Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Integral bridges are becoming popular day by day as they are easy to construct
and require less maintenance efforts due to absence of bearings. There is an
increasing tendency to construct long span bridges. However due to movement
restraints fatigue stresses build up that leads to reduction in useful life. In this
study, an effort has been made to fin out the fatigue life for an integral bridge
subjected to transient loads. In this paper, the results of a transient analysis of
an integral bridge of total length 156 m having 5 continuous spans with the
maximum span of 40 m has been done using ANSYS. The roles of deformation
and von-Misses stress that occur in the bridge have been found to influence
fatigue life. Further, midpoint deflection in the longest span, its variation with
loading history and its influence on fatigue life has been analyzed and found to
match satisfactorily with mathematical results and the same process is applied
on various length of longer span with the concrete variation to develop a
mathematical model for determination of fatigue life.
Bridges are very important structure for development of transport
system. One of the type of bridge that are getting in demand is integral bridge.
Integral bridges are Integral bridge is the structure that can be constructed easy
and rapid. Further, these types of bridges are economical in comparison to
other type. These types of structure that carries moving vehicle loads of heavy
weights and this heavy moving load cause severe effect on structure and
results in the permanent failure. This traffic condition is getting adverse in
upcoming years due to increasing population and number of vehicles and result
in the pre-mature failure of bridge. One of the reason for failure is introduction
of Fatigue in the parts of structure due to vehicular load. Fatigue is very
common reason behind the failure of such structure due to variable loading.
There is no proper method of fatigue assessment in the bridges, but finite
element based study can be reliable for Fatigue behavior simulation because
in the actual structure is will take very long time, almost decays of structure.
1.2 Objective
The fatigue study will be performed using finite element modeling and its and
it is applied on various length of bridge. To access the fatigue life of the
following objectives are adopted
• To make an effort for the analysis fatigue life of an integral bridge
subjected to transient loads using ANSYS 17.1.
Table No. 1 Comparison between stress life and strain life approach
S.N. Strain life Stress life
1 Strain Life is excellent for Stress life is widely used for the
characterizing for low cycle high cycle fatigue.
fatigue
2 Strain life is concerned with Stress life is based on total life not
the initiation of crack and its with the crack propagation and
propagation up to failure initiation.
3 Strains typically deals with low Used only for High cycle fatigue
number of cycle, therefore it
addressed result for low cycle
fatigue, but also work fine with
high cycle fatigue.
only one
Fig 1 Proportional loading of constant amplitude
Only one pair of finite element result are required and axes of principal stress
remain unchanged for entire process. In the fully reversed type of loading the
load is applied then equal amount of load is applied in then equal and opposite
load is applied. In this case load ratio is -1 because load is applied and removed
in each cycle .
f
(2 N )b (2 N )c
2 E f f f
where,
Total strain Amplitude
2
2 the stress amplitude
E Modulus of elasticity
N Number of cycle to failure
f
2N Nimber of reversals to failure
f
Number(2001) present the excellent equation to find out the role of local stress
and strain at a certain location as reported below
Neuber’s equation
K t2 eS (2)
Local (total ) starin
Local Stress
K Elastic stress Concentration factor
t
e No min al Elastic Strain
S No min al Elastic stress
Thus by solving Eqs (1) and (2) simultaneously, local stress and strain can be
calculated for given elastic inputs. Both the above equation will generate a
nonlinear equation and are required to be solved by iterative method.
Stephens and Fatemi 2001
this paper show that the fatigue occur due to progressive enlargement of flaw
in material that will become the reason beg=hind the failure caused by
repeating loads.
Baptiste et al,. 2011; Dicleli and Erhan 2011; Wagle and Watt 2011; Kalayci
et al,. 2011
This paper is based on the application of cyclic loads of random nature that
differs from the actual condition that a structure suffers ,these applied load are
need to modeled mathematically for the computation of fatigue life. These
mathematical models are based on the provided historical loading and historical
behavior.
Basquin (1910)
a f , (2 N f )b
where
a amplitude of stress;
f , coeffcient of fatigue strength,
N f number of cycles before failure, and
b exponentof fatigue strength
Coffin 1954; Manson 1965
For integral bridge that is subjected to cyclic loading, the strain can be defined
in terms of length of bridge. If plastic deformations are only considered the the
fatigue cycle can be find using Coffin-Manson formula that is stated as below
,f (2 N f )c
2
where
= plastic-strain amplitude,
,f = fatigue ductility coefficient, and
c = fatigue ductility exponent.
t f
'
(2 N f )b 'f (2 N f )c
2 E
where
t total strain amplitude,
'f fatigue strength coefficient,
'f fatigue ductility coefficient,
E Young's modulus,
N f number of cycles to failure, and
b and c = damage model constants.
The above equation is very useful and it shows good relationship with
experimental result
The equivalent stress is calculated from stress using von-mises approach and
termed as von-mises stress eq , and it can be computed from:
1
eq ( xx yy )2 ( yy zz ) 2 ( xx zz ) 2 6( yz2 xz2 xy2 )
2
Where,
xx , yy and zz are normal-stress;
xy , xz and xy are shear stress.
1
eq ( 1 2 )2 ( 2 3 ) 2 ( 1 3 ) 2
2
Where,
1 , 2 and 3 principal stresses.
when the von-Mises or equivalent stress eq value becomes equal to the value
of critical stress, the material will starts yielding and deform plastically and so
this stress is termed as yield stress.
But in concrete, due to cyclic loading the material fails before yielding,
1 3
eq ( xx yy )2 ( zz xx )2 ( xx zz ) 2 ( xy2 yz2 xz2 )
2(1 ) 2
1
eq (1 2 ) 2 ( 3 1 ) 2 ( 2 3 ) 2
2(1 )
Where
1 , 2 , and 3 are principal strains
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
In every bridge, there is requirement of designing it for carrying cyclic
loading. This cyclin loading it is going to wear for the entire life span. It has been
seen that the material will fails before the yielding due to repeated loading
For analysis, It is required to consider the geometry and material property for
existing structure. This data collection is required for constructing a software
based finite-element (FE) model. For general consideration, a widely adoptable
range of design criteria is used in this paper. In this paper, after the analysis,
the properties like different grade of concrete , different span of bridge and
different web thickness of girder are considered and analyzed further.
Integral RC Bridge is modeled of total span of 156 m. Bridge is divided into five
spans of 25m, 30m, 40m, 30m and 25m and 6 piers of 1m width and the height
of bridge is taken as 10 m. Figure shown below shows the length of bridge.
Table 2 Dimensions
For the modeled geometry there is requirement of assigning the property .of
material .The material property that are taken are tabulated below
LOAD APPLICATION
In this paper, dead load is taken as the load of bridge model, Live load
according to IRC standard. Further, Impact forces, thermal forces,
frictional resistance of expansion bearings, erection forces, wind load,
seismic load, racking force, force due to curvature and forces due to
parapets are not considered. For live load, standard load case that is
provided by Indian Road Congress (IRC:6-2014) is considered.
Environmental conditions are kept fixed to normal of 34° C in the
modeling of FE model. Thermal expansion and contraction is not
considered and other climate factor like wind loading snow loading etc. are
also neglected.
For the clear distance of 7.5 m between curb a simplified method was
established for slab-on-girder bridges, in order to get the width of each lane of
3.75m. In modeling of bridge the lane width was taken as 3.75 m ,resulting in a
total bridge width of 7.5 m.
The bridges is analyzed for 70-R and Class A loadings by the orthotropic
plate method of Cusens and Pama (1975), which is unified into computer
program ANSYS.
Combination of Live load
There is following consideration that are required for loading of 7.5 m wide deck.
Table 3 : Combinations of loads for designing
Meshing
One of the main component that is required for the analysis is meshing.
The mesh chosen depends on the various factors like material property, design
geometry, applied loading and so on.
As stated previously, for study an integral bridge of 156.2 meters long and
having 6 piers of 1m thick are taken. Further, length of long mid span is varied
to 45m, 50m, 55m, 60m, 65m and 70m. The deck is fabricated over 4 main
girder.
Finite element modeling is done using ANSYS 17.1. because of the material
faces all three axes stress so there are requirement of determining creteria like
von-Mises (1996) or Tresca (1864).In order to determine the state of stress and
subsequent deformation, weather that is elastic or plastic.
Fatigue-Damage Model
The model is designed using software and the result are compared with use
some formula .
This paper is based on the application of cyclic loads of random nature that
differs from the actual condition that a structure suffers ,these applied load are
need to modeled mathematically for the computation of fatigue life. These
mathematical models are based on the provided historical loading and historical
behavior.
a f , (2 N f )b
where
a amplitude of stress;
f , coeffcient of fatigue strength,
N f number of cycles before failure, and
b exponentof fatigue strength
For integral bridge that is subjected to cyclic loading, the strain can be defined
in terms of length of bridge. If plastic deformations are only considered the the
fatigue cycle can be find using Coffin-Manson formula that is stated as below
,f (2 N f )c
2
where
= plastic-strain amplitude,
,f = fatigue ductility coefficient, and
c = fatigue ductility exponent.
:
t f
'
(2 N f )b 'f (2 N f )c
2 E
where
t total strain amplitude,
'f fatigue strength coefficient,
'f fatigue ductility coefficient,
E Young's modulus,
N f number of cycles to failure, and
b and c = damage model constants.
The above equation is very useful and it shows good relationship with
experimental result
1
eq ( a1 a 2 ) 2 ( a 3 a1 ) 2 ( a 2 a 3 ) 2
2(1 )
is used in a 0.0795(2 N f )0.448 in order to find out the total number of cycles
before failure.
Chapter 4
Analysis of bridge model
Fatigue Life
For analysis, It is required to consider the geometry and material property for
existing structure. This data collection is required for constructing a software
based finite-element (FE) model. For general consideration, a widely adoptable
range of design criteria is used in this paper. In this paper, after the analysis,
the properties like different grade of concrete , different span of bridge and
different web thickness of girder are considered and analyzed further.
Properties
Volume 117.04 m³ 38.349 m³ 38.347 m³
Mass 9.188e+005 kg 3.0104e+005 kg 3.0102e+005 kg
Centroid X 78. m
Centroid Y -0.9061 m 0.34495 m
Centroid Z 4.6739 m 6.5239 m 7.3472 m 0.15284 m
Moment of Inertia Ip1 1.2041e+005 kg·m² 28444 kg·m²
Moment of Inertia Ip2 1.8681e+009 kg·m² 6.169e+008 kg·m²
Moment of Inertia Ip3 1.8682e+009 kg·m² 6.1692e+008 kg·m²
Statistics
Nodes 536 716 738
Elements 44 84 105
Mesh Metric None
Fig 9 Meshed Isometric view
Analysis procedure
For analyzing the fatigue performance of integral RC bridge, two vehicle of 100
ton moves from one end to other in both lanes. These types of small bridges
are usually constructed for city traffic so they travel between 40 km/h to 60
km/h. so as per above speed consideration of 40 km/h, To travel this 156 m
distance both vehicle will take 14.01s.
Reaction at supports
Maximum, minimum and resultant reactions are extracted from the model in
each of six supports.
800000
600000
400000
200000
0
-200000
-400000
-600000
-800000
-1000000
-1200000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time [s] (s)
1000000
Force Reaction (N)
500000
-500000
-1000000
-1500000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time [s] (s)
1500000
1000000
Force Reaction (N)
500000
-500000
-1000000
-1500000
-2000000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time (s)
1500000
Force Reaction (N)
1000000
500000
-500000
-1000000
-1500000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time (s)
1500000
1000000
Force Reaction (N)
500000
-500000
-1000000
-1500000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time (s)
1400000
1200000
Force Reaction (N)
1000000
800000
600000
400000
200000
-200000
-400000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time (s)
800000
Moment reaction (Nm)
600000
400000
200000
-200000
-400000
-600000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time (s)
1000000
Moment Reaction (Nm)
500000
-500000
-1000000
-1500000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time (s)
1500000
1000000
Force Reaction (Nm)
500000
-500000
-1000000
-1500000
-2000000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time (s)
1000000
Moment Reaction(Nm)
500000
-500000
-1000000
-1500000
-2000000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time (s)
1000000
Moment Reaction (Nm)
500000
-500000
-1000000
-1500000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time (s)
Deformation (X)
0.00035
0.00030
0.00025
Deformation (X) (m)
0.00020
0.00015
0.00010
0.00005
0.00000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time [s] (s)
1
eq ( xx yy )2 ( yy zz ) 2 ( xx zz ) 2 6( yz2 xz2 xy2 )
2
Where,
xx , yy and zz are normal-stress;
xy , xz and xy are shear stress.
1
eq ( 1 2 )2 ( 2 3 ) 2 ( 1 3 ) 2
2
Where,
1 , 2 and 3 principal stresses.
when the von-Mises or equivalent stress eq value becomes equal to the value
of critical stress, the material will starts yielding and deform plastically and so
this stress is termed as yield stress.
But in concrete, due to cyclic loading the material fails before yielding,
1 3
eq ( xx yy )2 ( zz xx )2 ( xx zz ) 2 ( xy2 yz2 xz2 )
2(1 ) 2
Where
1 , 2 , and 3 are principal strains
Equivalent strain
0.000045
0.000040
0.000035
Equivalent strain (m/m)
0.000030
0.000025
0.000020
0.000015
0.000010
0.000005
0.000000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time (s)
1
eq ( a1 a 2 ) 2 ( a 3 a1 ) 2 ( a 2 a 3 ) 2
2(1 )
is used in a 0.0795(2 N f )0.448 in order to find out the total number of cycles
before failure.
1
W k
N f total
W0
Where,
Wtotal = total strain energy released in one cycle of loading,
N f mean cycles to failure, and W0 and k fatigue coefficients.
In accordance of plastic deformation and strain energy type fatigue life can be
calculated for a model.
strain Energy
4000
3500
3000
2500
strain Energy (Nm)
2000
1500
1000
500
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time [s] (s)
The maximum amount of maximum strain will occur at the mid position of longer
span. From the above chart, maximum strain of 3657.8 Nm at mid of brigde.
Hysteresis curve
Fig 25 Hysteresis curve
The hysteresis curve for this bridge of 156 m is shown in above diagram and
its nature straight line and having proportion stress and strain amplitude.
Table 22 Fatigue life result and validation
Total Maximum Equivalent Fatigue life in Fatigue life Fatigue life from
length Span(mid) strain number of cycles (in years) ANSYS 17.1
of Amplitude using (In years)
bridge a 0.0795(2 N f )0.448
156 40m 7.67E-04 1.58E+06 76 79.342
161 45m 8.88E-04 1.14E+06 63 63.964
166 50m 1.01E-03 8.58E+05 54.6 53.234
171 55m 1.13E-03 4.72E+05 43.14 42.234
176 60m 1.25E-03 3.23E+05 37.58 35.8974
181 65m 1.37E-03 2.47E+05 21.75 17.954
186 70m 1.49E-03 9.06E+04 15.24 12.134
From above analysis, as tabulated in Table 22 it has been found that the
fatigue life of integral bridge for 156 m long having maximum span of 40 m is
76 years and for a bridge of length 186 m having maximum span of 70 m it
reduced to 15 years approximately.
CHAPTER 5
Conclusion
In this paper, a finite element modeling and analysis has been conducted for
evaluating the fatigue-life for different integral bridge. The same fatigue life
modeling is performed for 156 m, 161 m, 161 m,166 m, 171m, 176m,181m and
186 m bridge length. Fatigue life is evaluated form strain life based approach.
As it was realized, the finite element modeling confirms that the fatigue life of
integral bridge will reduce when the total strain amplitude increases due to
increase in the length of bridge.
Further, the behavior of integral bridge of 156m that was subjected to
transient loading of 70-R as per as IRC:6-2014 is studied. Total 7 types of
variation are considered in length of longer span and model is prepared in
ANSYS 17.1 design modeler.
The Fatigue life of integral bridge was found from mathematical model of
approximately 76 years for a integral bridge of 156 m long with a maximum
span of 40 m, and for the bridge of 186 m length with a span of maximum 70
m, it was found to be decreases about 15.24 years. So, it can be concluded
that as the length of span between two piers increases the fatigue life
decreases.
Further Scope
Further it this study can be extended for the other types of bridges like
steel box girder bridge, conventional stone bridge with a more longer span to
predict the fatigue life.
In this study, Integral bridge taken have only two lanes, this study can
further used for multilane bridge subjected to more adverse traffic condition.
The temperature variation due to seasonal and daily variation is not taken into
consideration, that is also an important factor and should be considered for
further progress of this project.