Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Accounting Thematic
Indian Accounting Thematic
Along with everything else, accounting quality in India seems to have Our three sets of accounting checks*
stagnated at a low level. Our analysis of the last four years of
Revenue recognition checks
consolidated accounts of the BSE500 (excl Financials) points to
Expense manipulation checks
continuing divergence in accounting quality within the stock market.
Cash pilferage checks
The silver lining is that the relationship between good accounting and
positive investment performance seems to be tightening over time. Source: Company. *For each category of
accounting checks, we calculate a range of
As one would expect, accounting quality varies by sector (see table on the right) accounting ratios – see pg 3 for details.
with the usual suspects like Realty, Conglomerates and Construction bringing
up the rear. More importantly, the change in a sector’s accounting scores over Sector by sector accounting scores
time seem to have a bearing on investment returns (see exhibit 6 on page 5). Blended Accounting
Sector
Ironically, this puts Realty companies in a nice position as, inspite of being the Score (FY08-11)
bottom of the class on a blended basis over FY08-11, Realty is one of the most Logistics 201
improved sectors when it comes to change in accounting score across FY08-11. Cement 198
Media companies are also in a similar position. Fertilizers 192
Similarly, accounting scores vary across market cap buckets (see table below right Telecom 190
& Section 3). Whilst the “top 50” stocks have the best blended scores across FY08- Shipping 185
11, the improvement in accounting scores over FY08-11 has been the greatest in Auto Anc 181
the midcap bucket (bucket 3: the 100 stocks with mkt cap between $0.2-0.6bn). Chemicals 180
Most importantly, from an investors’ perspective accounting scores have a clear Infrastructure 178
impact on stock level returns. Whilst this is not apparent when you look at the Utilities 175
BSE500 as a whole, when you drill down to the sector level the relationship is Industrials 174
clear (see Exhibits below and Section 5). In fact, if you drill down further into a FMCG 173
specific market cap segment in a sector (see Exhibit on the right), the link between Oil & Gas 172
good accounting and positive investment performance becomes even clearer.
Media 171
Exhibit 1: IT companies - Impact of Exhibit 2: Large cap IT companies – Textiles 170
accounting on share prices Impact of accounting on share prices IT 169
40% y = 0.1215x + 0.0032 25% y = 1.0662x + 0.1322 Capital Goods 167
30% R2 = 0.0083 R2 = 0.901 TCS
20% Pharma 166
Price performance (FY08-11)
20%
10% 15% HCL Metals 165
Wipro Tech
0%
10%
Infosys Auto 163
-10%
CAGR
CAGR
-20% 5%
Agro 163
-30% Oracle Consumer Durable 158
0%
-40%
Retail 153
-50% -5%
-40% -20% 0% 20% 40% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% Mining 152
Avg change in accounting score (FY08-11) Avg change in accounting score (FY08-11) Miscellaneous 152
Source: Ambit Capital research Source: Ambit Capital research. Construction 148
Conglomerate 141
Whilst our analysis uses on an array of accounting ratios to detect financial
Realty 136
manipulation by listed companies, the most powerful ratios are:
Average 169
CFO/EBITDA or the “cash conversion ratio” fluctuates widely across time and Source: Ambit Capital research
across companies. It appears that whenever promoters want to boost profits
(and do a QIP), working capital deteriorates and cash conversion suffers. Avg. accounting score by mcap bucket
BSE500 Bucket Avg. accounting score
“Other Loans & Advances as a % of Networth” seems to be the most
widely favoured route when it comes to pulling cash out of the company (to Top 50 cos 175
fund whatever else has caught the promoters’ fancy outside the listed entity). Next 100 174
“Provisioning for doubtful debtors as a % of gross debtors” also Next 100 162
fluctuates significantly across time and widely across sectors and companies. A
Next 85 cos 161
low score on this metric combined with poor cash conversion is arguably the
Source: Ambit Capital research
defining signature of a dodgy set of accounts.
Ambit Capital and / or its affiliates do and seek to do business including investment banking with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that Ambit
Capital may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.
Please refer to disclaimer section on the last page for further important disclaimer.
Accounting Thematic
CONTENTS
Methodology ..............................................................................3
Appendix 1...............................................................................15
Appendix 2...............................................................................17
1: Methodology
Using consolidated financials for FY08, FY09, FY10 and FY11 we have calculated
seven financial ratios for the BSE500 companies (excluding Financial Services
companies).
Our dataset comprises 335 companies since we are excluding:
75 Financial Services companies (on the grounds that the forensic accounting
ratios used below do not do justice to these companies) and
90 companies on the grounds that they have not been listed for the duration
of the four-year period that our study focuses on or have gone through
corporate actions like change in year end, de-merger etc.
Appendix 1 gives a full list of the excluded companies under these three headings.
Appendix 2 gives the names of the companies included in the study along with
their sectoral classification.
The accounting ratios that we are focusing on include:
Exhibit 3: Defining the three broad categories of accounting checks (this is not an
exhaustive list of the ratios used)
Category Ratios
Revenue recognition checks CFO/EBITDA
Provision for doubtful debts as a % of gross debtors, contingent
Expense manipulation checks
liabilities as a % of net worth
Miscellaneous expenses as a % of revenues and other loans
Cash pilferage checks
and advances as a % of net worth
Source: Ambit Capital research
Then for each of the four years between FY08-11 we calculate an accounting score
for each company based on the above ratios. The best company gets a score of
335 (as there are 335 companies in the list) and the worst a score of 1 i.e. the
score drops by 1 point for every company as we go down the accounting quality
spectrum.
Occasionally, in exceptional circumstances, we also assign a ‘0’ score if the
company reports an inexplicably bad ratio. For example, if the company reports
negative CFO and negative EBITDA, we assign a ‘0’ score.
Note that whilst calculating scores we ascribe equal weightings to each of the
ratios since we do not want to make the method any more judgmental than what
it already is.
Once the scores for each year between FY08-11 are calculated, we take the
average accounting score across the four years to calculate the blended
accounting score across FY08-11.
All our financial data are sourced from CapitaLine and our share price data, from
Bloomberg
Exhibit 5: “Share prices vs Blended accounting scores Exhibit 6: “Share prices vs Change in accounting scores
(FY08-11)” for all the sectors in the market (FY08-11)” for all the sectors in the market
Share price performance (FY08-
R2 = 0.0038 R2 = 0.0258
40% 40%
30% 30%
11)
20% 20%
10% 10%
0% 0%
130 150 170 190 210 -5% 0% 5% 10%
-10%
-10%
-20%
-20%
Blended Accounting Score (FY08-11) Avg annual chg in acctng score (FY08-11)
Source: Company, Ambit Capital research Source: Company, Ambit Capital research
Realty companies can spring a share price surprise going forward given
their substantial share price underperformance (15% over FY08-11) and the
significant improvement in the accounting score (10% improvement over FY08-
11).
Media companies could surprise on the positive side given the 28%
improvement in this sector’s accounting score over the FY08-11 (the highest
amidst peers) and share price underperformance relative to the Sensex.
On the other hand Consumer Durables and FMCG may disappoint given
these sectors’ huge share price outperformance relative to the Sensex (77%
and 33% respectively) coupled with only modest improvements in their
accounting scores (5% and 0% respectively).
Exhibit 8 looks at the experience (from an accounting perspective) of the five
sectors whose scores have improved the most over FY08-11 – Media, Realty,
Agro, Infrastructure and Utilities – and five sectors whose scores have
deteriorated the most (or stagnated) over FY08-11 – Telecom, IT, FMCG, Capital
Goods and Construction.
Exhibit 8: How the five best and worst performing sectors (from an accounting
perspective) have evolved over the past four years
Sectors showing the biggest improvement in accounting quality
Media has shown the most improvement (28% per annum) in its accounting score
Media over the past four years. This improvement has been mainly driven by better cash
generation and modest change in depreciation rate across all the four years.
Realty has also shown improvement (10% per annum) in its accounting score over
the past four years. This improvement has been mainly driven by better cash
Realty
generation, rising provision for doubtful debts, falling other loans as % of networth,
and modest change in depreciation rate across two years (FY10 and FY11).
Agro has also shown improvement (10% per annum) in its accounting score over
the past four years. This improvement has been mainly driven by better cash
generation, modest change in depreciation rate, falling miscellaneous expenses,
Agro
falling contingent liability, rising provision for doubtful debts, falling other loans as
% of networth and lower growth in audit fee relative to revenues across two years
(FY09 and FY10)
Infrastructure has also shown improvement (9% per annum) in its accounting score
over the past four years. This improvement has been mainly driven by better cash
Infrastructure generation, modest change in depreciation rate, falling miscellaneous expenses,
and lower growth in audit fee relative to revenues across two years (FY09 and
FY10)
Utilities has also shown improvement (8% per annum) in its accounting score over
the past four years. This improvement has been mainly driven by better cash
Utilities generation, modest change in depreciation rate, falling miscellaneous expenses,
lower growth in audit fee relative to revenues, falling contingent liability and rising
provisions on doubtful debts across two years (FY10 and FY11)
Sectors showing the biggest deterioration (or smallest improvement) in accounting quality
Telecom is the only sector whose accounting scores fell over FY08-11. This dramatic
deterioration is driven by rising other loans as % of networth, rising miscellaneous
Telecom
expenses, rising contingent liability as % of networth and falling provisions as % of
doubtful debts across two years ((FY08 and FY09).
FMCG’s accounting scores have stagnated over the past four years albeit at an
FMCG above average level (the FY08-11 blended average score for FMCG is 173 vs 169
for the BSE500).
IT’s accounting scores have stagnated over the past four years exactly in-line with
IT the market average level (the FY08-11 blended average score for IT is 169 vs 169
for the BSE500)
Capital Goods’ accounting scores have stagnated over the past four years BELOW
the market average level (the FY08-11 blended average score for Capital Goods is
167 vs 169 for the BSE500). This deterioration is driven by rising other loans as %
Capital Goods
of networth, rising contingent liability as % of networth, falling provisions as % of
doubtful debts and higher growth in audit fees relative to revenues over a period of
three years (FY09, FY10 and FY11).
Construction’s accounting scores have stagnated over the past four years WELL
BELOW the market average level (the FY08-11 blended average score for
Construction is 148 vs 169 for the BSE500). As highlighted in exhibit 7 on the
Construction
previous page, this sector fares very poorly on CFO/EBITDA (cash conversion ratio
of only 22% for this sector vs 61% for the BSE500 as a whole) and on “other loans
and advances” (amounting to 6% of networth vs 2% for BSE500 as a whole)
Source: Company, Ambit Capital research.
When we analyze the correlation between the blended accounting score and share
price performance across sectors, we find that in more than 50% of the sectors in
the BSE500, there is a direct correlation between share price performance and
blended accounting score (i.e. higher the score, higher the share price
performance for that particular sector). This issue (regarding the link between
accounting quality and share prices) is explored further on in this note.
In light of this correlation between accounting scores and share price performance
across sectors, exhibit 8 above becomes particularly relevant as:
Some of the hottest sectors in terms of investment returns over the past two
years – IT, FMCG, etc –have not seen any improvement in their accounting
quality over the past four years.
Some of the hammered sectors in terms of investment returns over the past
two years – Media, Realty, Infrastructure, Utilities, etc – have shown a strong
improvement in accounting quality over the past four years.
Exhibit 11: Changes in Accounting quality over time for the BSE500
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11
Revenue Manipulation
CFO/EBITDA ratio (%) 40% 86% 58% 58%
Expense Manipulation
Contingent liability as a % of networth 9% 10% 15% 13%
Provision for doubtful debtors as a % of gross debtors 3.8% 3.9% 4.1% 3.7%
Cash Pilferage
Misc expenses as % of revenue 2.8% 3.2% 2.5% 2.7%
Other Loans & Advances as % of networth 1.4% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9%
Share price performance 45% -44% 168% 5%
Type of market Bull Bear Bull Bear
Source: Ambit Capital research
Exhibit 12: “Share prices vs Change in accounting Exhibit 13: “Valuation vs Blended accounting scores
scores (FY08-11)” for all stocks in the BSE500 (FY08-11)” for all stocks in the BSE500
150% 91
76
FY11 P/E
100%
61
CAGR
50%
46
0%
31
-50% 16
-100% 1
-50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 0 10 20 30 40
Avg change in accounting score (FY08-11) Blended Accounting Score (FY08-11)
Source: Company, Ambit Capital research Source: Company, Ambit Capital research
If you look at the BSE500 as a whole (see the Exhibits above) there does not
appear to be any link between accounting scores and share price returns.
However, when you drill down to the level of the sector and compare stocks within
a sector, a clear positive relationship emerges (the comparison becomes more
“apples vs apples” thereby allowing the power of accounting to drive share prices).
to come through between share price performance and change in accounting
score. Interestingly, we also find that companies with higher blended accounting
score command higher valuations (see exhibit 15).
Exhibit 14: Share prices vs Change in accounting scores Exhibit 15: “Valuations vs Blended accounting scores
(FY08-11)” for the Mining sector (FY08-11)” for the Mining sector
40%
35%
FY11 P/E
30% 11
25%
CAGR
20%
15%
10%
5%
0% 1
-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 0 1 2 3 4 5
Avg change in accounting score (FY08-11) Blended Accounting Score (FY08-11)
Source: Company, Ambit Capital research Source: Company, Ambit Capital research
In fact if you take this a step further and you look at a specific size bucket within a
sector, the relationship becomes even more striking – see the Exhibits below for
large cap IT stocks.
Therefore, the more you isolate factors such as sector and the size of a company,
the more clearly you can see the role of accounting quality in driving share prices.
Exhibit 16: “Share prices vs Change in accounting Exhibit 17: “Share prices vs Change in accounting
scores (FY08-11)” for IT scores (FY08-11)” IT (Large caps)
CAGR
-20% 5%
-30% Oracle
0%
-40%
-50% -5%
-40% -20% 0% 20% 40% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10%
Avg change in accounting score (FY08-11) Avg change in accounting score (FY08-11)
Source: Company, Ambit Capital research Source: Company, Ambit Capital research
That being said, since sectors which have a large number of companies in the
BSE500 are more likely to have a greater presence in the bottom 50, a better
way to gauge the accounting quality of a sector is to look at the ‘probability of
a company in that sector being the BSE500‘. This probability is calculated by
dividing the number of entrants (from the sector) in the bottom 50 by the
number of companies from that sector in the BSE500. From this perspective,
the two worst placed sectors are Realty (50% probability of a company in this
sector being ranked amongst “worst 50” companies in India) and
Conglomerate (40% probability).
The weak accounting performance of Realty stocks (worst in the sector) is due
to weak scores on the CFO/EBITDA metric. This is likely to be because of the
following reasons:
90% of Indian companies in the Realty sector follow the ’percentage of
completion’ method of recognizing revenues — a method which can be
manipulated by overstating the percentage of completion.
These companies also offer long credit periods. If we analyze the individual
ratios of companies we find that Realty companies seem to have poor cash
generation due to high debtor days.
There are other aspects of corporate governance distinct from accounting (eg.
promoter integrity in general and insider trading in particular), which drive
investment returns. These aspects of corporate governance are even more
opaque that accounting.
In response to these challenges facing our clients, we offer two types of services:
For clients who are willing to share their portfolio composition with us, we can
share with them the blended accounting scores of these companies. For
companies receiving weak accounting scores, we can highlight the underlying
drivers of such scores. {Note: We can do this only for the BSE500 (ex-
Financials) universe that we have analysed.}
Whilst in our ongoing published research we will focus on the broader aspects
of corporate governance, for clients who are interested in a deeper dive into
such issues, we provide a bespoke research service. Our bespoke research at
the stock-specific level gives investors a comprehensive analysis of the
promoter’s integrity, board composition and competence and insider trading
patterns.
Clients wishing to avail of these services should contact our sales team or the
author of this note.
Appendix 1
Exhibit 20: List of companies excluded from our accounting thematic
SN Companies Reason for Exclusion SN Companies Reason for Exclusion
Data not there for FY11 as annual report is
1 3M India Year end change in between the periods 84 JSW ISPAT
not ready
2 A2Z Maintenance Not listed for entire tenure 85 Jyothy Lab. Not listed for entire tenure
3 Abbott India Year end change in between the periods 86 Karnataka Bank BFSI
4 Adhunik Metal Not listed for entire tenure 87 Kemrock Inds. Year end change in between the periods
5 Allahabad Bank BFSI 88 KF Airlines Not listed for entire tenure
6 Allcargo Logist. Not listed for entire tenure 89 Kiri Indus. Not listed for entire tenure
June ending company, balance sheet not yet
7 Amtek Auto 90 K S Oils Year end change in between the periods
ready
June ending company, balance sheet not yet
8 Amtek India 91 Kotak Mah. Bank BFSI
ready
Cash flow for FY10 is not available. Also
9 Andhra Bank BFSI 92 Kirloskar Oil
company has done demergining exercise
10 Aptech Year end change in between the periods 93 KSK Energy Ven. Not listed for entire tenure
11 Aqua Logistics Not listed for entire tenure 94 L&T Fin.Holdings BFSI
12 ARSS Infra Not listed for entire tenure 95 LIC Housing Fin. BFSI
13 Axis Bank BFSI 96 M & M Financial BFSI
14 Bajaj Auto Demerger 97 Magma Fincorp BFSI
15 Bajaj Corp Not listed for entire tenure 98 Mahindra Holiday Not listed for entire tenure
16 Bajaj Fin. BFSI 99 Manappuram Fin. BFSI
17 Bajaj Finserv BFSI 100 Max India BFSI
18 Bajaj Holdings BFSI 101 Mindtree Not listed for entire tenure
19 Balrampur Chini Year end change in between the periods 102 MOIL Not listed for entire tenure
20 Bank of Baroda BFSI 103 Motil.Oswal.Fin. BFSI
21 Bank of India BFSI 104 MphasiS Year end change in between the periods
22 Bank of Maha BFSI 105 Muthoot Finance BFSI
Data not there for FY11 as annual report is
23 Bayer Crop Sci. Year end change in between the periods 106 MVL
not ready
24 BGR Energy Sys. Not listed for entire tenure 107 Netwrk.18 Media BFSI
25 Blue Circle Ser. BFSI 108 NHPC Ltd Not listed for entire tenure
26 BOC India Year end change in between the periods 109 Oil India Not listed for entire tenure
27 Brigade Enterpr. Not listed for entire tenure 110 Omaxe Not listed for entire tenure
28 C Mahendra Exp Not listed for entire tenure 111 OnMobile Global Not listed for entire tenure
29 Cairn India Not listed for entire tenure 112 Orbit Corpn. Not listed for entire tenure
30 Canara Bank BFSI 113 Oriental Bank BFSI
31 Central Bank BFSI 114 Parsvnath Devl. Not listed for entire tenure
32 City Union Bank BFSI 115 Persistent Sys Not listed for entire tenure
33 Clariant Chemica Year end change in between the periods 116 Pfizer Year end change in between the periods
34 Coal India Not listed for entire tenure 117 Pipavav Defence Not listed for entire tenure
35 Corporation Bank BFSI 118 Power Fin.Corpn. BFSI
They changed the year end from 30th June
36 Crisil BFSI 119 Prism Cement
2008 to 31st March 2009
Data not there for FY11 as annual report is
37 D B Corp Not listed for entire tenure 120 Prraneta Inds.
not ready
38 D B Realty Not listed for entire tenure 121 PTC India Fin BFSI
39 Dalmia Bhar.Ent. Corporate action in 2010 122 Pun. & Sind Bank BFSI
40 Den Networks Not listed for entire tenure 123 Punjab Natl.Bank BFSI
Rain
41 Dena Bank BFSI 124 Year end change in between the periods
Commodities
42 Dev.Credit Bank BFSI 125 Reliance Capital BFSI
43 Dewan Housing BFSI 126 Reliance Media Year end change in between the periods
44 Dhanlaxmi Bank BFSI 127 Reliance Power Not listed for entire tenure
45 eClerx Services Not listed for entire tenure 128 Religare Enterp. BFSI
46 Edelweiss.Fin. BFSI 129 Rural Elec.Corp. BFSI
Appendix 2
Exhibit 21: Name of the companies included in our accounting thematic
SN Companies Ambit Sector SN Companies Ambit Sector SN Companies Ambit Sector
1 Ent.Network Media 113 Chambal Fert. Fertilizers 225 Mah. Seamless Metals
2 Dr Reddy's Labs Pharma 114 Mundra Port Infrastructure 226 Akzo Nobel Chemicals
3 CPCL Oil & Gas 115 Hind.Zinc Metals 227 Ashok Leyland Auto
4 Aditya Bir. Nuv. Conglomerate 116 Rallis India Agro 228 HPCL Oil & Gas
5 Raymond Textiles 117 Grasim Inds Conglomerate 229 Kirl. Brothers Capital Goods
6 Moser Baer (I) IT 118 BHEL Capital Goods 230 Jai Balaji Inds. Metals
7 Jindal Stain. Metals 119 Tata Coffee FMCG 231 AIA Engg. Industrials
8 Finolex Inds. Chemicals 120 Zydus Wellness FMCG 232 Essar Ports Infrastructure
9 Finolex Cables Industrials 121 Jindal Poly Film Miscellaneous 233 HEG Capital Goods
10 Panacea Biotec Pharma 122 JSW Energy Utilities 234 Areva T&D Capital Goods
11 Rajesh Exports Retail 123 Balmer Lawrie Miscellaneous 235 Rel. Comm. Telecom
12 Shoppers St. Retail 124 Container Corpn. Logistics 236 Walchan. Inds. Capital Goods
13 Rel. Indl. Infra Infrastructure 125 Geodesic IT 237 Elecon Engg.Co Capital Goods
14 Noida Tollbridg. Infrastructure 126 Timken India Auto Anc 238 Tulip Telecom IT
15 Hexaware Tech. IT 127 ABB Capital Goods 239 Gammon India Construction
16 Alstom Projects Capital Goods 128 Tata Chemicals Chemicals 240 Piramal Health Pharma
17 CESC Utilities 129 NMDC Mining 241 Dredging Corpn. Shipping
18 H T Media Media 130 DLF Realty 242 K E C Intl. Capital Goods
19 Bharat Electron Industrials 131 Birla Corpn. Cement 243 Gulf Oil Corpn. Chemicals
20 GMR Infra. Infrastructure 132 HCL Technologies IT 244 Neyveli Lignite Utilities
21 ONGC Oil & Gas 133 Cummins India Capital Goods 245 Bhushan Steel Metals
22 GNFC Fertilizers 134 Jagran Prakashan Media 246 Hotel Leela Ven. Miscellaneous
23 Usha Martin Metals 135 MRF Auto Anc 247 M&M Auto
24 Tata Comm Telecom 136 Jindal Steel Metals 248 Uflex Miscellaneous
25 MRPL Oil & Gas 137 Bharat Bijlee Capital Goods 249 Adani Enterp. Conglomerate
26 Engineers India Construction 138 Ambuja Cem. Cement 250 Aurobindo Pharma Pharma
27 Tech Mahindra IT 139 Biocon Pharma 251 Monnet Ispat Metals
28 Jubilant Food. Retail 140 Guj Fluorochem Chemicals 252 Blue Star Miscellaneous
29 V I P Inds. Consumer Durable 141 Deepak Fert. Fertilizers 253 Sadbhav Engg. Construction
30 GSFC Fertilizers 142 Bosch Auto Anc 254 Peninsula Land Realty
31 TTK Prestige Consumer Durable 143 Amara Raja Batt. Auto Anc 255 Electrost.Cast. Industrials
32 Titan Inds. Retail 144 AP Paper Miscellaneous 256 Hind.Copper Metals
33 D C Holdings Media 145 Dishman Pharma. Pharma 257 Himadri Chemical Chemicals
34 JSW Steel Metals 146 Uttam Galva Metals 258 Kalpataru Power Capital Goods
35 3i Infotech IT 147 Rolta India IT 259 Jyoti Structures Capital Goods
36 Castrol India Chemicals 148 Novartis India Pharma 260 Orchid Chemicals Pharma
37 Havells India Industrials 149 Elgi Equipment Capital Goods 261 Ranbaxy Labs. Pharma
38 Thermax Capital Goods 150 Tata Elxsi IT 262 Ingersoll-Rand Capital Goods
39 Nestle India FMCG 151 Phoenix Mills Realty 263 Opto Circuits Miscellaneous
40 Fag Bearings Auto Anc 152 Sterlite Inds. Metals 264 HCL Infosystems IT
41 RCF Fertilizers 153 Oberoi Realty Realty 265 Madhucon Proj. Construction
42 Bharti Airtel Telecom 154 Everest Kanto Industrials 266 Sintex Inds. Industrials
43 Heidelberg Cem. Cement 155 Mcleod Russel Agro 267 Tata Global FMCG
44 Torrent Pharma. Pharma 156 NIIT Tech. IT 268 JP Associates Conglomerate
45 Natl. Aluminium Metals 157 Arvind Ltd Textiles 269 Jet Airways Miscellaneous
46 Whirlpool India Consumer Durable 158 Coromandel Inter Fertilizers 270 Alok Inds. Textiles
47 ACC Cement 159 Infosys IT 271 Vardhman Textile Textiles
48 EIH Miscellaneous 160 Monsanto India Agro 272 Vakrangee Soft. IT
49 Polaris Finan. IT 161 Unichem Labs. Pharma 273 Escorts Auto
50 Century Textiles Conglomerate 162 Tata Power Co. Utilities 274 McNally Bharat Capital Goods
51 Aban Offshore Shipping 163 Infotech Enterp. IT 275 Glodyne Techno. IT
52 Hero Motocorp Auto 164 Sun Pharma.Inds. Pharma 276 Zuari Inds. Fertilizers
53 Tata Steel Metals 165 Emami FMCG 277 Radico Khaitan FMCG
54 Hind.Oil Explor. Oil & Gas 166 BASF India Chemicals 278 Unitech Realty
55 Indraprastha Gas Utilities 167 Glaxosmit Pharma Pharma 279 Guj NRE Coke Mining
56 GMDC Mining 168 Lak. Mach. Works Industrials 280 Simplex Infra Construction
Research
Sell <5%
Disclaimer
This report or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent ot Ambit Capital. AMBIT Capital Research is disseminated and available primarily
electronically, and, in some cases, in printed form.