Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kata Pengantar
Foreword
Congratulation
As a warm welcome, I congratulate all potential planner
candidates and also all students that have joined our study
program. We welcome you into as part of our big family to
look forward your future to be great planner.
i
Dear Potential Planner,
Being a part of Urban and Regional Planning Study Program of Universitas Gadjah Mada, is kind of
pride. It is because We want educate you not only skill full, but also full of knowledge, but with ethical
and strong moral integrated. By following the entire program both in the classroom and outside, you
will be designed to be great researchers or planners in this field. Your contribution can be defined in
the area of government or bureaucracy, consultant, developer, and Non-Government Organization
(NGO) that are ready to assist the community to develop its potential. In term to be like what We have
mentioned, you have to be ready to contribute in that fourth area, nationally or internationally. At
last, this academic guide book is structured to be your guideline basis at approximately 4 years in this
beloved University.
This handbook contains, alumni profiles derived from the vision and mission of the study program, the
basic values of UGM and basic values of planning in UGM, and We also give explanation of the
subjects and syllabus, however, beyond that, at the end of this manual also provides an overview of
additional capabilities that you need such as soft skills and vocational training to master as early as
possible. Also We include in this guide various facilities around the campus and campus life of
Yogyakarta, which is quite convenient. We hope that with this guide, you can spend your time during
the four years to build a carrier perspective future and better life for yourself, for your family, and for
the wider community, as well as for scientific planning of cities and regions.
ii
Daftar Isi
Table of Content
Kata Pengantar
Foreword i
Daftar Isi
Table of Content iii
Fasilitas
Facilities 6
Struktur Kurikulum
Curriculum Activity 8
Aktivitas Mahasiswa 28
Student Activities
Kehidupan Pelajar di Yogyakarta
Student Life in Yogyakarta 30
Informasi Kontak
Contact Information 31
iii
Profile of
Urban and Regional Planning
1
VISION
To be an internationally recognized study program in urban and regional planning in Asia, focused on
spatial engineering on the basis of moral values of democracy, equality, empowerment, justice, and
balance for sustainability and the glory of human civilization
MISSION
1. To conduct high quality education in order to produce professional urban and regional planner who
posseses moral integrity
2. To develop scientific knowledge for bridging the gap between planning theory and planning practice
in the real world
3. To actively contribute in shaping better civilization through urban and regional planning education
GOAL
To educate professional urban and regional planning graduates with moral integrity, who are able to
work in government institution, planning consultant, property developer, and non governmental
organization, in order to promote the creation of empowering place.
2
Entry Requirements of Urban and
Regional Planning Study Program
3
Alumni
37% 3.43
government agencies
50
urban and regional planning,
consultant and property developer
27% bulan
entrepreneur, banker, risk
management, etc
5%
research Data Survey 2014
4
Working Continuing Study in Master Degree
Graduating from URP-SP, students can choose In other hand, all graduated students can get
to work in specific field that they like. In great opportunity to continue their study. Some
average, the alumni of URP-SP only need 3-5 of alumni have gotten their master degree in
months after graduation to get their first job. many well-known universities all ove the world.
Besides, it is known that there are 73% of They can choose specialization subjects based
alumni that got job which is relevant with urban on their passion which relevant with the urban
and regional planning theory. and regional planning issues.
Mentioning the alumni that have worked, many Some of our alumni continue their master
of them are working in the government degree in Japan and England. Otherwise, many
agencies, such as National Planning Board, of them continue their study overseas because
Regional Planning Board, Ministry (like Ministry they got scholarships that can support them till
of General Work, Housing, Agriculture and they finish the master program.
Forestry, and others), property developer,
consultant like GIZ, and NGO like ITDP.
5
Facilities
6
Having 5 classrooms which has complete facilities such as projector,
LCD Screen, and Microphone.
There are more than 8.000 collections of book, journals, final project
reports and other that can be referenced by students.
7
Curriculum Structure
8
TKP 1101 Introduction to Urban and Regional Planning (2 credits)
Learning Outcome:
1. Students are able to explain the definition and role of the planners as well as describing history
and regional planning of Indonesian cities and other countries in WordPress page
2. Students are able to explain the learning system and method to plan
3. Students are able to explain the coverage/telecoms/and fields that works as a professional planner
4. Students are able to mention important points about what posted should owned by doing work
with their hearts
Reference book:
? Anthony, J.C & J.Snyder. 1982. An Introduction to Urban Planning. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co
? Birch, Eugenie. (ed). 2008. The Urban and Regional Planning Reader. New York : Routledge
? Hall, Peter dan Jones, Mark. 2011. Urban and Regional Planning Reader 5th Edition. New York :
Routledge
? Jensen, Eric. 2007. Rahasia Otak Cemerlang: Rangkaian Aktivitas Ringan Untuk Melatih Kerja Otak.
Jakarta: Gramedia
? Tscangho J.K., G.Knap, I.J. Aziz. (eds.). 1992. Spatial Development in Indonesia. Aldershot: Avebury.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain spatial concepts in scale city and regional
2. Competent to explain city/regional characteristic and entity that shape the city/regional, affecting
factors, and problems which is generated within the area
3. Competent to explain spatial intervention methods in order to implement ideal urban and regional
planning principles and ensure the sustainability of its future
4. Individually, competent to categorized various spatial potency and problems
5. Competent to elaborate connection within space individually
6. In a group, competent to categorized space/place typology, analyze aspects or factors which affects
space.
7. In a group , competent to do analysis on space
Referece Book:
Birch, E. L. (Ed.) (2008) The Urban and Regional Planning Reader, Routledge, New York.
?
Casey, E. S. (1998) The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History, Califórnia University Press, Berkeley.
?
Cresswell, T. (2003) Place: Short Introduction, Blackwell Publishing, Malden (MA).
?
Doxiadis, K. A. (1968) Ekistics: An Introduction to the Science of Human Settlements, Oxford
?
University Press, New York.
Fyfe, N. R.; Kenny, J. T. (Eds. ) (2005) The Urban Geography Reader, Routledge, New York.
?
Gottdiener, M.; Budd, L. (2005) Key Concepts in Urban Studies, Sage Publications, London.
?
LeGates, R. T.; Stout, F. (Eds.) (2011) The City Reader, Routledge, New York.
?
Sassen, S. (2006) Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages, Princeton
?
University Press, Princeton (NJ).
Hubbard, P.; Kitchin, R. (2010) Key Thinkers on Space and Place, SAGE Publications, London.
?
Tally Jr., R.T. (2012) Spatiality (New Critical Idiom), Routledge, London.
?
9
TKP 1103 Basic of Urban and Regions (2 credits)
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain urban and regional principle and mention the connection city and regional
growth dynamics
2. Competent to differentiate city growth theory and regional growth theory
3. Competent to use urbanization issue in the context of urban and regional development
Reference Book:
? Branch, Melvilla. 1993. Perencanaan Kota Komprehensif. Yogyakarta. Gadjah Mada University Press
? Carter, H. 1981. The Study of Urban Geography. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
? Drakakis-Smith, D. 1999. Third World Cities, 2nd. London, Routledge
? Levy, J. M. 1991. Contemporary Urban Planning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
? Hall, P. & U. Pfeiffer. 2000. Urban Future 21: A global agenda for the twenty first century cities.
London: E & FN Spon.
? Gore, C. 1984. Regions ini Question: Space, development theory and regional policy. London:
Methuen.
? LeGates, Richard dan Stout, Frederic. (eds). 2011. The City Reader, Fifth Edition. New York :
Routledge
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to identify relevant method and technique in urban space analysis
2. Competent to understand observation, data collection for district planning, analysis, and parallel
synthesis between spatial function and connection, also spatial morphology synthesis and analysis
3. Competent to understand data representation, characteristic, and variation in scoop urban and
regional planning
4. Competent to identify and assess a district
5. Competent to organize and structuring data
6. Competent to use the methods which is already taught for identifying potency and problem in a
district
Book Reference:
Short, J. 1984. Introduction to Urban Geography. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
?
Watts, K. 1974. Teknik Survey
?
Warpani, S. 1980. Analisa Kota dan Daerah. Bandung: ITB Press
?
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the interaction between urban space elements
2. Competent to differentiate the quality of urban space elements
3. Competent to explain potency and problems in a urban space
Book Reference:
? Jacobs, Allan B. 1985. Looking at Cities. Cambridge: Harvard university Press
? Carstens, Diane Y. 1993. People Places: Design for The Elderly: Issues, Guideliness and Alternatives.
John Wiley& Sons. Canada
10
TKP 1106 Presentation and Communication Techniques (2 credits)
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to mention the effective presentation principles
2. Competent to differentiate which one is effective presentation
3. Competent to communicate their ideas about planning effectively
Reference Book:
Ching, Francis D. K. 1979. Architecture: Form, Space and Order, dalam versi bahasa Indonesia
?
diterjemahkan oleh Ir. Pulus Hanoto A. Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta
? Simmonds, John O. 1961. Landscape Architecture: The Shaping of Man's Natural Environment. New
York: McGraw-Hill inc
? White, E.T. 1985. Presentation Strategies in Architecture.
Learning Outcome:
1. Students are able to explain the differences between the approaches that affect the process and
the process of urban and regional planning
2. Students are able to explain the process of urban and regional planning at every model
3. Students are able to explain the important things and problems that may arise in the process of
planning
4. Students are able to provide recommendations in the process of urban and regional planning
Reference Book:
Bracken, I. 1981. Urban Planning Methods. London: Methuen & Co.
?
Couch, C. 1990. Urban Renewal: Theory and Practice. London: MacMillan Education Ltd.
?
Stren, R. & J.K. Bell (eds.). 1995. Urban Research In The Developing World. Canada: University of
?
Toronto Press.
Ability to read, understand, communicate in writing and orally on the issues and topics of urban and
regional planning (physical planning , environmental planning, urban management, economic
development, civic design) in English.
Reference Book:
Frank, M. 1972. Modern English. N. J. : Prentice- Hall, Inc
?
Park, N.L. 1968. The Language of Architecture A Contribution to Architectural Theory. The Hague;
?
Paris, Mouton
Learning Outcome:
1. Students are able to explain the definitions and concepts of population
2. Students are able to mention five examples of population problems in the city/region/country
3. Students are able to mention at least three of population management policies in Indonesia
11
4. Students are able to connect between cities and regions policy with the problems of population
5. Students are able to propose a suitable approach for resolving problems of the population as a
group
Reference Book:
- Poston, Dudley L. dan Bouvier, Leon F. (2010). Population and Society: An Introduction to
Demography. New York: Cambridge University Press
- Preston, Samuel H., et.al. 2001. Demography: Measuring and Modelling Population Processes.
Oxford: Blackwell Publisher
Learning Outcome:
1. Cognition :
- Students are able to explain the variety of planning concepts (planning thoughts)
- Students are able to explain the development of the concept of good planning on a global scale or
Indonesia
2. Affection : Students are able to be critical of the concept and planning issues
3. Psychomotor : Students are able to identify the linkages between the concept of planning with
planning practice in the field
Reference Book:
Archibugi, Franco (2008) Planning Theory: From the Political Debate to the Methodological
?
Reconstruction. Springer
Chadwick, George (1978) A Systems View of Planning: Towards a Theory of the Urban and Regional
?
Planning Process. Pergamon Press
Faludi, Andreas (1978) Essays on Planning Theory and Education. Pergamon
?
Faludi, Andreas, eds. (1973) A Reader in Planning Theory. Pergamon
?
Friedmann, John (2011) Insurgencies: Essays in Planning Theory. Taylor & Francis
?
Holden, Debra J. and Zimmerman, Marc A. (2008) A Practical Guide to Program Evaluation
?
Planning: Theory and Case Examples. Sage Publications, Inc
Moser, Caroline (1993) Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and Training.
?
Routledge
Pallagst, Karina M. (2007) Growth Management in the US: Between Theory and Practice. Ashgate
?
Paris, Chris, eds. (1982) Critical Readings in Planning Theory. Pergamon Press
?
Taylor, Nigel (1998) Urban Planning Theory since 1945. Sage Publications
?
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain at least 3 type of urban design stream
2. Competent to explain concept element, method, and application that develops in the domain of
urban design
3. Competent to compare the urban design streams
4. Competent to describe a district scale planning based on one of the stream in a group
12
Reference Book:
? Barnett, J. (1982) An Introduction to Urban Design, Harper & Row, New York.
? Carmona, M., Tiesdell, S. (eds.) (2007) Urban Design Reader, Architectural Press, Burlington (MA).
? Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., Speck. J. (2000) Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline
of the American Dreams, North Point Press, New York.
? Frey, H. (1999) Designing the City; Towards a More Sustainable Urban Form, E&FN Spon, New York.
? Krieger, A., Saunders, W.S. (eds.) (2009) Urban Design, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
? Lang, J. (2005) Urban Design: A Typology of Procedures and Products, Architectural Press, Burlinton
(MA)
? Marshall, S. (2005) Streets and Patterns, Spon Press, Oxon
? Moor, M., Rowland, J. (eds.) (2008) Urban Design Futures, Routledge, New York.
? Moughtin, C. (2003) Urban Design: Street and Square, Architectural Press, Burlington (MA).
? Moughtin, J.C.; Cuesta, R.; Sarris, C.; Signoretta, P. (2002) Urban Design: Method and Techniques
(Urban Design), Butterworth-Heinemann, London.
? Sucher, D. (2003) City Comforts: How to Build an Urban Village, City Comforts Press, Seattle
? hawaites, K. Porta, S., Romice, O., Greaves, M. (eds.) (2007) Urban Sustainability Through
Environmental Design: Approaches to Time-People-Place Responsive Urban Places, Routledge, New
York.
? Urban Design Associates (2003) The Urban Design Handbook: Techniques and Working Methods,
W. W. Norton & Company, New York.
? Watson, D., Plattus, A., Shibley, R. (eds. ) (2003) Time Saver Standards for Urban Design,
McGrawHill, Amrhest.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the method to decide neighbourhood planning concept, spatial organization
approach in 2 dimension or 3 dimension
2. Have a sense/competent to recognize and assess(good/bad; contextual/not) neighbourhood
planning
3. Competent to recommend planning pattern and able to explain the concept with 2 dimension or 3
dimension model
Reference Book:
Talen, Emily. 2009. The Urban Design Reclaimed. Chicago: American Planning Association.
?
Tachieva, Galina. 2010. Sprawl Repair Manual. Washington: Island Press
?
Alexander, Cristopher. 1977. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford
?
University Press
American Planning Association. 2006. Planning and Urban Design Standards. John Wiley and Sons,
?
Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain basic material in neighbourhood planning planning (RTBL) and
implementation utilities
2. Have a sense/competent to recognize and assess(good/bad; contextual/not) neighbourhood
planning
13
3. In a group, competent to recommend planning pattern and able to explain the concept with 2
dimension or 3 dimension model for supporting the implementation of planning concept
Reference Book:
? Talen, Emily. 2009. The Urban Design Reclaimed. Chicago: American Planning Association.
? Tachieva, Galina. 2010. Sprawl Repair Manual. Washington: Island Press
? Alexander, Cristopher. 1977. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford
University Press
? American Planning Association. 2006. Planning and Urban Design Standards. John Wiley and Sons,
Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey.
Learning Outcome:
1. Cognition : Able to explain the order of the elements in the tread
2. Affection : Able to interpret contour until inundation area with individual GIS
3. Psychomotor : In the group were able to plan the tread area (site plan/master plan) for certain
themes (housing, campus, industrial area or the area of ?tourism)
Reference Book:
Beer, A., & Higgins, C. (2004). Environmental Planning for Site Development: A manual for
?
sustainable local planning and design. Routledge.
Harris, C. W., & Dines, N. T. (1998). Time-saver standards for landscape architecture. Me Graw Hill.
?
Marsh, W. M. (2005). Landscape planning: Environmental applications. New York: Wiley.
?
LaGro, J. A. (2011). Site analysis: A contextual approach to sustainable land planning and site
?
design. John Wiley & Sons.
Ozyavuz, M (Ed)., (2012). Landscape planning. InTech.
?
Pramono, R. W. D. (n.d).Buku ajar perencanaan tapak. (unpublished)
?
Russ, T. H. (2002). Site planning and design handbook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
?
Santamouris, M., Alvarez, S., Dupagne, A., Hall, D., Teller, J., Coronel, J. F., & Papanikolaou, N.
?
(2000). Environmental site layout planning: solar access, microclimate and passive cooling in urban
areas (Vol. 380). Building Research Establishment.
Simonds, J. O. (1983). Landscape architecture: a manual of site planning and design. McGraw-Hill.
?
Tal, D. (2010). Google Sketchup for site design: a guide to modeling site plans, terrain and
?
architecture. John Wiley & Sons.
Learning Outcome:
1. Students are able to explain the system of linear equations, linear systems, linear programming,
matrix systems, and probability
2. Students are able to give examples of the use of the above matters in the analysis or planning
district/city/region
3. Students are able to capture the variables that influence city issues a phenomenon that can be
explained through the concept/principle of mathematics
4. In the group was able to make one simple mathematical model to explain the phenomenon of
urban activities
14
Reference Book:
? Salvadori, Mario, 1968, Mathematics Architecture, Canada, Prentice Hall.
? Spiegel, Murray R, 1981, Calculus, Singapore, New York, McGraw Hill Book Co.
? R. Courant, 1978, Differential and Integral Calculus Volume I, II
Learning Outcome:
1. Students are able to understand the basic principles of religion and its practice creatively, wisely,
and full of responsibility
2. Students are able to assess the views and religious teachings in the context of the development of
science and technology, globalization, natural and built environment, design or engineering
particularly related to the principles of planning and design
Learning Outcome:
1. Able to explain the descriptive models of regional economic development and the determinants
2. Able to explain the normative theories of regional economic development and examples of its
application in policy/practice
3. Being able to scrutinize the effectiveness of a policy/approach to regional economic development
4. In the group were able to propose a concept of regional economic approach in a case (studio case
based)
Reference Book:
Hoover, Edgar., and Giarratani. F. An Introduction to Regional Economics.
?
Capello, R. 2009. Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories. UK: Edward Elgar
?
Publishing Limited.
Pike, A., et all. 2006. Local and Regional Development. USA: Routledge.
?
Martinez-Vazquez, J., and Vaillancourt, F. 2008. Public Policy for Reional Development. USA:
?
Routledge.
Rodrigue, J., Comtois, C., and Slack, B. 2006. The Geography of Transport System. USA: Routledge.
?
Todaro, M., and Smith, S. 2010. Economic Development, Eleventh Edition. New York: Addison-
?
Wesley.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the definition of housing and settlement
2. Competent to explain the supply and housing demand (housing market)
3. Competent to explain about affordabile housing
4. Competent to explain housing types
5. Competent to explain housing layout
6. Competent to evaluate existing housing layout and site plan
7. Competent to calculate existing housing needs and future housing needs
8. Competent to calculate housing economics
9. Competent to plan a residential neighborhood by group
15
Reference Book:
? ALTMAN, I. & WERNER, C. M. (eds.) 1985. Home Environments, London: Plenum Press.
? ARIAS, E. G. (ed.) 1993. The Meaning and Use of Housing: International Perspectives,
Approaches and Their Applications Avebury: Aldershot.
? CLAPHAM, D. 2005. The Meaning of Housing: a Pathways Approach, Bristol, Policy
? Doxiadis, C.A. 1976. Ekistics: An introduction to the science of human settlements. London:
Hutchinson & Co.
? PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT 1987. Petunjuk Perencanaan Kawasan Perumahan (Guideline of
Urban Residential Area Planning). Jakarta: Departemen Pekerjaan Umum (Public Work
Department), Jakarta.
? TURNER. J.F.C. 1972. Housing as a Verb. In: TURNER, J. F. C. & FICHTER, R (eds.) Freedom to Build:
Dweller Control of the Housing Process. New York: Macmillan.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to mention documents which is needed for urban data analysis, also describe function
and role of the city
2. Competent to explain demography structure and dynamics
3. Competent to classify cities depends on their classification
4. Competent to compare demography projection method and demography development scenario
5. Competent to compare infrastructure quality with applicable standards
6. Competent to compare urban economy quality based on qualitative indicators (exp: URA)
7. In a group, competent to count demographic dynamics, structure, and projection for making a
demographic development scenario
8. In a group, competent to analyze urban economic development trend
9. In a group, competent to count the demand for urban infrastructure
10.Competent to explain land suitability for urban land use.
Reference Book:
Chapin, F.S. & E. Kaiser. 1979. Urban Land Use Planning. London: University of Illinois Press.
?
Rondinelli, D.A. 1985. Applied Methods of regional Analysis the Spatial Dimensions of
?
Development Policy. America: Westview Press.
Harjowigno, S., dan Widiatmaka. 2007. Evaluasi Kesesuaian Lahan: Perencanaan Tata Guna Lahan.
?
Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Muta'ali, L. 2012. Daya Dukung Lingkungan untuk Perencanaan Pengembangan Wilayah.
?
Yogyakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Geografi UGM.
Learning Outcome:
1. Both individually and in a group, competent to explain city profile related to potency and
problems, and city's character
2. Individually, competent to assess the function and role of the city
3. In a group, competent to identify the actual issues, problems, and potency
4. Individually, competent to do a detailed analysis about city issues using the method which has
been already taught ( demography analysis, economy, and urban needs standards)
16
Reference Book:
? Thadani, D.A. 2010. The Language of Towns and Cities. New York: Rizolli.
? Chiara, J.D.; Koppelman, L.E. 1975. Urban Planning and Design Criteria. New York: McGrawHill.
? Berke, P.R.; Godschalk, D.R. Kaiser, E.J.; Rodriguez, D.A. 2006. Urban Land Use Planning, 5 th. ed.
Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
? American Planning Association. 2006. Planning and Urban Design Standards. New York: Wiley.
? Duany, A.; Speck, J.; Lydon, M. 2009. The Smart Growth Manual. New York: Mc. Graw Hill
Professional.
? LaGro Jr., J.A. 2013. Site Analysis: Informing Context-Sensitive and Sustainable Site Planning and
Design. New York: Wiley.
? Innes, J.E.; Booher, D.E. 2010. Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative
Rationality for Public Policy. London: Routledge.
? Hopkins, L.D.; Zapata, M. 2007. Engaging the Future: Forecasts, Scenarios, Plans, and Projects,
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. New York.
? Kelly, E.D. (2007). Community Planning: An Introduction to the Comprehensive Plan. Washington:
Island Press.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain land use criteria based on sustainable development concept (considering
ecology, economy, ethics, and local wisdom)
2. Competent to explain regulations which is applied in Indonesia and several examples from another
country, which includes substance standards, planning techniques, and implementation regulations
3. Competent to compare good and bad land use based on sustainable development concept
(considering ecology, economy, ethics, and local wisdom)
4. Competent to create simple land use projection model
5. Competent to analyze land potency for urban and regional planning
Reference Book:
Bernstein, J.D. 1993. Land Use Considerations in Urban Environmental Management. Washington,
?
DC: The World Bank Institute.
Chapin, F.S. 1985. Urban Land Use Planning. London: University of Illinois Press.
?
Kaiser, E.J. 1995. Urban Land Use Planning. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
?
Mandelker, D.R. 1993. Land Use Law. Virginia: The Michie Co.
?
Donner, W. 1987. Land Use and Environment in Indonesia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
?
Marsh, W., M. 1978. Environmental Analysis for Land Use and Site Planning. New York: Mc Graw-
?
Hill.
Patterson, T., W. 1979. Land Use Planning: Techniques of Implementation (USA). Van Nostrand
?
Reinhold.
Randolph, J. 2004. Environmental Land Use Planning and Management. Island Press.
?
Goetz, S., J., Shortle, J., S. (Eds) 2005. Land Use Problems and Conflicts: Causes, Consequences, and
?
Solution. New York: Routledge.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain variable classification
17
2. Competent to explain probability theory and normal curve
3. Competent to differentiate descriptive statistic concept and inferential statistic
4. Competent to choose suitable statistics analysis methods for solving urban and regional planning
case
5. Competent to count univariate statistics, hypothetical test, and correlation
Reference Book:
? Djunaedi, A. 1997. Statistik untuk Perencanaan Kota dan Daerah. Yogyakarta: Magister
Perencanaan Kota dan Daerah.
? Everitt, B.S. 1996. Making Sense of Statistics in Psycology: A Second Level Course. Oxford: Oxford
University Press
? Paryono, P. 1994 Mengolah Data Statistik dengan SPSS/PC, Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
? Sutrisno, Hadi, 1997, Statistika Jilid I. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the market mechanism (supply-demand side)
2. Competent to explain the structure of the urban economy
3. Competent to explain land rent theory
4. Competent to explain components of the urban economy, such as housing, urbanization, informal
sector, and labor
5. Competent to assess the urban economy performance
6. Competent to formulate the problem solving about the urban economy which is done by group.
Reference Book:
? Hoover, Edgar & Giarattani Frank, 1984. An Introduction to Regional Economics, 3rd ed. New
York: Alfred A. Knopf
? McCann, Philip. 2001. Urban Regional Economics. New York
? Mills and Hamiltion. 1989. Urban Economics. Scott, Foresman and company. USA
? O'Sullivan, Arthur. 1996. UrbanEconomics. McGraw-HillCompanies.
? Reksohadiprodjo, S dan Karseno. 2001. EkonomiPerkotaan. BPFE. Yogyakarta.
? Richardson, Harry W.1978. Urban Economics. TheDryden press. USA
Learning Outcome:
1. Cognition:
After completing this course, students are able to explain about:
(A) The implications of the wide spectrum of domains and the planning of the need for information
and its management
(B) the role of information, information systems planning and its position in the planning system
(C) components and processes in information systems planning based Geographic Information System
(GIS).
(D) collection technology and information required of planning.
18
2. Affection:
After completing this course, students have the awareness and concern for preparing the data,
procedures, devices (hardware and software) with the correct process in a system to produce
quality planning information
3. Psychomotor:
After completing this course, students are able to:
(A) Perform the basic operation information system GIS-based Planning.
(B) Presenting the layout of the results of operations performed in the system.
(C) Develop Planning Information System data base.
Reference Book:
Aronoff, S. 1989. Geographic Information Systems: A Management Perspective. Ottawa: WDL
?
Publications.
Elgendy, Hany. 1989. Development and Implementation of Planning Information Systems in
?
collaborative spatial planning processes. PhD Dissertation, Karlsruhe, Germany
Maguire, DJ, Goodchild MF, Rhind. (eds) 1991. Geographical Information Systems: Principles and
?
Applications. New York: John Wiley &Sons
Laurini, R. 2001. Information Systems for Urban Planning: hypermedia co-operative approach.
?
London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the definition, concept, and components of ecosystem
2. Competent to explain a concept about service ecosystem in relation with urban and regional
development
3. Competent to explain environment carrying capacity concept implementation principle in term
urban and regional planning
4. Competent to critically recognize the environmental and ecosystem issues as the result of urban
and regional development
5. In a group, competent to recommend approaches for particular urban and regional planning case
which has included environmental issue or sustainable ecosystem
Reference Book:
Blowers, A. (ed), 1993, Planning for a Sustainable Environment, London, UK: Earthscan
?
Bridgman,H., Warner,R., Dodson,J., 1995, Urban Biophysical Environment, Melbourne: Oxford
?
University Press.
Cunningham, W. dan Cunningham, M., 2008, Principles of Environmental Science, Yew York:
?
McGraw-Hill.
Goudie, A., 1997, The Human Impact on the Natural Environment, Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
?
Haughton,G., dan Hunter,C., 1994, Sustainable Cities, Regional Policy and Development Series 7,
?
London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Miller, T. and Armstrong, P., 1982, Living in the Environment, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
?
Muschett,D., 1997, Principles of Sustainable Development, Delray Beach, Florida: St. Lucie Press.
?
White,R., 1994, Urban Environmental Management, Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
?
19
TKP 2404 Methods and Planning for Urban Planning (3 credits)
Learning Outcome:
1. Cognition : Students are able to explain the methods and techniques needed to develop a plan
cities or parts of cities
2. Affection :
a. Able to identify and assess the spatial planning department (complete / incomplete , good / bad ,
contextual / no )
b . Able to identify the policy / regulatory / programs / activities that can support the achievement of
the spatial plan area of ?the city
3. Psychomotor :
a. (as a group) were able to develop a way discussion (discourse ) in order to set goals , concepts ,
and indicators of achievement of regional development
b . Being able to use technical methods to establish the spatial component as well which include land
use plan , a plan intensity , utility plan , and RTBL
c . Able to develop examples of zoning regulations for one block
Reference Book:
? SNI 03-1733-2004 tentang Tata Cara PerencanaanLingkunganPerumahan di Perkotaan
? PeraturanMentri PU 06/2007 tentangPedomanUmumRencana Tata BangunandanLingkungan
? Grove, William R. 1967. Economies of Scale in the Provision of Urban Public Services.
? O'Sullivan, Arthur. 2005. Market Areas and Central Place Theory.
? Porter, Michael, E. 1995. The Competitive Advantage of the Inner City.
? Rui, Yikang. 2013. Urban Growth Modelling Based on Land Use Changes and Road Network
Expansion.
? Tovar, Beatriz., et.al. Economic Estimation of Scale and Scope Economies within the Port Sector: a
Review.
? Wenban-Smith, Hugh Boyd. Economies of Scale, Distribution Costs, and Density Effects in Urban
Water Supply.
? Yuan, Jing., et.al. 2012. Discovering Regions of Different Functions in a City Using Human Mobility
and POIs.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain basic material for urban development planning, spatial planning, and
implementation utilities
2. Competent and sensitive to response planning aspirations and ideas through field observation,
interaction with the society and working group
3. In a group, competent to arrange planning urban development,space-orde, and implementation
programs
4. In a group, competent to arrange urban development planning, spatial planning, and realization
programs
5. Competent to formulate urban planning goals and indicators of achievement
6. Competent to formulate or choose urban development concept and programs
7. In a group, competent to recommend spatial structure and pattern of the city
20
Reference Book:
? Thadani, D.A. 2010. The Language of Towns and Cities. New York: Rizolli.
? Chiara, J.D.; Koppelman, L.E. 1975. Urban Planning and Design Criteria. New York: McGrawHill.
? Berke, P.R.; Godschalk, D.R. Kaiser, E.J.; Rodriguez, D.A. 2006. Urban Land Use Planning, 5 th. ed.
Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
? American Planning Association. 2006. Planning and Urban Design Standards. New York: Wiley.
? Duany, A.; Speck, J.; Lydon, M. 2009. The Smart Growth Manual. New York: Mc. Graw Hill
Professional.
? LaGro Jr., J.A. 2013. Site Analysis: Informing Context-Sensitive and Sustainable Site Planning and
Design. New York: Wiley.
? Innes, J.E.; Booher, D.E. 2010. Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative
Rationality for Public Policy. London: Routledge.
? Hopkins, L.D.; Zapata, M. 2007. Engaging the Future: Forecasts, Scenarios, Plans, and Projects,
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. New York.
? Kelly, E.D. (2007). Community Planning: An Introduction to the Comprehensive Plan. Washington:
Island Press.
Learning Outcome:
1. In a group, competent to recommend urban infrastructures
2. Competent to mention applicable standards for urban and regional infrastructure planning
3. Competent to assess urban/regional infrastructure availability based on standards and the contexts
of community life
4. Competent to project public infrastructure necessity in a region or city
Reference Book:
Kodoatie, Robert J. 2003. Manajemen dan Rekayasa Infrastruktur.
?
Stein, Jay M.1988. Public Infrastructure Planning and Management.
?
SNI 03-1733-2004 tentang Tata Cara Perencanaan Lingkungan Perumahan di Perkotaan
?
Peraturan Mentri PU 3/2013 tentang Penyelenggaraan Prasarana dan Sarana Persampahan dalam
?
Penanganan Sampah Rumah Tangga dan Sampah Sejenis Sampah Rumah Tangga
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain social theory as recommendation for urban and regional planning process
2. Competent to relate social process in urban and regional planning process
3. Competent to use social basic in urban and regional planning engineering
Reference Book:
Berlage, G. & W. Engelman. 1993. Understanding Social Issues: Critical Thinking and Analysis.
?
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Books.
?
Miles, M, T. Hall & L. Borden, 2000. City Cultures Reader. London: Routledge.
?
Soedjito, S. 1987. Aspek Sosial Budaya dalam Pembangunan Pedesaan. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
?
Delanty. 2009. The Cosmopolitan Imagination. Boston: Cambridge Press.
?
21
Harvey. 2012. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. New York: Verso.
?
Kendall. 2009. The Sociology of Cosmopolitanism. New York: Palgrave Mac Millan.
?
Lefebure. 2003. The Urban Revolution. Minnesota US: Minnesota Press.
?
Morley. 2008. Home Territory. London: Routledge.
?
Nas, PJM. 1983. Kota di Dunia Ketiga, Pengantar Sosiologi Kota. Jakarta: Bhratara Karya Aksara.
?
Pal Airban. 2008. Planning from the Bottom up. Amsterdam: IOS Press-Delf University.
?
Rahardjo. 1983. Perkembangan Kota dan Permasalahannya. Jakarta: Bina Aksara
?
Sannders, P. 1986. Social Theory and the Urban Question (2nd Edition). London: University of
?
Sussex.
Stevenson, D. 2003. Cities and Urban Culture. Meidenhead-Philadelphia: Open University Press.
?
Suzuki Hiroaki. 2010. Eco Cities: Ecological Cities as Economic Cities. Washington: World Bank.
?
Bounds, M. 2004. Urban Social Theory: City, Self, and Society. South Melbourne: Oxford University
?
Press.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain development problem which is priority in local and global level
2. Competent to explain minimum 2 paradigms for analyzing urban/regional development issues and
problems
3. Competent to capture various problems in a city or region and classify the problems based on
literature/public policies
4. In a group, competent to recommend several solutions to overcome the development problems
Reference Book:
Barton, Hugh. 2003. Shaping Neighbourhood. London : Spon Press
?
Darjosanyoto, Endang. 2003. Penelitian Arsitektur di bidang Perumahan dan Permukiman.
?
Surabaya: ITS Press
Idham. 2004. Konsolidasi Tanah Perkotaan. Bandung : PT. Alumni Bandung
?
Sumardjono, Maria. 2008. Mediasi Sengketa Tanah. Jakarta : Kompas
?
Learning Outcome:
Reference Book:
Bruton, MJ. 1985. Introduction to Transport Planning (3rd edition). London: UCL Press Limited.
?
Papacostas, C.S. 1987. Fundamentals of Transportation Engineering. Singapore: Prentice Hall Inc.
?
22
Khisty, C.J., & Lall, B.K. 1990. Transportation Engineering. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
?
Ortuzar, J.D., & Willumsen, L.G. 1994. Modelling Transport, Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons.
?
Tamin, OZ. 2003. Perencanaan dan Pemodelan Transportasi, Contoh Soal dan Aplikasi. Bandung:
?
Penerbit ITB.
Regulasi dan peraturan di bidang transportasi
?
Tumlin, J. 2010. Sustainable Transportation Planning: Tools for Creating Vibrant, Healthy, and
?
Resilient Communities. New York: Wiley.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the definition and spatial border, components, and attributes which affects
development
2. Competent to explain various analysis for 5 regional attributes as one of techniques that can be
used to identify potency and problems in particular region
3. Competent to criticize regional development concept suitability with potency and problems
priority
4. Competent to criticize spatial suitability with regional development trend
5. Competent to use quantitative methods and spatial analyze using GIS to identify regional problems
such as poverty, economy gap, disaster vulnerability, and spatial and infrastructure unsuitability
6. Competent to do role simulation for formulating regional development vision and concept
7. Competent to develop approaches to elaborate development vision and concept for spatial
planning and programs
8. Competent to use at least 1 method to analyze development programs eligibility
Reference Book:
? Gordon, G.L. 1993. Strategic Planning for Local Government. Washington, D.C.: The International
City.
? Migdal, J.S. 1998. Strong Societies and Weak States: State society relations and state capabilities in
third world. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
? Bendavid-Val, Aurom. 1991. Regional and Local Economic Analysis for Practitioners, Fourth Edition.
London: Praeger.
? Rondinelli, Dennis A. 1985. Aplied Methods of Regional Analysis the Spatial Demensions of
Development Policy. London: Westriew Press.
? Dickey,John W. 1978. Analytic Techniques in Urban and Regional Planning. New York: McGraw-Hill
Book Company.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain various development documents and its content in Indonesia
2. Competent to explain process/procedure for regional planning theoretical as well as in Indonesia
3. Competent to explain various data from the 5 regional planning attributes
4. Competent to explain potency analysis techniques and regional problems, and spatial structure
and pattern evaluation techniques
5. Competent to differentiate whether the planning document has a good quality or not
6. Competent to assess the suitability of regional spatial structure which suitable with regional
activity pattern
23
7. Competent to assess the suitability of regional spatial pattern in a document with the distribution
of regional potency
8. In a group, competent to make a working plan/schedule for urban and regional planning such as
field survey, data processing, analysis, and planning
9. In a group, competent to arrange a profile which describe regional basic character
10 Individually, competent to arrange an article about regional development issues
11.In a group, competent to formulate regional priority issue that need to be resolved and potency
that can be optimized.
Reference Book:
? Chiara, J.D. (1978). Planning Design Criteria. New York: McGraw-Hill.
? Rubenstein, H. (1969). A Guide to Site & Environmental Planning. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
? Bendavid-Val, Aurom. 1991. Regional and Local Economic Analysis for Practitioners, Fourth Edition.
London: Praeger.
? Rondinelli, Dennis A. 1985. Aplied Methods of Regional Analysis the Spatial Demensions of
Development Policy. London: Westriew Press.
? Dickey,John W. 1978. Analytic Techniques in Urban and Regional Planning. New York: McGraw-Hill
Book Company.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the history of “Community Development” stream in planning theory and
practical
2. Have a sense in community development issues
3. Competent to give some examples of participatory planning implementation best practices and
also able to mention the success factors
4. In a group, competent to recommend an example of several efforts for problem solving/ the
accomplishment development vision which will be effective to be done with community
development approach
Reference Book:
? Gordon, G.L. 1993. Strategic Planning for Local Government. Washington, D.C.: The International
City.
? Migdal, J.S. 1998. Strong Societies and Weak States: State society relations and state capabilities in
the third world. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
? Van Der Ryn, S. & P. Calthorpe. 1986. Sustainable Communities. San Fransisco: Sierra Club Books.
? Ife, Jim. 1995. Community Development Creating Community Altenatives Vision Analysis and
Practice. Melbourne: Longman.
? Cousins, W., and Catherine, G. 1979. Changing Slum Communities: Urban Community Development
In Hyderabad. New Delhi: Indian Social Intitute.
? Hatton, Michael J. 1999. Community-Based Tourism in the Asia-Pasific. Toronto: The School of
Media Studies.
? Schmentz, Midred. 1995. Zimmer Gunsul Frasca: Building Community. Massachusetts: Rockport
Publisher Inc.
24
TKP 3602 Planning Law (3 credits)
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain system and the order of regulation in Indonesia related to urban and
regional planning and development activity
2. Competent to recognize such phenomenon in the society which contradict with planning
regulation
3. In a group, competent to recommend the implementation of planning regulation or permission in
order to resolve city's problems
Reference Book:
UU RI No 24/1992 tentang Penataan Ruang
?
UU RI No 25/2004 tentang Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional
?
Soedjono D, 1978. Segi-segi Hukum tentang Tata Bina Kota di Indonesia. PT. Karya Nusantara.
?
Bandung.
Maria S. W. Sumardjono, 2001. Kebijakan Pertanahan antara Regulasi dan Implementasi, Kompas,
?
Jakarta.
Imam Koeswahyono, 2012. Hukum Penatagunaan Tanah dan Penataan Ruang di Indonesia. UB
?
Press, Malang.
Marianne M. Jennings. 1985. Real Estate Law. PWS-Kent Publishing Company. Boston,
?
Massachusetts.
Thomas L. Daniels, John W. Keller, Mark B. Lapping, Katherine Daniels, 2007. The Small Town
?
Planning Handbook. APA, Chicago, Illinois, Washington DC: Planners Press.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain basic material in regional development, planning, and implementation
2. Competent to explain various planning documents kota (RPJP, RPJM, RTRW, RDTR, PZ, RTBL, APBD)
3. Competent to capture aspiration and ideas sensitively for regional development through field
observation, interaction with local people and government, and also from working in a group
4. In a group, competent to formulate a regional development planning which includes vision,
mission, concept, policy, strategy, and planning
5. Every person in a group, competent to make a programs which is effective to push the
implementation of regional development planning
6. In a group, competent to formulate regional long term development planning principles (Vision,
mission, policy, strategy, concept, and indicators)
7. In a group, competent to formulate regional planning (Goals, policy, Structure planning, Pattern
Planning, Utilities planning, etc)
8. Every person in a group must be competent in formulating 1 pilot program to support vision and
planning implementation equipped with argumentations, priority, investment feasibility and stages
of implementation
Reference Book:
Fegene, M. 1977. Citizen Participation in Planning. Oxford: Penguin Press.
?
Michelsen, B. 1995. Metode Penelitian Partisipatoris dan upaya Pemberdayaan. Jakarta: Yayasan
?
Obor.
?
25
PPG. 2000. Regional Planning Guidance. UK: Departement of the EnvironmentFriedmann, John.
?
1964. Regional Development and Planning a reader. Massacusetts: The MIT press
Bendavid-Val, Aurom. 1991. Regional and Local Economic Analysis for Practitioners, Fourth Edition.
?
London: Praeger.
Rondinelli, Dennis A. 1985. Aplied Methods of Regional Analysis the Spatial Demensions of
?
Development Policy. London: Westriew Press.
Dickey,John W. 1978. Analytic Techniques in Urban and Regional Planning. New York: McGraw-Hill
?
Book Company.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain various approaches/ paradigms whether qualitative or quantitative to do a
research in urban and regional planning or district development domain
2. Competent to assess the precision of an approach or method implemented in a research or
planning activity
3. Competent to formulate scientific research correctly
Reference Book:
Balnaves, M. and P. Caputi. 2001. Introduction to Quantitative Research Methods. Sage
?
Publications.
Djarwanto. 2003. Statistik Non Parametrik. Yogyakarta: BPFE (Badan Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi)
?
UGM.
Horayangkura, V. 1989. Observer-as-Participant: Method of Data Gathering. New Directions for
?
Evaluation 42: 65-74.
Lonner, W. J. and J. W. Berry, Eds. 1986. Field methods in Cross-Cultural Research. Cross-Cultural
?
Research and Methodology Series. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Miller, J. and B. Glassner. 2004 (2nd edition). The "inside" and the "outside": Finding realities in the
?
interviews. Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. D. Silverman. London: Sage
Publications: 125-139.
Patton, M. Q. 1987. How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. Sage Publications, Inc.
?
Silverman, D., Ed. 2004 (2nd edition). Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London:
?
Sage Publications.
Silverman, D. 2006. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Method for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interactions.
?
London: Sage Publications.
Tashakkori, A. and C. Teddlie. 1998. Mixed Methodology: Mengombinasikan Pendekatan Kualitatif
?
dan Kuantitatif). California: SAGE Publications.
Taylor, S. J. and R. Bogdan. 1998. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and
?
Resource. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to recognize realistic position and situation from the planning process and planning
which is produced in context of social, culture, economy, and politic
2. Competent to understand the need of continuity in planning process up to implementation in
order to achieve successful planning
26
3. Competent to discuss for making a decision for particular management issuw and making
presentation in front of the class to explain the issue clearly and critically, in order to get lesson
learned or conclusion which benefits for understanding of planner role in changing society
management
Reference Book:
Flynn, N. 1993. Public Sector Management. New York: Harvester
?
Musgrave, R.A. 1989. Public Finance in Theory and Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
?
Rohdewohld, R. 1995. Public Administration in Indonesia. Australia: Montech Pty.
?
Stein, J.M. 1998. Public Infrastructure and Planning. London: Sage Publications
?
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain and evaluate institution order in Indonesia
2. Competent to explain basic theory and various evaluation approach
3. Competent to recognize and categorized evaluation which includes output, outcome or impact
4. Competent to evaluate a case of development programs or activity which has strong spatial
dimension
Reference Book:
? Benefit/Cost Analysis: Introduction. Mankato State University. undated.
? Bennet, C. and K. Rockwell. 1995. Targeting outcomes of Programs (TOP). USDA, draft document
? Forman, Ernest H.; Saul I. Gass (2001-07). The analytical hierarchy process—an exposition.
Operations Research
? Patton, M.Q. 1982. Practical Evaluation. Baberly Hills: Sage Publications
? Isaac,Stephen. 1981. Handbook in Research and Evaluation. San Diego: Edits Publisher.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the working scope of such institution and their role in planning/ managing
development city term
2. Competent to mention challenges, difficulties, and significant prospect of working scope in order
to push urban and regional development
3. Competent to make an practical work report
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the definition of planning ethics
2. Competent to give several examples of planning ethics implementation
3. Competent to decide an action based on planning ethics
Reference Book:
Martin, Wachs, ed. 1985. Ethics in Planning. Rutgers: CUPR
?
Carol, Barrett. 2002. Everyday Ethics for Practicing Planners. APA Planners Pres
?
27
Hendler, Sue. 1995. Planning Ethics, a Reader in Planning Theory Practice and Education. New
?
Jersey: New Brunswick.
Herzog, Thomas. 2009. Sustainable Design: Toward A New Ethic In Architecture adn Town Planning
?
With Foreword. Berlin: Birkhauser.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the writing sentences and paragraphs
2. Competent to explain the systematic thesis standard
3. Competent to compare plagiarism writing with no plagiarism
4. Competent to write a scientific article
5. Competent to write a bibliography properly
6. Competent to write proposal propoerly
Reference Book:
BLACK, J. A. & CHAMPION, D. J. 1976. Methods and Issues in Social Research, New York, John
?
Wiley & Sons.
BOGDAN, R. C. & BIKLEN, S. K. 1982. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to
?
Theory and Methods, Boston, Allyn and Bacon.
BRANNEN, J. 1995. Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research, Aldershot,
?
Avebury.
BRYMAN, A. 2008. Social Research Methods, Oxford ; New York, Oxford University Press
?
CRESWELL, J. W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five
?
Traditions, Thousand Oaks, California, Sage Publications.
CRESWELL, J. W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method
?
Approaches, California, Sage Publications.
DANE, F. C. 1990. Research Methods, California, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
?
LEEDY, P. D. & ORMROD, J. E. 2005. Practical Research: Planning and Design, Upper Saddle
?
River, N.J., Prentice Hall.
ELECTIVE COURSES
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain how theories and concepts can affect planning process and its products.
2. Competent to criticize the effectiveness of urban and regional economic policy or approach based
on the result of economic analysis in scope of urban and regional.
3. In a group, competent to recommend an economic planning concept both in city or regional.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to understand various regional economic policies and also the implication towards
planning.
2. Competent to criticize and evaluate a regional economic policy.
3. Competent to recommend regional economic policy design based on data and analysis result.
28
Development Control
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the urgency of development control in context of urban and regional
planning.
2. Competent to adopt several methods for development control which is effective, appropriate, and
efficient in term of urban and regional planning.
3. In a group, competent to recommend controlling utilities for urban and regional planning.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to understand and explain the institution of information system management which is
useful for urban and regional planning.
2. Competent to evaluate institution performance for urban and regional planning.
3. Competent to recommend an institution of information system which is useful for supporting
urban and regional planning and management.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to understand and explain about the types of ecosystem and biodiversity in Indonesia.
2. Competent to identify ecology condition and type related to Urban and regional planning.
3. Competent to present a concept in an ecology and ecosystem related to biodiversity, structure,
function, and dynamics ecology within ecosystem.
Learning Outcome:
1. Students are able to understand the definition and scope of the study, and basic principles in term
of geomorphology, classification, and characteristic of landscape, also various information for
geomorphology and landscape mapping.
2. Individually, students have academic and professionalism soul for understanding, applying, and
analyzing various characteristic of landscape as the object study in geomorphology and associate it
with land use planning.
3. Competent to ”morpho-associate” connection between landscape characteristic wit land use,
interpret and identify landscape and its characteristic, and also the type of land use through map
and remote sensing.
Rural Planning
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain various example of rural area development model (agropolitan, minapolitan,
OVOP, Desa Pusat Pertumbuhan).
2. Competent to capture rural society's aspiration and discuss it using particular paradigm.
3. Competent to create a rural planning document.
29
Industrial Planning District
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the requirements for developing industrial district.
2. Competent to criticize government policy related to development of industrial district.
3. Competent to formulate planning concept implication and policy in order to facilitate industrial
district development.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the definition of disaster, vulnerability level, disaster factors and
management disaster.
2. Competent to recognize and analyze various development policy which is responsive and
unresponsive one towards disaster.
3. In a group, competent to recommend a responsive policy towards disaster.
Social Engineering
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain scope of the urban sociology study, approach study model, and the benefit
for urban and regional planning.
2. Competent to recognize the urban issues at students surrounding which can be explained using
urban sociology theory.
3. Competent to recommend a proposal of urban sociology study that has benefits for urban
planning.
Urban Morphology
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to understand and explain about urban morphology and the connection with city
development dynamics.
2. Individually students competent to categorized urban planning system based on its morphology.
3. Competent to adopt urban morphology concepts in terms urban development.
Community Development
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain community development theories and models as recommendation for urban
and regional planning process.
2. Competent to give and adopt several best practices of community development in urban and
regional development.
3. In a group, competent to give several alternatives for urban problem solving based in community
development.
30
Community Participation
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the history of community participation in theories and approaches model for
planning implementation.
2. Competent to give several example of best practices from regional development case based on
community participation and be able to mention factor which affects.
3. In a group, competent to offer several solutions based on community participation.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to identify management system and politic constellation in urban planning process.
2. Competent to mention and adopt the important aspect of good governance and the
implementation of urban planning.
3. Competent to actively contribute in politic issues discussion to get more knowledge about urban
management and politic.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain definition, scope, and tourism industry components, approach and planning
procedure for tourism development planning.
2. Competent to mention tourism development planning best practices.
3. In a group, competent to recommend a package of tourism activity or tourism area.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain preservation and conservation theories for urban heritage planning.
2. Competent to develop integrated development between preservation and economy.
3. Competent to formulate preservation and conservation regulation and planning for district.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the history, paradigm, various concepts of informal sector
2. Competent to relate the urban development policy with informal sector
3. Competent to formulate several alternative to resolve informal cases.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the difference factors of urban/regional development and the difference of
Planning Culture and Planning Institution.
2. Competent to capture such phenomenon/important issues that happens in Planning Field Study
destination so that will become a lesson learned.
3. Competent to create and present an individual work which is inspired by Planning Field Study
destination.
31
Urban and Regional Infrastructure Management
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the scope of regional infrastructure management, budgeting strategy,
development institution, and regional infrastructure operational.
2. Competent to recognize the regional management issues in particular case.
3. In a group, competent to recommend problem-solving strategies for regional infrastructure
management in a particular case.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the land value concept from economy, ecology, socio-culture perspective and
urban land management which is consist of law/regulation and planning, utilization, and
controlling procedure.
2. Competent to identify actual issues of urban land conflict or not optimized urban land use that
happens in real life.
3. In a group, competent to give recommendations for resolving urban land conflict or not optimized
land use that happens in real life
Environmental Management
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the background and urban environment management scope, also various
approaches and urban environment management instrument.
2. Competent to recognize the instruments intended for urban environment management and the
basic approaches.
3. In a group, competent to recommend an approach and explanation about the instruments in order
to solve urban environment problems.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the back ground, goal, and principles of local economy development, local
economy planning procedure.
2. Competent to recognize the clusters of local economy which have contributions for urban or
regional development.
3. In a group, competent to recommend local economy development strategies from particular
cluster in urban and regional scope.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the framework, principles, steps, and urban landscape planning and design
methods.
2. Competent to develop indicators for urban landscape quality assessment.
3. In a group, competent to recommend concept and basic design for landscape planning in particular
city.
32
Urban Sociology
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain scope of the urban sociology, approach study model, and the benefit of
urban and regional planning.
2. Competent to recognize the urban issues at students surrounding which can be explained using
urban sociology theory.
3. Competent to recommend a proposal of urban sociology study that has benefits for urban
planning.
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to explain the characteristic of coastal area as planning object, principles, steps, and
planning methods, potency, and common issues in coastal area.
2. Competent to recognize various conflicts and problem solving examples in coastal area.
3. In a group, competent to recommend basic concept and problem solving strategy in coastal area.
Urban Regeneration
Learning Outcome:
1. Students are competent to explain the definition, urban regeneration terminology, and identify the
factors which affect urban regeneration.
2. Students are capable to analyze urban regeneration concept critically in particular case.
3. Students are capable to analyze and synthesize urban regeneration theme and strategies which is
applied in their case study.
Resilient City
Learning Outcome:
1. Competent to understand basic concept of resilient city such as common issues of the city,
vulnerability, and risk, resilient city concept, resilient and sustainable city and also understand the
connection between city performance and resilient city strategy approach which is suitable and
developed.
2. Competent to analyze resiliency of particular city.
3. Competent to compare resilience side of the city and real condition of Indonesian resilient city.
33
Student Activities
34
a
36
Contact Information
37
Other Information
Fauna 4, Komplek Lembah UGM Bulaksumur, Jl. Kabupaten Lingkar Utara, Sleman
Yogyakarta 55281 Telp. 0274-4530303, 0274-4530404,
Telp. / Fax: 0274-583267, 583193, Fax. 0274-4530606
Nyoto Sutrisno: 085 6433 298 01 www.rsa.ugm.ac.id