Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Resumo
1. Introduction
The excellent combination of me- point of view and also processing char- 2007). Also important is the control of
chanical strength and corrosion resistance acteristics, the SDSS production in large the ferrite/austenite balance (usually near
in various types of environments and the diameters bars is a challenge because their 50% each) that can be established by a
good performance in applications found attractive properties may be destroyed by proper compositional balance between
in Oil and Gas fields makes duplex stain- the formation of precipitates due to the ferrite and austenite former elements.
less steels (DSS) an excellent choice by more difficult thermal transfer conditions The knowledge of the thermodynamic
equipment designers IMOA (2009). The found in bars with diameters higher than and kinetics of such complex stainless
development of more corrosion resistant 100 mm. The most common precipitates steels is a pre-condition to understand
grades has led to the so called Super-duplex are chromium nitrides Cr2N and inter- and control the formation of such undesir-
stainless steels (SDSS), where the chemi- metallic precipitates (IP) such as sigma/chi/ able precipitates. Many of these aspects
cal composition is modified by increasing phase/R phases that can be formed in the are very well studied and documented in
specially the molybdenum and nitrogen temperature range from 600 to 1000°C, literature (DUPLEX, 2007).
content, leading to a higher pitting cor- depending on the thermal cooling as well In order to investigate the reasons
rosion resistance, evaluated by the pitting as deformation conditions imposed during why corrosion resistance is sometimes
resistance equivalent number – PREN, the fabrication of large diameter bars. The affected in the production of SDSS in
from a typical value of 35, found in nor- main technological properties that are ad- large diameter bars over 80 mm, we
mal duplex grades, to more than 40. This versely affected are the pitting corrosion re- conducted an extensive study in the grade
new class of DSS can fight the more chal- sistance and the toughness. It is interesting UNS S 32760 ASTM A-276 (4501), see
lenging corrosion problems found in the to note that in the present study, although Table 1. The main task was to fulfill the
nowadays deep water oil and gas reserves the pitting corrosion resistance was dam- additional requirements found in the
where, besides temperature increases, aged by the presence of chromium nitrides, Norsok standard MDS D57 Revision 3,
higher H2S and CO2 pressures are met the minimum impact toughness was not especially regarding pitting corrosion. The
(Løvland, 2003). Also, besides the super- affected when a very small percentage of IP production bars were produced by rolling
martensitic 13Cr, the SDSS shows the is present in the microstructure, confirm- conventional cast ingots from EAF+VOD
best combination of corrosion resistance ing previous work showing that to have a process. After controlled rolling, the
and yield strength ultrapasses 600 MPa serious decrease in toughness several per- bars were water solution annealed from
(Barbosa, 2008). From the metallurgical cent of IP is necessary (Nilsson & Kangas, 1120ºC.
2. Experimental Procedure
Pilot scale heats were produced in The ingots were further forged down to ductility and toughness (Esteban, 2008).
order to verify the compositional effects 70 mm square bars with a 4:1 reduction The specimens were cut from the
on the microstructures and corrosion as ratio. The chemical composition of the middle section of the 70 mm square bar
well as to study the effect of the chemi- produced ingots is given also in Table 1. and exposed to pilot heats to control the
cal composition balance. The pilot scale The conventional base composition was microstructure and corrosion testing. In
heats were produced by casting 50 kg reproduced in the pilot scale heat and it the production heats the samples were
ingots from a vacuum induction furnace, is indicated as well as the modified ones. taken at different positions of the 152.40
with 140 mm medium cross section size. In the rebalanced composition the PREN mm diameter rolled bars. The production
All heats were cast using the same raw number was increased via chromium and heats were produced by EAF+VOD and
material and were forged together using molybdenum to more than 41. The content 1.7 t ingot cast. The materials were water
the same heating condition. The chemi- of ferrite in the conventional steel, around solution annealed from 1120ºC. The
cal compositions were established using 57%, was reduced to around 42% in the specimens for corrosion testing according
as a base the typical composition found rebalanced composition in the solution ASTM G-48 method A (AMERICAN
in heats from regular production in order annealing temperature of 1120ºC as cal- SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MA-
to run the thermodynamic phase simula- culated by the Thermo-Calc. The higher TERIALS, 2007) and Norsok standard
tion using the software Thermo-Calc. amount of austenite promotes a higher were taken from the mid radius in the
202 REM: R. Esc. Minas, Ouro Preto, 66(2), 201-208, abr. jun. | 2013