1

Sheriff’s Justice Institute: Central Bond Court Report

February 21, 2018

Executive Summary
The Sheriff’s Justice Institute recorded data and observations in Central Bond Court from 8/29/16-12/20/16 and then
again from 9/18/17-11/28/17.
We find that:

 Felony gun charges

o Before 9/18/17: D-Bonds for felony gun charges were administered in 95.8% of cases
 After: D-Bonds for felony gun charges were administered in 39.8% of cases
o Before 9/18/17: The average D-Bond was $133,684, the median D-Bond was $75,000
 After: The average D-Bond was $21,891, the median D-Bond was $10,000
o Before 9/18/17: No Bonds, IEM, and I-Bonds were rarely administered
 After: The use of No Bonds, IEM, and I-Bonds increased dramatically
 I Bonds and No Bonds Increased
o Before 9/18/17: I-Bonds were administered 20.5% of cases.
 After: I-Bond were given in 54.7% of cases.
o Before 9/18/17: No Bonds were administered 0.6% of cases.
 After: No Bonds were given in 7.8% of cases.
 D Bond frequency and amount decreased
o Before 9/18/17: D-Bonds were administered 53.0% of cases.
 After: D-Bonds were given in 21.2% of cases.
o Before 9/18/17: The average D Bond was $95,815, the median was $75,000.
 After: The average D Bond was $23,927, the median was $8,500.
 Decrease in defendants with a lead charge of Retail Theft
o Before 9/18/17: Retail Theft was the 4th most frequent charge.
 After: Retail Theft was the 11th most frequent charge.
 Judges tend to follow Office of the Chief Judge’s (OCJ) Pretrial Divisions recommendations more
frequently
o Before 9/18/17: Judges followed the DMF in 34.0% of bond court decisions.
 After: Judges followed the DMF in 71.2% of bond court decisions.
 Defendants spend more time in front of Judges
 After 9/18/17 defendants spent more than twice as long in front of Judge as they did before.
 Disparities between private attorneys and Public Defenders (PD) have diminished
o Before 9/18/17: Private attorneys spent 2.8 times longer in front of the bench than PDs.
 After: Private attorneys spent 1.3 time longer in front of the bench than PDs.

Overview
Before 9/18/17 (Observed from 8/29/16-12/20/16) After 9/18/17 (Observed from 9/18/17-11/28/17)

 25 Days Observed  47 Days Observed

 Average of 58 defendants per day  Average of 42 defendants per day
 94.2% Public Defender (PD)  93.7% Public Defender (PD)
o 3.4% currently in DOC custody o 3.4% currently in DOC custody
o 1.6% not in court due to incapacitation o 0.5% not in court due to incapacitation
 Private Attorney 5.8%  Private Attorney 6.3%
 2

Bonds for Felony Gun Charges

Before 9/18/17, D-Bonds for felony gun charges were administered at a higher rate with higher bond amounts than
after 9/18/17. Before 9/18/17, No Bonds, IEM, and I-Bonds were rarely administered for felony gun charges. After
9/18/17, the use of No Bonds, IEM, and I-Bonds increased dramatically.

Before 9/18/17 After 9/18/17

2.0% 0.6%
2.2%

9.3%

22.4% 39.8%

95.8%
28.0%

D EM I C D I IEM NO BOND

Bond Type n % Bond Type n %

C Bond 0 0.0% C Bond 2 0.6%
D Bond* 250 95.8% D Bond* 128 39.8%
Less than $10,000 4 1.6% Less than $10,000 58 45.3%
$10,000 - $39,999 41 16.4% $10,000 - $39,999 41 32.0%
$40,000 - $99,999 106 42.4% $40,000 - $99,999 21 16.4%
$100,000 - $249,999 53 21.2% $100,000 - $249,999 7 5.5%
$250,000 or more 46 18.4% $250,000 or more 1 0.8%
I Bond 5 2.0% I Bond 90 28.0%
IEM 6 2.2% IEM 72 22.4%
Less than $10,000 0 0.0% Less than $10,000 0 0.0%
$10,000 - $39,999 4 66.7% $10,000 - $39,999 27 37.5%
$40,000 - $99,999 2 33.3% $40,000 - $99,999 27 37.5%
$100,000 - $249,999 0 0.0% $100,000 - $249,999 18 25.0%
No Bond 0 0.0% No Bond 30 9.3%
Nolle 0 0.0% Nolle 0 0.0%
Total 261 100.0% Total 322 100.00%

*Average D Bond: $133,684 *Average D Bond: $21,891

*Median D Bond: $75,000 *Median D Bond: $10,000
 3

Felony Gun Charges Breakdown

The following is a breakdown of the charge group “Felony Gun Charge.” This group is broken down by class, charge, and
statute for the 322 individuals that entered CBC after 9/18/17 facing a felony gun charge.

CLASS N %
X 14 4.3%
1 6 1.9%
2 148 46.0%
3 36 11.2%
See page 15 for Felony Penalties
4 118 36.6%
TOTAL 322 100.0%

Statute Charge Class n %

FELON POSS/USE WEAPON/FIREARM/PAROLE 2/3 170 52.8%
*720-5/24-1.1(A)
FELON POSS BODY ARMOR X 2 0.6%
*720-5/24-1.6(A)(1) AGG UNLAWFUL USE OF WEAPON/VEH 4 72 22.4%
AGG UNLAWFUL USE WEAPON/PERSON 4 33 10.2%
*720-5/24-1.6(A)(2) AGG UUW W/ BODY ARMOR/NO
X 1 0.3%
720-5/12-3.05(E)(1) AGG BATTERY/DISCHARGE FIREARM X 11 3.4%
720-5/24-5(B) POSS FIREARM W/ DEFACED SER NO 3 11 3.4%
720-5/24-1.5(A) RECKLESS DISCHARGE OF FIREARM 4 6 1.9%
720-5/24-1.2(A)(2) AGG DISCHARGE FIREARM/VEH/SCH 1 4 1.2%
720-5/24-1-A-9 CARRY/POSSESS CONCEALED GUN 4 3 0.9%
720-5/12-2-C-2 AGG ASSAULT/DISCHARGE FIREARM 4 1 0.3%
720-5/24-1.2(A)(1) AGG DISCHARGE FIREARM/OCC VEH 1 1 0.3%
720-5/24-1.6-A-3-A AGG UUW/LOADED PISTOL, REVOLVER, HANDGUN-NO CCL 4 1 0.3%
720-5/24-1.8(A)(1) POSS FIREARM/VEHICLE/GANG MBR 2 1 0.3%
720-5/24-1-A-4 CARRY/POSSESS FIREARM SCHOOL 3 1 0.3%
720-5/24-3(A)(K) SELL FIREARM/NO VALID FOID 4 1 0.3%
720-5/24-3.8(A) POSSESSION OF A STOLEN FI 2 1 0.3%
720-5/29D-35.1(A) BOARD AIRCRAFT WITH WEAPON 4 1 0.3%
720-5/4-3.1 A-1 AGG UNLAWFUL USE OF WEAPON 4 1 0.3%
Total 322 100.0%
*Statutes 720-5/24-1.1(A), 720-5/24-1.6(A)(1), and (A)(2) make up 86.3% of CBC Felony Gun charges.

7 Days After CBC n % Rebooking Reason n %

Community 195 60.6% New Charge 13 61.9%
I Bond 87 44.6% Felony Gun 5 38.5%
Bond Paid 54 27.7% VOBB 6 28.6%
EM 34 17.4% Placed on EM 2 9.5%
Bond Paid Released EM 20 10.3% Total 21 100.0%
Hard Custody 127 39.4%
Total 322 100.0%
As of 2/1/18, 21 individuals have been rebooked.
This does not include defendants who went from
SJI tracked whether a person was released from EM to hard custody.
CCDOC 7 days after defendants appeared in
CBC.
 4
Bonds

I Bonds and No Bonds have increased. Before 9/18/17, I-Bonds were administered in 20.5% of cases and after, I-
Bonds were given in 54.7% of cases. Before 9/18/17, No Bonds were administered in 0.6% of cases and after, No
Bonds were given in 7.8% of cases.
Overall, D-Bond frequency and amounts have decreased. Before 9/18/17, D-Bonds were administered in 53.0% of
cases and after, D-Bonds were given in 21.2% of cases. Before 9/18/17, the Average D-Bond was $95,815, with a
Median at $75,000. After 9/18/17, the Average D-Bond was $23,927 with the Median at $8,500.

Before 9/18/17 After 9/18/17

Bond Type n % Bond Type n %

C Bond 1 0.1% C Bond 5 0.3%
D Bond* 859 53.0% D Bond* 422 21.2%
Less than $10,000 91 10.6% Less than $10,000 211 50.0%
$10,000 - $39,999 285 33.2% $10,000 - $39,999 113 26.8%
$40,000 - $99,999 249 29.0% $40,000 - $99,999 70 16.6%
$100,000 - $249,999 126 14.7% $100,000 - $249,999 25 5.9%
$250,000 or more 108 12.6% $250,000 or more 3 0.7%
I Bond 333 20.5% I Bond 1091 54.7%
IEM 415 25.6% IEM 321 16.1%
Less than $10,000 33 8.0% Less than $10,000 2 0.6%
$10,000 - $39,999 202 48.7% $10,000 - $39,999 151 47.0%
$40,000 or more 180 43.4% $40,000 - $99,999 168 52.3%
No Bond 10 0.6% No Bond 155 7.8%
Nolle 3 0.2% Nolle 0 0.0%
Total 1621 100.0% Total 1994 100.0%

*Average D Bond: $95,815 *Average D Bond: $23,927

*Median D Bond: $75,000 *Median D Bond: $8,500
 5

Judge Comparisons

CBC Outcome by Judge Before 9/18/17

64%

57% 57% 56%

46%

28%
25% 26% 25% 24%
22%
18% 18%
16%
12%

1.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.7% 1.1%

Bourgeois
Judge A JudgeBrown
B Chiampas
Judge C Panarese
Judge D JudgeSullivan
E

CBC Outcome by Judge After 8/18/17

69%
65%

51% 52%
47%
44%

34%
27%
25%
22%
18% 20%
15% 17%
14% 14%
11% 10% 10% 11%
7% 6%
5% 4%

Atcherson
Judge F ClancyG
Judge Lyke H
Judge Marubio
Judge I MillerJ
Judge Navarro
Judge K
 6

A Closer Look
Before 9/18/17
8/29/16-12/20/16 Judge A Judge B Judge C Judge D Judge E
D Bond 64.3% 56.6% 57.4% 28.3% 56.4%
Less than $10,000 0.0% 1.1% 27.4% 0.0% 5.7%
$10,000 - $39,999 5.5% 50.2% 36.3% 4.0% 41.5%
$40,000 - $99,999 28.6% 36.6% 16.4% 46.7% 34.0%
$100,000 - $249,999 28.6% 5.8% 15.1% 27.3% 8.1%
$250,000 or more 37.3% 6.3% 4.8% 22.0% 10.7%
IEM 22.4% 18.0% 25.5% 46.0% 18.1%
Less than $10,000 0.0% 0.0% 24.6% 0.0% 2.0%
$10,000 - $39,999 13.6% 96.9% 47.7% 23.2% 82.3%
$40,000 or more 86.4% 3.1% 27.7% 76.8% 15.7%
I Bond 12.2% 25.4% 15.9% 24.6% 24.5%
No Bond 1.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.7% 1.1%
C Bond 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0%
Nolle 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

After 9/18/17
9/18/17-11/28/17 Judge F Judge G Judge H Judge I Judge J Judge K
D Bond 11.0% 33.6% 25.3% 27.1% 10.4% 22.1%
Less than $10,000 75.0% 14.3% 45.9% 85.3% 65.1% 28.8%
$10,000 - $39,999 9.4% 27.5% 33.9% 11.6% 27.9% 48.1%
$40,000 - $99,999 12.5% 40.7% 11.9% 3.2% 4.7% 21.2%
$100,000 - $249,999 3.1% 17.6% 7.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
$250,000 or more 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 2.3% 1.9%
IEM 15.1% 18.5% 16.7% 14.0% 14.2% 20.0%
Less than $10,000 0.0% 2.0% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
$10,000 - $39,999 27.3% 62.0% 61.1% 12.2% 55.9% 53.2%
$40,000 or more 72.7% 36.0% 37.5% 87.8% 44.1% 46.8%
I Bond 68.8% 43.5% 46.9% 51.4% 64.6% 51.9%
No Bond 5.1% 4.4% 10.0% 7.4% 10.8% 6.0%
C Bond 0.0% 0.0% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
 7

Charges
Defendants lead charge shown in each observational period. Before 9/18/17, Retail Theft was a top five charge. After
9/18/17, it did not crack the top ten.

Before 9/18/17 After 9/18/17

Charges n % Charge n %
PCS 445 27.5% PCS 601 30.1%
Felony Gun Charge 261 16.1% Felony Gun Charge 322 16.1%
Mfg/Del/Possession with Intent 203 12.5% Mfg/Del/Possession with Intent 196 9.8%
*Retail Theft 123 7.6% Felony Cannabis 136 6.8%
Driving Suspended/Revoked License 97 6.0% Residential/ Burglary 88 4.4%
Felony Cannabis 76 4.7% Agg/Robbery/Firearm 85 4.3%
Agg/Robbery/Firearm 60 3.7% Driving Suspended/Revoked License 75 3.8%
Residential/ Burglary 55 3.4% Agg Battery Peace Officer 68 3.4%
Agg DUI 53 3.3% Agg DUI 65 3.3%
Theft 44 2.7% Theft 46 2.3%
Agg Battery 34 2.1% 44 2.2%
*Retail Theft
Agg Battery Peace Officer 32 2.0%
Agg Battery 41 2.1%
Fraud/Forgery 18 1.1%
Fraud/Forgery 35 1.8%
Escape EM 17 1.0%
Possession of Stolen Motor Vehicle 16 1.0% Escape EM 30 1.5%
Agg Assault 14 0.9% Possession of Stolen Motor Vehicle 27 1.4%
Criminal Damage to Property 13 0.8% Agg Domestic Battery 26 1.3%
Fleeing/Eluding 12 0.7% Armed Habitual Criminal 21 1.1%
Agg Domestic Battery 8 0.5% Agg Fleeing/Eluding 13 0.7%
Vehicular Hijacking 7 0.4% Vehicular Hijacking 10 0.5%
Attempted Murder 5 0.3% Armed Violence 9 0.5%
Battery 5 0.3% Criminal Damage to Property 9 0.5%
Arson 4 0.2% Att Murder 8 0.4%
Armed Habitual Criminal 4 0.2% Home Invasion 6 0.3%
Home Invasion 4 0.2% Violation Order of Protection 4 0.2%
False Report 3 0.2% Agg Battery Child/Disabled 3 0.2%
Agg Battery Child 2 0.1% Child Abduction 3 0.2%
Armed Robbery 1 0.1% Agg Kidnaping 2 0.1%
Possession of Explosives 1 0.1% Aggravated Cruelty to Animals 2 0.1%
Unauthorized Video Taping 1 0.1% Arson 2 0.1%
Mob Action 1 0.1% Continuing Fin Crim Entrprs 2 0.1%
Criminal Trespass to Vehicle 1 0.1%
Criminal Trespass 2 0.1%
Drinking in the Public Way 1 0.1%
False report of offense 2 0.1%
Total 1621 100.0%
Intimidation 2 0.1%
Att Defeat Screen Test 1 0.1%
Bring/Poss Contra Penal Inst 1 0.1%
Communicate Witness 1 0.1%
ID Theft 1 0.1%
*Before 9/18/17: Retail Theft was the 4th most False Personation Peace Officer 1 0.1%
frequent charge Obstruction/ Destroy Evidence 1 0.1%
Public Indecency 1 0.1%
*After 9/18/17: Retail Theft was the 11th most Resist/ Obstruct Peace Officer 1 0.1%
frequent charge Stalking 1 0.1%
Total 1994 100.0%
 8

PSA
Beginning July 1, 2015, the Chief Judge’s Office’s Pretrial Service Division implemented a comprehensive risk
assessment instrument known as the Public Safety Assessment (PSA). The PSA is a Kentucky-based model designed to
better evaluate a defendant’s threat to the community and likelihood to appear at their next court date. The PSA is broken
down into three scales: New Criminal Activity (NCA), Failure to Appear (FTA), and New Violence Criminal Activity
(NVCA). In bond court the NCA and FTA scales are designated as a number from 1 to 6. Higher numbers are used to
indicate higher likelihoods that the defendant will be rearrested or fail to appear for court dates. The NVCA scale is
designated as a “violence flag.” The NVCA flag is used to notify judges that a defendant has a high likelihood of
committing a new violent crime. A defendant either has a violence flag or does not.

The combined NCA and FTA scores result in a defendant’s recommended monitoring level which can be found using the
Decision Making Framework (DMF) Matrix (see next page). There are 7 total recommendations, in order of increased
levels of monitoring:

1) Release with No Conditions

2) Release with PM- court date reminders
3) Release with PSL I- once a month face-to-face meetings.
4) Release with PSL II- biweekly face-to-face meetings.
5) Release with PSL III- biweekly face-to-face meetings and biweekly phone call check-ins.
6) Sheriff’s EM
7) Maximum conditions

DMF pretrial monitoring levels with their respective conditions are laid out in the chart below:

DMF- Monitoring Level and Contacts

Risk Level (by Monitoring Level Phone Contact Face-to-Face Conditions of
Color) Contact Monitoring
Dark Green Release w/ No Conditions None None No
Light Green Release w/PM None None No
Yellow PSL I None 1x Monthly Yes
Amber PSL II None 1x Biweekly Yes
Light Orange PSL III 1x Biweekly 1x Biweekly Yes
Dark Orange Sheriff’s EM
Red Maximum Conditions
 9

The charge a defendant is facing can have an effect on the DMF. These charges include: Domestic Battery, Stalking,
Violation of an Order of Protection, Criminal Sexual Abuse, Kidnapping, and Arson. If a defendant is arrested for any of
these charges then the defendant will be “bumped up” a level on the DMF matrix. For example: If a defendant scored a 4
on the NCA scale and a 4 on FTA scale then, on the DMF matrix, this would land them on a monitoring level of PSL III.
If a person was arrested for Domestic Battery then this would “bump up” the defendant’s monitoring level to Release with
Sheriff’s EM. There are certain charges that are automatic Maximum Conditions Recommended including but not limited
to certain types of Aggravated Battery, Vehicular Hijacking, Armed/Agg Robbery, and Att/Murder.

NCA 1 NCA 2 NCA 3 NCA 4 NCA 5 NCA 6

Released with Released with
FTA 1
No Conditions No Conditions
Released with Release with
FTA 2 Release with PM PSL I PSL II
No Conditions PM
PSL III with Maximum
FTA 3 Release with PM PSL I PSL II
Curfew Conditions
Maximum
FTA 4 PSL I PSL I PSL III Sheriffs's EM
Conditions
Maximum Maximum
FTA 5 PSL I PSL III Sheriffs's EM
Conditions Conditions
Maximum Maximum Maximum
FTA 6
Conditions Conditions Conditions

All information collected on the PSA and DMF was gathered on November 13, 2015 during a PSA Refresher Training
Opportunity Go-To-Meeting sponsored by Dr. Marie VanNostrand of Luminosity.

For more info visit: http://www.arnoldfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/PSA-Risk-Factors-and-Formula.pdf

For the remainder of this report levels “Release on PM”, “PSL I”, “PSL II”, “PSL III” and “PSL with curfew under” are
grouped together under the category of Pretrial Supervision.
 10

DMF in Practice
Side by comparisons of the OCJ’s Pretrial department’s recommendations on all defendants during the periods observed.

Before 9/18/17 After 9/18/17

Pretrial Recommendation N % Pretrial Recommendation n %
No Conditions 177 10.9% No Conditions 307 15.4%
Pretrial Supervision 895 55.2% Pretrial Supervision 1048 52.6%
EM 83 5.1% EM 120 6.0%
Max 206 12.7% Max 291 14.6%
N/A* 260 16.0% N/A* 228 11.4%
Total 1621 100.0% Total 1994 100.0%

*N/A- There were instances when Pretrial Service was unable to conduct an interview for certain defendants. Instances
included: defendants admitted to the hospital, defendants in CCDOC custody prior to Bond Court, defendants without
any prior history, or if an interpreter was not present. Some scores were unavailable to court attendees because the
Judge did not ask for the PSA numbers.

Followed DMF?
Before 9/18/17 Judges followed the DMF in 34.0% of bond court decisions. After 9/18/17 Judges followed the
DMF in 71.2% of bond court decisions. It is important to note the DMF recommendations do not directly
correspond with the current bond court system. Below is an attempt to match the DMF recommendation with
the administered bond type and amount.

Before 9/18/17 After 9/18/17

Accordance n % Accordance n %
Yes 463 34.0% Yes 1257 71.2%
No, harsher 831 61.1% No, harsher 301 17.0%
No, more lenient 67 4.9% No, more lenient 208 11.8%
Total* 1361 100.0% Total* 1766 100.0%
*N/A not included

Grid
Pretrial Recommendation
Follow DMF? No Condition Pretrial Supervision EM Max
Yes I-Bond, Bond defendant I-Bond, Bond defendant EM Bond defendant cannot
can afford can afford afford, No Bond
No, harsher Bond defendant cannot Bond defendant cannot Bond defendant cannot
afford, EM, No Bond afford, EM, No Bond afford, No Bond ---
No, more lenient I-Bond, Bond defendant I-Bond, EM, Bond
--- --- can afford defendant can afford

Bond defendant can afford- If the defendant explicitly stated an amount they could post.

Bond defendant cannot afford- If the defendant explicitly stated an amount they could not post or the defendant never stated a bond
amount they could post.
 11

Followed DMF by Judge

Before 9/18/17
DMF Accordance by Judge
74.9%
65.0%
62.1%
54.9% 56.3%

Bourgeois
Judge A Brown
Judge B Chiampas
Judge C Panarese
Judge D Sullivan
Judge E
Yes No, harsher No, more lenient

8/29/16-12/20/16 Judge A Judge B Judge C Judge D Judge E

Yes 24.0% 32.7% 39.4% 31.3% 36.2%
No, harsher 74.9% 65.0% 54.9% 56.3% 62.1%
No, more lenient 1.2% 2.3% 5.7% 12.5% 1.7%

After 9/18/17
DMF Accordance by Judge
78.2%
75.1%
70.2% 71.6%
63.2% 63.6%

Atcherson
Judge F Clancy
Judge G Lyke H
Judge Marubio
Judge I MillerJ
Judge NavarroK
Judge
Yes No, harsher No, more lenient

9/18/17-11/28/17 Judge F Judge G Judge H Judge I Judge J Judge K

Yes 75.1% 63.2% 70.2% 71.6% 78.2% 63.6%
No, harsher 7.1% 29.4% 20.7% 15.7% 8.9% 25.7%
No, more lenient 17.8% 7.4% 9.2% 12.8% 12.9% 10.7%
 12

Time
After 9/18/17, defendants spent more than twice as long in front of the bench as they did before 9/18/17.

Before 9/18/17 After 9/18/17

Judge Ave Time (sec) Judge Ave Time (sec)

All 80.0 ALL 181.5
Judge G 197.1
Judge E 107.4
Judge I 196.9
Judge C 104.8
Judge J 191.2
Judge D 77.8
Judge K 183.8
Judge B 70.9
Judge F 178.8
Judge A 65.5
Judge H 156.7

PD vs. Private
The time disparity between private attorneys and Public Defenders has diminished. Before 9/18/17, private attorneys spent
2.8 times longer in front of the bench than PDs. After 9/18/17, private attorneys spent 1.3 time longer in front of the
bench the PDs.

Before 9/18/17 After 9/18/17

Private Attorney Private Attorney

Public Defender Public Defender

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 50 100 150 200 250

Seconds Seconds

Representation Avg time (sec) Representation Avg time (sec)

Public Defender 69.4 Public Defender 179.8
Private Attorney 191.8 Private Attorney 237.1
 13

Felony gun charge comparisons

The following are side by side examples of defendants charged with felony gun charges from before and after 9/18/17.
For information on Pretrial’s scores and recommendations please see pages 8 and 9.

Before 9/18/17 After 9/18/17

Defendant D.S. Age 31 Defendant M.D. Age 24

NCA 6 NCA 6
FTA 4 FTA 5
NVCA No NVCA No
Pretrial Rec. Max Pretrial Rec. Max
Charge UUW Felon Charge UUW Felon
Disclose Disclose $500
Bond 400,000 D Bond 5,000 D

Defendant E.M. Age 20 Defendant A.S. Age 20

NCA 2 NCA 2
FTA 1 FTA 1
NVCA No NVCA No
Pretrial Rec. No conditions Pretrial Rec. No conditions
Charge AGG Discharge Charge AGG Discharge
Disclose $500 Disclose $1,000
Bond 250,000 D Bond 10,000 D

Defendant F.P. Age 26 Defendant M.F. Age 24

NCA 1 NCA 1
FTA 1 FTA 1
NVCA No NVCA No
Pretrial Rec. No conditions Pretrial Rec. No conditions
Charge AGG UUW Charge AGG UUW
Disclose Disclose
Bond 40,000 D Bond I-Bond

Defendant A.H. Age 19 Defendant T.R. Age 28

NCA 2 NCA 2
FTA 1 FTA 1
NVCA No NVCA No
Pretrial Rec. No conditions Pretrial Rec. No conditions
Charge AGG Discharge Charge AGG Discharge
Disclose Disclose $5,000
Bond 500,000 D Bond 50,000 D
 14

Before 9/18/17 After 9/18/17

Defendant L.C. Age 38 Defendant K.C. Age 18
NCA 3 NCA 3
FTA 2 FTA 2
NVCA No NVCA No
Pretrial Rec. Pretrial Supervision Pretrial Rec. Pretrial Supervision
Charge UUW Felon Charge AGG UUW
Disclose Disclose $500
Bond 500,000 D Bond 2,000 D

Defendant D.D. Age 20 Defendant R.G Age 36

NCA 4 NCA 6
FTA 2 FTA 5
NVCA Yes NVCA Yes
Pretrial Rec. Max Pretrial Rec. Max
Charge AGG UUW Charge UUW Felon
Disclose Disclose $1,500
Bond 350,000 Bond No Bond

Defendant C.M. Age 28 Defendant E.J. Age 46

NCA 6 NCA 4
FTA 4 FTA 4
NVCA Yes NVCA Yes
Pretrial Rec. Max Pretrial Rec. Max
Charge UUW Felon Charge UUW Felon
Disclose Disclose $0
Bond 500,000 D Bond I-Bond

Defendant J.M. Age 27 Defendant J.M Age 29

NCA 1 NCA 1
FTA 1 FTA 1
NVCA No NVCA No
Pretrial Rec. No conditions Pretrial Rec. No conditions
Charge AGG UUW Charge AGG UUW
Disclose Disclose
Bond 100,000 D Bond I-Bond

Defendant D.G. Age 29 Defendant A.H. Age 56

NCA 4 NCA 4
FTA 3 FTA 3
NVCA No NVCA No
Pretrial Rec. Pretrial Supervision Pretrial Rec. Pretrial Supervision
Charge UUW Felon Charge UUW Felon
Disclose Disclose
Bond 150,000 D Bond No Bond
 15

Felony Penalties in Illinois

 Class X- between 6 and 30 years IDOC and/or fine up to $25,000
 Class 1- between 4 and 15 years IDOC and/or fine up to $25,000
 Class 2- between 3 and 7 years IDOC and/or fine up to $25,000
 Class 3- between 2 and 5 years IDOC and/or fine up to $25,000
 Class 4- between 1 and 3 years IDOC and/or fine up to $25,000