Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BY
SEPTEMBER, 2015
i
DEVELOPMENT AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A SOLAR DRYER WITH
OPTIMIZED CHIMNEY HEIGHT AND THERMAL PROPERTIES
BY
M.Sc/ENG/1899/2011-2012
SEPTEMBER, 2015
ii
DECLARATION
I declare that this dissertation titled “Development and Performance Evaluation of a Solar Dryer
with Optimized Chimney Height and Thermal Properties” has been carried out by me in the
Department of Mechanical Engineering. The information derived from the literature has been
duly acknowledged in the text and a list of references provided. No part of this dissertation was
previously presented for another degree at this or any other Institution.
iii
CERTIFICATION
by Kasim Hussain, AHMAD meets the regulations governing the award of Master Degree in
Mechanical Engineering of Ahmadu Bello University, and is approved for its contribution to
__________________________ ___________________
Dr. F. O. Anafi Date
__________________________ ____________________
Dr. D. M. Kulla Date
Member, Supervisory Committee
_________________________ _____________________
____________________________ _____________________
Prof. Kabir Bala Date
Dean, School of Postgraduate Studies.
iv
DEDICATION
With immense gratitude to God, I dedicate this dissertation to my family members and the
community of solar energy researchers.
v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I must start by thanking Allah the Almighty, for granting me good health, strength,
focus and tenacity to remain steadfast in the pursuit of this degree. I owe a very big debt of
gratitude to my parents and remain eternally grateful and prayerful to them.
To my supervisors, Dr. F.O Anafi and Dr. D.M Kulla, I appreciate your support and the time you
gave to read my work and your contributions that made this research meaningful. I say thank you
very much.
My warm gratitude also goes to the entire lecturers of the Department of Mechanical
Engineering for their candid support and to some of them, who took their personal time to read
and suggest some corrections to be made. Also to the management and entire staffs of
National Space Research and Development Agency. To this end, I remain exceptionally thankful
to you all.
My heartfelt gratitude also goes to the entire friends and course mates of mine, whom I always
struggle with, in the pursuit of my studies. At this juncture, Special mention should be made to
my beloved wife to be, Hafsat Isma’eel Khalid. Also to my friends and colleagues, Abubakar
Aliu, Ahmed Ibrahim, Engr Kaisan Usman, Engr Ali Danladi, Hamisu Dandajeh, Musa
Abubakar, Maryam Abdulkareem, Abubakar Ciroma, Owolabi Babatope, Mariya Akilu, Awwal
Nasiru Danamana, Muyideen Balogun, Ahmad Abbas, Moh’d Shuaibu, Muhammed Baba
Abdullahi, Sayyadi Sanda, Iorpenda Msuega Jnr among others. Also special thank goes to the
management team of Barhama Café.
vi
ABSTRACT
Three identical solar dryers with an optimum chimney height and varied thermal properties were
developed, tested under the same conditions and their relative performance evaluation was
carried out. Dryer-A has plastic chimney, Dryer-B has blackened steel chimney and Dryer-C has
blackened steel chimney covered with transparent glazing. Comparatively, dryer C exhibits the
lowest collector exit temperatures but with the highest chimney temperatures at all instances
compared to dryer A and B also obey similar pattern. The moisture loss in dryer C is also
slightly faster than that of dryers A and B which were faster than the direct open sun drying.
Drying rates of 1.84 g/min, 1.91 g/min, 1.96 g/min and 1.69 g/min, total drying period of 18 hrs,
17 hrs, 16 hrs and 22 hrs, drying efficiencies of 26.8 %, 27.8 %, 28.6 % and 24.8 % for dryer A,
B, C and direct open sun drying respectively were achieved to an equilibrium moisture content of
8 % for drying tomato. A drying period of 18 %, 23 % and 27 % was saved for dryer A, B and C
respectively compared to the direct open sun drying. Also, drying rates of 1.21g/min, 1.21g/min,
1.41 g/min and 1.17 g/min, drying periods of 14 hrs, 14 hrs, 12 hrs and 15 hrs, and drying
efficiencies of 21.1 %, 21.1 %, 22.2 %, and 19.9 % were obtained for dryer A, B, C and the
direct open sun drying respectively to an equilibrium moisture content of 16 % for the red
pepper. Engineering Equation Solver (EES) was used to evaluate the chimney densities, air flow
velocities and the buoyant pressure head in the systems. Maximum buoyant pressure head was
evaluated (0.4019, 0.4019 and 0.4442 N/m2) and chimney air flow velocity (0.2047, 0.2047 and
0.2158 m/s) for the dryers (A, B and C) at average chimney temperatures (48, 48 and 50 o C
respectively). The costs of manufacture are ₦14380, ₦14730 and ₦16330 for dryer A, B and C
respectively.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page…………………………………………………………………………..…………..i
Declaration……………………………………………………………………………....…….ii
Certification……………………………………………………………………………..…….iii
Dedication…………………………………………………………………………..…………iv
Acknowledgment…………………………………………………………………...………….v
Abstract…………………………………………………………………………..……………vi.
Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………………vii
List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………………..xi
List of Tables………………………………………………………………..………………….xiii
List of Plates………………………………………………………………………….…………xv
List of Appendices………………………………………………………………….………….xvi
Nomenclatures………………………………………………………………..……………….xvii
1.1 Background………………………………………………………………………………..1
viii
I.4 Aim and Objectives……………………………………………………………..………..4
2.8.1 Transmission…………………………………………………………………….……….21
ix
2.8.2 Absorption………………………………………………………………………..……21
2.8.3 Reflection…………………………………………………………………………..….22
3.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….23
3.4 Materials…………………………………………………………………………………30
3.8.2 Procedure………………………………………………………………………….……39
x
3.9 Modelling…………………………………………………………………………….…..41
5.1 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….55
5.2 Recommendations………………………………………………………………………56
REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………….57
APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………………..61
xi
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 4.2: Variation of Average Collector Exit and Ambient Temperatures with Time…….…44
Figure 4.3: Variation of Average Chimney and Ambient Temperatures with Time ……………44
Figure 4.7: Variation of Average Collector Exit Temperatures with Time ……………………..47
xii
Figure 4.9: Drying Period against Moisture Loss ………………………………………………48
Figure 4.10: Average Drying Rates for Drying of Red Pepper …………………………...…….48
Figure 4.12: Variation of the differential pressure head with time (tomato drying) …………..50
Figure 4.13: Variation of the chimney air flow velocity with time (tomato drying) …………...50
Figure 4.14: Variation of the differential pressure head with time (red pepper) ………………51
Figure 4.15: Variation of the chimney air flow with time (red pepper) ……………………….51
xiii
LIST OF TABLES
Table A2: Reading from Dryers A, B and C for Drying of Tomato ………………………….61
Table A3: Moisture Loss from Dryer A, B, C and Open Sun Drying (OSD)…………………...62
Table A4: Reading from Dryers A, B and C for Drying of Tomato ……………………………62
Table A5: Moisture Loss from Dryer A, B, C and Open Sun Drying (OSD) …………………..63
Table A6: Reading from Dryers A, B and C for Drying of Tomato …………………………….63
Table A7: Moisture Loss from Dryer A, B, C and Open Sun Drying (OSD) ……………..……64
Table A8: Drying Rates and Efficiency for Drying Of Tomato …………………………….….64
Table A9: Reading from Dryers A, B and C for Drying of Red Pepper………………….…….65
Table A10: Moisture Loss from Dryer A, B, C and Open Sun Drying (OSD) ………….….….65
Table A11: Reading from Dryers A, B and C for Drying of Red Pepper ………………………66
Table A12: Moisture Loss from Dryer A, B, C and Open Sun Drying (OSD) …………………66
Table A13: Drying Rates and Efficiency for Drying of Red Pepper ……………………………67
xiv
Table A14: Chimney Performance for Drying of Tomato ……………………………………67
xv
LIST OF PLATES
Plate 9: Solarimeter……………………………………………………………………………...74
xvi
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX B: Sample Calculation for Mass Loss, Moisture Loss, Drying Rates and Drying
Efficiencies ……………………………………………………………….……………………68
Appendix E: EES Codes for Evaluation of Air Flow Velocity and Buoyant Pressure Head in the
Solar Chimney Dryers …………………………………………………………………….……77
xvii
NOMENCLATURES
n Number of day
xviii
Qconv Rate of convective losses from the absorber, W
Qloss Rate of heat loss from the collector absorber to the surrounding, W
r Reflectivity
t Time in seconds, s
Ta Ambient temperature,0C
v Velocity, ms-1
Va Volume of air, m3
x Thickness, m
α Absorptivity
τ Transmissivity
xix
αc Solar absorptance of the collector absorber plate surface,
αw Water activity
ηc Instantaneous efficiency, %
ηd Drying efficiency, %
xx