Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GEOPHYSICAL
INSTITUTE
.Kiruna Sweden
A NEh WAY GF ORGANIZING SPECTRAL LINE INTENSITY RATIO
FLUCTUATIONS OF DIFFERENT ELEMENTS
by
B. Thelin
Kiruna Geophysical Institute, P.O. Box 704,
S-981 27 Kiruna, Sweden
Printed in Sweden
Kiruna Geophysical Institute
Kiruna 1986
ISSN 0349-2656
h new way of organizing spectral line intensity ratio
fluctuations of different elements
by
Bo Thelin
Kiruna Geophysical Institute
P. 0. 3ox 704, S-981 27 Kiruna, Sweden
Abstract
ia = c a (' -1
(D
mn mn •
where I is the intensity of light with the photon energy
hv from sample constituent "a". C is here built by fac-
mn mn
tors which are derived from transition probability, electron
and atomic density, quenching, absorption effects, sample
geometry and apparatus constants.
Y m -L/kT is here the partition sum over all energy levels of
r i i
an atom, and is the statistical weight of an energy
level.
Experimenta1
a
D(E) = |E
I m - Em ,-ET+E
1 (3]
(4)
••..•Am'n'*
This means that according to equation (4) it should be mathe-
matically possible to obtain a straight line with the direc-
tion coefficient (1/kT) • R(T) in a diagram when plotting
R(I /I > -) versus D(E) for all studied line pairs of the
elements a and b because equation (4) is a linear differential
equation.
By using very stable ICP light sources when making repeated
intensity measurements of different iron lines with the IDES-
system, the present author discovered that no linear
structure was obtained with D(E) = IE -E ,I in equation (4).
i m mi
An example of this lack of linearity is shown by the circular
points in the RD-graph in Fig (1) of a "side-on" ICK These
points form a cloud with no linear structure at all. The
author then discovered that, if the R-values of the intensity
ratios were plotted versus D(E) = Ihv -hv * ,\ instead, a
i mn m ni
linear structure (triangular points) in Fig (1) was obtained.
Similar results have earlier been presented by the author (6),
using "end-on" and "side-on" ICP:s in combination with
different IDES-spectrometer systems. These results were very
obvious and were performed from experiments that included
much more data than Fig (1), which will serve more as an
example of the Fe-Fe-combination. One might then question if
the temperature and energy dependent exponential factor in the
convential intensity formula in eq (1) is really exp(-E /kT).
Concerning this fluctuation analysis, a more detailed descrip-
tion of the statistical questions is discussed in the previous
paper (6).
By studying RD-graphs of different element combinations, the
present author discovered that the element combinations from
different elements (analysis line/analysis line or analysis
line/iron line) have bigger fluctuations than the element
combinations from the same elements (iron line/iron line). The
author and Dr.S. Yngström at the institute then discovered
that the different element combinations were organized
linearly, if D(E) = |J -J + hv - hv * *| was used in equa-
tion (4), where J is the ionization energy for the different
elements. This can be seen in Fig (2) from an ICP-measurement
("side-on"), where R ( I m n / I m ' n ') is
plotted versus D(E) for
spectral line pairs from various element combinations. Notice
that the slope of the Fe-lines (J -J =0) is the same between
the curves in Figs (1) and (2). To illustrate the influence of
J -J in equation (4) a comparison between Figs (2) and (3)
has been made for different element combinations. In Fig (3)
J -J has been put equal to zero for all element combinations.
As is shown in Fig (3), the circular points do not represent
an ordered pattern as in Fig (2), where the linear pattern is
obvious with a very good correlation coefficient (r=0.90).
Theoretical motivation for introducing the ionization energy
here was proposed by Dr. S. Yngström (7,8).
liv using D(E)=|Ea-E ,-Ea+E I according to the standard inten-
sity formula (1) instead, no linear relationship at all was
obtained (r=-0.17), which is seen in Fig (4) for ICP. To
illustrate the separation between the points in Fig 3, four
examples (points A, B, C, and D) in these plots were chosen.
Point A represents the combination between the line pair
Co Cr
Co3453A - Cr4254Ä with J -J =1.11 eV, and point B represents
the combination between Cr4254Ä-Fe4271Å with J r-JFe=-1.10 eV.
These two examples illustrate big positive translations along
the D(E)-axis, where the same element (Cr) has been combined
with different elements. Points C and D represent the combina-
tion Ni3415A-Fe5167Ä and rio3864A-Fe5167A respectively and
illustrate negative translations along the D(E)-axis, where
J -J =-0.23 eV and J -J =-0.48 eV.
This means that each point in Fig 2 represents two salt con-
centrations. In this way the D(E) dependence is more pro-
nounced because the intensity ratio fluctuations are "col-
lected" from two different samples with different salt con-
centrations and the meanvalue of K(I /I n ' n ') *s calculated
and plotted versus D(E). This means that each point in the
graph has "collected" intensity ratio fluctuations from 20
repeated measurements. From this data set it is possible to
compare the two exponents in the graphs. By doing such a com-
parison one must seriously ask oneself how to obtain such
results without changing the standard intensity formula in
equation (1).
Plots similar to the one in Fig (2) of the ICP can be seen in
Figs (5) and (6) of a double chamber hollow cathode lamp
(DCHC) and in Fig (7) of a hollow cathode lamp for flat metal
samples (FSHC). These plots seem to follow as nice a linear
relationship as Fig (2) of the ICP, and they prove that it is
possible to obtain such plots with other types of plasmas,
having different temperatures and plasma densitites than the
ICP. It is also interesting to compare Figs (5) and (6) for
the DCHC-lamp, which clearly demonstrates the linearisation
effect for two different powers (170 W and 250 W) in the lamp.
These graphs clearly demonstrate the temperature dependence
Acknowledgement
Table I.
Power 1.2 kw
Henry frequency 27.12 MHz
Argon cooling gas flow-rate 12 1 min"1
Nebuliser flow-rate of argon 7 1 min"1
Nebuliser pressure 131 Pa
Sample uptake rate 3 ml min"1
Observation height 15 mm
The DCHC-lamp
Flush time 60 s
Pre-burn time 60 s
Pressure, Ne 1 torr
Current 1.1 A
Power 250 W
Sample, tube shape, 3 cm x 4 mm i.d.
12
Table I.
The FSHC-lamp
Flus time 60 s
Pre-burn time 60 s
Pressure, Ne 0.4 torr
Current 0.03 A
Power 120 W
Sample, flat sample
Spectrometer
Table II.
Cu 3247.54
Ni 3414.77
Cr 4254.33
Mn 4034.49
Al 3961.52
Ål 3092.84
MO 3864.11
Co 3453.51
Fe 3859.91
Fe 3440.61
Fe 3236.22
Fe 5167.49
Fe 3570.10
Fe 4271.76
Fe 3922.91
Fe 2987.29
14
References
D(E)feV)
D(E)(6V)
Figure 2 Relative fluctuations of spectral line pair inten-
sity ratios plotted versus D(E)=|J -J + hv -
- hv > A for a "side-on" ICP. The triangular
points are the same as in Fig. 1. The circular
points describe data from line pairs originating
from two different kinds of metal atoms. These
line pairs have been selected among spectra from
Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu and Mo. The points A, B, C,
and D describe data from the line pairs Co 3453A -
Cr 4254A, Cr 4254A - Fe 4271 A, Ni 3415A -
Fe 5167A, and Mo 3864A - Fe 5167A respectively.
They represent positive and negative translations
along the D(E)-axis in comparison with Fig. i and
are described in the text.
D(E)(eV)
D(E) eV
10
•# • *. C *• ••
~ 6
. s . •* • •
of •••
a. - . t.* • • • • •
-V ' •• • •
• •
NEW
• • r*0.76
°oL 2
D(eV)