Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Elaine Dean
Jacksonville University
Introduction
is assessed, typically by a supervisor. The assessment is done along a given set of dimensions, a
score is then assigned and the employee made aware of his or her formal rating (Devisi &
Murphy, 2017). Whether the performance appraisal is done on a periodic basis or annually it is a
key tool that allows organizations to determine the alignment of performance with the
expectation of the position. Performance appraisals should be designed to set standards based on
job analysis. It should communicate job standards, compare performance to standards, and
measure performance (Rajut, 2015). A performance appraisal should be structured in a way that
it provides a systematic opportunity to discuss progress and performance with employees and
allow the organization to perform checks and balances of its processes and policies. That being
measuring progress, and adapting to changing conditions. The performance appraisal should be
precise and well documented as it not only become a permanent part of the employee record but
also a variety of decisions concerning the employee is based on the ratings from a performance
appraisal (Fallon & McConnell, 2014). These decisions include salary and wages, coaching and
Report”. The performance appraisal type used to evaluate the employee who functions as an
Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP) in the nephrology specialty clinic is the essay
CRITIQUE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL 3
or free-form method. The technique is combined with a graphic rating scale. There is a legend
that explains each category of the rating system. However, the word “reasonable” is used in the
rating criteria dialogue-giving rise to possible perception issues and or judgmental errors. The
collaboration, and scientific inquiry each defined to communicate the expectation of each
standard. The writing on this performance appraisal was well done it did not include any
superficial information or any flowery language. The narrative in each section reflected the job
knowledge and potential of the employee, the employee understanding of the organization’s
policies, protocols, procedures, and objectives, the relationship with co-workers, the employee
general planning and organizational abilities, and the attitude and perception of the employee in
general. Each section of the essay described facts and often includes examples and evidence to
support the information. The rater’s essay also provided a good deal of information about the
employee and effectively supported the graphic scale rating by substantiating an explanation for
the rating in the narrative. The supervisor prepared the essay in a way that it properly assessed
Performance standards provide the employee with specific performance expectations for each
duty, it tells the employee what it is to be done. They are observable behaviors and actions that
explain how the job is to be done, plus the result results that are expected for a satisfactory job
performance. Performance standards are derived from sources such as detailed work-study and
method analysis (Fallon & McConnell, 2014). According to Fallon and McConnell (2014)
performance standards address four key dimensions namely productivity, quality, timeliness, and
CRITIQUE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL 4
cost. Quality should address how well the work is performed and how effective the outcome is. It
should also relate to accuracy. Productivity should address how much work is produced.
Timeliness should address how quickly or by what date is the work is required to be done, and
cost should address dollar savings. This performance appraisal did not indicate the source of the
performance appraisal but most importantly it did not completely address quantifiable indicators
used to address how well an individual is performing. The quality dimension was substantive but
there was no supporting data or information for timeliness, productivity, and cost. Considering
these are attainable, realistic, and understandable measures used to define successful
comprehensive performance appraisal typically involves more than performance measures that is
credible specific standards that will allow the employee to know in no uncertain terms how well
All effective performance appraisals are tied to specific measurable and attainable
objectives. This involves a collaborative goal-setting process between employee and supervisor.
Employee and manager can foster a unique relationship to work together to develop personal
objectives (Fallon & McConnell, 2014). Employee developmental plans facilitate employees’
personal and professional growth through training and opportunities to take on new
responsibilities. The performance appraisal process is an ideal setting in which to set objectives
for achievement in employee developmental initiatives. The performance appraisal used by this
organization did not include a section involving mutually set objectives between the employee
and the supervisor. There was no measurement for meeting current or future objectives
CRITIQUE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL 5
indicating whether an objective or developmental plan was met or not met. The essay narrative
did not indicate specific objectives or specify the required executed action needed to achieve
those objectives. While there were several events within the body of the essay that could be seen
as an objective, it was totally a perception on the part of the reader. Additionally, the instructions
in the section titled “Narrative Summary” implied it was designed to outline development plans
and future objectives. However, it was left blank. In most organizations, new objectives are
developed as an ongoing process that links individual performance to the organization’s strategic
these objectives in terms of desired results and successful outcome rather than activities and
action as was present in this performance appraisal. According to Fallon and McConnell (2014),
and a date for completion (Fallon, McConnell, 2014). In turn, this would provide clear
expectation for a credible performance appraisal. This performance appraisal did not meet the
criteria.
Interview/Self-Appraisal/Employee Feedback.
The appraisal interview offers the chance for both the employee and the supervisor to
access the employee’s current performance and work opportunities for further personal
development. In most organization communication occur daily between manager and employee
that is vital for factual corporation. However, it cannot be a substitute for the purpose of an
This facilitates the discussion of key areas of improvement and how the employee can grow
through feedback mechanism. The main purpose of feedback is to help the employee understand
where they stand in relation to expected and or productive job behavior. Managers who engage
CRITIQUE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL 6
in continuous feedback with employees not only do those employees perform better they are also
more engaged (DVA, 2017). The performance appraisal of this ARNP had no employee
feedback section. This may have created a missed opportunity for suggestion for improvement.
The ARNP also received a high satisfactory rating on the graphic rating scale. This score on the
rating scale together with the absence of valuable feedback might in the future be an obstacle to
substantive development planning as the grade might suggest that the ARNP is already a superior
worker. Throughout the essay, the supervisor did not acknowledge any employee input.
However, since the employee signed the performance appraisal it indicated that was some sort of
interview or formal contact between the employee and the supervisor. As to whether that process
was a true appraisal interview or if it was effective and efficient is purely speculative. In some
organization, employees complete a self-appraisal prior to the actual performance review. This
affords the employee the opportunity to provide self-rating, include successes, and highlight
appraisal as it not the best way to comprehensively evaluate performance. According to Gallo
(2013) employees are usually not the best judges of their own performance (Gallo, 2013).
to be achieved they cannot self-assess whether or not they achieve the expectation. According to
Sargeant (2012) for self-appraisal to be accurate two conditions must exist there must be clear
understanding of a performance standard and criteria for measuring them and the employee must
be able to use the criteria to make a judgment on personal performance (Sargeant, 2012). This
essay performance appraisal of this ARNP did not have the characteristics of a self-appraisal and
it lacks the elements of the employee point of view. However, this could just be a manager
Conclusion
There are many different types of performance appraisal methods an organization can
adopt. There are the older methods including the behavior checklist, the essay method, and the
grading method. But there are also the newer more modern methods such as the 360-degree
feedback, the behaviorally anchored rating scale (BARS) and the management by objectives
(MBO) method. A performance appraisal should be a process that evaluates how well employees
perform their jobs compared to a set of standards. Employee appraisal should be in line with the
overall strategic objectives of the organization, therefore, these objectives must be clearly
translated to each employee. The essay method used in this performance appraisal allowed the
appraiser to concentrate on describing specific strengths of this employee. Because this method
is less structural and confining it allowed the supervisor to examine and explore any relevant
attributes he or she deemed appropriate utilizing the methods open-endedness and flexibility.
This flexibility allowed the appraiser to explore performance areas that would otherwise be
neatly dissected and scaled. However, the method is highly subjective and in consequence, it is
difficult to fully grasp a structured conclusion about the organization’s performance requirement
References
Fallon, L. F., & McConnell, C. R. (2014). Human resource management in health care:
Principles and practice (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
https://hbr.org/2013/03/how-to-write-the-dreaded-self-appraisal
Rajput, V. (2015, ). Performance appraisal system. Asian Journal of Nursing Education and