poblacion, Kalibo,
Aklan, of VIOLATION OF ANTI-FENCING ACT , committed as follows, to wit:

That on or about 04:00 in the Afternoon of January 6, 2018 in the Junkshop owned by
the accused, located at Poblacion, Kalibo, Aklan, Philippines, the said accused did then and
there , willfully, unlawfully, feloniously, with intent of gain and by means of deception, without
the consent of the owner therof, bought the Electric wires owned by the Kati-kati Construction
and Supply from a certain Buko Martin, wo have stolen the same.

The undersigned executed this affidavit to attest the truthfulness of the foregoing facts
and to support the filing of Criminal Case against Buko Martin for crime of violation of ANTI-
FENCING ACT.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereto affixed my signature this 8th day of Jauary 2018.

KRIS ZALDIVAR
(Offended Party)
VIN:0407-0031B-D1345PGH50000-4
Date Issued: January 10, 2010
Valid until:

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 8th day of January 2018, at Kalibo, Aklan
Philippines by affiant who was satisfactorily proven to me his identity indicated below his
name-affiant is known to me and known to be the same person who executed the foregoing
affidabit. I hereby certify that i have personally examined the affiant and i am satisfied that he
has freely executed the foregoing affidavit and the allegation contained are fully understood
by her/him.

Maria Khristianie Rubias-Refendor

Prosecutor I
Republic of the Philippines)
Province of Aklan- - - - - - -) S. S.
Municipality of Nabas- - - -)

AFFIDAVIT

I, DANIEL PATILLA y Perez, Filipino, male, married, 31 years old, Foreman of Kati-
kati Construction and Supply, and a resident of Poblacion, Kalibo, Aklan, Philippines after
having been sworn to in accordance with law, hereby signed and say:

That at about 11:00 in the morning of Janaury 5, 2018, I went to the Construction site
of Katol Hospital, Poblacion, Kalibo, Aklan to check for certain material needed at the site,
for additional delivery.

That upon arrival thereat, I found the suspect, Buko Martin, holding several eletric
wires. Thinking that he was just arranging the same, so i did not disturbed him, instead I left
the site.

That after heading back to the said site at around 12:00 noon, the suspect was no
longer there, but what surprised me was that, the electric wires were already missing.

That I then reported the incident to my boss, Kris Zaldivar, who was the owner of Kati-
kati Construction. He then tried to contact the suspect, but the latter could not be reached.

That the following day, I went to Kalibo Police Station and requested for police
assistance, to visit the suspect from his residence, which was also at Poblacion, Kalibo,
Aklan, hoping for the posibility of making him admit his crime and for the recovery of the
stolen items.

That upon arrival at the suspect’s house, I accused him of stealing the wires, but he
was able to establish his alibi of not stealing the same. So the PNP and I take our leave.

Upon heading back the gate, I suddenly notice that the laundry line used by the
suspect was a stripped cover of an electric wire, and upon getting closer to the said laundry
line, I then identified it as the same wires we had at the Constructin site.

That, we later learned that some of the wires were already sold to Muro Ami a junk
dealer, and that the latter revealed that the same was already forwarded to larger junkshops
in Ibajay, Aklan.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereto affixed my signature this 8th day of Jauary 2018.

DANYEL PATILLA
BIR ID: 123-789BH-9
Date Issued: March 3, 2015
Valid until: December 15, 2018

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 8th day of January 2018, at Kalibo, Aklan
Philippines by affiant who was satisfactorily proven to me his identity indicated below his
name-affiant is known to me and known to be the same person who executed the foregoing
affidabit. I hereby certify that i have personally examined the affiant and i am satisfied that he
has freely executed the foregoing affidavit and the allegation contained are fully understood
by her/him.

Maria Khristianie Rubias-Refendor

Prosecutor I
Republic of the Philippines)
Province of Aklan- - - - - - -) S. S.
Municipality of Nabas- - - -)

AFFIDAVIT

I, KRIS ZALDIVAR, Filipino, male, single, 30 years old, owner of Kati-kati Construction
and Supply, and a resident of Poblacion, Nabas, Aklan, Philippines after having been sworn
to in accordance with law, hereby signed and say:

That at about 2:30 in the afternoon, a foreman from my Construction firm, in the person
of Danyel Patilla, Filipino, male,31 years old, married and a resident of Poblacion, Kalibo,
Aklan reported to me that several electric wires which where place at the construction site of
Katol Hospita, located at Poblacion , Nabas, Aklan, was misisng.

That the reporting person further disclosed that, it was Buko Martin, a Mason from the
same Construction firm, has carted away the said wires.

That I tried to reach Buko Martin through a cellphone call, bu I was not able to reached
him. I asked another mason from my Construction site, to visit him to his house at around
03:00 in the afternoon of the same date, but he could no longer be found.

That hence I have no chance of confronting him, i instead reported the incident to
Nabas Police Station to take appropriate action againts him.

That the following day, i was again informed by Danyel that some of the wires were
positively identified and located from the house of the suspect, for he used the same as a
laundry line, fixed within the vicinity of his house, and that for further investigation, a certain
Muro Ami, junkshop owner confirmed that several wires were sold to him, but the same were
already forwarded to larger junkshops in Ibajay.

I am executing this sworn statement for the purpose of charging the respondent with
having committed the crime of THEFT.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereto affixed my signature this 8th day of Jauary 2018.

KRIS ZALDIVAR
VIN:0407-0031B-D1345PGH50000-4
Date Issued: January 10, 2010
Valid until:

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 8th day of January 2018, at Kalibo, Aklan
Philippines by affiant who was satisfactorily proven to me his identity indicated below his
name-affiant is known to me and known to be the same person who executed the foregoing
affidabit. I hereby certify that i have personally examined the affiant and i am satisfied that he
has freely executed the foregoing affidavit and the allegation contained are fully understood
by her/him.

Maria Khristianie Rubias-Refendor

Prosecutor I
1. Mansalud vs. National Housing Authority, Gr. No. 167181

Facts:
Petioner Winnie Munsalud is the daughter and one of the compulsory heirs of the late
Lourdes Bulado who died in 1985. During the lifetime of Bulado, respondent National Housing
Authority (NHA) awarded her a lot pursuant to the “Land for the Landless” program of
respondent. Upon the death of Bulado, her daughter Winnie, assumed the obligation to pay
for the monthly amortizations. Respondent NHA recognized petitioner spouses’ assumption
of obligations as their names were reflected in the receipts and they were allowed to occupy
the lot. In 1989, petitioners completed the amortization payments evidence by the annotation
“full payment” reflected on the left side portion of the official receipt. Consequently, petitioners
demanded that NHA issue in their favor a Deed of Sale and a Title over the property.
However, respondent refused. In 2003, petitioners by counsel, sent respondent a letter to
issue a Deed of Sale and Titile. Respoondent did not issue the requested documents but
informed petitioners that Winnie’s name does not appeaer as beneficiary. Petitioners replied
that Winnie was representing her mother, the late Lourdes Bulado. Respondent did not
respond to the reply. Left with no recource, petitioners instituted a complaint for mandamus
with the RTC which dismissed the cmplaint for the petiton is insufficient in form and substance
and that there being no reference to any law which respondent by reason of its office, trust
or station is especially enjoined as a duty toperform. Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration
was likewise denied. On appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal. Hence, this
instant petition.

Issue:
Whether or not the petiton for mandamus is sufficient in form and substance.

Ruling:
Yes. The petition for mandamus was sufficient in form and substance. The complaint
desiganted by petitioners as mandamus reveals that it is sufficient in form. It has the caption
with the name of the court, the name of the parties, and the docket number. The complaint
contains allegations of petitioners’ claims. It has a prayer and the date when it was prepared.
The signature page shows the signature and name of petitioner’s counsel, the counsel’s IBP,
PTR and Roll of Attonrney’s Numbers. Th complaint was also verified and accompanied by
a certificate of non-forum shopping and signed by petitioners as plaintiffs. It was filed
personally with the office of the clerk of court. Substance is one which relates to the material
allegations and the chavracter of the relief sought for in the pleading. It is determinative of
whether or not a cause of action exists and is the embodiment of the essential facts necessary
to confer jurisdiction upon the court. The action commenced by petitioners before the trial
court, although designated as mandamus, is in reality an action to perform a specifict act.
The averments of the complaint are clear. The essential facts are sufficiently alleged as to
appraise the court of the nature of the case. The relief sought to be obtained aimes to compel
respondent to issue a deed of sale and the corrsponding titile over the property awarded to
Bulado. Thus, the Court finds the complaint sufficient in substance. The designation or
caption is not controlling, more than the allegations in the complaint, for it is not even an
indispensable part of the complaint. There is no need to make reference to any law which
respondent by reason of its ffice is enjoined as a duty to perform. Respondent’s duty arose
from its contractual obligation under the “Land for the Landless Program”.
2. Rheem Philippines vs. Ferrer, 20 SCRA 441

Facts:

The proceeding for certiorari and contempt is an offshoot of the Court of Industriak
Relations’ (CIR) denial of motion of dismiss the respondent’s complaint.

The following was filed by the counsel (Atty. Jose S. Armonio) for the petitioner: one
pitfall into which this Honorable Court has repeatedly fallen whenever the question as to
wheter or not a particular subject matter is within the jurisdictio of the court of Industrial
Relations is the tendency of this Honorable Court to rely upon its own pronouncement without
due regard to the statutes which dlineate the jurisdictin of the industrial court. Quite often, it
is overlooked that no court, not even this Honorable Court is empowered to expand or
contract through its decsiion the scope of its jurisdictional authority as conferred by law. This
error is manifested by the decisions of this Honorable Court citing erlier rulings but without
making any reference to and analysis of the pertinent statute governing the jurisdiction of the
Court of Industrial Relations. This manifestation appears in this Honorable Court’s decision
in the instant case. As a result, the errors committed in erlier cases dealing with the
jurisdiction of the Industrial court are perpetuated n subsequent cases invoving the same
issue. The court ordered counsel to show cause why he should not be held in contempt.

Issue:
Whether or not Atty. Armonio’s statements violated the duty of respect to courts.

Held:
Yes. Canon 1 of the Code of Professional Responsibility states that “it is the duty of th
lawyer to maintain towards the courts a respectful attitude, not for the sake of the temporary
incumbent of the judicial office but for the maintenance of its supreme importance.” Worth
remembering is the attorney’s duty to the courts can only be maintained by rendering no
service involving disrespect to the judicial office which he is bound to uphold. In the present
case, the Court felt that Atty. Armonio’s language makes a sweeping charge that the
decisions of the SC blindly adhere to earlier rulings without making any reference and
analysis of the pertinent statutes of the CIR. The statements made by counsel detract much
from the dignity and respect of the SC.
3. Philippine Daily Inquirer vs Alameda

Facts:
Philippine Daily Inquirer (PDI) published an article entitled , “After Bong, whs next?” in
its August 1, 2000 issue. The article narrated the death of Expedito Bong Caldez, who was a
photo correspondent in the Cagayan branch of PDI Here the family of Caldez lamented has
death due to the erroneous diagnosis of Dr. Luz Babaran. On September 29, 2000, the PDI
published another article, “DOH orders probe of fotogs death”, where they reported that the
regional Department of Health (DOH) in Tuguegarao City has started investigating the death
of Expedito Caldez following an order from the DOHs Bureau of Licensing and Regulation.
On July 25, 2001, Dr. Babaran filed a complaint for Damages against PDI because of the two
column articles printed by it. She alleged that: She wrote a letter to PDI’s editor after learning
about the August 1 article but did not receive a response; the 2nd article was published, again
singling her out as erroneously diagnosing the illness of Caldez; the DOH Fact-Finding
Committee concluded that her diagnosis was not erroneous, but this was not published; PDI
acted in bad faith because of the above.

On September 13, 2001, PDI filed their answer with counterclaims and raised the
following defenses: complaint states no cause of action; complaint fails and omits to state
factual premises to support that there was a malice on PDI’s part in publishing the questioned
news; Babaran failed to allege actual malice; a case for actionable libel with claims for
damages has not been adequately stated in the complaint; complaint fails to establish basis
of PDI’s liability.

Pre-Trial was held and terminated, and PDI filed a motion for a Preliminary Hearing
on Affirmative Defense Raised in the Answer which is also a ground for a motion to dismiss.
In said motion, it was alleged that at the pre-trial, the court noted that one of the defenses
raised by PDI was that Babaran has not delineated the participation of each of petitioners in
the publication of the alleged libelous articles. Thereupon, Babaran’s counsel asked for a few
days to amend the complaint hence, PDI filed the motion. PDI contended that: in libel
charges, the participation of each defendant must be specifically alleged in the complaint,
which Babaran failed to do; Allegations in complaint are mere conclusions of law and opinions
of Babaran.; PDI asked that a preliminary hearing be conducted on their affirmative defense
that the complaint failed to state a cause of action; and after that the complaint be dismissed.

Issue:

Whether or not the Complaint which fails to validly and sufficiently state a cause of
action for libel should be dismissed

Ruling:
No. There are 3 essential elements of a cause of action. 1. Right in favor of plaintiff;
2. Obligation on the part of the defendant to respect or not violate such right; 3. Act or
omission on the part of such defendant in violation of the right of the plaintiff or constituting a
breach of the obligation of the defendant to the plaintiff which the latter may maintain an
action for recovery of damages or other appropriate relief. This court finds that petitioners
raised the threshold question of whether the complaint sufficiently alleges a cause of action.
Hence, the trial court should have granted petitioners motion for a preliminary hearing on the
affirmative defenses raised in the answer based on the failure to state cause of action.
Date August 31, 2007

JUN MIRANDA
No. 9 West Aguila, Green Cross Subdivision,
Quezon City

Dear Mr. Miranda

It has been 30 days since you received my letter dated July 31, 2007 and still, you have
failed to pay and still refuses to pay your arrears which have now amounted to THREE
HUNDRED THOUSAND PESOS (P 300, 000.00).

Please be reminded that I have sent you several letters of demand for you to pay your back
rentals and to vacate the premises but the same letters have been left unanswered. Consider
this then, as my last and final demand for you to pay your account within five (5) days from
receipt and to VACATE THE premises within ten (10) days from receipt of this notice.
Otherwise, I shall be constrained to commence suit to protect my interests.

Very truly yours,

IAN ALBA
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
BRANCH 6
Quezon City, Philippines

IAN ALBA
Brgy. Banungbanong, Quezon City
Plaintiff,
CIVIL Case No. 214-567
-versus- For: Unlawful Detainer

Jun Miranda
No.9 West Aguila St., Green Cross Subdivision,
Quezon City, Philippines

COMPLAINT

PLAINTIFF, by counsel, and unto this Honorable Court, most respectfully states:
1. That plaintiff is a Filipino, of legal age, single, and residing at Brgy. Banungbanong, Quezon
City, whereas defendant is likewise a Filipino, of legal age, married, and residing at No.9 West Aguila
St., Green Cross Subdivision, Quezon City, Philippines, at which addresses the parties herein
may be served with summons and other court processes.

2. Plaintiff is the registered owner of a house and lot located at No.9 West Aguila St.,
Green Cross Subdivision, Quezon City, Philippines and covered by Transfer Certificate of
Title No. RT-75849 of the Registry of Deeds of Quezon City;

3. On 11 September, 2006 plaintiff and defendant entered into a Contract of Lease

over the above-mentioned property owned by the plaintiff for a period of one (1) year
commencing on September 11, 2006 and ending December 1, 2007 at the agreed rental rate
of Php 50, 000.00 per month payable on or before the 5th day of every month. A copy of the
Contract of Lease is hereto attached as Annex “A” and made an integral part thereof.

4. Defendant then occupied the property and paid the corresponding advance rental
and deposit stipulated in the Contract of Lease.

5. However, starting January 2007 and up to the time of the filing of this Complaint,
the defendant failed to pay the stipulated rental without any valid or justifiable reason.

6. Plaintiff then demanded, through his lawyer that the defendant vacates the premises
and to pay the rental arrears.

7. Plaintiff likewise initiated proceedings before the Lupong Tagapamayapa of the

place where the property is located, however the plaintiff and defendant faild to come up with
an amicable settlement prompting the Lupong TAgapamayapa to issue Certificate to File
Action.

A copy of the Certificate to File Action is hereto attached as Annex “B” and made an
integral part hereof.

8. Because of defendant’s unjustified refusal to pay the rental arrears and to vacate
the subject property despite repeated demands to do so, the plaintiff was compelled to litigate,
and for the purpose, engaged the services of the undersigned law firm for a fee of P30,000.00
for which the defendants should be held liable, including the costs of suit.
 PRAYER

WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that judgment be rendered in favor of the

plaintiff and against the defendant, ordering the latter as follows:

1. Ordering the defendant and all persons claiming rights under him to VACATE the
house and lot located at No.9 West Aguila St., Green Cross Subdivision, Quezon City,
Philippines

2. Ordering the defendants to PAY the plaintiff the rental arrears at the rate of Php 50,
000.00 per month from January 1, 2007 until the subject property is vacated.

3. Ordering defendants to pay plaintiff the amount of Php 30, 000.00 for and attorney’s
fees as well as the costs of suit..

Other reliefs just and equitable in the premises are likewise prayed for

Quezon City, September 1, 2007

Maria Khristianie Rubias-Refendor

Project 11, Quirino District, Quezon City

Roll of Attorney No. 12345

PTR No. 678/issued at Quezon City/ on April 7, 2004
IBP No. 911/issued at Quezon City/on April 7, 2004
ATTY. REYNALDO ROSS D. SUCGANG IV
Legal Forms Professor
College of Law
Aklan Catholic College
Andagao, Kalibo, Aklan

Dear Sir:
Please excuse me for having been absent from your class last Tuesday, January 23, 2018,
for I was attending for my 2 month-old baby. He was suffering from a fever so I was basically
monitoring him from time to time.
I know that a quiz will be given, which is an essential requirement in passing the subject,
however I was left no choice but to act as a mother rather than a student at that time.
I don’t have intention of disregarding my duty as a student and to further compromise my
education but I am hoping earnestly that you will understand my situation.
Thank you and God bless!

Respectfully yours;

MARIA KHRISTIANIE I RUBIAS-REFENDOR

III-LLB Student