Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • G.R. No. 210636 July 28, 2014 Ma. Hazelina A. Tujanmilitante in Behalf of The Minor Criselda M. CADA, Petitioner, RAQUEL M. CADA-DEAPERA, Respondent

    Uploaded by

    Leogen Tomulto
    5 views1 page
    The document discusses a petitioner's assertion that a summons was improperly served in a habeas corpus petition. The summary states that service of a summons is not required in a habeas corpus petition under the Rules of Court or administrative order. As held in a previous case, a writ of habeas corpus plays a role similar to a summons in acquiring jurisdiction over the respondent, like in ordinary civil actions.

    Original Description:

    Habeas Corpus

    Original Title

    Notes

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses a petitioner's assertion that a summons was improperly served in a habeas corpus petition. The summary states that service of a summons is not required in a habeas corpus petition under the Rules of Court or administrative order. As held in a previous case, a writ of habeas corpus plays a role similar to a summons in acquiring jurisdiction over the respondent, like in ordinary civil actions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views1 page

    G.R. No. 210636 July 28, 2014 Ma. Hazelina A. Tujanmilitante in Behalf of The Minor Criselda M. CADA, Petitioner, RAQUEL M. CADA-DEAPERA, Respondent

    Uploaded by

    Leogen Tomulto
    The document discusses a petitioner's assertion that a summons was improperly served in a habeas corpus petition. The summary states that service of a summons is not required in a habeas corpus petition under the Rules of Court or administrative order. As held in a previous case, a writ of habeas corpus plays a role similar to a summons in acquiring jurisdiction over the respondent, like in ordinary civil actions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Lastly, as regards petitioner’s assertion that the summons was improperly served, suffice it

    to state thatservice of summons, to begin with, is not required in a habeas corpus petition, be
    it under Rule 102 of the Rules of Court or A.M. No. 03-04-04-SC. As held in Saulo v. Cruz, a
    writ of habeas corpus plays a role somewhat comparable to a summons, in ordinary civil
    actions, in that, by service of said writ, the court acquires jurisdiction over the person of the
    respondent.22

    G.R. No. 210636 July 28, 2014

    MA. HAZELINA A. TUJANMILITANTE IN BEHALF OF THE MINOR CRISELDA M.


    CADA, Petitioner,
    vs.
    RAQUEL M. CADA-DEAPERA, Respondent

    You might also like