Professional Documents
Culture Documents
English IV
Ms. O’Keefe
January 28th, 2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjPf2HVgzKc
Children
language, but what is a child? According to the Oxford Dictionary, a child is, “A young human
being below the age of puberty or below the legal age of majority.” In literal terms, a child is a
human under the age of eighteen. When we think of a child, we think about their physical and
mental characteristics; some characteristics associated with youth are playful and carefree nature,
much energy, laughter, smaller size, and happiness. The time of childhood makes up about a
The definition of a child may be examined under the literal lense. One application of this
is in the case that many people under the age of eighteen are tried as adults in court. For
example, why do many sixteen-year-olds who commit crimes become penalized as adults? If
these youngsters are below the age of eighteen, why are they considered fully mentally and
physically developed? Some would argue that it is not just to consider these kids as full adults in
this sense.
There is also the nuances of age group and also mental development to consider in these cases.
For instance, the court would examine a 10-year-old differently than they would a 16-year-old.
There are a few factors that are involved in these cases, such as the court system and
decision-making.
In the year 2017, in the state of Wisconsin, two girls of the age of thirteen were tried as
adults in court for attempted murder. According to Huffington Post, Two 13-Year-Old Girls
Are Being Tried As Adults. Here’s Why That Matters., “Waukesha County Circuit Judge
Michael Bohren said Monday that defense lawyers “failed to convince him” the cases should be
moved, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.” Wisconsin law states that minors above
the age of ten with the crime of homicide or attempted homicide are tried as adults. The decision
to consider the thirteen-year-old girls as adults was put into consideration, and this was put to
test while looking at the Wisconsin jurisdiction that juveniles under sixteen may have the
opportunity to be tried in juvenile court. But, defense lawyers must request this, and the Judge
must approve it. In this case, the Waukesha County Circuit Judge did not allow the girls the pass;
in result they became automatically tried in adult court. In the situation that a child is tried and
convicted as a juvenile, they receive mental treatment and are released at the age of eighteen.
These girls had the intent of killing their classmate in order to please a fictional horror character.
In conclusion, these girls were ultimately found not guilty because of mental reasons; one of the
There is much debate on issue of charging children as adults. On one side of the issue,
there are negative consequences to imprisoning children as adults. The more ethical option
would to send children who commit crimes to correctional lessons or therapy to help them to
The way children process information and think is different than older individuals- it is
the way that we view the children that impacts their lives. It is important that we nourish
children’s minds, so that our world can become more healthy and informed.
A case from a previous generation should be examined. There is cases where mentally,
emotionally, or physically abused children target their parents. The Menendez Brothers case is a
famous case in the 90’s that was tried two times. On August 20, 1989 brothers Lyle and Eric
Menendez murdered their parents in their Beverly Hills mansion. The defense attorneys, Leslie
Abramson and Jill Lansing, advocated for their clients thoroughly and based her arguments on
the sole purpose of why and what lead the youngsters to kill their wealthy parents. Considering
this would be the strength of their work. During the trials, the young men were referred to as
“children” or “boys” by the defense, although they were aged twenty-one and eighteen at the
time of the crime. The two lawyers were criticized by the prosecutors and the media for calling
Lyle and Eric by these terms. This is because those against the Menendez case did not want them
to be looked at as children, because they were legal and fully grown adults. Opposers also
thought that Abramson was behaving too extravagantly, as this was part of her personality. In
addition, they believed that she could have been trying to ‘“trick” or possibly use the power of
the words “child” or “boys” to change the minds of the jury and audience. Leslie Abramson was
very endearing and liked to look at Lyle and Eric as her children. The men’s lawyer also liked to
have them dress in casual, but nice, sweaters instead of suits to court in order to make them
This highly publicized case and televised trial lead the public to form opinions. The
defense evidence showed that Lyle and Eric Menendez encountered sexual and mental abuse
during their whole lives from their father. Eric begun to be molested at the age of six, throughout
his entire childhood until the age of seventeen and eighteen.The two defendants testified, with
both of them recounting horrid details of their lifelong abuse as children. Their strong emotional
reactions could have not been faked. Eric, the younger of the brothers, was targeted more by
their father, and their mother did nothing to stop these situations. Their lawyers argued that the
brothers had no sense of stability, and years of trauma has lead to the real but irrational fear that
their parents were going to kill them. The young men became afraid because of the belief that
they could never run away. They were in a dead-end situation and did not know better. They
were made to believe that if they ran away with their father’s secret of sexual abuse and told
others, their father would kill them. If the two stayed at home, they thought the abuse would
never end. Abramson and Lansing also used emotion to convince the jury, and that the brothers’
age was a large factor in the crime. There was much evidence for this, including the testimonies
of many family members, explicit pictures, and more. Although the harm against Lyle and Eric
Menendez was perpetrated during childhood, the crime that the men committed took place while
they were adults. The prosecutors argued that the crime was committed for desire of inheritance
and greed. This case ended in a hung jury, which lead the case to be retried that ended in 1996.
The bulk of the defense evidence was blocked from the jury in the second case. As a result, the
prosecution won, because the judge was biased and did not allow this evidence any longer. Both
As children, Lyle’s and Eric’s minds were molded to believe that there was no way out of
their pain. The brothers were children when they endured the violence. Maybe one might say that
they could have not thought through the moments right before the crime. Maybe they did not
There is many meanings to the word “child.” There is not only one lens to look through
when it comes to looking at a person. As one gets older, he or she learns and grows, and learns
lessons that create morals. We learn from mistakes. We learn right from wrong. There might not
a right age to define a child. Everybody grows and becomes wiser with age.
Works Cited
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/slenderman-youth-adults-prison-wisconsin_us_55
cbc70ce4b0cacb8d32ee35
http://www.genfkd.org/juveniles-tried-adults-happens-children-go-prison
https://www.philosophytalk.org/shows/what-child
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/child
television: “Law and Order True Crime: The Menendez Murders.” I also watched
movies on this. I did not look anything up about this topic because I remember all