Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NUEVA
ME 201: Strategic Management of Engineering Enterprise
Master in Management Engineering
Pangasinan State University
At the end of this lecture and presentation, we will be
able to:
Hence,
Example:
YEAR END
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
MID-PERIOD
YEAR END
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
FINAL
•For each proposal a consensus report is prepared. The report faithfully reflects
the views of the independent experts referred to in Step 2.
•Any particular interpretations of the criteria to be used for evaluation are set out
in the work programme, in particular the way in which they translate into the issues
to be examined.
PROPOSAL MARKING.
•Evaluators examine the individual issues comprising each block of evaluation
criteria and in general mark the blocks on a six-point scale from 0 to 5 or any other
marking. An example of score markings are as follows:
0 - the proposal fails to address the issue under examination or can not be judged
against the criterion due to missing or incomplete information
1 - poor
2 - fair
3 - good
4 - very good
5 - excellent
•Where appropriate, half marks may be given. If appropriate, evaluators may also
be asked to give a mark to each of the individual issues comprising the blocks of
criteria. Only the marks for the blocks of criteria are taken into account (after
applying any weightings) for the overall score for the proposal.
THRESHOLDS AND WEIGHTINGS.
•Thresholds may be set for some or all of the blocks of criteria, such that any
proposal failing to achieve the threshold marks will be rejected. The thresholds to
be applied to each block of criteria as well as any overall threshold are set out in
the call. If the proposal fails to achieve a threshold for a block of criteria, the
evaluation of the proposal may be stopped. The reasons will be detailed in the
consensus report. It may be decided to divide the evaluation into several steps
with the possibility of different experts examining different aspects. Where the
evaluation is carried out in several successive steps, any proposal failing a
threshold mark may not progress to the next step. Such proposals may
immediately be categorised as rejected.
•According to the specific nature of the instruments and the call, it may be decided
to weight the blocks of criteria. The weightings to be applied to each block of
criteria are set out in the call.
“Implementation of Evaluation is set &
ready if and only if organized team,
approved proposal, released budget,
validated evaluation instruments are
all prepared”
Users are the individuals or organizations that will employ the evaluation
findings in some way. The users will likely have been identified during Step
1 during the process of engaging stakeholders. In this step, you need to
secure their input into the design of the evaluation and the selection of
evaluation questions. Support from the intended users will increase the
likelihood that the evaluation results will be used for program
improvement.
Evaluation
Focus
The information source we select will depend upon what is available and what
answers the evaluation questions effectively. Most common source of evaluative
information fall into 3 categories namely:
1. EXISTING INFORMATION
2. PEOPLE
3. PICTORAL RECORDS AND OBSERVATIONS
Collect
Data
•That may mean subjecting it to statistical operations that can tell you not
only what kinds of relationships seem to exist among variables, but also to
what level you can trust the answers you’re getting.
•It may mean comparing your information to that from other groups to
help draw some conclusions from the data. The point, in terms of
evaluation, is to get an accurate assessment in order to better understand
the work and its effects in order to better understand the overall situation.
Analyze &
Interpret
• To view
QUANTITATIVE
DATA Page Pls. Proceed
Click Button
• To view
QUALITATIVE
DATA Page Pls. Proceed
Click Button
QUANTITATIVE DATA
-Refer to the information that is collected as, or can be translated
into, numbers, which can then be displayed and analyzed
mathematically
Examples include:
➢The Frequency
➢Test scores
➢Survey Results
➢Numbers or Percentages
•Record data in the agreed-upon ways. These may include pencil and paper,
computer (using a laptop or handheld device in the field, entering numbers into a
program, etc.), audio or video, journals, etc.
•Sort your information in ways appropriate to your interest. This may include
sorting by category of observation, by event, by place, by individual, by group, by
the time of observation, or by a combination or some other standard.
•Calculating the mean (average), median (midpoint), and/or mode (most frequent)
of a series of measurements or observations.
•It should also be in agreement with the facts presented, briefly stated in
answer to the questions raised and preferably arranged sequentially in
accordance with the order of the problems or objectives of the project.
http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicmodel.html
http://learningstore.uwex.edu/assets/pdfs/G3658-4.pdf
http://ctb.ku.edu/en/tablecontents/chapter37/section5.aspx
http://webxtc.extension.ualberta.ca/research/evaluation//evalModel3a.cfm?&subsecti
onid=3§ionid=1&level3=6&sublevel3=17
HENRY JOHN N. NUEVA
PLAN EVALUATION & IMPLEMENTATION
Masters in Management Engineering