Ben Steigmann

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Proclamation, pt. III

Love conquers all. By that I mean that from personal experience it can resolve internal crisis
periods. And externally, it can dissolve the violence, in whatever form, leading to worldwide
misery. It is our natural state, once incoherence is dissolved. As William James noted in The
Varieties of Religious Experience:

"The mind-curers ... have demonstrated that a form of regeneration by relaxing, by letting go,
psychologically indistinguishable from the Lutheran justification by faith and the Wesleyan
acceptance of free grace, is within the reach of persons who have no conviction of sin and care
nothing for Lutheran theology. It is but giving your little private convulsive self a rest, and
finding that a greater Self is there. The results, slow or sudden, or great or small, of the combined
optimism and expectancy, and the regenerative phenomena which ensue on the abandonment of
effort, remain firm facts of human nature, no matter whether we adopt a theistic, pantheistic-
idealistic, or a medical-materialistic view of their ultimate causal explanation."

With that said, Love does not imply apathy and acquiescence. Of relevance here is Aurobindo
Ghose's response to Ghandi.

As for my commentary below, it, and everything else I have written, are rough drafts subject to
revision, until further notice. By that, I do not mean that I am abandoning the various theses I
have put forward, but rather, since everything I have put forward here is controversial, I will
have to thoroughly refine and in some cases expand my argument, a process that will take
months and, in some cases, years. At present it is a serious contender with widely held narratives
that I feel are erroneous or unjust. I would like the full power of these points to be felt, so that
they make the necessary refutations or modifications to these widely held narratives.

A major point of interest to me is remedying what I feel to be implicit structural economic

flaws. I am a 22 year old undergraduate who was studying economics, and will complete my
bachelors in it, but found that it, as presented, was in many ways a form of apologetics for
neoliberalism (there are several recent arguments against it that I have found interesting -
Michael Hudson's book "Trade, Development, and Foreign Debt", which I have preliminarily
looked at and will look at more in depth, Stephen Zarlenga's "The Lost Science of Money",
positively reviewed by Hudson, and Mason Gaffney's essay (which I have some familiarity with,
but which I will more thoroughly look at later). There is also this independently verifiable fact of
hidden in plain sight government ownership of major portions of multinationals, showing stores
of wealth that reveal a discrepancy between alleged wealth and real wealth of government, and
that government and industry are a sort of fusion. This is well documented by Walter Burien in
his overview of comprehensive annual financial reports - it challenges those who defend the
system we are in: http://www.cafr1.com/)
I will perhaps get a Masters degree in Finance so that I can launch a compelling, credible critique
of my own, from a social justice perspective, and I think the above authors are on the right track,
though they seem to ignore that major economic changes follow the patterns of top down, pre-
determined agendas.Their structural critiques would, I feel, halt the ability for these agendas to
manifest as they do, but it is an extreme error, in my view, for these critics to not acknowledge
that this is a driving force. To see how this plays out, just look at the UK Ministry of Defence
DCDC Global Strategic Trends Programme 2007-2036 document, which "predicts" (p. 78), that
"Globalization will result in critical interdependencies that will link members of a globalized
society that includes a small super-rich elite and a substantial underclass of slum and subsistence
dwellers, who will make up 20% of the world population in 2020." This document used to be
here: http://www.cfr.org/defense-strategy/dcdc-global-strategic-trends-programme-2007-
2036/p13101, but it is archived
here: http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/articles/strat_trends_23jan07.pdf

Of course, this is conservative, since the following Dec., 2011 NBC News article noted that 50%
of Americans are poor: http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2011/12/15/9461848-dismal-
prospects-1-in-2-americans-are-now-poor-or-low-income

Jacques Attali, in Millennium: Winners and Losers in the Coming World Order (1991), was more
explicit, though rather than engaging in "prediction", he spoke in pure unbridled prophecy - he
said (p. 12), "Ordinary people will gape with awe and resentment from their modest suburbs and
homeless streets at the high rises of wealth and skyscrapers of power that will loom above their
reach.", and (p. 84), "In the coming world order, there will be winners and there will be losers.
The losers will outnumber the winners by an unimaginable factor. They will yearn for the chance
to live decently, and they are likely to be denied that chance. They will encounter rampant
prejudice and fear. They will find themselves penned in, asphyxiated by pollution, neglected
through indifference. The horrors of the twentieth century will fade by comparison."

Finally, when we get to items like the 2012 fiscal year Annual Financial Report for the

educational behemoth CORE , we find (p. 3) that:

"The global agenda of the 21st century is set around economy and trade, with
manufacturing shifting from the west to the east, employment landscape would immensely
change at both ends. In order to sustain their economic growth, developed as well as developing
economies need to intensify their human capital formation. Not surprising then, nations across
the world are increasingly investing in education for continued development of their human
capital, quantitatively as well as qualitatively.": http://www.core-
edutech.com/pdf/CETLAnnualReport2011-12.pdf

Well, now we know that the transfer of productive capacity was pre-planned - and the pre-
planned setting up of the Chinese Communist machine is something that will be further explored
in the initial post. We also learn that human beings are considered to be natural resources, just
like the other natural resources that are exploited and controlled by extremely wealthy families
whose incorporated old world assets have, along with modern extortion strategies, become the
foundation upon which the world's economy is currently indebted. The present basis for such
human management is cybernetics and control theories - noting such a fact might be in
contradiction to sociological dogmas, but it is clearly laid out in relevant military literature, as I
have shown here: http://wwws.forummotion.com/t556-darpa-goes-deep-green#3129

Neil Kramer is a person who seems to have independently had many of the same insights I have
had about life. In "The Unfoldment", he noted quite correctly: "Once you have the distortion
coordinates-the cipher that makes sense of all the surface weirdness-everything begins to slot
into place. The mist of the confusion disperses. You can see. And those coordinates are horribly
uncomplicated: Most of the human population on the planet lives in a consumer plantation
designed to provide physical and spiritual slave labor to an elite few. Reality and truth are
concealed in order to maintain and protect the powerbase. None of this has anything to do with
politics or ideologies."

Yet ideologies and movements can often serve as masks behind which the present World Order
operates, and because of the emotions associated with such masks, prevent, by Pavlovian reflex,
a proper comprehension of the death-oriented control system we live in. I have seen this behavior
express itself most blatantly among the "educated", in their incredulity and aversion to items
such as those that are discussed here, and they, in their actions, highlight the veracity of the
observations of the sociologist Jacques Ellul, who, when commenting on the tendency for
"intellectuals" to absorb ideas based on the mainstream consensus, noted, in his book
"Propaganda": "Naturally, the educated man does not believe in propaganda, he shrugs and is
convinced that propaganda has no effect on him. This is, in fact, one of his great weaknesses, and
propagandists are well aware that in order to reach someone, one must first convince him that
propaganda is ineffectual and not very clever. Because he is convinced of his own superiority,
the intellectual is much more vulnerable than anybody else to this maneuver." And on p. 81, he
noted: "The individual's adherence to his group is "conscious" because he is aware of it and
recognizes it, but it is ultimately involuntary because he is trapped in a dialectic and in a group
that leads him unfailingly to his adherence. His adherence is also 'intellectual' because he can
express his conviction clearly and logically, but it is not genuine because the information, the
data, the reasoning, that have led him to adherence to the group were themselves deliberately
falsified in order to lead him there."

I was, for a few years deeply concerned about a movement towards World government that I
document on this site, provably being steered by a global "elite" with illegitimate power. I was
immediately shot sown in this, with people, who were sufferers from the problem Ellul
diagnoses, arguing to me that claims of this taking place had their origins in "anti-semitic
propaganda" based on the Protocols of Zion "forgery". I later found that those who have made in
depth analyses of the subject have shown serious flaws in the standard forgery arguments - e.g. -
Peter Myers made an in depth critique of Norman Cohn, the leading proponent of the "Protocols
as fake" idea, which includes this gem - "Cohn's arithmetic is incorrect. The word-count of the
parallel-passages from the Protocols, as listed by Bernstein (at bernstein.zip), is 4,361, while the
word-count of the Protocols is 26, 496. That is, the parallel passages comprise 16.45% of the
Protocols; this is substantial, but still less than one sixth of the total. What Cohn especially omits
to mention, is the Protocols' extensive coverage of the world finance system. ":
mailstar.net/toolkit.html

More textual critique is given in the initial post, showing that the Protocols are best thought as a
part of the continuing literature of an older semi-clandestine movement, and also, as I
substantiate in the main post, the testimony on which the arguments against it are flawed and
controverted by another disposition, and that looking into Joly's text reveals an association of it
with the World Revolutionary Movement of the time. But much more importantly, I was able to
accumulate primary source literature showing that the essential aspects of the Protocols were
reflected in the actions and words of key power elite figures - associated, in fact, with the Zionist
movement.

For a while, I continued this quest of understanding this problem of Globalism that I, initially,
felt was true only by intuition, as I was beleaguered by the seemingly fully comprehensive
counterarguments put forth by apologists for the present system. I looked into the standard, low
quality "conspiratorial" literature on the subject, and gradually came across better, higher quality
presentations, like those offered here and here. I did some more in depth research on the subject,
looking into problems of Globalism that the "political far-right" and the "political far-
left" critiques in different ways, though what they're critiquing has a common origin, and came
upon items like the following:

A major item of importance is the recordings of the 4th World Wilderness Congress that
preceded the 1992 Earth Summit. Here people like you and I are called "the cannon fodder,
unfortunately, that populates the Earth". And a banking system set up by and for the Rothschilds
is shown to be the centerpiece of the new mode of organization that "sustainability" measures
will create. The attendees (like Maurice Strong) have no qualms about acknowledging the
dominance of that family in World Affairs. Strong states that there is "no better person" to
spearhead this project than Edmund Leopold de Rothschild, and that he (Rothschild) "epitomizes
in his own life that positive synthesis between environment and conservation on the one hand
and economics on the other":

The following overview notes what this would metastasize into, that "The 4th WWC introduced
the concept of a World Conservation Bank, leading to the formation of the The Global
Environment Facility (GEF) of the World Bank.": http://wild10.org/en/about/accomplishments

We can see the outlines of these proposals being promoted at the present time. In a document
called "Trading Emissions: Full Global Potential" (London: The Social Market Foundation,
January 2008:http://www.smf.co.uk/assets/files/publications/SMF_Trading_Emissions.pdf) -
written by Simon Linnett, Executive Vice Chairman of N.M. Rothschild, London (see "about the
author" section of that document). In the document, he defines "greenhouse emissions" as the
new form of "social market" and states: "That such a market has to be established on a world
basis coordinated by an international institution with a constitution to match.... That, perhaps, it
might be regarded as having wider benefits than merely `saving the planet' - perhaps it might be
the basis of a new world order, one that is not based on trade and/or conflict resolution. Perhaps
one can see a way to achieve this goal through leadership, vision and some marginal and
manageable renunciation of national sovereignty, how the world might just get there. The
repercussions of addressing climate change may extend well beyond that single but critical
issue.... Implicit in all the above is that nations have to be prepared to subordinate, to a certain
extent, some element of their sovereignty to this world initiative." He notes that "The political
costs of such loss of sovereignty are lengthy. Loss of competitiveness (massively overstated in
the activities in which energy is used - especially since trade will be more difficult, if, at the
margin, transport is made more costly), loss of power and loss of direct control over economic
levers are potentially the most significant and give the most cause for concern. But these actions
are necessary if we are to answer the accusation that "it doesn't matter what we do when China is
expanding its energy usage at its current rate" - we have to bring China and India in and they are
not going to enter a scheme where they do not have a "say". When countries are already
foregoing the right of direct control over monetary policy through the creation of independent
central banks, this [the above] could be a relatively small price to pay for such inclusion." He
furthermore states that "The EU member states have recognised their need to subordinate
sovereignty to the EU; in time, if this is to work, the EU itself will need to yield sovereignty to a
bigger world body on carbon trading." He states "Above all, this plan requires "sponsors" - a
country prepared to host it and a senior politician prepared to lead this new initiative. If such a
route map could be found, then perhaps we might be at the beginning of a new world constitution
and a new world order." He states that regulating this should be a "World Environment
Authority" operating from a "world city with world skills and world facilities." He then notes, in
a section entitled "A natural role for London", "London is a world financial centre (possibly
"the" world financial centre)." and that "London would make a compelling case to house the
World Environmental Agency."

Documents retrieved from the congress from which audio of Edmund de Rothschild was taken
state the following (in the introductory email, I endorsed Mullins - an endorsement which I
redact because he is such a problematic source, but I stand behind everything else in the email
prefacing the document. The document itself gives insight into the accumulated degeneracy of
the elite of the world at present - I thought initially that a signed letter preceding document was
sufficient as an affidavit, but I will be getting a genuine affadivit supervised by a notary from
George Hunt concerning this document very shortly - and there are people who question this
because online knockoffs have the wrong number of Gephardt - 814-631-9959. But this,a copy
of the original (see p. 5), has the right number, 314-631-9959, and is consistent with the other
items presented, a part of the continuing literature of this partially-open-conspiracy:
http://archive.org/download/GeorgeHuntUncedEarthSummit1992cobdenClubsPapersaldousHuxl
eythe_125/1-1-the-cobdenClubsPapers.pdf Excerpts are as follows: "The time is pressing. The
Club of Rome was founded in 1968, Limits to Growth was written in 1971, Global 2000 was
written in 1979, but insufficient progress has been made in population reduction. Given global
instabilities, including those of the former Soviet bloc, the need for firm control of world
technology, weaponry, and resources, is absolutely mandatory. The immediate reduction of
world population, according to the mid-1970's recommendation of the Draper Fund, must be
immediately affected. The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying
capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception,
sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently
existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary. ... Compulsory cooperation is not
debatable with 166 nations, most of whose leaders are irresolute, conditioned by localist
"cultures" and lacking the appropriate notions of the New World Order. Debate only means delay
and forfeiture of our goals and purpose. The UN action against Iraq proves conclusively that
resolute action on our part can sway other leaders to go along with the necessary program. The
Iraq action proves that the aura of power can be projected and sustained and that the wave of
history is sweeping forward. ... We are the living sponsors of the great Cecil Rhodes will of 1877
... We stand with Lord Milner's credo. We too are "British Race Patriots" and our patriotism is
"the speech, the tradition, the principles, the aspirations of the British Race". Do you fear to take
this stand, at the very last moment when this purpose can be realized? do you not see that failure
now, is to be pulled down by the billions of Lilliputians of lesser race who care little or nothing
for the Anglo-Saxon system? ...The Security Council of the UN, led by the Anglo-American
Major Nation Powers, will decree that, henceforth, all nations have quotas for REDUCTION on
a yearly basis, which will be enforced by the Security Council by selective or total embargo of
credit, food, medicine or military force, when required. ... outmoded notions of sovereignty will
be discarded and the Security Council has complete legal, military and economic jurisdiction in
any region in the world, to be enforced by the Major Nations of the Security Council. The
Security Council of the U.N. will explain that not all races are equal, nor should they be. Those
races proven superior by superior achievements ought to rule the lesser races, caring for them on
sufferance that they cooperate with the Security Council. ... All could be lost if opposition by
minor races is tolerated and the vacillations of those we work with, our closest comrades, is
cause for our hesitations. Open declaration of intent followed by decisive force is the final
solution."

Incidentally, Baron Phillipe de Rothschild admitted that his was “the richest and most powerful
family in the world”: http://www.scribd.com/doc/124350489/A-Rothschild-Confession

As for the references to Cecil Rhodes, it is well known that the Rothschild family was a sponsor
of his ambitions. Penetrating insight into those ambitions comes from the following article in the
New York Times, in 1902, which noted that following his 1877 will, Rhodes, in 1890, set forth
the goal that his secret society should work towards "gradually absorbing the wealth of the
world": http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-
free/pdf?res=F00811FB395412738DDDA00894DC405B828CF1D3

The Last Will and Testament of Cecil John Rhodes verifies that article.:
It states (p. 73): "What an awful thought it is that if we had not lost America, or if even now we
could arrange with the present members of the United States Assembly and our House of
Commons, the peace of the world is secured for all eternity. We could hold federal parliament
five years at Washington and five at London. The only thing feasible to carry this idea out is a
secret one (society) gradually absorbing the wealth of the world to be devoted to such an object.
There is Hirsch with twenty millions, very soon to cross the unknown border, and struggling in
the dark to know what to do with his money; and so one might go on ad infinitum."
It also states (p. 74): "It would have been better for Europe if Napoleon had carried out his idea
of Universal Monarchy; he might have succeeded if he had hit on the idea of granting self
government to the component parts. Still, I will own tradition, race, and diverse languages acted
against his dream; all these do not exist as to the present English speaking world, and apart from
this union is the sacred duty of taking the responsibility of the still uncivilized parts of the world.
The trial of these countries who have been found wanting---such as Portugal, Persia, even Spain-
--and the judgment that they must depart, and of course, the whole of the South American
republics. "
He continues: "What a scope and what a horizon of work for the next two centuries, the best
energies of the best people in the world; perfectly feasible, but needing an organization, for it is
impossible for one human atom to contemplate anything, Much less such an idea requiring the
devotion of the best souls of the next 200 years. There are three essentials--- (1) The plan duly
weighed and agreed to (2) The first organization (3) The seizure of the wealth necessary."

In the text “The First Global Revolution”, leading “intellectual elites” in the Club of Rome
admitted that they manufactured the threat of anthropogenic global warming as a “unifying
external threat” that would place the blame on humanity (and this would obviously make people
sympathetic to the Globalist rhetoric of “global problems requiring global solutions”), and that
appointed bureaucracies must replace any vestige of democracy as a governing force. The
relevant chapter is called “The Vacuum”. Excerpts are as follows:

"It would seem that men and women need a common motivation, namely a common adversary to
organize and act together; in the vacuum such motivations seem to have ceased to exist‚ or have
yet to be found.

The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. States have striven to overcome
domestic failure and internal contradictions by designating external enemies. The scapegoat
practice is as old as mankind itself. When things become too difficult at home, divert attention by
adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face an outside enemy, either a real one or
else one invented for the purpose. With the disappearance of the traditional enemy, the
temptation is to designate as scapegoat religious or ethnic minorities whose differences are
disturbing.

[...]The old democracies have functioned reasonably well over the last 200 years, but they appear
now to be in a phase of complacent stagnation with little evidence of real leadership and
innovation

Democracy is not a panacea. It cannot organize everything and it is unaware of its own limits.
These facts must be faced squarely. Sacrilegious though this may sound, democracy is no longer
well suited for the tasks ahead [so obviously the "intellectual elite" should take over decision
making - as they have been doing for a very long time]. The complexity and the technical nature
of many of today’s problems do not always allow elected representatives to make competent
decisions at the right time.

[...]The Common Enemy of Humanity is Man

In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of
global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. In their totality and
interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which demands the solidarity of all
peoples. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap about which we have already
warned, namely, mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human
intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy, then, is humanity itself." (Alexander King & Bertrand Schneider, The First
Global Revolution: A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome (New York : Pantheon Books,
c1991), pp. 107-108, 109-110, 115)

Interestingly, in the 1970s, this think tank was warning of the "threat" of “global cooling” which
would herald in a “new ice age”: http://www.scribd.com/doc/87504398/Goals-for-Mankind

For more on this, see the

following: https://archive.org/details/GeorgeHuntUncedEarthSummit1992cobdenClubsPapersald
ousHuxleythe_125

Many of these people have used these arguments as an excuse to increase Governmental power.
One such example is Arnold Toynbee, director of studies for the Royal Institute of International
Affairs, who, addressing these issues, said in that “In all developed countries a new way of life—
a severely regimented way—will have to be imposed by a ruthless authoritarian government”
(cited by Arthur Miller in an article in the Washington and Lee Law Review, Volume 41, Issue
4, p. 1262): http://tinyurl.com/6n726qr

Toynbee, prior to that, as recorded in the RIIA’s own journal, said, "In the world as it is to-day,
this institution can hardly be a Universal Church. It is more likely to be something like a League
of Nations. I will not prophesy. I will merely repeat that we are at present working, discreetly but
with all our might, to wrest this mysterious political force called sovereignty out of the clutches
of the local national states of our world. And all the time we are denying with out lips what we
are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local national state of the
world is still a heresy for which a statesman or a publicist can be - perhaps not quite burnt at the
stake, but certainly ostracized and discredited. The dragon of local sovereignty can still use its
teeth and claws when it is brought to bay. Nevertheless, I believe that the monster is doomed to
perish by our sword. The fifty or sixty local states of the world will no doubt survive as
administrative conveniences. But sooner or later sovereignty will depart from them. Sovereignty
will cease, in fact if not in name, to be a local affair." ("The Trend of International Affairs Since
the War", International affairs: Journal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, Volume 10,
p. 809): http://www.jstor.org/stable/3015848?seq=7

Maurice Strong presided over the UNCED 4th World Wilderness Congress and was a co-signer
of the Earth charter. Mikhail Gorbachev was also a co-signer of the Earth charter. In 1987, he
said: “We are moving toward a New World, the world of Communism. We shall never turn off
that road.” (cited in Conquest, Robert and Paul Hollander. Political Violence: Belief, Behavior,
and Legitimation. Palgrave Macmillan; First Edition (October 28, 2008). p. 118)

The Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovsky was allowed to examine secret Soviet archives, which
show that the modern EU was implemented as a result of a conspiracy between the Politburo led
by Gorbachev and the elite of the Trilateral Commission - David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger,
Yasuhiro Nakasone, and Valéry Giscard d’Estaing: http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/865

He gave excerpts from the documents in his monograph "EUSSR: The Soviet Roots of European
Integration": http://ia601603.us.archive.org/12/items/ArticlesOfInterest/87502960-EUSSR-The-
Soviet-roots-of-European-Integration.pdf

So that covers my explorations into the modern globalist milieu. But gradually I came upon other
items suggesting the crucial role of Zionism in the behind the scenes shaping of world affairs. A
major source of my awakening to this issue was the speech of Benjamin Freedman concerning
Zionism and the world wars - and my later corroboration, discovering his speech was mot merely
the rambling of an extremist, but was in fact corroborated by admissions from key figures in the
Zionist movement, showing the steering of the world wars by the
Zionists: https://archive.org/details/ZionismAndTheWorldWars

I later discovered verification of other aspects of Freedman's argument, that the Khazarian thesis,
arguing that a non-Semitic Turko-slavic group is the origin of much of European Jewry, has recently
been verified by genetic research by Dr. Eran Elhaik (commentary on it occurs in the article Highlight:
Out of Khazaria—Evidence for “Jewish Genome” Lacking, and a news article on it began with the
headline Gene study settles debate over origin of European Jews). This is important, as it rebukes the
argument of racists, and on this, I would like to state that I have Jewish ancestry, and some of my all
time favorite people, David Bohm, Brian Josephson, Lester Levenson, Seth Farber, and Phillip Glass,
had a Jewish background - to criticize people based on birth is the height of bigotry and ignorance -
and a major point I stress, throughout this piece, is that narcotizing ourselves with ideologies is an
immense breeder of destruction, and prevents the emergence of an undivided humanity. Moreover, I feel
that buttressing ourselves with identity structures like this is delusional action - some of the
aforementioned individuals have transcended this action. I do not "follow" Jiddu Krishnamurti, but I
consider him very relevant for his insights in philosophical psychology, and he has brought this out rather
lucidly what I feel is the solution to this problem.

What we do find from this, however, is both that the Jewish racial claim to Palestine is illegitimate,
and that we are dealing with a hyperbolic manifestation of this ideological problem that leads to what,
for want of a better phrase, is a corrosive culturally conditioned mental race - similar to the occult
concept of an egregore. Like all forms of destructive indoctrination, there is here the possibility for a
dissolution of conditioning, and it is my hope, for reasons that will be further substantiated, that
people of a Jewish background learn to shake off their cultural conditioning, which is
comparable to the cultural conditioning of a member of the Ku Klux Klan, though more
pernicious. It is also my hope that they work to dismantle the destructive political edifice that is
their legacy. And I bring attention to this, while otherwise noting the more general
destructive actions of humanity, because if we don't give attention to this immediate
problem, then our species is imperiled.

Cementing this interpretation for me was the historical argument I later discovered that was put
forth by Douglas Reed in The Controversy of Zion,a book that is not anti-Semitic, but anti-
clerical, and seeks to document the explosive impact of a racist, megalomaniacal ideology upon
world politics. This ideology we can clearly see in the Old Testament, and Reed provides a
mindblowing analysis of it. Many people might not know this, but the Old Testament (Tanakh) is
replete with verses advocating Jewish world domination.

Subsequent commentary in the Talmud and Zohar, and modern Rabbinic commentary, is even
worse, as I show in the main comments to my site.

Noting this we can see an ideologically based megalomania that is not confined to Zionism, but
is a political consequence of Judaism - having effects recorded by historians throughout the ages.
For example, the Roman historian Suetonius noted that “There had spread over all the Orient an
old and established belief, that it was fated at that time for men coming from Judaea to rule
the world. This prediction, referring to the emperor of Rome, as afterwards appeared from the
event, the people of Judaea took to themselves; accordingly they revolted and after killing
their governor, they routed the consular ruler of Syria as well, when he came to the rescue,
and took one of his eagles. Since to put down this rebellion required a considerable army with a
leader of no little enterprise, yet one to whom so great power could be entrusted without risk,
Vespasian was chosen for the task, both as a man of tried energy and as one in no wise to be
feared because of the obscurity of his family and name. 6 Therefore there were added to the
forces in Judaea two legions with eight divisions of cavalry and ten cohorts.13 He took his elder
son as one of his lieutenants, and as soon as he reached his province he attracted the attention of
the neighbouring provinces also; for he at once reformed the discipline of the army and fought
one or two battles with such daring, that in the storming of a fortress he was wounded in the knee
with a stone and received several arrows in his shield.” (Tranquillus, Gaius Suetonius. “The Life
of Vespasian 4:5″, The Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Loeb Classical Library, (1914), pp. 289-
291): http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Suetonius/12Caesars/Vespasian*.htm
l

Moreover, within the Jewish religious literature are other verses showing that what is forbidden
to discuss in modern society - ritual murder and blood drinking associated with Judaism - was
actually approved religious practice in this sick cult! I would be an extremely horrible, anti-
Semitic monster if this was my fabrication, but I take note of this because it is noted in
Jewish scholarship - and the discrepancy between what is noted in this way and what is
given for public consumption is chilling. Jewish scholars even note the role of Satanism in
Judaism, how animals are sacrificed to "Satan". Other scholars note the preponderance of
cannibalism and other such acts in the Jewish tradition on behalf of the Old Testament God. To
me, considering the expressed nature of both, I really don't see a distinction between Satan and
many of the pronouncements of the Old Testament "God" (given that, as Douglas Reed argues,
the Old Testament is replete with Levitical interpolations) - both could reasonably be put under
one name - Depravity. On the subject of Satanism with Judiasm, though, the Jewish scholar Israel
Shahak noted how fundamental it is to Judaism, writing, in "Jewish History, Jewish Religion": "Other
prayers or religious acts, as interpreted by the cabbalists, are designed to deceive various angels
(imagined as minor deities with a measure of independence) or to propitiate Satan. At a certain point in
the morning prayer, some verses in Aramaic (rather than the more usual Hebrew) are pronounced. This is
supposed to be a means for tricking the angels who operate the gates through which prayers enter
heaven and who have the power to block the prayers of the pious. The angels only understand Hebrew
and are baffled by the Aramaic verses; being somewhat dull-witted (presumably they are far less clever
than the cabbalists) they open the gates, and at this moment all the prayers, including those in Hebrew,
get through. Or take another example: both before and after a meal, a pious Jew ritually washes his
hands, uttering a special blessing. On one of these two occasions he is worshipping God, by promoting
the divine union of Son and Daughter; but on the other he is worshipping Satan, who likes Jewish prayers
and ritual acts so much that when he is offered a few of them it keeps him busy for a while and he forgets
to pester the divine Daughter. Indeed, the cabbalists believe that some of the sacrifices burnt in the
Temple were intended for Satan. For example, the seventy bullocks sacrificed during the seven days of
the feast of Tabernacles, were supposedly offered to Satan in his capacity as ruler of the Gentiles, in
order to keep him too busy to interfere on the eighth day, when sacrifice is made to God. Many other
examples of the same can be given.": http://tinyurl.com/74wwyhh
And because the Jewish religious text "The Zohar" (1:65a) states, "Come and see: Every single new
moon, as the moon is renewed, this End of all flesh is given one portion over and above the offerings, to
keep him occupied handling his portion, so that the aspect of Israel is alone to delight with their King. This
is the goat (According to Numbers 28:15, on each new moon a goat must be brought as a sin-offering.
Here, this goat is intended to preoccupy Satan, leaving Israel alone with God.)": http://tinyurl.com/87w7y8f
See also, for citations of Jewish scholars concerning Jews sacrificing chickens to Satan on the
Kapparot ritual on the eve of Yom Kippur, the
following: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2011/01/sacrificing-chickens-to-
satan.html

Of course, much of this is approved within the traditional Jewish religious literature, in spite of
the Satanic excursions of some adherents. Full discussion of this is beyond the scope of this
piece, but for a preliminary overview, note that Deuteronomy 7:16 states: "And thou shalt consume
all the people which the LORD thy God shall deliver thee..."

Also, the book of Ezekiel states: "Assemble yourselves, and come; gather yourselves on every side to
my sacrifice that I do sacrifice for you, even a great sacrifice for you, even a great sacrifice upon the
mountains of Israel, that ye may eat flesh and drink blood. Ye shall eat the flesh of the mighty,
and drink the blood of the princes of the earth (39:17-18)… And ye shall eat fat till ye be full,
and drink blood till ye be drunken (39:19)… and I will set my glory among the heathen, and all the
heathen shall see my judgment that I have executed, and my hand that I have laid upon them (39:21)."

William Douglas Morrison, in “The Jews under Roman Rule”, cited Dio Cassius to show the method by
which Jews in the eastern provinces of the Roman Empire, in the year 116 A.D., began to murder various
peoples they lived among during a rebellion. He noted that “in the Island of Cyprus alone the Jews put
two hundred and forty thousand of the native population to death, and in Cyrene on the African coast
more than two hundred thousand Greeks and Romans were brutally massacred. … Wherever the Jews
obtained the mastery they behaved like hordes of cannibals, eating the flesh of their victims and
smearing themselves with blood.”(Morrison, William Douglas. The Jews Under Roman Rule, T. Fisher
Unwin: Paternoster Square, G.P. Putnam’s Sons: New York, 1890, pp. 191-
193): http://tinyurl.com/3j43kgp

The most famous occultist of the 20th century, Aleister Crowley, noted in his "Preface to Sepher
Sephiroth" that "Human sacrifices are today still practised by the Jews of Eastern Europe, as is set
forth at length by the late Sir Richard Burton in the MS. which the wealthy Jews of England have
compassed heaven and earth to suppress, and evidenced by the ever-recurring Pogroms against which
so senseless an outcry is made by those who live among those degenerate Jews who are at least not
cannibals.":http://tinyurl.com/7qxysb5

I also urge readers to see the following items, relating this to occult/magical beliefs within
Judaism, which tie into this:
Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan introduces the occult practices of the Kabbalah, in his introduction to the Sefer
Yetzirah: "The third category of Kaballah - the magical - is closely related to the meditative. It consists of
various signs, incantations, and divine names, through which one can influence or alter natural events.
Many of the techniques closely resemble meditative methods, and their success may depend on their
ability to induce mental states where telekenetic or spiritual power can be effectively channeled. As with
the second category, the most important texts have never been printed, although some fragments have
been published. One of the best examples is the book Raziel" (Sefer Yetzirah: The Book of Creation in
Theory and Practice, 1997. p. x): http://tinyurl.com/6ven85n
Bernard Lazare could hardly be considered an "anti-Semite" - he wrote a book attacking "anti-Semitism",
and was a Dreyfusard and participant in the Zionist movement. Yet in that book attacking "anti-Semitism",
although he attempted to dilute the charges, he nevertheless made some important
confessions: http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/jewish/lazare-anti.asp
"Throughout the Middle Ages the Jew was considered by the common people as the magician par
excellence. As a matter of fact, a number of Jews did devote themselves to magic. We find many
formulas of exorcism in the Talmud, and the demonology both of the Talmud and the Kabbala is
very complicated. Now it is well known the blood played always a very important part in the arts of
sorcery. In Chaldean magic, it was of the utmost consequence... Now it is quite probable, certain, in
fact, that Jewish magicians may have sacrificed children, and thence the genesis of ritual murder.
The isolated acts of certain magicians were attributed to them in their character as Jews. It was
maintained that the Jewish religion which approved of the Crucifixion of Christ, prescribed in addition the
shedding of Christian blood; and the Talmud and the Kabbala were zealously searched for text that might
be made to justify such a thesis. Such investigations have succeeded only through deliberate
misinterpretation, as in the Middle Ages, or through actual falsifications like those recently committed by
Dr. Rohling, and[161] proven spurious by Delitzch. The result, therefore, is this, that whatever the facts
brought forward, they cannot prove that the murder of children constituted, or still constitutes, a part of the
Jewish ritual any more than the acts of the marechal de Retz and of the sacrilegious priests who
practiced the "black mass" would prove that the Church recommends in its books assassination and
human sacrifice."
For more on the types of characters, self-styled magicians, that Lazare was discussing, and their
political influence, see the
following: http://iamthewitness.com/books/Nesta.H.Webster/Secret.Societies.and.Subversive.Mo
vements.htm#ch08 (for a defense of Webster against her attackers, see this very old forum
post I wrote, which is vastly inferior to my present work, and extremely truncated (I have
lost the original full text of my argument), but still establishes definitively that her critics
misrepresent her (I made one citation there that I redact regarding percentages of Jews in
political positions that was from an unsubstantiated source, though much better sources
corroborate a similar
argument): http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index.php?PHPSESSID=9e839de8e6bcdc494e6
a8e57d1336058&topic=14110.0;wap2)
Lazare was extremely convoluted in this, because he noted demonology as a part of the Kabbalah, and
that many Kabbalists did engage in human sacrifices, but attempted to distance this from Judaism.
Professor Ariel Toaff is the son of the Chief Rabbi of Rome, and he is a bit less convoluted in his
presentation. He has written a book going much further, saying that ritual murder was indeed a part of
certain extremist sects of Judaism - including that blood was believed to have magical properties. He said
"I will fight for my truth even if I am crucified": http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/bar-ilan-
professor-who-claimed-jews-used-christian-blood-in-passover-ceremonies-defends-his-book-i-will-fight-
for-my-truth-even-if-i-am-crucified-1.212739
- Toaff was forced under pressure to partially recant, see the following item for information on
the obfuscatory nature of subsequent
work: http://www.jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/toaffdonor.htm, see the following for uncensored
revelations: http://www.jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/toaffupdate.htm
See also the following two items - concerning Jewish testimony to ritual murder:
1. http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2011/12/another-jews-admits-to-jewish-
ritual.html
2. http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2010/06/is-it-just-jews-who-state-on-
national.html

Also, In May 2011, a Swiss banker, who would not be named for fear of the consequences, was
interviewed by the Russian magazine NoviDen. He revealed the mentality of these people, what they like
to do in their spare time:http://noviden.info/article_239.html

"these people are corrupt, sick in their minds, so sick they are full of vices and those vices are kept under
wraps on their orders. Some of them like Strauss-Kahn rape women, others are sado maso, or
paedophile and many are into Satanism. When you go in some banks you see these satanistic symbols,
like in the Rothschild Bank in Zurich. These people are controlled by black-mail because of the
weaknesses they have. They have to follow orders or they will be exposed, they will be destroyed or even
killed."

He also noted, regarding the powerful policy steering group known as the Bilderberg group: "You have
the inner circle who are into Satanism and then there are the naive or less informed people. Some people
even think they are doing something good, the outer circle."
Again, full discussion of this lies far beyond the scope of the present article, but it provides a
taste of a suppressed reality. Thus we see a huge discrepancy between approved public discourse
and the actual facts.

To continue - this "religion" is so sick that within it is the Kol Nidre prayer - used many Jews to break
oaths to gentiles. Many deny the reality of this, but using Jewish sources, I have refuted them:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/80454336/Kol-Nidre

This is probably one of the reasons why there are at least 256 newspaper references prior to the
Nuremberg trial, beginning in 1900, concerning the claims, fabricated by Jewish organizations, of
"6,000,000" Jews in various types of
"peril": http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/145-references-to-6000000-jews-prior-
to.html?zx=dea2f39387769f50 - also of interest is the admitted lack of evidence for the mainstream
holocaust narrative that comes from the words of the leading holocaust
historians!: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2011/12/no-real-evidence-for-gas-
chambers.html?zx=9adb2c3e7aba8af7

Now, I am in no position to deny individual suffering which may have occurred, but we must
face the fact that America and Europe are being blackmailed and bludgeoned by this to permit
the destructive fury of World Zionism as it is used to "conquer the world" (far from
exaggeration, this is the function of Zionism as described by the Zionist leader David Wolffsohn
- as recorded in the New York Times (August 22,
1907): http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FB0D16FD3C5A15738DDDAB0A94D0
405B878CF1D3, (September 17,
1914): http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F70913FA3D5C13738DDDAE0994D140
5B848DF1D3

Insight into the real nature of the Zionist entity, which necessitates our vigilance in neutralizing
it, comes from a speech in Jerusalem in December 1919 given by Chaim Weizmann, who
months later would become president of the World Zionist Organization, and would later become
the first president of the state of Israel. As recorded by Judische Rundschau, January 16, 1920
(No. 4), p.4, Weizmann stated the following:

"Lloyd George once said: I know the Palestinian front much better than I know the French front, for every patch of
land and every stream is familiar to me from the Bible. Palestine is, above all, a matter of the Bible for England. The
English believe in the Bible more than many groups in Jewry. Thus, first came the idealistic grounds [for the
decision to issue the Balfour Declaration], and only afterwards the material. We are the ones who have made clear to
the English political leadership that it was in England's interest to join with us, to spread the British protectorate over
Palestine. We reached the [Balfour] Declaration not by miracles, but through persistent propaganda, through

We will
unceasing demonstration of the life force of our people. We told the responsible authorities:

establish ourselves in Palestine whether you

like it or not. You can hasten our arrival or
you can equally retard it. It is however better
for you to help us so as to avoid our
constructive powers being turned into a
destructive power which will overthrow the
world.
We demand neither a charter nor concessions, but rather a complete national edifice that meets the following
preconditions: the right to acquisition of ownerless land, the facilitation of land acquisition in general, the
prerogative of developing public works, complete autonomy in the spiritual and intellectual sphere, and last not
least, a direct influence upon the English administration in the territory. The regulation of immigration by us is, for
us, likewise an unconditional demand."

This admission validates what was provided above, and is corroborated with information given
below. With that said, I would like to emphasize strongly the importance of not "solving" these
kinds of problems with the same level of consciousness that created them, of not responding with
destruction, but rather, responding with solutions that will transcend the master-slave, oppressor-
oppressed dialectic.

Beyond this, the leaders of the Zionist movement have explicitly stated their desire for a World
Government to be ruled by Israel in outlets like the New York Times. According to Theodore
Herzl, the official (though not actual - see the initial post) founder of Zionism, this Israel would
ultimately be massively expanded beyond the 2013 boundaries. A current threat to this species
from Zionism was enunciated by Martin Levi van Creveld, professor of military history at the
Hebrew University in Jerusalem, when he wrote: “We possess several hundred atomic
warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at
Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force. Let me quote General Moshe
Dayan: “Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.” I consider it all hopeless
at this point. We shall have to try to prevent things from coming to that, if at all possible.
Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the
second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure
you that that will happen before Israel goes under.”:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/sep/21/israelandthepalestinians.bookextracts

And there are other facts showing a parallel major problem in history - the association of Jews
and Bolshevism - that has been ingeniously covered up, that are discussed at length in the main
post in this website, with refutations of the narratives obfuscating those facts, showing that
sources seeming to controvert it rely on falsified information or can otherwise be controverted.

My belief is that there is an ideological origin to this extremism and hate in the Jewish religion,
fueling this mask that is the public face of the global oligarchy - and I have devoted time to it in
order to penetrate this layer of our World System that the "educated" refuse to question because
they are living under mind control - and I credit a very fortunate prior alienation that I was
eventually able to overcome (to become post-alienated, but not trapped in the traditional mode of
competitive conformity), as well as an unflinching desire to go where the facts took me, as the
two things that broke me from such mind control. I have substantiated my argument on this
above and I substantiate this in much more detail in the main post, though preliminarily, insight
into the racism that permeates it even in modern times is provided in the following collection of

primary source footage . So while my ultimate desire is for an undivided humanity, I believe
it is important to constatate this aspect of our political situation, and nullify in such a way as to
not emulate the problem, lest we be overrun by the megalomania fueling it. And although I am
not Jewish, I do have Jewish ancestry, and have no problem with that (though I do have
problems with the Jewish religion, which I document as a probable ideological origin of the
malicious activity of the Zealots leading these movements, which percolates even the
purportedly “atheistic” variants: http://mailstar.net/philos.html), and I maintain the distinction
between those zealots and other people, not intoxicated with hatred and megalomania, who
merely happened to be born Jewish. I am working in the tradition of Oscar Levy - see his
commentary at pp. viii-xiii of the
following: http://ia700603.us.archive.org/22/items/TheWorldSignificanceOfTheRussianRevoluti
on/48920297-Rivers-The-World-Significance-of-the-Russian-Revolution.pdf

As for what is presented here - this constitutes only one of several items of interest - I will move
on to those other items and focus primarily on them from this point forward, after exploring
the can of worms that are opened with a consideration of the role of PTech in the September 11th
attacks, and exploring the allegations of Zionist connections to the firm, and obtaining the
remaining documentation (and full archival information for this documentation) that I mentioned
in the first post would be required to establish that the banking firm of Kuhn, Loeb, & Co was
the "hidden hand" behind the Bolshevik revolution and resolve the contradictory accounts that
surround this issue. It also appears, given the Weizmann admission and other corroborating
admissions, that Zionism may be illegal, the laws outlawing it may have just not yet been
enforced. I have seen references to a couple - as one whose closest political stance is that of
philosophical anarchist, but who does not want revolution, but rather, wants change, I hesitate to
recommend such laws be enforced, but recognize the importance of doing so. The alleged
references are as follows:

Corpus Juris Secundum 16: Constitutional Law 213 (10):

"The Constitutional guaranty of freedom of speech does not include the right to advocate, or
conspire to effect, the violent destruction or overthrow of the government or the criminal
destruction of property."
Corpus Juris Secundum 22, Criminal Law sec. 182 (3):
"A prosecution for conspiracy to commit an offense against the U.S., may also be tried in any
district wherein any overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy is performed." U.S. v. Cohen
C.A.N.J. 197 F 2d 26.

Looking at those two references alone, we can easily see how they can be applied to the Zionist
movement, given what has been provided. I will have to verify these references to see if they, or
analogues of them are genuine.

I will refine my writing to include only primary and academic sources, or seriously well
documented, reliable sources outside of academia (these three classes of sources at this time
constitute almost all of the material on this website). At some time I might be able to get my
findings published in a peer-reviewed journal - they have relevance as substantive items of
information. However, given that they controvert widely accepted narratives, in the current
climate, this might be difficult. As noted in Casadevall & Fang (2009), Is Peer Review
Censorship?:

"Given the unpleasantness of having one's work rejected, as well as a desire for more-rapid communication of
scientific findings, some scientists have expressed nostalgia for the good old days when nearly any submitted
manuscript was accepted for publication, and some have even compared peer review to censorship. After all, neither
Newton nor Darwin had to submit to the indignity of peer review prior to publication!
[...]
The current system persists despite abundant evidence of imperfections in the peer review process. Most scientists
would agree that peer review improves manuscripts and prevents some errors in publication. However, although
there is widespread consensus among scientists that peer review is a good thing, there are remarkably little data that
the system works as intended. In fact, studies of peer review have identified numerous problems, including
confirmatory bias, bias against negative results, favoritism for established investigators in a given field, address bias,
gender bias, and ideological orientation. Smith wrote that peer review is “slow, expensive, ineffective, something of
a lottery, prone to bias and abuse, and hopeless at spotting errors and fraud”. Chance has been shown to play an
important role in determining the outcome of peer review, and agreement between reviewers is disconcertingly low.
Bauer has noted that as a field matures, “knowledge monopolies” and “research cartels”, which fiercely protect their
domains, suppress minority opinions, and curtail publication and funding of unorthodox viewpoints, are established.
In response, experienced authors learn to negotiate reviewer hurdles by embracing conservatism
and avoiding speculation, although some have complained that this response has the effect of
“dumbing down” the scientific literature. [...] it is self-evident how foibles in peer review can create a major
problem with scientific acceptance, for peer reviewers are the major gatekeepers for the printed word.
[...]
Misrepresenting [...] discredited ideas as victims of censorship risks minimizing the true threats of scientific
censorship, as when a government deletes politically sensitive remarks by scientific agency heads and surgeon
generals, alters reports by government scientists, or prohibits the publication of sensitive data.

Publishing in peer-reviewed journals remains the major mechanism for the dissemination of scientific knowledge.
The peer review of scientific manuscripts is clearly distinct from these examples of censorship. However, if
reviewers prevent authors from any discussion of controversial or speculative viewpoints or if editors are
overzealous in screening manuscripts for perceived newsworthiness or consistency with prevailing dogma, there is a
danger of blurring the distinction between peer review and censorship. If a reviewer obstructs the publication of a
manuscript because it competes with or questions his or her own work, there is an ethical dimension as well. [...]
Even more importantly, excessive influence by reviewers can stifle legitimate scientific debate and encourage
conformity.
[...]
Peer review is very different from censorship, but we need to be careful to maintain the distinction. A respect for the
wisdom of age requires us to give Galileo the final word here: “Long experience has taught me this about the status
of mankind with regard to matters requiring thought: the less people know and understand about them, the more
positively they attempt to argue concerning them, while on the other hand to know and understand a multitude of
things renders men cautious in passing judgment upon anything new”."

That, though, may be too much of a rosy picture - see Brian Josephson's presentation
Pathological Disbelief. Additionally, this may be difficult in the political climate in the United
States as of 2013. But I will not be silenced on these issues that, for me, are of tremendous
importance, and I will persist in refining this work and spreading it.

I will now refute the attempts of those who would like to ignore this information by using
poisoning the well fallacies. People who use this strategy desire to kill the messenger so as to
make others of their mind set see him as non worthy of responding to and wrong from the start. It
is a flawed, intellectually dishonest, but unfortunately effective method for propagandizing to
those who lack intellectual self-defense skills that s used by those who wish to combat material
that is different from their belief system. In this particular case, such an approach is entirely
invalid because I have made my information independently verifiable. But I will address it
anyway:

As I noted in the initial post, in an exploratory and much more immature stage, I left an internet
legacy. At this time, the items I stand behind that are on the internet that I wrote are those written
during and after the summer of 2013 as myself and as Blissentia, this blog, and the following
archive.org items (items I have shared - 1,2 - items I have written and/or will rewrite
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 - and items I will expand - 1,2,3). However, I will explain some of the other
items:

This forum cites some support I gave to the website "Zioncrimefactory" because of the Israel and
9/11 book of the author. I am very much a supporter of much of his update to the book.
However, for a while, the author engaged in extremist, racist rhetoric. On his old site, before it
was hijacked by a Christian Identity adherent, at personal risk to myself, I commented using my
own name on some of his articles. I attempted to show, in lengthy comments to the "about" page,
the fallacy of the racist approach, and while extremely egregious anti-social behavior is
associated with Zionism, and that it was much more pernicious than mainstream critics
acknowledged, this did not justify the fallacious racist approach (this commentary is archived
here). Some of the responses in the comments show a beginning of a change in view, and later,
on his current site, he declared White Nationalism to be a racist cult. From the time period that I
was making these arguments, I made various statements trying to show the fallacy of this
approach. One person in comments to a racist website that I do not endorse quoted something
that I said during this time period - "Judaism is a sociopolitical mental illness that has wreaked
immense havoc with Communism, Zionism, and the Rothschild banking system." I currently hold
that this assertion is misguided, and the "mental illness" gambit is historically a weapon of

political oppression that is lacking in scientific basis , but I do maintain, and substantiate
below, that there is immense extremism and hate in Judaism that contributed ideologically to the
movements I critique here (some could certainly describe this as mental illness, but it is only a
more virulent strain of what is currently a general human malaise), and because of ruthless
strategy, these movements achieved success. In contrast to those efforts, the old manager of the
"Outlaw Forum" once wrote a quasi-reasonable article on these issues, but then his perspective
degenerated to embrace extremism and hate. So, I, again, at personal risk to myself, attempted to
show on his "updated" site the fallacy of such an approach, but this seemed to have no effect.

I used to post at the outlaw forum when I was 19 and 20, when I got into this after I went into a

shock from watching ENDGAME the movie , which contains some good information but a
lot of hot air and dearth of quality sources to back up its claims (in spite of this, I still intuitively
resonated with core elements of the film, like the excerpt of Aldous Huxley's discussion of

scientific dictatorship - that Brave New World was not fiction, but what was actually being
implemented, and I later discovered that Huxley was way up in power elite circles implementing
this, and while he feigned concern, his associates, like his brother, were actively implementing
much of this. I later found that much of the underlying narrative of the film can be substantiated,
and I did this, but it cannot be substantiated from the material the dubious filmmaker provides
(note - I don't support the overall site of the embedded link just given - http://www.sott.net - but
the article I just linked to - http://www.sott.net/article/195039-Alex-Jones-The-Pied-Piper-of-
Extremism-Who-Brands-Truth-Seeking-as-Mental-Illness - is very good and is very relevant)).
Around this time, when my intellectual strength was less developed, I wrote up a glib forum
thread cutting and pasting a bunch of material from popular "alternative media" sources that had
varying degrees of documentation justifying their claims (some were of low quality, others were
of high quality) and using that as the crux of my argument on conspiratorial narratives. Thus this
critic, "Muertos", using appeal to ridicule, made false statements about that, implying that I did
not even read the articles I cited (I did, and I acknowledge this, make the error of glibly cutting
and pasting a bunch of sources rather than systematically addressing claims), and then, after I
had a bit of an exchange, on his website addressing a film that I now way endorse totally, but
endorse engaged in belittling appeal to ridicule. I have become much more assiduous than I was
when I made that "outlaw forum" thread, and have provided overlooked, but necessary sources to
the public stemming from original research for the issues of concern here. This critic will no
longer let me comment on his site to provide refutations of his commentary, and if his item ever
becomes problematic, I will provide a copy of his admission of censorship. I don't really care to
engage him further however, as much of his commentary is refuted within the body of this site.
"Muertos" means "dead", and I am reminded of the phrase "let the dead bury their own dead"
when considering his outlook and arguments. With intellectual laziness, he references Wikipedia
as a main source. I will, very soon, provide (and have already provided) proof of the deep
flaws of wikipedia as a source for controversial issues in the comments section of this post
(or, rather, people can see this and this and the general history of my struggles as
Pottinger's cats on wikipedia - showing double standards being applied throughout
contentious articles).

In contrast, I do have respect for Ernie Lazar, and the work he has done, though, when I wrote
more polemically, I nevertheless noted an accurate truth - that he ignores the points
corroborating his opponents, and uses logical fallacies. He is a source that challenges some of the
historical ideological aspects of arguments I present here. And because of my intellectual
honesty, and desire to not be tendentious, I provide, in the comments section of the original post,
other sources upholding the more widely held narratives. I nevertheless persist with my thesis
because in spite of that, I have found deep holes in those narratives - and evidence showing a
different reality from what they promote. What people like Lazar seem to forget however is the
following - THE FACT THAT BIGOTS AND EXTREME RIGHTISTS HAVE
DISCUSSED THESE ISSUES IN THE PAST DOESN'T NULLIFY WHAT THE
LEADERS OF THE POWER ELITE MOVEMENTS, WHO I AM BRINGING
ATTENTION TO, ADMIT THEY ARE DOING IN THEIR OWN WORDS.

Many people will be reluctant to accept the facts presented here, in spite of the documentation
corroborating them, because the Establishment version created the narratives they uphold first,
and it is a scary thought that those in such positions, who people are trained to look up to, could
be psychopaths and predators and deceive people. Those using this type of argumentation usually
look to corporate media, regulatory agencies, and government as final arbiters of "truth". But
such a stance is problematic for several reasons:

The concentration of media ownership, as it falls ever more into the hands unaccountable mega-
corporations that, though it is not immediately obvious, are becoming (and have been for quite
some time) increasingly like cartels because of interlocking directorates is a major reason whey
that stance is untenable. And for the issues examined in this site, a relevant item is Manny
Friedman's Times of Israel article "Jews DO control the media", which is filled with very
disturbing rhetoric. It is addressed to a Jewish audience, and is thus more candid than a normal
publication. Beyond that, it is important to note that Kent Cooper, who served as general
manager of the Associated Press from 1925 to 1943, and then became it's executive director, in
his book "Barriers Down", pp. 6-9, noted that by the beginning of the 20th century, the news
agencies Reuters, Wolff, and Havas were a triumvirate that together monopolized international
news. On p. 21, he noted that in his circles, the account was that international bankers, led by the
Rothschilds, assumed ownership of those agencies at the beginning of the 20th Century.

It is true that many items informing my analysis are derived from mainstream media sources, but
these sources stop short of giving a full picture, and, for most articles, bombard the readers with
propaganda meant to further the objectives of Zionists and various multinational cartels.

For regulatory agencies, it is important to note that even though the EFSA states that
"involvement in industry-funded research does not necessarily constitute a conflict of interest
provided that the research does not relate directly to the topic being considered by the Panel or
Working Group.", it is provable that the leaders of EFSA research panels have deep conflict of
interest according to the EFSA's own guidelines (see also this and this), and thus they invalidate
themselves as a reliable source according to the principles of witness impeachment. The same is
true of so called "science watchdog" groups who selectively attack opponents, like Gilles-Éric
Séralini, of the trends set by monopoly capitalists in their mad lust for power, in spite of the fact
that those like Séralini who are selectively attacked are actually using perfectly fine protocols in
their research, according to the regulatory agencies, when not selectively attacking those who
raise items about concern regarding their corporate sponsors, themselves (see also this (rebuttal
to criticisms of Séralini) and this (general research papers of Séralini) - and for the bigger
picture, see this (pertaining to horizontal gene transfer with GMOs) and this (pertaining to the
toxicity of the Roundup herbicide) and ESPECIALLY this (a superb article on GM health
dangers): http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/15/11/4748 -and this - concerning the environmental
problem shown by the fact that in 2001 Mexican government ministers attempted to intimidate
Prof Ignacio Chapela into withdrawing or renouncing his work which showed that the country’s
maize landraces were contaminated by GM cross-pollination). For a general overview of
everything on this, see the following: http://gmoevidence.com
There is also less subtle conflict of interest with the FDA, and this is a reason for the extremely
egregious behavior of this organization.

Subtle, hidden in plain sight government ownership of major corporations takes conflict of
interest to a whole new level, and reveals not only that there are stores of wealth separate from
the money governments make taxing people (showing across the board lying by officials who are
either deceptive or ignorant of this major problem, and that many claims of budgetary deficit are
fictional), but also that government and industry are a self serving fusion. Aside from that,
monopoly capitalists are often the people steering the formation of major governmental bodies -
again, an interesting item, in this regard, is the work of Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovsky, who
was allowed to examine secret Soviet archives, and found that the modern EU was implemented
as a result of a conspiracy between the Politburo and the elite of the Trilateral Commission –
David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Yasuhiro Nakasone, and Valéry Giscard d’Estaing. He
gives the documentation in his book “EUSSR”, and an interesting article on this is here. And on
a related note, presidents are groomed by these types of organizations - Reuters noted that
"Invited as speakers, Bill Clinton and Tony Blair were groomed at Bilderberg meetings before
rising to fame as U.S. President and British Prime Minister respectively." This used to be on
yahoo news
(http://web.archive.org/web/20010901000000*/http://uk.news.yahoo.com/010523/80/brbbh.html
), but it has been removed - fortunately it has been preserved here. And finally, for those who,
after reading all of this, still think we live in any kind of "democratic open society", the
following is of relevance - Burke's Peerage is considered the definitive source for royal
genealogy, and according to Burke's Peerage researchers, "The presidential candidate with the
most royal genes and chromosomes has, up to now, always won the White House..."

So why would you expect these entities to bite the hand that feeds them?

Finally, some with intellectual cowardice might like to dismiss my argument as "crazy", because
of its variance with their Pavlovian conditioning and indoctrination. Such a stance is invalid, but
even if we were to entertain it, the documentation is independently verifiable, and aside from
that, the defamatory accusation has interesting historical connotations (see 1, 2, 3, 4).
Posted by Ben Steigmann at 2:28 PM 2 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook

Friday, July 5, 2013

Proclamation, pt. II

Much of what was previously posted did adequately prove the reality of conspiratorial politics,
and disprove standard denials on these issues. However, it was fundamentally erroneous, since it
focused on who rather than what.

I find my intellectual journey in this area similar to that of Ezra Pound (from what others have
said about my previous characteristics, and from what I have observed, I do share similarities, in
that like him, I was an extremely eloquent writer, was concerned about serious issues that others
dubbed crazy, and was, for a while, very narcissistic). He initially was concerned deeply and
rationally about the problems of financial parasitism, and I vindicate his concerns in my previous
post. However, for him, "international bankers" became "Rothschilds" (his view was that the
English were a slave race governed by the Rothschilds since Waterloo, a view that unfortunately
can be validated), which then became "Jews" (with the term used in such a way so as to employ
hasty generalization fallacies in writings like "The Jews, Disease Incarnate" - such hatred is not
justifiable). He lost sight of the forest for the trees, as he plummeted down a spiral descent into
bigotry. He later came out of it and apologized for his "suburban anti-Semitism" in the 1960s.
I never really spiraled as low as he did, though I did embrace extremist thought processes for a
while,and I did revel in writing polemics for catharsis, later as a means to attempt to enact
vengeance and dominate family members (I'm not Jewish, but I do have Jewish ancestry through
my grandfather, and this significantly impacted my family - so I would write polemics using this
information, but in a more hostile style, so as to attempt to achieve some type of intellectual
domination). Because of my ancestry, I, before coming into this, had a perspective very different
from what is revealed in the initial post on this site. My investigations required me to modify that
position, and I encountered the depths of obfuscated, but very true historical evil and violence,
and developed a reactionary attitude that ultimately was a continuation of the same violence
informing the evil I had condemned. Still, I was intellectually, and later through insight and

integration, able to go beyond that low level . This was not just related to the subject matter
in this blog, as in my interactions in general, there was a lessening of a previous harshness and
psychological violence.

I have said in the previous post that I advocate economic reforms that get rid of those underlying
structural issues, and I maintain this view. But, at a more fundamental level, I feel that the
violence discussed in the previous post is a trend expressed in varying degrees in a great
majority, perhaps all of us – typical of a fragmented humanity. Thus the Rothschilds, the Lenins,
and the Weizmanns of the world express the same fundamental impulse as the rest of us, but via
cunning have seized power at opportune moments and projected their violence upon great
masses of people. These apostles of violence have become increasingly drunk on the “power”
they obtain, and thus increasingly corrupt and violent, in a self-perpetuating positive feedback
loop. If we revolt against the most successfully violent among us, then a new group of people,
totally compelled by this robotic, fear based, dominating drive, will emerge, and continue this
process. And the weaker people, also compelled by this process, will follow them as “leaders”,
and dominate and continue to be dominated. With the increasing destructive power of our
technology, this will continue until we totally destroy ourselves. Or maybe not. Perhaps attention
can be brought to this underlying process itself, stripped of the imagery that we layer upon it,
which occults and confuses our understandings. Nevertheless, I keep the information below,
since it is valid and incontrovertible, and the documents speak for themselves. I have noted the
problems of political chemotherapy, and how the appliers of that, with their authoritarianism,
might turn into the exact kind of problem they oppose, but this does not negate the fact that we
are definitely dealing with a many-layered problem that has infected the body politic (in many
ways, beyond the scope of the particular movements that are profiled here). Those may sound
like vicious words, but they are well substantiated with what has been given. I would like to
point out though that while I have confirmed, to my satisfaction, the meta-conspiratorial
narrative, and need to just iron out a few more items and make a few more refutations to make
my case airtight, this does not imply that condemning groups of people is justified. All it shows
is that psychopathic political priesthoods are able to dupe their followers and dupe others around
them, just as the Levites and Pharisees did in ancient times. Beyond such focus on particulars, I
feel that it is important to focus on general top-down social violence. Politics itself is control, as
noted by Plato when he referred to "the cybernetics of men, as you, Socrates, often call politics."
And such control theories are definitely operating at a high level in society today, as can be
inferred by military literature like the following:
1) "Joint Vision 2020" (which calls for "full spectrum dominance" over all
"battlefields"): http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/doctrine/genesis_and_evolution/source_materials/joint_
vision_2020.pdf

2) "Control Warfare - Inside the OODA Loop" (which defines mental space as a
"battlefield"): http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA391774

Military literature has actually discussed disabling the cognitive function of political dissidents,
like the document “Toward Narrative Disruptors and Inductors: Mapping the Narrative
Comprehension Network and its Persuasive Effects”, which notes that "Once the research group
determines which parts of the brain are associated with cognitive reasoning and narrative
comprehension, they will be attempt to impair those sections in order to “create a fundamental
basis for understanding how to disrupt or enhance aspects of narrative structure and/or brain
functioning to minimize or maximize persuasive effects on subject proclivity to engage in
political violence.” (Page 23) ": http://www.activistpost.com/2013/07/secret-darpa-mind-control-
project.html

The full ramifications of this are discussed here: http://wwws.forummotion.com/t556-darpa-

goes-deep-green#3129

Furthermore, the discussion on comprehensive financial reports in the preceding post shows full
scale corruption and money squandering and corporate takeover across all of government.

So that is important to keep in mind the fact of general psychopathy existing as a trend across
society infecting those addicted to pseudo-power, not being confined to one particular group.
Finally, I would like to emphasize that I feel that the following is good at helping one rid oneself
of the delusional tendency that would take the information below, and emulate the problem being
discussed, creating more fragmentation: