Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
This is a compilation of all the necessary forms and checklist used for quality
assurance and control on site for actual works done. There include forms for material
testing and approval, works testing and approval, testing results form, inspection
checklists and the likes. These standard records encompass all civil engineering works
including concrete works, road works, foundation works, water supply works and building
works.
These records are the recognized mandatory standard for JPS project which
the contractor must include in their QAP and be incorporated in their construction
processes.
ii
Jasa Perunding Sabah
iii
QA/01
Project : PROJEK BEKALAN AIR LUAR BANDAR (BALB),
KE KG SUANGPAI, KUDAT, SABAH.
SITE INSTRUCTION
S.I. No. :
From : RESIDENT ENGINEER / * CLERK OF WORK
Date :
To : PROJECT MANAGER / CONSTRUCTION MANAGER / SITE AGENT * (Contractor)
S.M. Ref : (if any)
Attn. :
REMARKS :
* select as appropriate
QA/02
SITE MEMO
Signature :
RE /ARE / C.O.W/*
Name :
Distribution List :
Copy to : Action : Attachment : Received for Contractor ;
Clerk of Works
1 TO : ……... / …...… / …….... Sketch Signature :
(COW)
Project Manger/Construction Manager/Site Agent*
Lab. Tech.
2 TO : ……... / …...… / …….... Drawing Name :
(LT)
Survey Tech.
3 TO : ……... / …...… / …….... Others : (specify)
(ST)
Date : / /
4
REMARKS :
We request for inspection and permission to proceed with the following work;
Time : Date : / /
Name :
Comments :-
Survey & Setting Out : Inspection of Prior Work : Testing of Prior Work :
Remarks :
Time : Date : / /
Signature :
Project Manager/Construction Manager/Site Agent*
Neither the endorsement of this Form nor anything written on it is intended to convey final approval for
Time : Date : / / any part of the Works, nor does it relieves the Contractor of his responsibility to comply with the quality
requirements of the Works.
* select as appropriate
QA-04(a)
Project : PROJEK BEKALAN AIR LUAR BANDAR (BALB), KE
KG SUANGPAI, KUDAT, SABAH.
As at : ………../………………………../……………..
CORRECTIVE ACTION
NCR DATE NON-CONFORMITY FOLLOW-UP NCR STATUS NCR
REMARKS
SERIAL NO. ISSUED (Details) DATE (Closed out/Pending) Closed Out Date
PROPOSAL DUE DATE
/
* select as appropriate
QA-04(b)
Reference : S I No.
NCR Serial No. : /
NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT (NCR)
Date of Issue : / / 20
SUBJECT :
Received by ; Issued by ;
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
for Contractor PM/RE/ARE/C.O.W
PART B : PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION (to be completed by Contractor & QAE/ C.O.W)
2. Scrap 4. Others
Signature : Accepted by ;
Name : Signature :
for Contractor
Name :
Date : / / PM/RE/ARE/C.O.W
Signature :
Name : / /
Date
for Contractor
* select as appropriate
QA/05(b)
Acceptability
Drawing No. Ref.: ……………………………………………………………………………………. Ref. Approval Chit No.
Date
Item & COMMENTS
OK Not OK
Work Components Time (Deficiencies, Degree of Completion, Weather,
(3) (X)
Others)
2. FORMWORK
2.1 Dimensions & Alignment
2.2 Rigidity & Alignment, Bracing and Working Platform
2.3 Sealing of Joints
2.4 Application of Debonding Agent
2.5 Tightness
2.6 Screeding Lines and Guides
2.7 Chamfers and Splays
2.8 Acceptability of Surface of Forms
3 BLINDING
3.1 Dry
3.2 Clean
3.3 Thickness & Level
4 REINFORCEMENT
4.1 Type/Bar Dia. /Length/Spacing (According to Drawing?)
4.2 Tying and Rigidity
4.3 Cover Spacers (Bottom & Sides) / Correct Cover
4.4 Cleanliness form Loose Rust, Soil, Oil
4.5 Starter Bars
4.6 Lap Lengths
5 INSERTS
5.1 Shape, Number & Position
6 JOINTS
6.1 Expansion Joint / Location / Cleaned & Roughened
6.2 Construction Joint / Location / Cleaned & Roughened
10.2 Are Slump Cone & Cube Moulds Available? / Dimension OK?
Checked by;
Signature : Signature :
Clerk of Works Engineer / QAE / Asst. QAE *
* Select as appropriate
QA/05(c)
Corrective Work
(if any)
Post Concreting Checks Acceptability Comments
Acceptable
Not Acceptable (5)
(3)
CONCRETE CURING
- Curing membrane in place? Y/N*
- Water curing adequate?
CONCRETE STRENGTH
Is cube strength > minimum requirement for
removal of formwork Y/N*
CONCRETE FINISH
Shrinkage Cracks Y/N*
Segregation Y/N*
Honeycombing Y/N*
ALIGNMENT
Visual check of alignment O. K. / Not O. K. *
Signature : Signature :
CLERK OF WORK (COW) RE/ARE / QAE / Asst. QAE *
Name : Name :
Date : / / Date : / /
* Select as appropriate
QA/06(a)
* select as appropriate
QA/06(b)
CULVERT DETAILS :
Location :
# NOTE : For the changes made relative to the Drawing / Contract Requirement :-
: ~
SKETCH [Section of Culvert showing Ground Profiles (original and as constructed), Length & Invert Levels, Embankment Fill above with Heights &
Widths)
Date : / / Date : / /
* Select as appropriate
QA/08
Project : PROJEK BEKALAN AIR LUAR BANDAR (BALB), KE KG SUANGPAI, KUDAT, SABAH
Contract No : KKLW/P/JP/20/2016
JASA PERUNDING SABAH
Project : PROJEK BEKALAN AIR LUAR BANDAR (BALB), KE KG SUANGPAI, KUDAT, SABAH.
Contract No : KKLW/P/JP/20/2016
JASA PERUNDING SABAH
Surface Settlement Marker (SSM) Reduced Level At Designed R/L at Top of SSM (m) Settlement (m)
Surcharge
top of surcharge formation level
Removal Date First Reading Reading at last Current
Reading for the period Cummulative Remarks
Chainage / Offset from Date of (m) (m) reporting Reading
Ref. No.
centreline Installation (immediately after (at centreline) (proposed) (a) (b) (c) No Date (c) - (b) (c) - (a)
construction)
/
* select as appropriate
QA/12(a)
* select as appropriate
QA/12(b)
Subject :
Submitted by ; Checked by ;
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
( ) Project Manager/Construction Manager/Site Agent*
Date : / /
Remarks :
Signature : Date : / /
Project Manager/Construction Manager/Site Agent *
Date : / /
copy to : Engineer under the Contract (at Minsar Head Office) : Attn :
* select as appropriate
Edition 1.0 31 OCT 2012
iv
Jasa Perunding Sabah
v
Jasa Perunding Sabah
Continued….
No. Description Form Ref Related Field
29. Summary of Marshall test results QC-21 Road
30. Bitumen stripping test QC-22a Road
31. Quantitative extraction of Bitumen QC-22b Road
32. Coring & In-situ compaction record QC-23 Road
33. Monitoring of surcharge settlement (Surface QC-24a Road/goetechnic
Settlement Marker)
34. Monitoring of settlement (Rod Settlement QC-24b Road/geotechnic
Gauge)
35. Water Main Pressure and Leakage Test Report QC-25 Water
36. Water Reticulation Inspection Form QC-26 Water
37. Pipeline Chlorination Test QC-27 Water
38. Flushing of Pipeline QC-28 Water
39. QC-29 Building/
Quality Control checklist For Architectural
Works Architectural
vi
QC-1
CHAINAGE (m)
Item of Work TEST
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 etc….
Marshall Test (prod. & laying stages)
Laboratory Test (prod. & laying stages)
Asphaltic Wearing Course
Compacted Density (core sample)
Thickness (core sample)
Marshall Test (prod. Stage)
Laboratory Test (prod. Stage)
Asphaltic Binder Course
Compacted Density (core sample)
Thickness (core sample)
Gradation
P.I.
Agg. Crushing Value
Flakiness Index
Road Base
CBR - 4 Days Soaked Test
B.S. 1377 Compaction Test
Field Density - Top Layer ( )
Field Density - Bottom Layer (150mm)
Gradation
L. L. / P.I.
Agg. Crushing Value
Sub Base CBR - 4 Days Soaked Test
B.S. 1377 Compaction Test
Field Density - Top Layer ( )
Field Density - Bottom Layer (150mm)
Gradation
L. L. / P.I.
CBR - 4 Days Soaked Test
Top 300mm Subgrade
B.S. 1377 Compaction Test
Field Density - Top Layer ( 150mm )
Field Density - Bottom Layer (150mm)
Identify Cut and Fill Areas along the Chainage
Gradation
L. L. / P.I.
CBR - 4 Days Soaked Test
B.S. 1377 Compaction Test
Embankment Fill Below …. Etc.
Top 300mm Field Density 1200 - ……………. (etc.)
Field Density 900 - 1200mm
Field Density 600 - 900mm
Field Density 300 - 600mm
Field Density 0 - 300mm
L. L. / P.I.
CBR - 4 Days Soaked Test
Shoulders
B.S. 1377 Compaction Test
Field Density
* select as appropriate
NOTES : 1. #, o - Indicates the test has been carried out. The marked location indicates the approximate chainage where the test has been performed. ( # - up to previous month ; 0 - current month)
2. L. L. / P. I. - Liquid Limit / Plasticity Index
3. First Layer of Embankment fill is referred to as 0-300mm (existing ground taken as Datum 0)
QC-2
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS (Covering Period : from ……… / ……….. to ………./………./ 20 …)
(……………………………… Works)
Page No. : of
From St. Compaction Test Field Density Test Passing (Re-Test)
M. C. Passed /
Offset from # Layer % of MDD Field Density M.C.
Sample MDD OMC Test No. Date Chainage Achieved Failed Remarks
Centre (m) Reference Mg/m³ Test No. Date Achieved
No. (Mg/m³) % (%) (1st Test) % of
Achieved Target Mg/m³ (%)
MDD
FDT/ FDT/
FDT/ FDT/
FDT/ FDT/
FDT/ FDT/
FDT/ FDT/
FDT/ FDT/
FDT/ FDT/
FDT/ FDT/
FDT/ FDT/
FDT/ FDT/
FDT/ FDT/
FDT/ FDT/
FDT/ FDT/
FDT/ FDT/
FDT/ FDT/
FDT/ FDT/
* select as appropriate
Notes : 1. # - Identify the layers as (0-300), (300-600), etc. First layer of 'Embankment Fill' is referred to as 0-300mm (existing ground taken as Datum-0)
2. M. D. D. - Maximum Dry Density
3. O. M. C. - Optimum Moisture Content
QC-3c
* select as appropriate
Notes : 1. Sample numbers identified with (#) in column - 1 refers to samples taken from the top 300mm Subgrade of cut formation.
2. Identify those tests performed during the month of reporting with a (**) in the respective columns.
QC-3c
* select as appropriate
Specification Requirements Table 9.1 of SSRW 30% 25% 1.5% 2% 0.4% 20% 12% 0.06% 0.4%
Note : Identify those tests performed during the month of reporting with a (**) in the respective columns.
QC-4
Tested by : Witnessed by :
( ) ( )
Date : / / Date : / /
* Select as appropriate
QC-5a
Sample Location (Chainage / Depth / Borrow Pit No. / Stock Pile No) * :
Soil Description :
Sample Ref. No :
Sample Preparation : (air dried / oven dried / other)* Envelope : (Zone / Type) *
B. S. Sieve Mass Retained (g) (%) Retained (%) Passing Specified Limits (%)
75.0 mm
63.0 mm
50.0 mm
37.5 mm
28.0 mm
25.0 mm
20.0 mm
14.0 mm
12.5 mm
10.0 mm
9.5 mm
6.3 mm
5.0 mm
4.75 mm
3.35 mm
2.36 mm
2.00 mm
1.18 mm
600 µm
425 µm
300 µm
212 µm
150 µm
75 µm
63 µm
Pan
Total
Remarks : Signature :
Name :
Laboratory Technician
Date : / /
* Select as appropriate
QC-5b
40 40 40 60
P R
A 30 30 30 70 E
S T
S 20 20 20 80 A
I I
N 10 10 10 90 N
G E
0 0 0 100 D
0.001 0.01 0.1 1.0 10 100
SAND : % 1. ; 2. Name :
( ) ( ) Laboratory Technician
SILT & CLAY : % Date : / /
* Select as appropriate
QC-6a
Date of Test : / /
LIQUID LIMIT (CASAGRANDE METHOD ) & PLASTIC LIMIT TEST
BS 1377 : Part 2 : 1990 (Cl. 4.5)
Material Tested For : Road Section : Test No. : LL/PI/ /(sample ref. no.)
Sample Location (Chainage / Depth / Borrow Pit No. / Stock Pile No.) * :
Specimen No. 1 2 3
Container No. SPECIFICATION LIMITS :-
Mass of Wet Soil + Container (w2) g
Mass of Dry Soil + Container (w3) g L. L. - %
Mass of Container (w1) g
Plastic
Specimen No. 4 5 6 7 8
Number of Bumps
Container No.
Mass of Wet Soil + Container (m2) g
Mass of Dry Soil + Container (m3) g
Liquid
Sample Preparation
(Delete / Identify as appropriate)
l
As received:
l Oven Dried at : °C
%
l
Test Results
LL %
%
PL
10 15 20 25 30 40 50
NUMBER OF PI
Remarks :
Tested by : Signature :
( )
Name :
Witnessed by : Laboratory Technician
( )
Date : / /
* Select as appropriate
QC-6b
Project : PROJEK BEKALAN AIR LUAR BANDAR (BALB), KE
KG SUANGPAI, KUDAT, SABAH.
Sample Location (Chainage / Depth / Borrow Pit No. / Stock Pile No) * :
PLASTIC LIMIT -
Specimen No. 1 2 3 4
Container No.
Mass of Wet Soil + Container (w2) g
Mass of Dry Soil + Container (w3) g
Mass of Container (w1) g
Mass of Moisture (w3 - w1) g
Mass of Dry Soil [(w2 - w3) / (w3 - w1)] x 100 g
Moisture Content %
AVERAGE MOISTURE CONTENT %
LIQUID LIMIT -
Specimen No. 5 6 7 8
Initial dial gauge reading mm
Final dial gauge reading mm
Cone Penetration mm
Average Penetration mm
Container No.
Mass of Wet Soil + Container (m2) g
Mass of Dry Soil + Container (m3) g
Mass of Container (m1) g
Mass of Moisture (m2 - m3) g
Mass of Dry Soil (m3 - m1) g
Moisture Content [(m2 - m3) / (m3 - m1)] x 100 %
26.00
# # # # # # # # # l Oven Dried at : °C
20.00
Tested & Witnessed by :
1.
18.00
( )
2..
16.00 ( )
14.00
Signature :
Name :
Laboratory Technician
Moisture Content (%)
Date : / /
* Select as appropriate
QC-7a
Date of Test : / /
C. B. R. TEST (4-Days Soaked Test)
BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990 {Cl. 7.2 (method-3 ) 7.3, 7.4, 7.5 & 7.6}
Sample Location (Chainage / Offset / Depth / Borrow Pit No. / Stock Pile No.) * :
SPECIMEN PREPARATION : 4.5 kg Rammer Method (Manual / Mechanical) / Vibrating Hammer Method* Result of BS Compaction Test :
* Target moisture content : % (as identified previously in Test No. ) (Using CBR mould with 62 nos. of blows/layer)
* Compaction effort : No. of blows / layer = (as identified previously in Test No. ) M.D.D. : Mg/m³
No. of layers = O.M.C. : %
BEFORE SOAKING
DENSITY MOISTURE CONTENT Top face Bottom face
Mould No. Container No.
Mass of Mould + Base + Compacted Soil (m2) g Mass of Wet Soil + Container (w2) g
Mass of Mould + Base (m1) g Mass of Dry Soil + Container (w3) g
Mass of Compacted Soil (m2 - m 1) g Mass of Container (w1) g
Volume of (CBR) Mould (v) cm³ Mass of Moisture (w2 - w3) g
Bulk Density of Soil [P = (m 2 - m 1) / v] Mg/m³ Mass of Dry Soil (w3 - w1) g
Av. Moisture Content (w) % Moisture Content [(w2 - w3) / (w3 - w1)] x 100 %
Dry Density of Soil [Pd = 100 P/(100 + w)] Mg/m³ Av. Moisture Content w %
4- DAYS SOAKED CBR TEST : Proving Ring Constant : kN/Div
Penetration of Penetration of Force on Plunger
Gauge Reading (Div) Force on Plunger (kN) Gauge Reading (Div)
plunger plunger (kN) l Dry Density of the specimen
(mm) Top Bottom Top Bottom (mm) Top Bottom Top Bottom Mg/m³
0 4.00
0.25 4.25 l
Specimen compacted to :
0.50 4.50 % of
0.75 4.75
MDD of sample
1.00 5.00
1.25 5.25
1.50 5.50
1.75 5.75
2.00 6.00 From the graph
2.25 6.25 (after corrections if appropriate)
2.50 6.50 CBR Values at penetrations of :
2.75 6.75 2.5 mm 5.0 mm
3.00 7.00 Top face (%)
3.25 7.25 Bottom face (%)
3.50 7.50
Accepted CBR Value : %
3.75
Name :
Laboratory Technician
1. ; 2.
( ) ( ) Date : / /
* Select as appropriate
QC-7b
Contractor *: Project : PROJEK BEKALAN AIR LUAR BANDAR (BALB), KE
KG SUANGPAI, KUDAT, SABAH.
Date of Test : / /
C. B. R. TEST (4-Days Soaked Test) - Graph
BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990 {Cl. 7.2 (method-3 ) 7.3, 7.4, 7.5 & 7.6}
Sample Location (Chainage / Offset / Depth / Borrow Pit No. / Stock Pile No.) * :
Dry Density of the Specimen : Mg/m³ ( % of M.D.D. of sample) Moisture Content of the Specimen : %
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 TEST RESULT CURVES OF TOP & BOTTOM FACES OF SPECIMEN
Force on Plunger (kN)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Remarks :
Tested By : Signature :
( )
Name :
Witnessed By : Laboratory Technician
( ) Date : / /
* Select as appropriate
QC-8
Contractor *: Project : PROJEK BEKALAN AIR LUAR BANDAR (BALB), KE
KG SUANGPAI, KUDAT, SABAH.
Material Tested For : / Road Section : Test No. : MDD/ /(sample ref. no.)
Sample Location (Chainage / Borrow Pit No. / Depth / Stock Pile No.) * :
Specimen No. 1 2 3 4 5
DENSITY :
Amount of Water Added ml
Mass of Mould + Base + Compacted Soil (m2) g
Mass of Mould + Base (m1) g
Mass of Compacted Soil (m2 - m1) g
Volume of Mould (1.0 litre / CBR)* (v) cm³
BULK DENSITY OF SOIL [P = (m2 - m1) / v) Mg/m³
MOISTURE CONTENT :
Container No.
Mass of Wet Soil + Container (w2) g
Mass of Dry Soil + Container (w3) g
Mass of Moisture (w2 - w3) g
Mass of Container (w1) g
Mass of Dry Soil (w3 - w1) g
(w2 - w3) x 100
Moisture Content %
(w3 - w1)
Average MOISTURE CONTENT (w) %
DRY DENSITY OF SOIL [Pd = 100 P/(100 + w)] Mg/m³
0 5 # 1. # # # 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0 5 # # # # #
DRY DENSITY Mg/m3
SPECIMEN PREPARATION :
No. of blows / layer = ; No. of layers = MAX. DRY DENSITY (MDD) = Mg/m³
Initial sample mass = OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (OMC) = %
Mass retained on (20mm / 37.5mm) * sieve = g ( %)
Remarks :
Signature :
Name :
Tested by : ( ) Laboratory Technician
Witnessed by : ( ) Date : / /
* Select as appropriate
QC-9
Contractor *: Project : PROJEK BEKALAN AIR LUAR BANDAR (BALB), KE
KG SUANGPAI, KUDAT, SABAH.
Location :
Work Item : / Chainage : CH To CH Date of Test : / /
Liquid Limit (L.L.) : % Plasticity Index (P.I.) : Test Ref. No. : LL/PI/ /
4-Days Soaked CBR Value : % (indicate if relevant for the work item, if not indicate as N/A) Test Ref. No. : CBR/ /
CALIBRATION
Mean mass of sand in cone of pouring cylinder (M2) g g g : g
Tested by : ; Witnessed by :
( ) ( )
Name :
Laboratory Technician
Date : / /
* Select as appropriate
** First layer of embankment fill is referred to as (0-300)mm, where Datum -0 is the original ground
QC-10
CONCRETE CUBE
STRUCTURE Slump (mm) Compressive
Compressive Strength
(Component / Element), (at place of Date Load Remarks
Age Weight Density (N/mm²)
LOCATION & CHAINAGE concreting) Ref. No. (kN)
(days) (g) (kg/m³)
Cast Tested
7 28 Days Mean
28
28
7 28 Days Mean
28
28
7 28 Days Mean
28
28
7 28 Days Mean
28
28
7 28 Days Mean
28
28
7 28 Days Mean
28
28
( )
Cube Dimensions (cm) : 15 x 15 x 15 Name :
* Select as appropriate
QC-11
Notes :
# 85% of Characteristic 1
Strength = N/mm² 2
# Specification requirements: 3
* not more than 5% of
4
the test results shall be
allowed to be within 5
85% & 100% of
6
characteristics
strength. 7
8
* 4 samples average 9
shall be ³ specified
etc.
characteristic strenth
(+) 50% of current
margin
* A current margin of
12.0 N/mm² is used for
evaluation.
* Select as appropriate
QC-12
Contractor *: Project : PROJEK BEKALAN AIR LUAR BANDAR (BALB), KE
KG SUANGPAI, KUDAT, SABAH.
Concrete Supplier :
Time of
Measured Slump Cube Identification
Mixer Truck Volume (at place of No.
Placing Remarks
No. Delivered (m³) concreting)
Loading Delivery (mm)
Commencement Completion
Remarks:
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Clerk of Works Laboratory Technician
Date : / / Date : / /
* select as appropriate