5G: Converging Towards

IMT-2020 Submissions

© 2017 InterDigital, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 Moderator: Panelists:

Benoît Pelletier Ahmed Alsohaily Giovanni Romano Venkatesh Sampath

InterDigital University of Toronto Telecom Italia, NGNM Ericsson

2 © 2017 InterDigital, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Overview
• Introduction
• Panelists
• The Road Towards IMT-2020 – Ahmed Alsohaily
• 3GPP Roadmap Towards IMT-2020 – Giovanni Romano
• Evaluation Process; Canadian Evaluation Group – Venkatesh Sampath
• Q&A

3 © 2017 InterDigital, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 Introduction – IMT-2020
• ITU-R initiated a process in
2014 for the future
development of IMT.

• Objective is to support next

generation (5G) of mobile
broadband communciations
systems beyond IMT-
Advanced, then termed
“IMT-2020”.

* Source: ITU -- http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-R/study-groups/rsg5/rwp5d/imt-2020/Pages/default.aspx

4 © 2017 InterDigital, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 IMT-2020 from Vision to Technical Requirements
Recommendation M.2083-0: “IMT Vision – Framework and
overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2020
and beyond”

Draft New Reports

ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH PERF ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.EVAL] - ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.SUBMISSION] -

REQ] - Minimum requirements Guidelines for evaluation of radio Requirements, evaluation criteria
related to technical performance interface technologies for IMT- and submission templates for the
for IMT-2020 radio interface(s) 2020 development of IMT-2020

5 © 2017 InterDigital, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

IMT-2020 from Technical Requirements to Specifications

RIT and SRIT Final

Technical
Candidate Recommendations
Requirements
Proposals and Specifications

Evaluation
against
requirements

6 © 2017 InterDigital, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Overview
• Introduction
• Panelists
• The Road Towards IMT-2020 – Ahmed Alsohaily
• 3GPP Roadmap Towards IMT-2020 – Giovanni Romano
• Evaluation Process; Canadian Evaluation Group – Venkatesh Sampath
• Q&A

7 © 2017 InterDigital, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

The Road Towards IMT-2020
Development, Requirements and Evaluation

Ahmed Alsohaily, University of Toronto

 IMT-2020 Usage Scenarios and Performance Targets
User experienced
Peak data rate data rate
(Gbit/s) (Mbit/s)

Peak User experienced

Enhanced mobile data rate High importance data rate
20 100
IMT-2020
broadband 10
Medium 1
Area traffic
capacity Spectrum
Spectrum efficiency
Area traffic efficiency (Mbit/s/m2 ) 10
capacity Low 1´ 3´
1
0.1

1´ 350
10´ 400
100´ 500
Network Network
IMT-advanced Mobility
Mobility
energy efficiency energy efficiency (km/h)

Ultra-reliable 5
10
Massive machine 10
and low latency
type communications communications 6
10 1
Connection density Latency
Connection density Latency
2
M.2083-04 (devices/km ) (ms)

M.2083-03

5 connectivity scenarios (3 eMBB, 1 URLLC and 1 mMTC) in total

 eMBB scenarios comprise Indoor Hotspot (IH), Dense Urban (DU) and Rural (RU)
 URLLC and mMTC scenarios assume Urban Macro
 Configuration details for each scenario are specified in ITU-R Document 5/57-E, October 2017

Souce: ITU-R Document IMT-2020/1-E, June 2016

 IMT-2020 Overall Requirements
Requirements to be satisfied by a single Radio Interface Technology (RIT) or a set of RITs

Service Requirements
eMBB, URLLC and mMTC must be supported

Spectrum Requirements
Single RIT systems must support at least one IMT band (450 – 4990 MHz) and one high
frequency band (above 24.25 GHz)
For a set of RITs, every RIT must support at least one IMT band and at least one RIT must
support one high frequency band

Technical Performance Requirements

Minimal technical performance requirements must be satisfied for at least three scenarios (two
eMBB scenarios and either the URLLC scenario or the mMTC scenario)
Souce: ITU-R Document IMT-2020/2, February 2017
 IMT-2020 Minimal Technical Performance Requirements
Table A
Scenario DL (bps/Hz) UL (bps/Hz)
Metric Minimal Value Indoor Hotspot 0.3 0.21
Peak data rate (eMBB) 20 Gbps (DL), 10 Gbps (UL) Dense Urban 0.225 0.15
Souce: ITU- Rural 0.12 0.045
Peak spectral efficiency (eMBB) 30 bps/Hz (DL), 15 bps/Hz (UL)
R
User experienced data rate (eMBB) 100 Mbps (DL), 50 Mbps (UL) Table B
Scenario DL (bps/Hz) UL (bps/Hz)
Document
5th percentile user spectral efficiency (eMBB) See Table A
Indoor Hotspot 9 6.75
5/40-E,
Average spectral efficiency (eMBB) See Table B Dense Urban 7.8 5.4
February
Area traffic capacity (eMBB) 10 Mbps/m2 Rural 3.3 1.6
2017 latency (eMBB, URLLC)
User plane 4 ms (eMBB), 1 ms (URLLC) Table C
Control plane latency (eMBB, URLLC) (10 ms encouraged) Scenario Mobility Classes Spectral Efficiency
Connection density (mMTC) 1,000,000 devices/km2
Stationary,
Energy efficiency (eMBB) Inspection Indoor Hotspot 1.5 bps/Hz
Pedestrian
Reliability (URLLC) 99.999% Stationary,
Mobility (eMBB) See Table C Pedestrian,
Dense Urban 1.12 bps/Hz
Vehicular (up to 30
Mobility interruption time (eMBB, URLLC) 0 ms km/h)
Bandwidth At least 100 MHz, up to 1 GHz 0.8 bps/Hz (120
Pedestrian, km/h), 0.45 bps/Hz
Rural Vehicular, High (500 km/h)
Speed Vehicular

Souce: ITU-R Document 5/40-E, October 2017

 IMT-2020 Radio Interface Evaluation Criteria
Characteristic for evaluation
Peak data rate (eMBB)
Peak spectral efficiency (eMBB)
User experienced data rate (eMBB)
5th percentile user spectral efficiency (eMBB) Simulation
Average spectral efficiency (eMBB)
Area traffic capacity (eMBB)
User plane latency (eMBB, URLLC)
Control plane latency (eMBB, URLLC)
Connection density (mMTC)
Energy efficiency (eMBB)
Reliability (URLLC)
Mobility (eMBB)
Mobility interruption time (eMBB, URLLC)
Bandwidth
Support of wide range of services
Supported spectrum band(s)/range(s)
Souce: ITU-R Document 5/57-E, October 2017
High-level assessment method Related section of ITU-R Reports
Analytical Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH PERF REQ], § 4.1
Analytical Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH PERF REQ], § 4.2
Analytical (single band & layer),
Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH PERF REQ], § 4.3
Simulation (multi-layer)
Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH PERF REQ], § 4.4
Simulation Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH PERF REQ], § 4.5
Analytical Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH PERF REQ], § 4.6
Analytical Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH PERF REQ], § 4.7.1
Analytical Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH PERF REQ], § 4.7.2
Simulation Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH PERF REQ], § 4.8
Inspection Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH PERF REQ], § 4.9
Simulation Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH PERF REQ], § 4.10
Simulation Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH PERF REQ], § 4.11
Analytical Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH PERF REQ], § 4.12
Inspection Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH PERF REQ], § 4.13
Inspection Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.SUBMISSION], § 3.1
Inspection Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.SUBMISSION], § 3.2
 IMT-2020 Radio Interface Development Process
ITU-R
Step 1
Circular Letter to invite proposals for radio
interface technologies and evaluations
Step 3
Submission/Reception of the RIT and
SRIT proposals and acknowledgement
of receipt
Step 5
Review and coordination of
outside evaluation activities
Coordination between independent evaluation groups
Step 6
Review to assess compliance
with minimum requirements
Step 7
Consideration of evaluation
results, consensus building, and
decision
Step 8
Development of radio interface
Recommendation(s)
Souce: ITU-R Document IMT-2020/2, Feb 2017
Outside ITU-R
Step 2
Development of candidate radio
interface technologies
Step 4
Evaluation of candidate radio interface
technologies by independent evaluation
groups, grouping of the technologies
through consensus building
Descriptions of proposed radio interface
technologies and evaluation reports
Radio interface specifications (SPECS),
sufficiently detailed to enable worldwide
compatibility
Step 9
Implementation of Recommendation(s)
IMT-2020 2-02
 IMT-2020 Radio Interface Development Schedule
WP 5D 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
meetings No.23 No.24 No.25 No.26 No.27 No.28 No.29 No.30 No.31 No.32 No.33 No.34 No.35 No.36

Step1 and 2
(0) (40 months: #23 - #32)
Step 3
(20 months: #28 - #32) (1)
Step 4
(16 months: #31 - #34) (2)
Steps 5,6 and 7
(28 months: #29 - #35) (3)
Steps 8
(12 months: #33 - #36) (4)
Steps in radio interface development process:
Step 1: Issuance of the circular letter Step 5: Review and coordination of outside evaluation activities
Step 2: Development of candidate RITs and SRITs Step 6: Review to assess compliance with minimum requirements
Step 3: Submission/Reception of the RIT and SRIT Step 7: Consideration of evaluation results, consensus building and
proposals and acknowledgement of receipt decision
Step 4: Evaluation of candidate RITs and SRITs by Step 8: Development of radio interface Recommendation(s)
Independent Evaluation Groups
Critical milestones in radio interface development process:
(0): Issue an invitation to propose RITs March 2016 (2): Cut off for evaluation report to ITU February 2020
(1): ITU proposed cut off for submission (3): WP 5D decides framework and key June 2020
July 2019
of candidate RIT and SRIT proposals characteristics of IMT-2020
- RIT and SRIT
(4): WP 5D completes development of radio October 2020
interface specification Recommendations

Souce: ITU-R Document IMT-2020/2, Feb 2017 IMT-2020 2-01

Thank You!
GRUPPO TELECOM ITALIA

3GPP roadmap towards IMT-2020

Giovanni Romano
3GPP ITU-R Ad-Hoc Contact Person

October 2017
 3GPP Roadmap

• 3GPP features will be phased as it

will be not possible to standardize
all in time for Rel-15 completion
and early deployments
• Key requirement: NR design shall
be forward compatible at its core
so that efficient and ‘optimized’
features can be added in later
releases
• Release 15 (aka phase 1, by June ‘18) will aim at enabling a first phase of expected
deployments in 2020
• Release 16 (aka phase 2, by Dec ’19)
• Additional “Early drop” milestone (Dec ’17 ) added to support emerging market needs
17
 3GPP System

• 3GPP aims to the definition of a full system (Radio and Core Network)
• 3GPP specifications will be labelled “5G” from Release 15 onwards
• 5G requirements
• Service: TS 22.261 “Service requirements for next generation new services and markets”
• Radio: TR 38.913 “Study on scenarios and requirements for next generation access
technologies”
• Overall architecture (expected Dec 2017):
• TS 23.501: “System Architecture for the 5G System; Stage 2”
• TS 23.502: “Procedures for the 5G System; Stage 2”
• RAN aspects
• TR 38.901: “Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz”
• TR 38.912: “Study on new radio access technology”
• Technical specifications will be captured in the 36, 37 and 38 series

18
 3GPP deployment scenarios

Non stand-alone «LTE Assisted», 5G CN

connected Stand-alone NR, 5G CN connected Stand-alone Rel15 eLTE, 5G CN connected

Non stand-alone «NR Assisted», 5G CN Control plane

connected User plane

• December 2017: 4G Core

Network • Release 15 (June 2018):
• NR Non Stand-Alone
• 5G Core Network
(NSA) - The eNB is the
master node • NR Stand-Alone, eLTE Stand
• 4G Core Network (EPC) Alone and NSA combinations
• Enanced LTE (eLTE) From RP-161266

19
 Release 15 contents (Radio)

• R15 NR WID (RP-172115)

• R15 LTE: LTE/NGC integration, Enhanced reliability and short TTI (URLLC per
LTE), enhancements of MTC & NB-IOT, C- V2X Phase II, Fixed Wireless Access,
FeCoMP, Positioning enhancements, eVideo, QoE reporting, CA utilization
• Some feasibility studies:
• NR: Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA), eV2V, Relay, CU-DU lower
layer split, Test methods for New Radio (OTA measurements)
• LTE: Architecture Evolution for E-UTRAN (split CU-DU for LTE), Study on
Aerials (planned to be part of Rel 15)

20
 Release 15 NR features

R15 NR WID (RP-172115)

• Radio architectures and RAN interfaces
• NR-LTE co-existence mechanisms
• Support co-existence of LTE UL and NR UL within the bandwidth of an LTE component carrier and co-existence of LTE DL and
NR DL within the bandwidth of an LTE component carrier
• Support of ultra-reliable part of URLLC
• Radio Access Network architecture, interface protocols and procedures for functional split between central and distributed
units
• Normative stage-2/3 specification of one higher layer split (based on centralised PDCP/RRC and decentralised
RLC/MAC/PHY)
• Dual Connectivity between E-UTRA and NR and within NR
• Carrier Aggregation within NR
• Support for network slicing
• Support for PWS and IMS voice
• Support of (SON) functions: Automatic Neighboring Relation (ANR); NG/Xx/Xn setup
• Inter-RAT mobility between NR and E-UTRA

21
IMT-2020 submission - timeplan

From RP-172098 22
IMT-2020 submission format
• Submission 1
• SRIT
• Component RIT: NR (*)
• Component RIT: EUTRA/LTE
• incl. standalone LTE, NB-IoT, eMTC, and LTE-NR DC
• full 38 and 36 series, and subset of 37 series
• Submission 2 (In addition to the above)
• NR RIT (*)
• Naming
• Name : 5G
• Footnote: Developed by 3GPP as 5G, Release 15 and beyond

• (*) The plan is to leverage the NR RIT (in submission 2) as the NR component RIT in submission 1; NR details TBD

From RP-172098 23
giovanni.romano@telecomitalia.it

24
IMT-2020 Workshop
Munich, Germany
4th October 2017

www.IMT-CEG.ca
Overview
Structure, organisation, future plans

• Organisation
• History
• Evaluation approach
• Questions
www.IMT-CEG.ca

4th October 2017 www.IMT-CEG.ca 26

CEG – Organisation
(CNO process)

• The Canadian Evaluation Group

Engineering, Planning &
Standards

ISED
was started in 1996
• Under the auspices of the Canadian
CNO (ITU-R) Executive
Committee

National Organisation
• “Reports” to CNO-5D (in a manner Etc. CNO-SG4 CNO-SG5 Etc.

of speaking); follows the CNO

methods of working
CNO-5A CNO-5B CNO-5C
CNO-5D
(Land mobile, amateur, (Aeronautical, maritime, (Fixed wireless systems,
(IMT)
wireless access in fixed) radiolocation) HF)

• CEG has worked on the evaluation

Canadian Evaluation

of both IMT-2000 and IMT- Group

Advanced candidate submissions

4th October 2017 www.IMT-CEG.ca 27

CEG – History (1)
IMT-2000 (part 1)

• IMT-2000 (Period: 1st Jul – 30th Sept 1998)

• Objective was to evaluate candidate Radio
Transmission Technology (RTT) proposals i.e. verify
each candidate submission met the requirements of
an IMT-2000 radio interface
• These requirements were established by the ITU-R
in BR Circular Letter 8/LCCE/47
(http://www.itu.int/itudoc/itu-
r/archives/rsg/lcce/rsg8/37459.html)
• Total of 10 terrestrial and 5 satellite RTTs submitted;
only the terrestrial candidates were evaluated
• Procedure guided by Recommendation ITU-R
M.1225
• CEG evaluated only the most important
criteria (priority ‘G1’), and the attributes
associated with each criterion
• Each criterion assigned a co-ordinator
(Ericsson, Bell, Nortel, Microcell, Clearnet and
Cantel)
• Each co-ordinator performed an analysis of
the criterion across the candidate RTTs
(“horizontal” eval.)
First WS on RTT proponents held in Toronto, Canada, 1996
4th October 2017 www.IMT-CEG.ca 28
CEG – History (2)
IMT-2000 (part 2)
• 2007: Carried out evaluation of IP-
OFDMA (terrestrial RTT) to qualify as
‘IMT-2000’
• Period (roughly): Jan-May 2007
• Procedure very similar to 1996
• Co-ordinators were Ericsson, Bell, Nortel, RIM,
Telus, Rogers (Motorola & Wavesat as
alternates)
• Again, each co-ordinator performed an
analysis of the criterion assigned
• RESULTS OVERALL: As of Jan 2009, IMT-
2000 had 6 terrestrial RTTs
• Detailed radio specifications are
contained in Recommendation ITU-R
M.1457
• Updates of this Recommendation take
place every other year in close
collaboration with the concerned SDOs

4th October 2017 www.IMT-CEG.ca 29

CEG – History (3)
IMT-Advanced (part 1)

• IMT-Advanced (Sept 2009 – June 2010)

• Objective: evaluate candidate Radio Interface
Technology (RIT) proposals i.e. verify each
candidate submission met the requirements of an
IMT-Advanced radio interface
• Well-established procedure with
• Work guided by Resolution ITU-R 57
• Detailed process and schedule
• Requirements, evaluation criteria and
submission templates in Report ITU-R M.2133
• Key Technical Performance Requirements in
Report ITU-R M.2134
• Guidelines for the evaluation of the RITs in
Report ITU-R M.2135
• Evaluation accomplished through:
• Inspection
• Analysis
• Simulation (simulator established with the help of
academic participation)

4th October 2017 www.IMT-CEG.ca 30

CEG – History (4)
IMT-Advanced (part 2)

• 15 organisations took part; 2 additionally

as observers (IC, CRTC)
• “Matrix of responsibilities”: Divided the task of
evaluation of each of the 13 key technical
parameters amongst the members
• RITs received from 3GPP (IMT-ADV/8) and
IEEE (IMT-ADV/4) (with slight ‘variants’
from some SDOs); both passed the
evaluation process
• CEG Report issued as IMT-ADV/12
Detailed radio specifications are
contained in Recommendation ITU-R
M.2012
• Updates of this Recommendation take place
every other year in close co-operation with the
concerned SDOs

4th October 2017 www.IMT-CEG.ca 31

 Technical parameters evaluated
IMT-2000
Number Criteria Most Important Technical Attributes (G1)
Additional Attribute used by the CEG
A3.1 Spectrum efficiency 1. Voice traffic capacity (E/MHz/cell)
2. Information capacity (Mbit/s/MHz/cell) A3.4.2.1.4 Band plans and frequency duplexing Q G1 A1.2.1
A3.2 Technology complexity – Effect on 1. Peak transmitter/carrier (Pb) power (New attribute) The proponent should describe how their and A1.2.2
cost of installation and operation 2. Broadband power amplifier (PA) system will provide global service delivery
3. Number of users per RF carrier/frequency q A1.2.2.1
in the different regional/national band
channel
plans and frequency duplexing A1.2.4
4. Base site implementation/installation
requirements arrangements for IMT2000 systems.
5. Handover complexity
A3.3 Quality 1. Maximum user bit rate for data (bit/s)
2. Voice quality

A3.4 Flexibility of radio technologies 1. Multimedia capabilities Not evaluated by the CEG in 1999
2. Flexibility in the use of the frequency band
3. Minimum frequency band required to But evaluated in 2007
operate
4. Frequency management between different
layers
5. Existing system migration capability
A3.5 Implication on network interfaces 1. Examine the network modifications
required for the RTT to pass the standard

A3.6 Handportable performance 1.

set of ISDN bearer services
Peak transmission power
Data rates:
optimization capability 2.
3.
Diversity schemes
The number of antennas
2 Mbits/s in stationary environment
4.
5.
The number of receivers
The ratio of “off(sleep)” time to “on” time
384 kbits/s in low-speed environment (50 kmph)?
A3.7 Coverage/power
6.
1.
Digital signal processing requirements
Base site coverage efficiency
144 kbits/s in high-speed environment (120 kmph?
efficiency 2. Method to increase the coverage efficiency

4th October 2017 www.IMT-CEG.ca 32

 Technical parameters evaluated
IMT-Advanced
Chart summarizing the commitment of CEG participants in the evaluation activity
Institution
Deployment
Peak Control in one Support Cell-edge
Spectral Plane User Plane identified Channel bw wide range Cell spectral spectral VoIP
Efficiency Latency Latency Handover Bandwidth IMT band scalability of services efficiency efficiency Mobility capacity Link budgets
Intra-freq Inter-freq
HO HO
interruption interruption Inter-
time time system
Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis Inspection Inspection Inspection Inspection Inspection Simulation Simulation Simulation Simulation Verification
Bell 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP
Ericsson (CAN) 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP
Aviat Networks IEEE
Huawei (CAN) 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP, IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP; IEEE
Intel (CAN) IEEE IEEE IEEE IEEE IEEE IEEE IEEE IEEE IEEE IEEE IEEE IEEE IEEE IEEE IEEE
RIM 3GPP: IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP
Rogers 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE
Telesat
Telus 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP
Carleton 3GPP; IEEE
INRS 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE
Memorial IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE
Univ. Laval
Ottawa U.
U-of-Tor 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP 3GPP
Waterloo

CRTC
IC
CRC 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE 3GPP; IEEE
Sofiene Sofiene Sofiene Sofiene Ivo (3GPP)
Section (3GPP) (3GPP) (3GPP) (3GPP) Vishnu
Coordinator Andy M. Remi C. Remi C. Andy M. Andy M. Andy M. P.F. Ng P.F. Ng P.F. Ng Jose C. Remi (IEEE) Remi (IEEE) Remi (IEEE) Remi (IEEE) (IEEE)
Target Compl Mar/2010 Mar/2010 Mar/2010 Mar/2010 Mar/2010 Mar/2010 Mar/2010 Mar/2010 Mar/2010 Mar/2010 May/2010 May/2010 May/2010 May/2010 Feb/2010
4th October 2017 www.IMT-CEG.ca 33
 CEG – evaluation approach
• Similar to what we’ve done on the previous two occasions:
• Guided by Resolution ITU-R 65
• Following the detailed process and schedule
• Requirements, evaluation criteria and submission templates in Report ITU-R
M.xxxx
NOTE: Reports complete, to receive
nos. at SG5 meeting in Nov’17
• Key Technical Performance Requirements in Report ITU-R M.yyyy
• Guidelines for the evaluation of the RITs in Report ITU-R M.zzzz
• Co-ordinators will perform the necessary
• Inspection, Analysis, Simulation (link- & system-levels, as per §7.1 of
IMT.EVAL)
• Industry and academia will participate

4th October 2017 www.IMT-CEG.ca 34

 Technical parameters to evaluate
IMT-2020

Link Peak data Peak User 5% user Avg Area Latency Connection Energy Reliability Mobility Mobility Bandwidth
Budget rate spectral experienced spectral spectral traffic density efficiency InH interruption
efficiency data rate efficiency efficiency capacity On load DU time
User Contr
per test per test (In-H, plane ol No load RU
plane
env env eMBB)
Verific - Analytical Analytical Analytical Simulation Simulation Analytical Analytical Simulation Inspection Simulation Simulation Analytical Inspection
ation (single band
& layer);
Simulation
(multi-layer)

Ericsson
Bell
Rogers

Telus

Interdi
gital
Etc.

Noted that, for each test environment (5 in all), there may be up to 3 configurations to evaluate
4th October 2017 www.IMT-CEG.ca 35
Service parameters to evaluate
IMT-2020

Support of wide range Supported spectrum

of services band(s) range(s)
Inspection Inspection

Ericsson
Bell
Rogers
Telus
Interdigital
Etc.

4th October 2017 www.IMT-CEG.ca 36

Q&A

37 © 2017 InterDigital, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

THANK YOU

38 © 2017 InterDigital, Inc. All Rights Reserved.