Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s11759-008-9058-8
RESEARCH
Kai Horsthemke, Wits School of Education, University of the
Witwatersrand, St. Andrews Road, Parktown, Johannesburg,
Gauteng 2193, South Africa
E-mail: Kai.Horsthemke@wits.ac.za
ABSTRACT
________________________________________________________________
KEY WORDS
Introduction
rainmaking and the like. (The tokoloshe and mantindane are claimed to be
‘fearful’, ‘extremely aggressive and viciously cruel’ creatures that reside in
southern Africa, with a penchant—respectively—for ‘sexually assaulting’ and
even raping women, ‘challenging benighted travellers to stick fights’, and
repeatedly ‘kidnapping’ and ‘ill-treating’ people by ‘scooping out flesh from
their legs, thighs and even buttocks and upper arms’. For detailed descrip-
tions of these creatures and their exploits, see Mutwa 1996:31–32.)
Conceptions of indigenous knowledge, development and struggles for
cultural autonomy are usually articulated in terms of critiques of ‘western’
knowledge, development and hegemony. There are, broadly, two types of
defence of ‘indigenous knowledge’. The more radical defence joins, and
avails itself of, ‘post-colonial’, ‘post-modern’ and relativistic critiques of
the ‘western’ notion of ‘universal knowledge’. The more cautious approach
emphasises the different ways in which particular disciplines—like anthro-
pological cultural relativism, radical constructivism and realism—deal with
questions of knowledge.
The present paper eschews the popular and ‘politically correct’ option
of embracing the idea of indigenous knowledge. I argue here that extant
defences of ‘indigenous knowledge’ err in several significant respects.
A lot has been said and continues to be said about the idea of indigeneity.
Although some writers (Macedo 1999:xv; Semali and Kincheloe 1999b:23)
reject this contraposition, ‘indigenous knowledge’ is commonly contrasted,
implicitly or explicitly, with ‘knowledge from abroad’, a ‘global’, ‘cosmo-
politan’, ‘occidental’, ‘formal’ or ‘world’ (system of) knowledge (see Semali
and Kincheloe 1999a passim, Higgs et al. passim, Odora Hoppers 2002a
passim, Odora Hoppers 2005).
Regarding the purported definition of ‘indigenous knowledge’, it is gen-
erally understood to cover local, traditional, aboriginal or ‘oriental’ or (in
our case) African beliefs, practices, customs and worldviews. Odora Hop-
pers writes that
the notion of IKS has been defined as the sum total of the knowledges and
skills which people in a particular geographic area possess, and which enables
them to get the most out of their environment … Traditional knowledge is
… the totality of all knowledges and practices, whether explicit or implicit,
used in the management of socio-economic, spiritual and ecological facets of
life. In that sense, many aspects of it can be contrasted with ‘cosmopolitan
knowledge’ that is culturally anchored in Western cosmology, scientific dis-
coveries, economic preferences and philosophies. (Odora Hoppers 2005:2)
My Project
Five centuries after ‘the holocaust’, ‘the cataclysm that shook Africa’—the
slave trade, spread of European diseases, uprootment and displacement of
indigenous Africans—and that resulted in the disappearance of ‘African
genius’, archaeologists ‘began to pick up some of the pieces’, according to
Ivan van Sertima, Rutgers director of African Studies (Van Sertima
1999:307). Some evidence of early African metallurgy, astronomy, mathe-
matics, architecture and engineering, navigation, agricultural science, medi-
cine and writing systems has thus been unearthed, which Van Sertima and
others (e.g., Seepe 2000) have claimed to precede and/or to be superior to
the European sciences.
My concern is not with the idea of Africa being the cradle of human-
kind, and by implication of all human knowledge. Whether or not this is
so is both moot and irrelevant here. Rather, does what Van Sertima enu-
merates and elaborates upon constitute ‘indigenous knowledge’? Assuming,
for the sake of argument, that the archaeological evidence favours the view
espoused by Van Sertima, what we have here are extraordinary indigenous
skills—like the Dogon ability to perceive minute stars with the naked
eye, or Yoruba mathematics. But do they yield indigenous theoretical
knowledge, in any meaningful sense of ‘indigenous’?
In what follows, I argue that ‘indigenous knowledge’ is a misnomer. As I
see it, the dilemma for the ‘indigenous knowledge’ apologist is the following.
Insofar as the term ‘indigenous’ makes sense, it is not a matter of
‘knowledge’, strictly speaking, but rather of ‘indigenous skills/ practices’ or
136 KAI HORSTHEMKE
society to society, from culture to culture, truth does not so vary. Truth
provides the objective anchor for knowledge.
The tokoloshe is real—it does exist. … When Africans fear the tokoloshe they
are not fearing a figment of their imaginations. … There is another creature
which is not unlike the tokoloshe in its love of inflicting bodily harm, and
which is also greatly feared. … I have personally fallen victim to mantin-
dane—not once, but three times—and I still carry the scars on my body to
testify to the truth of what I say. (Mutwa 1996:32)
138 KAI HORSTHEMKE
Implications
References Cited
Crossman, P., and R. Devisch
2002. Endogenous Knowledge in Anthropological Perspective: A Plea for a Con-
ceptual Shift. In Indigenous Knowledge and the Integration of Knowledge
Systems: Towards a Philosophy of Articulation, edited by C. Odora
Hoppers. New Africa Books, Claremont.
Higgs, P., S. Lillejord, Q. Mkabela, Y. Waghid, and L. Le Grange (editors)
2004. Indigenous African Knowledge Systems and Higher Education. South
African Journal of Higher Education 18(3).
Horsthemke, K.
2004a. ‘Indigenous Knowledge’: Conceptions and Misconceptions. Journal of
Education 32:31–48.
2004b. Knowledge, Education and the Limits of Africanisation. Journal of Philos-
ophy of Education 38(4):571–587.
2004c. ‘Indigenous Knowledge’, Truth and Reconciliation in South African
Higher Education. South African Journal of Higher Education 18(3):
65–81.
Hountondji, P.J.
2002. Knowledge Appropriation in a Post-Colonial Context. In Indigenous
Knowledge and the Integration of Knowledge Systems: Towards a Philosophy
of Articulation, edited by C. Odora Hoppers. New Africa Books,
Claremont.
International Labor Organisation (ILO)
1989. International Labor Organisation Convention on Indigenous and Tribal
Peoples in Independent Countries. June (referred to as Convention 169).
Geneva: ILO.
Macedo, D.
1999. Decolonizing Indigenous Knowledge. In What is Indigenous Knowledge?:
Voices from the Academy, edited by L.M. Semali and J.L. Kincheloe.
Falmer Press, New York and London.
Mutwa, C.
1996. Isilwane: The Animal. Struik, Cape Town.
Nel, P.
2004. Making the Past Part of Our Future. Beyond Matric/Mail & Guardian
7–13:3.
Ntuli, P.P.
2002. Indigenous Knowledge Systems and the African Renaissance: Laying a
Foundation for the Creation of Counter-Hegemonic Discourses. In Indige-
nous Knowledge and the Integration of Knowledge Systems: Towards a
The Idea of Indigenous Knowledge 143