Data Interpretation-2: WWW - Bankking.in

WWW.BANKKING.
IN
www.bankking.in
Data Interpretation-2
Solution Booklet
By Rahul Rituraj and Vivek Singh
2015
“Wework for humanity not
for money because your
happiness is our happiness”
www.bankking.in
WWW.BANKKING.IN
India’s First absolutely Free Online Bank Exam Coaching
: WWW.BANKKING.IN
1. Answer – (C)
2. Solution:
From the table we can observe that only Dipan is eligible to apply for the prize.
So Dipan gets the prize.
Hence, option D.
3. Solution:
Dipan was the only boy to score at least 95 in at least one paper from each of the groups.
Hence, option A.
4. Solution:
JOIN OUR GROUP

https://www.facebook.com/groups/bankking.in
: WWW.BANKKING.IN
JOIN OUR GROUP

: WWW.BANKKING.IN
5.
6.Answer – (B)
Solution:
Cost of spinal fusion in India:
= Rs.5500×40.928
Cost with the increased value of Rupee:
=(5500×40.928)/35
=6431 USD
Cost of Spinal Fusion in Singapore =9000 USD
Required difference:
=9000–6431=2569 USD
Hence, option B.
7.Solution:
Cost of Hysterectomy in Thailand:

=4500+6000=10500 USD
Cost of Hysterectomy in India:
=3000+5000=8000 USD
Travelling cost:
=15000 Bahts
=1500/32.89 USD
=456 USD
Required difference:
=10500–8456
=2044 USD
JOIN OUR GROUP

: WWW.BANKKING.IN
=2044×32.89=67227 Bahts
Hence, option D.
8.Solution:
As shown in the table, Malaysia will have the cheapest package.

India Thailand SingaporeMalaysia USA
Angioplasty 16000 18000 17000 17000 57000
Hip Replacement 16000 17000 17000 18000 43000
Knee
17500 16000 17000 12000 40000
Replacement
Total 49500 51000 51000 47000 140000
Hence, option C.
9. Solution:
Referring to the table below, India will be the most expensive for knee replacement from the
given options.
India Thailand SingaporeMalaysia USA
Angioplasty 16000 18000 17000 17000 57000
Hip Replacement 16000 17000 17000 18000 43000
Knee
17500 16000 17000 12000 40000
Replacement
Total 49500 51000 51000 47000 140000
Hence, option A.
10. Answer: Option D

Explanation:
Total exports of the three Companies X, Y and Z together, during various years are:
In 1993 = (30 + 80 + 60) = 170
In 1994 = (60 + 40 + 90) = 190
In 1995 = (40 + 60 + 120) = 220
In 1996 = (70 + 60 + 90) = 220
In 1997 = (100 + 80 + 60) = 240
In 1998 = (50 + 100 + 80) = 230
In 1999 = (120 + 140 + 100) = 360
Clearly, the total exports of the three Companies X, Y and Z together are same during the years
1995 and 1996.
JOIN OUR GROUP

: WWW.BANKKING.IN

Explanation:
Analysis of the graph: From the graph it is clear that
1. The amount of exports of Company X (in Pesetas) in the years 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997,
1998 and 1999 are 30, 60, 40, 70, 100, 50 and 120 respectively.
2. The amount of exports of Company Y (in Pesetas.) in the years 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997,
1998 and 1999 are 80, 40, 60, 60, 80, 100 and 140 respectively.
3. The amount of exports of Company Z (in Pesetas) in the years 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997,
1998 and 1999 are 60, 90,, 120, 90, 60, 80 and 100 respectively.
Average annual exports (in Pesetas) of Company Y during the given period
= 1/7 x (80 + 40 + 60 + 60 + 80 + 100 + 140) = 560/7= 80.
Average annual exports (in Pesetas) of Company Z during the given period
= 1/7 x (60 + 90 + 120 + 90 + 60 + 80 + 100) = (600/7 ) .
Therefore Required percentage =
12. Answer: Option C

Explanation:
The difference between the exports from the Companies X and Y during the various years are:
In 1993 = (80 - 30) = 50
In 1994 = (60 - 40) = 20
In 1995 = (60 - 40) = 20
In 1996 = (70 - 60) = 10
In 1997 = (100 - 80) = 20
In 1998 = (100 - 50) = 50
In 1999 = (140 - 120) = 20
Clearly, the difference is minimum in the year 1996.
Explanation:
Average exports of the three Companies X, Y and Z in 1993
= [ 1/3 x (30 + 80 + 60) ] = ( 170/3)
Average exports of the three Companies X, Y and Z in 1998
= [1/3 x (50 + 100 + 80) ] = (230/3)
Difference [ ( 230/3) - ( 170/3) ]
= ( 60/3) = 20

Explanation:
Average annual exports of Company Z during the given period
= 1/7 x (60 + 90 + 120 + 90 + 60 + 80 + 100)
= ( 600/7) = 85.71
JOIN OUR GROUP

: WWW.BANKKING.IN
From the analysis of graph the exports of Company Z are more than the average annual exports
of Company Z (i.e., 85.71) during the years 1994, 1995, 1996 and 1999, i.e., during 4 of the
given years.
15. Option D
Explanation: Let the total population of State R be x million. Then, population of State R above
poverty line
16. Answer: Option B
Explanation:
Total population of State S = 7 million.
Therefore Population above poverty line = [(100 - 19)% of 7] million
= (81% of 7) million = 5.67 million.
And so, the number of females above poverty line in State S
= (3/7)x5.67 million
= 2.43 million.
Explanation:
Female population below poverty line for State P = 2.1 million Let the male population below
poverty line for State P be x million.
JOIN OUR GROUP

: WWW.BANKKING.IN
18. Option B
Explanation:
For State Q: Male population below poverty line = 2.4 million. Let the female population below
poverty line be x million.
JOIN OUR GROUP

: WWW.BANKKING.IN
19. Answer – (B)

Solution:
The difference in the angles subtended by USA and Germany:
=45°−32.4°
= 12.6°
Difference in the exports of USA and Germany (in $ billion):
=72,000×(12.6/360)
= $2520 billion.
20. Answer – (C)
Solution:
The difference in the angles subtended by Japan and France:
=36°−18°=18° -------- (A)
The difference in the angles subtended by UK and Taiwan:
=21.6°−18°=3.6° -------- (B)
(A) is 5 times (B)
21. Answer – (A)
Solution:
Value of the exports of India and Australia:
=7.2°+7.2°=14.4° -------- (A)
Value of exports OPEC countries:
=104.4°×(20/100)CAL
= 20.88° -------- (B)
20.88°−14.4°=6.48° is the difference.
In terms of value, difference is:
72,000×(6.48/360)= $1296 billion
22. Answer – (C)
Solution:
The total number of countries = I4
⇒ Average angle subtended by each country:
=360/14≈25.7°
Only USA, Japan, Germany, Russia and Others are greater than 25.7.
So there are 5 such countries whose exports are more than the average exports per country.
23. Answer – (C)
24.Answer: Option D
JOIN OUR GROUP

: WWW.BANKKING.IN
Explanation:
Difference = [(10% of 475000) - (8% of 475000)]
= (2% of 475000)
= 9500
Explanation:
Let x be invested in Company P in 2000, the amount invested in Company Q in 2000 = (30 - x)
Total interest received from the two Companies after 1 year
Explanation:
Amount received from Company P after one year (i.e., in 1998) on investing 1200000 in it
JOIN OUR GROUP

: WWW.BANKKING.IN
= [1200000 + (8% of 1200000)]
= 1296000
Amount received from Company P after one year on investing 1296000 in the year 1999
= [1296000 + (10% of 1296000)]
= 1425600
Appreciation received on investment during the period of two years
= (1425600 - 1200000)
= 225600
= 2,25,600.
Explanation:
Amount received from Company Q after one year on investment of 500000 in the year 1996
= [500000 + (6.5% of 500000)]
= 532500
Amount received from Company P after one year on investment of 532500 in the year 1997
= [532500 + (9% of 532500)]
= 580425
= 5,80,425.
JOIN OUR GROUP

: WWW.BANKKING.IN
Explanation: Let the expenditure is 1998 be x
31.Answer: Option D
Explanation:
The line-graph gives the comparison of percent profit for different years bu the comparison of
the expenditures is not possible without more data.
Therefore, the year with minimum expenditure cannot be determined.
- See more at: http://www.theonlinetestcentre.com/line-charts6.html#3
Explanation:
From the line-graph we obtain information about the percentage profit only. To find the profit in
2000 we must have the data for the income or expenditure in 2000.
JOIN OUR GROUP

: WWW.BANKKING.IN
Therefore, the profit for 2000 cannot be determined.
Explanation:
Average percent profit earned for the given years
= 1/6 x [40 + 55 + 45 + 65 + 70 + 60] = 335/6 = 55 5/6
34. Answer – (B)

Solution:
From the bar – graph we get to know that the number of competitors of C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C7
and C8 is 1, 3, 6, 4, 7, 3 and 6 respectively.
Since C5 is the competitor of each of the other companies, therefore the only competitor of C1 is
C5.
Let’s consider C3: Number of competitors is 6.
We know for sure that C1 is not the competitor of C3; therefore the six competitors of C3 are C2,
C4, C5, C6, C7 and C8.
Similarly C8: Number of competitors is 6 and the competitors of C8 are C2, C3, C4, C5, C6 and
C7.
Therefore competitors of C7 are C5, C3 and C8 and competitors of C2 are C5, C3 and C8.
Since the competitors of C1, C2, C3, C5, C7 and C8 are known and fixed by us, the third
competitor has to be C6.
Therefore the competitors of C6 are C5, C3, C8 and C4.
Now consider C4: Out of the four competitors it has, three are C5, C3 and C8.
So number of competitors of C6 is 4
35. Answer – (E)
Solution:
C5.
C4, C5, C6, C7 and C8.
C7.
JOIN OUR GROUP

: WWW.BANKKING.IN
Since the number of competitors of C1, C2 and C7 is 1, 3 and 3 respectively, therefore the
number of competitors who sell furniture in the regions in which either of C1, C2 and C7 sell
furniture can be at most 4.
So the region in which maximum possible numbers of competitors sell furniture is the one that
sells C4 or C6.
So, such a region could possibly have C5, C4, C6, C3 and C8.
Hence at most 5 competitors can sell furniture in one region.
36. Answer – (A)

Solution:
C5.

C4, C5, C6, C7 and C8.
C7.
Given that there is one region where no company sold furniture. Let R4 be such a region.
Assume that C1 sells furniture in region R1, so the other company that sells furniture in R1 has
to be C5.
Since C7 has three competitors, therefore the number of companies selling furniture in the region
where C7 sells is 4.
Let’s assume C7 sells in R2, therefore the complete list of companies selling furniture in R2 is
C5, C7, C3 and C8.
JOIN OUR GROUP

: WWW.BANKKING.IN
The same holds true for C2, which has three competitors.
Let’s assume C2 sells in R3, therefore the complete list of companies selling furniture is C5, C2,
C3 and C8.
Now, since the number of competitors of C4 and C6 are 4 each the complete list of companies
selling furniture in R5 will be C5, C4, C6, C3 and C8.
The following table can be made now.
Region Companies
R1 C1, C5
R2 C5, C7, C3, C8
R3 C5, C2, C3, C8
R4 None
C5, C4, C6,
R5
C3, C8
Aggregate number of points given to all the regions:
=2+4+4+5
= 15
37. Answer – (C)

Solution:
C5.
C4, C5, C6, C7 and C8.
C7.
Referring to the table made in the previous question, for maximizing the number of regions in
which C1 sells furniture, it is possible that C1 sells furniture in R4 as well.
Hence the number of regions in which C1 sells furniture is at most 2
JOIN OUR GROUP

: WWW.BANKKING.IN
38. Answer – (D)

Solution:
Let the consumption of ‘High Quality’ and ‘Low Quality’ rice by the residents of the city X in
the year 2002 be ‘A’ and ‘B’ respectively. It is given that A > B
2002200320042005 2006 2007 2008
A 1.2A 0.3A 0.15A 0.18A 0.225A 0.09A
B 0.8B 0.6B 0.84B 0.21B 0.126B 0.189B
In the year 2007, the ratio of the consumption of ‘High Quality’ rice to ‘Low Quality’ rice by the
residents of city ‘X’ was more than that in the year 2002.
39. Answer – (D)

Solution:
2002200320042005 2006 2007 2008

A 1.2A 0.3A 0.15A 0.18A 0.225A 0.09A
B 0.8B 0.6B 0.84B 0.21B 0.126B 0.189B
As A and B are positive quantities, it is very clear that the consumption of ‘High Quality’ rice is
maximum in the year 2003 and the consumption of ‘Low Quality’ rice is 2nd highest in 2003 (it
is highest in the year 2005).
Total consumption of rice in the year 2003 is definitely more than that of each of the years 2004,
2006, 2007 and 2008.
We need to compare the data for the years 2003 and 2005.
Let the total consumption of rice in the years 2003 and 2005 be x and y respectively.
We know that x=1.2A+0.8B and
y=0.15A+0.84B
x–y=1.05A–0.04B
Now, As A>B, 1.05A>1.05B>0.04B
⇒ 1.05A>0.04Bor1.05A–0.04B>0
⇒ x – y > 0 or, x > y.
⇒ The total consumption of rice in the year 2003 is the maximum in the period 2003-2008.
JOIN OUR GROUP

: WWW.BANKKING.IN
40. Answer – (E)

Solution:
2002200320042005 2006 2007 2008
A 1.2A 0.3A 0.15A 0.18A 0.225A 0.09A
B 0.8B 0.6B 0.84B 0.21B 0.126B 0.189B
Total consumption of rice by the residents of city X in 2004:

=0.3A+0.6B
Total consumption of rice by the residents of city X in 2006:
=0.18A+0.21B
⇒ 18A+21B ≥ (1/2(30A+60B))
⇒ 6A≥18B
⇒ A≥3B
Except for the year 2005, in each of the years in the period 2003 – 2008, the consumption ‘High
Quality’ rice is definitely more than that of ‘Low Quality’ rice.
JOIN OUR GROUP

: WWW.BANKKING.IN
KEEP VISITING BANK

KING ON
www.bankking.in
JOIN BANK KING ON FB
https://www.facebook.com/grou
ps/bankking.in/
LIKE BANK KING ON FB
https://www.facebook.com/1ba
nkking1
JOIN OUR GROUP


Data Interpretation-2: WWW - Bankking.in

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Data Interpretation-2: WWW - Bankking.in

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

WWW.BANKKING.

JOIN OUR GROUP

JOIN OUR GROUP

Cost of Hysterectomy in Thailand:

JOIN OUR GROUP

As shown in the table, Malaysia will have the cheapest package.

10. Answer: Option D

JOIN OUR GROUP

11. Answer: Option D

12. Answer: Option C

14. Answer: Option C

JOIN OUR GROUP

16. Answer: Option B

Total population of State S = 7 million.

Therefore Population above poverty line = [(100 - 19)% of 7] million

= (81% of 7) million = 5.67 million.

And so, the number of females above poverty line in State S

17. Answer: Option D

JOIN OUR GROUP

JOIN OUR GROUP

19. Answer – (B)

JOIN OUR GROUP

Difference = [(10% of 475000) - (8% of 475000)]

25. Answer: Option D

26. Answer: Option D

Total interest received from the two Companies after 1 year

27. Answer: Option C

JOIN OUR GROUP

= [1200000 + (8% of 1200000)]

= [1296000 + (10% of 1296000)]

Appreciation received on investment during the period of two years

28. Answer: Option B

= [500000 + (6.5% of 500000)]

= [532500 + (9% of 532500)]

29. Answer: Option D

JOIN OUR GROUP

30. Answer: Option C

Explanation: Let the expenditure is 1998 be x

Therefore, the year with minimum expenditure cannot be determined.

- See more at: http://www.theonlinetestcentre.com/line-charts6.html#3

32. Answer: Option D

JOIN OUR GROUP

Therefore, the profit for 2000 cannot be determined.

33. Answer: Option B

Average percent profit earned for the given years

= 1/6 x [40 + 55 + 45 + 65 + 70 + 60] = 335/6 = 55 5/6

34. Answer – (B)

JOIN OUR GROUP

36. Answer – (A)

Let’s consider C3: Number of competitors is 6.

JOIN OUR GROUP

37. Answer – (C)

JOIN OUR GROUP

38. Answer – (D)

39. Answer – (D)

2002200320042005 2006 2007 2008

JOIN OUR GROUP

40. Answer – (E)

Total consumption of rice by the residents of city X in 2004:

JOIN OUR GROUP

KEEP VISITING BANK

JOIN OUR GROUP

You might also like