Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ithihas
Kaleidoscope of Indian civilization
August 2008 ascendancy and control over the forces of nature, liberation was too small a goal
July 2008 for them. In course of time (around 10th century A.D.) the literature of pure
June 2008 Shavism ceased to be called Tantra and Tantra proper became more Shaktic in
May 2008 character9.
April 2008
March 2008
Literature of Vaishnava Tantras
February 2008
The Vaishnava Tantras are represented by the Pancaratra Agamas and
Vaikhanasa Agamas which were originally voluminous in form but unfortunately a
considerable part of them has now been lost. The Vaishnava Agamas said to be
108 in number seem to be developments of the Bhagavata and Pancharatra and
the Sattvata schools which are mentioned in the Mahabharatha. The differentiation
into schools seems to have originally depended on the specific mantra, which was
the shibboleth of each school. Thus it appears that the Bhagavatas adopted the 12
lettered mantra and Pancharatras the 8 lettered one. The fundamental ideas and
practices of the Bhagavatas have been adopted by the Ramanuja, Madhava and
the later schools of bhakti. The 108 Agamas are all called Pancharatra Agamas10.
According to traditions the total number of Shaiva Tantras is 28 which include ten
Shaivagamas or Shaiva Tantras and 18 Raudragamas. While the Shaivagamas
propagate dualistic philosophy the Raudagamas propagate monistic cum dualistic
philosophy. The names of these Agamas differ in different texts. Apart from the
above texts there is a group of 64 Bhairava Tantras which preach purely monistic
Shaiva philosophy14. Some of the important works belonging to the Kashmir
school of Shaivism are Abhinavagupta’s Tantraloka, Tantrasara,
Pratyabhijnavimarshini and Pratyabhijnakarika; Sivasutra, Malinivijaya,
Vijnanabhairava, Rudrayamala, Svayambhuva, etc15.
Tantric Denominations
The Tantra worshippers are divided into various sects and sub sects based on
deities worshipped and the ritualistic procedure followed. The Shaktisangama
Tantra refers to the sects of Vaishnavas, Shaivas, Ganapatyas, Svayambhuvas,
Candras, Pashupatas, Cinas, Jainas, Kalamukhas and Vaidikas. But judged by the
number of followers they have we have three major sects, namely Shaiva
(worshippers of Shiva), Shakta (worshippers of Shakti or divine mother) and
Vaishnava (worshipper of Vishnu) and two minor sects, namely Ganapatyas
(worshippers of Ganesha) and Souras (worshippers of Surya the sun god). These
sects are once again subdivided into various sub-sects20.
According to Lalan Prasad Singh the Vaishnava, Shaiva and Shakta are the
metaphysical schools of Tantra; Avidya, Upavidya and Vidya are the esoteric
division of Tantra and Dakshinacara, Vamachara and Madhyamacara the
psychological schools of Tantra21.
In the view of Kamalakar Mishra there are several traditions and sub traditions of
Tantra in India, some of which have become extinct and some still living.
Accordingly the living traditions are classified under three major denominations
namely Shaiva-Shakta Tantra, Buddhist Tantra and Vaishnava Tantra. All the sub
trend of Tantrism can be placed under one or the other denomination. For example
the Natha tradition of Gorakhanatha and the Aghora tradition of Kinarama can be
regarded as branches of Shaiva Shakta Tantra. Similarly the Sahajiya cult of
Bengal which might have originated from the Buddhist Sahajayana and later on
taken Vaishnava form can be safely classified as Vaishnava Tantra. The Baul
tradition of eastern India seems to be a combination of Buddhist Tantra, Vaishnava
Tantra and Islamic Sufism. The Kapalika tradition which flourished in the medieval
period is now virtually extinct is an off shoot of Buddhist Tantra with a mixture of
Shaiva-Shakta Tantra. The cults of Shaiva-Shakta Tantra are divided into two
lineages, the Girnari and Newari. Girnar in Gujarat is the seat of Lord Dattatreya
and he is regarded as the original leader of Shaiva-Shakta Tantra. The followers of
Aghora tradition owe their allegiance to Dattatreya and are called Girnaris. Newar
is the sub Himalayan region chiefly Nepal. The followers of Natha tradition are
mainly Newari22.
Tantric Buddhism
enlightenment24. Some of the important Buddhist tantric works are Advaya Siddi,
Arya Manjusri Mulakalpa, Sambhara Tantra, Guhya Siddi, Hevajra Tantra,
Kalacakra Tantra, Mahakala Tantra, Sadhana Mala, etc.25
The Shaiva schools are so intimately allied to the Shakta schools that the literature
and doctrines of one are quoted as authoritative by the other. The chief
characteristic of the Shaiva School is that Shiva is the prominent being and
especially in the later developments of these schools, Shakti is almost negligible
factor of the cosmos26.
The worshippers of Shaiva are referred under four groups namely Shaivas, the
Pashupatas, the Karunikasiddhantins and the Kapalikas. The name
Kathakasiddhantins and Kalamukhas are referred in place of Karunikasiddhantins
in other sources. The Viraagama refers to four schools of Shaivas as Samaya
Shaiva, Purva Shaiva, Mishra Shaiva and Suddha Shaiva. Some Puranas refer to
Shaiva sects such as Vama, Pashupata, Soma, Langala, Bhairava, Kapala and
Nakula. They were considered as un-Vedic. Gunaratna refers to a number of sub
sects like Bharata, Bhakta, Laingika, etc. Other famous Shaiva schools are the
followers of Siddhantaagamas and the Lingayats or the Virashaivas in south
India27.
The two important Vaishnava schools are the Pancharatra and the Vaikhanasa.
The former is considered as sathvika and superior to Vaikhanasa which is
considered as tamasika30. The Pancharatra School is more liberal in its outlook
and practice and tantric practices have exerted a very deep influence on it. The
Vaikhanasa School on accounts of its pure Vedic links perhaps arouse earlier than
the Pancharatra school and naturally tantric mantras (and yantras) have no role to
play in Vaikhanasa31.
There are three principal schools of Shakta Tantrism namely the Samaya, the
Mishra and the Kaula. The Samaya school is concerned with internal worship or
meditation. It has nothing to do with external worship or rituals including muttering
of mantras, homa and purashcarana. It lays stress on mental performance of the
rites which is very difficult and can be known only from the preceptor. Among
Samayin are two groups, samanya or general and vishista or special32. The
Mishras perform all nitya karmas and worship Devi. The Kaula school is one of the
most powerful Shakta schools which occupies a unique position among the left
handed Shakta tradition with a history of 1300 years. It was popular in all parts of
the country and directly and indirectly influenced the religio-philosophical thoughts
of all Shaiva-Shakta schools. According to Kularnava Tantra– The Shaivas are
superior to the Vedic, the left handed and right handed Shaktas are superior to the
Shaivas, the Kaulas are superior to both left and right handed and there is none
which surpasses the Kaulas33. The Kaulas are pure monists who postulate one
Supreme Reality which they name as the Supreme Samvit34.
A number of sub schools exist among the Kaulas and the Kaularatnodyota list six
schools namely- Ananda, Avali, Prabhu, Yaugika, Atika and Pada. The
Kaulajnananirnaya a Tantrik test ascribed to Matsyendranath mention seven
distinct schools of Kaula worshippers like Padottistha Kaula, Maha Kaula, Mula
Kaula, Yogini Kaula, Vahni Kaula, Vrishnottha Kaula and Siddha Kaula. Jayaratha
in his commentary on the Tantraloka mention four Kaula schools like Maha Kaula,
Kaula, Akaula and Kula Kaula35. There is also mention of Kaula sub sects like
Purva Kaulas, Uttara Kaulas and Kapalikas. The Digambaras are stated to be a
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2018/01/ 4/19
26.02.2018 January | 2018 | Ithihas
sub sect of the Kapalikas while the Ksapanakas a sub sect of the Digambaras36.
Another important Shakta school is the Parananda or Paramananda school which
is similar to the Samayins in some respects though it is characterized by certain
peculiarities. It taboos Nyasas and killing of living beings. Other Shakta schools are
the Gaudas, the Kashmira and the Kerala schools37. Though different texts refer to
a variety of Kaula schools established by different Kaula teachers in different
periods of time each of which is characterized by a particular mode of spiritual
discipline, they fail to mention their distinguishing traits. Hence it is not possible for
us now to delineate their individual nature38.
Shakti Pitas
Dashamahavidyas
The Tantrik texts speak of ten Vidyas or cultic goddesses whose worship is
commended for health, happiness, wealth and welfare here and liberation from
phenomenal bondage hereafter. The ten divinities are classified into-
1. The extraordinary vidyas (maha vidyas) where the divinities are Kali and
Tara
2. The ordinary vidyas (vidyas) with divinities like Shodashi or Tripurasundari,
Bhuvaneshvari, Chinnamasta, Bhairavi and Dhumavati
3. Adept vidyas (siddha vidyas) where divinities like Bagalamukhi, Matangi and
Kamala are worshipped.
The practice of extraordinary vidyas is filled with great risks as the devotee is
supposed to exercise great rigour, austerity, persistence and detachment while
worshipping the divinities. So also is the case of adept vidyas which involve rituals
of a kind that the common man would find extremely ardous and hazardous. The
ordinary vidyas are suitable for ordinary aspirants and are considered safe. Each of
these Vidyas has a characteristic form and particular dhyana, mantra, kavacha and
other details of tantric ritual46.
The gods of Mahavidyas are in fact the manifestations of Shakti or the Great
Mother in the process of creation, preservation and destruction of the universe47.
The primal (adya) vidya is Kali who is the bestower of direct liberation while
goddess Tara is the bestower of knowledge. The third goddess Shodashi is known
for her benevolence. Goddess Bhuvaneshwari is conceived of as the protectress of
the world while Bhairavi as the goddess who relieves her worshipper from all types
of distress. Chinnamasta bestows on her worshippers anything they want and
Dhumati is invoked for the purpose of destroying enemies. Goddess Vagala,
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2018/01/ 5/19
26.02.2018 January | 2018 | Ithihas
Matangi and Kamala are goddess of tamas quality and invoked especially in
connection with satkarma and allied purpose48.
Texts that dwell in detail on the Mahavidyas are the Tantrasara, Shakta Pramoda,
Shaktisamgama–tantra, etc49. The lists or depictions of the Mahavidya almost
always include Kali, Tara, Chinnamasta, Bagalamukhi, Tripurasundari and
Dhumavati, but the others are sometimes excluded. At times well known
goddesses such as Durga, Annapurna and Kamakhya may be included in the list
and even obscure goddesses such as Vashali, Bala and Pratyangiras are
included50.
Both literary and iconographic materials give the general impression that the ten
Mahavidyas are different forms of an overarching, transcendent female reality, who
is usually referred to simply as the Mahadevi (great goddess)51. An underlying
assumption of many Shakta texts is that the highest reality is the Great Goddess
and this infinitely great being manifests herself in a wide variety of forms. Many
myths in Shakta literature describe a goddess or the goddess as producing other
goddesses from her own body. In such cases she often announces that she
assumes different forms at different times to maintain cosmic stability, to bless a
particular devotee or out of a sense of sport or playfulness. There is evidence that
the ten avataras (incarnations) of Vishnu are the model for the ten Mahavidyas as
expressions of the Mahadevi that is the Mahadevi represents at least to some
extent a Shakta version of the Vaishnava idea52.
Regarding the origin of Mahavidya as a group the first version is that the
Mahavidyas are different forms of Goddess Sati, the second version is that they
are form of Parvathi, the third version is that they arise from goddess Kali, herself
one of the Mahavidya and the fourth version is that they are forms of goddess
Durga and the fifth version is that they are said to arise from goddess Shataksi who
is identified with Shakambari and Durga53.
The Sri Vidya cult is of considerable antiquity and in its origin was a folk cult with a
beginning before the formation of the Vedic corpus. But in due course the folk
elements and sophisticated Vedic ideas were fused together and the cult assumed
its present form. This cult is prevalent all over India and there are regional
variations in the practical details of the tradition54.
Vidya usually means knowledge, learning, discipline, system of thought. But in the
tantric contest it has an extended meaning and it signifies a female divinity or her
power. The mother goddess Durga is described as stationed in all being in the form
of Vidya. Adepts of Sri Vidya cult recite a 15 lettered mantra known as
panchadasakshari. By adding the secret syllable ‘shrim’ it becomes shodashi (16
lettered). Shodashi literally means ‘the damsel of sixteen years’ and her form is
identified with deities like Lalitha, Rajarajeshvari, Sundari, Kameshvari and Bala.
According to texts this vidya is called Shodashi as the manta of this vidya consists
of 16 seed syllables. The verbal expression of this vidya is the mantra panchadashi
or shodashi and the visual expression is the yantra, Sri Chakra. The chief
instrument through which the mother goddess is propitiated and the knowledge
concerning her as put into practice is Sri Chakra yantra55.
Sri Chakra
The Sri Chakra is the most celebrated and potent yantra mentioned in the Tantra
sastra. It is famous as the eternal abode of Lalitha, the mother of grace. Sri Chakra
is called the king of Chakras for it contains and sustains all other Chakras in the
same way as the Divine Mother, the abiding deity in the Sri Chakra is the source
and sustenance of all the gods and goddesses. The Tantra says that the worship of
any deity can be conducted in Sri Chakra as this is the foundation, basis and
continent of all the other Chakras56. The mere presence of Sri Chakra is believed
to confer on the faithful material and spiritual benefits. There are several temples in
south India like Kanchipuram, Chidambaram, Sringeri, Kollur, etc. where the
worship of Sri Chakra assumes importance57.
Worship through Sri Chakra is more abstract than worship through pratima, image
and leads one to the direct perception of the divine form and that is why so much
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2018/01/ 6/19
26.02.2018 January | 2018 | Ithihas
There are nine Chakras in the Sri Chakra, proceeding from the outermost to the
innermost they are Trailokya Mohana, Sarvasaparipuraka, Sarvasankshobhana,
Sarvasaubhagyadayaka, Sarvarthasadhaka, Sarvarakshakara, Sarvarogahara,
Sarvasiddhiprada and Sarvanandamaya chakras. Each chakra has a colour of its
own, a presiding deity, Chakreshvari and a particular class of Yoginis belonging to
it. Each chakra has its own mudra devata59.
There are two ways to worship the Sri Chakra, external and internal. In external
worship one worship the Sri Chakra by adoring it with leaves of bilva, lotuses or
tulsi, flowers, waves lamps in front of it, etc., do the japa of Sri Vidya (panchadashi
or shodashi mantra) and recites the thousand names of Lalitha
(Lalithasahasranama). In inner worship all these activities are imagined. The
followers of Samaya marga install (imagine) the Sri Chakra in the adhara chakra or
basic centres in their subtle bodies and conduct the worship of the goddess
there60.
It is said that Sri Shankaracharya was initiated in the tantric cult of Sri Vidya at
Varanasi and the principal poetic work of this cult Saundaryalahari is ascribed to
his authorship; so also tantric works like Prapanchasara and Chintamani–Stava.
But S.K.Ramachandra Rao says that the authorship of the above works are
wrongly ascribed to Shankaracharya and he was entirely ignorant of Sri Chakra. It
is probable that Vidyaranya who is regarded as a teacher in Shankaracharya’s line
was proficient in the Sri Chakra cult. Associated with the founding of Vijayanagara
Empire and with two pontificates, Sringeri and Kanchipuram he was a great
spiritual, social and political force in south India. It may be due to his influence that
the Sri Vidya cult spread in this part of the country61.
According to Lalan Prasad Singh, Sri is the consort of Vishnu and Sri Chakra is the
abode of Vishnu, hence Sri Vidya cult belongs to the Vaishnava Tantra and not
Shakta Tantra. Also according to him the Saundaryalahari is a devotional hymn in
praise of Sri Chakra and is the canonical literature of Tantric Vaishnavism62.
The word Yogini has several meanings like a female devotee, sorceress or witch,
fairy, attendants of Durga, a name of Durga and the female counterpart of a Yogi63.
In some texts the term Yogini is used to denote minor goddesses who are
described either as companions or attendants of the Goddess64. The names of the
64 Yoginis contained in the Puranic list suggests that in certain traditions the
Yoginis were regarded as varying aspects of the great Goddess who through those
Yoginis manifested the totality of her presence65. An important tradition derives the
64 Yoginis in groups of eight from the Ashta Matrakas or eight mothers. From very
early times we know that Sapta Matrakas or seven mothers (namely Brahmi,
Maheshvari, Kaumari, Vaishnavi, Varahi, Aindri and Narasimhi) as an independent
group of goddesses later expanded to eight, nine or sixteen were popularly
worshipped all over India66. The main goal in the worship of Yoginis was to obtain
a wide variety of occult powers67. These powers were achieved through a series of
rites and practices known collectively as Mahayaga68.
The origins of the worship of Yoginis can be traced to the worship of village
goddesses called grama devatas. In the villages of India each grama devata
presides over the welfare of her village. These village goddesses seem to have
been gradually transformed and consolidated into potent numerical grouping of 64
acquiring thereby a totally different character. It was tantrism that elevated these
local deities and gave them a new form and vigour as a group of goddesses who
could bestow magical powers on their worshippers. The philosophy and rituals of
these deities were brought together under the heading Tantra and thus given
legitimacy in later Hinduism73. Even today in the daily worship of Devi Kamakhya
in the temple of Kamakhya in Assam, the names of the 64 Yoginis are recited74.
To be continued
Bibliography
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2018/01/ 9/19
26.02.2018 January | 2018 | Ithihas
Advertisements
Report this ad
Report this ad
Eastern India was the birth place of Tantric sadhana and from there it travelled to
other parts of India and Nepal. According to Jayaratha (12th century A.D.) a
commentator of Tantraloka of Abhinavagupta, Kaula Tantras are said to have
issued from Kamarupa in Assam2. Some eminent scholars including Winternitz
think that Bengal was the cradle of Tantra based on the following facts-
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2018/01/ 10/19
26.02.2018 January | 2018 | Ithihas
Meaning of Tantra
Contents of Tantra
The word Aagama or Aagamana means inductive experience. Aagama also means
that which come, that is the knowledge which arises from within the self when
spiritual impurity is removed. Aagama also means that which come by tradition.
The two words Tantra and Aagama taken together mean a fully and logically
worked out discipline or body (tantra) of knowledge that has come down by
tradition and that is originally based on inductive experience (aagama) of the
seers10 Aagama is that wisdom spoken by Lord Shiva to Parvathi. All available
Aagamas contain a fourfold content-
The word Aagama and Tantra are often used as synonymous terms and there is
also no distinction in respect of their essential teachings. The Aagama have been
divided into Sat Aagamah or orthodox which accept the authority of the Vedas and
Asat Aagamah or heterodox which do not accept the authority of the Vedas12. The
Aagamic scriptures as a whole have branched out in three main currents, the
Shaiva, the Shakta and the Vaishnava sastras or scriptures13. Usually the sastras
of the Shaivas is referred as Aagama, that of Shaktas as Tantra and that of the
Vaishnavas as Samhita14.
Thought the terms Tantra and Aagama are used synonymously the scope of Tantra
is wider than that of Aagama as the former deals with as many as 25 subjects
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2018/01/ 11/19
26.02.2018 January | 2018 | Ithihas
whereas the Aagamas covers only seven of the said 25 subjects15 According to
Varahi Tantra the Aagamas contain seven topics that includes origin and
dissolution of the world, modes of worship of deities and modes of spiritual
disciplines, purificatory rites and practice of magical rites called satkarmas namely
marana- vanquishing enemies, ucatana- ruining of adversary, vashikarana-
subjugation of enemies, stambhana- paralyzing enemies or inimical forces,
vidveshana- causing hostility in enemies and svastyayana- rites for obtaining
peace and prosperity16.
It is difficult to determine the exact time when the word tantra came to be employed
in the sense in which it is used in the so called tantra literature nor is it possible to
decide what people first introduced its principles and practices or where they first
arouse17. Dr. Bhattacharya says that the Buddhist were the first to introduce the
tantras in their religion and that the Hindus borrowed them from the Buddhist in
later times. But there is hardly any evidence of any Buddhist tantrik work before
650 A.D. except perhaps the Guhyasamajatantra and Manjushrimulakalpa, both of
which contain late elements. There is evidence of the prevalence of tantra and
shakta worship in India long before the 7th century A.D.18 Hence the question
whether Buddhist tantra were prior to the Hindu tantras or vice versa is difficult to
decide. It appears probable that both arose nearly about the same time19. The
Amarakosha composed around 500 A.D. is silent on the Tantras and so also the
Chinese pilgrims who visited India during 400-700 A.D. make no reference to
Tantra literature. It seems safe to assume that the Tantras did not take a define
shape before seventh century though many mantras and hymns which they include
may be of very much earlier date. The existing works on Tantra and commentaries
written on them belong to the period 7th century to 18th century A.D.20
At the same time orthodox scholars believe that the Tantras may have existed from
the time of the Vedas or may be even older than the Vedas. Of course the
language of the Tantric texts presently available is the post Vedic Sanskrit
systematized by Panini, which might suggest that Tantras are post Vedic. But
almost all the traditions in ancient India existed first in oral form and were handed
down from guru to disciple or from generation to generation. Hence it is reasonable
to believe that the Tantra philosophy existed in oral form from the time of the Vedas
if not earlier and was only written down after the time of the Vedas21
Founder of Tantra
The founder of Tantra is Lord Shiva. He is known as Adi Guru, a great ascetic
(Maha Yogi) and a great Tantrika (Maha Kaula). He attained occult power through
Tantra sadhana22. Lord Shiva was skilled in chemistry and medicine and was
known for his yogic powers. He resided in the vicinity of Himalaya Mountain and
his religious outlook was non-Vedic. He was a champion of the poor, diseased and
the tyrannized. He made no distinction between the high and low. He had
numerous followers all over India who were designated as Asuras, Rakshasas and
Danavas by the Devas (Manavas). These followers of Shiva constantly clashed
with Devas and caused hindrance to the sacrifices of the Brahmanas. Sati the
daughter of Daksha a king who ruled a part of Himalayan territory fell in love with
Shiva and married him though opposed by her father. Once when Sati heard that
her father was performing a sacrifice, though uninvited she wished to attend it. At
the venue of the ceremony Sati was humiliated by her father who used offensive
words against Shiva. Unable to bear the humiliation Sati swooned never to regain
her senses. When Shiva heard this he was furious and in rage desecrated the
sacrificial ground. All these incidents mentioned in the Puranas are interpreted as a
revolt against the domination of Brahmins and their sacrificial modes of worship.
After this incident there was reconciliation between the followers of Vedic religion
and followers of Shiva and the latter was included one among the Trinity and yoga
prescribed as a method for spiritual advancement. Gradually the popularity of
Tantra increased among all class of people23.
system. Music, art, literature, yoga; were all getting a new life and a new form.
Henceforth every department seems to start with the name of Iswara and his
consort. The goddess becomes markedly prominent in the shape of Durga and
Kali. The old gods Mitra, Varuna, Indra, Aswins were subordinated and gradually
became mythological beings shorn of their divine importance24.
In the old method of worship the fire god is the duta or messenger and offerings
were thrown to the fire were carried to different gods. In the new method Avahan,
Dhyana, Shodashapachara, Dharana, Nyasa and Kshamaprarthana were
introduced. The mythology as disclosed in the Vedas is quite different from the new
mythology of the Tantras and Puranas. The new mythology deals principally with
Shiva, Durga, Kali, etc. and does not deal principally with the Vedic deities.
Goddesses became very prominent in the shapes of Dasamahavidya; all being
different manifestation of Shakti. In the old method of worship prayers or hymns to
divinity consisted mostly in asking for worldly boons and pardon as also for moral
advancement. The new method of worship consisted of contemplation of divinity
and merging of the smaller individual self into the higher ego (Brahman)25.
Characteristics of Tantra
Tantra Shastra is meant for all classes irrespective of caste, creed, sex and
all could be given spiritual initiation.
Tantra Shastra is primarily a sadhana shastra and it affords to all freedom to
be engaged in spiritual practice according to one’s competence and shows
the practical method which would qualify the spiritual aspirant (sadhaka) to
proceed along the higher path of knowledge; knowledge in terms of
experience as distinguished from intellectual theorizing alone26.
The most significant character of the Tantra is to synthesize all the facts
apparently opposed to each other. Tantra Shastra embraces all the view
points of the Indian mind right from the black magic of the occultist to the
highest peaks of karma, bhakti, upasana and jnana yoga of the rishis, munis,
siddhas and saints27.
The philosophical foundation upon which Hindu Tantrism rest is the Sivadvaita
school of Hinduism which maintains that the Supreme Reality is Shiva himself,
being a Pure Consciousness, which is self-luminous, all pervading, eternal and
absolute. Shiva is endowed with a Shakti (a female principle) which is a part of Him
and eternally coexisting in Him. Their collective name is Param Shiva representing
two aspects of the Absolute, one transcendent and static Shiva and the other
immanent and dynamic, the Shakti28.
The origin and development of the Tantras as a special class of literature and
Tantras as a special mode of sadhana were intimately connected with the rise of
Shaivism and Pancaratra movement31. The Tantra form of sadhana probably came
into special prominence when on the one hand, the elaborate details enjoined by
the Vedic sacrifices taking a long time to be performed could not be accomplished
by the people of feeble attainments and when on the other the Upanishadic
method of acquisition of transcendent knowledge surpassed the intellects and
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2018/01/ 13/19
26.02.2018 January | 2018 | Ithihas
equipment of the common people. The Puranas were at this time preaching the
bhakti cult in order to place before the masses an easy method capable of being
grasped and followed by all. Then the Tantras offered themselves to the people
containing within them the essentials of the Vedic sacrifices and oblations, the
essence of the monotheistic philosophy of the Upanishad, the bhakti cult preached
by the Puranas, the Yoga method propounded by Patanjali and the mantra element
of the Atharva Veda32
Tantra preached the principle of mukti (liberation) through bhukti (enjoyment) and
did not advocate the repression of natural human propensities. It also did not
advocate its adherents to give up eating meat and drinking wine and in the
observance of Tantric rituals there was no caste restriction, all these factors gave
rise to the popularity of Tantras33.
The development of Tantric Hinduism reached its zenith in Bihar, Bengal and
Orissa under the Pala kings who ruled these parts of eastern India from 760-1142
A.D., in Kanyakubja under the Pratihara kings from 800-1019 A.D. and in
Bundelkhand under the Chandella kings from 950- 1203 A.D.34
What was the necessity of Tantra to emerge when there was Veda and many Vedic
based scripture like Dharmasastra and the six philosophical treatises? This was
because the elitist sastras failed to satisfy the aspirations of the common men
particularly the shudras and women. In the post-Vedic scriptures, shudras and
women were marginalized. They were denied the right to perform sacrifices and to
participate in other religious observances. Moreover as life became busier and
living more complicated, people felt the need for easier ways of devotion than the
elaborate rituals. The orthodox Brahmanical scriptures demanded self-mortification
and renunciation as stepping stones to liberation. This stifled the people’s natural
inclination for enjoyment of sex, drinking wine and eating meat, etc. All these
reasons led to the composition of Tantras, which provided easier methods of
devotion without denying the satisfaction of natural human propensities35. As
Tantra was a collective expression of numerous tribal and regional cults36 it could
be termed as an alternative religion of the commoners as against the Vedas which
was the religion of the elitist.
The smrti texts based on the Vedas repudiated the Pancaratra doctrines as they
initiated and admitted within their sect even women and Shudras38 Badarayana in
his Brahma Sutras refutes the Pashupata and the Pancaratra Agamas39. Similarly
the Agamic schools rejected the authority of the Vedas. The Anandabhairava
Tantra declares-‘A wise man should not elect as his authority the words of Vedas
which is full of impurity, produces but scanty and transitory fruits and is limited. He
should instead sustain the authority of the Shaiva scriptures. Abhinavagupta in his
Tantraloka remarks-‘That which according to the Veda is a source of sin leads
according to this doctrine (Tantra) directly to liberation. In fact all the Vedic teaching
is dominated by Maya40. In Mahanirvana Tantra Shiva declares- ‘The fool who
follow other doctrines heedless of mine is as great a sinner as a parricide or the
murderer of a Brahman or of a woman. The Vedic rites and mantras which were
efficacious in the first age have ceased to have power in this age. They are now as
powerless as snakes whose fangs have been drawn and are like dead things41.
The Kularnava says ‘Mukti does not result from the study of the Veda nor by the
study of shastras, it results from correct knowledge alone which is imparted by the
teaching of the guru and which confers mukti42.
The Vedic ritual is propitiatory and sacrificial while the Tantra (Agamic) ritual
consists essentially in devote worship of and personal communion with the
deity.
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2018/01/ 14/19
26.02.2018 January | 2018 | Ithihas
At first the Vedic tradition and the Tantric tradition were almost irreconcilable. Each
camp looked upon the other as antagonistic, perverse and purposeless. If the
Puranas proclaimed that the Tantras were prepared only in order to confound the
wicked the Tantras like Kularnava claimed that a Tantra is like an honourable
house wife while the Veda with its accessories like Puranas and shastras is like a
common harlot. The orthodox view projected mainly by Kumarila (early 6th century)
holds that Tantra was meant for the degenerate, the uneducated, the fallen or the
infirm and that its rituals were fraught with dangers of all sorts. But the Tantrik
enthusiasts held and hold even now that the Vedas being antiquated cannot lead to
much good. There was obviously a struggle for ascendance and each tradition
geared itself up to meet the needs of both the folk and the elite. And in the process
inevitably each modeled itself after the other, assimilated the attractive particulars
of the other and attempted to secure the authority and support of the other. The
Tantrik adherents sought to show that Tantra had Vedic foundation, Vedic sanction
and Vedic authority. The Vedic puritans took over many of the hand gestures
(mudras), spells (mantras) and magic designs (mandalas) the Tantriks employed
together with their method of exposition47.
The reconciliation between the two divergent traditions was partly effected by the
orthodox authorities affiliating the Tantra to the Saubhagya kanda of Atharvaveda
and the Tantrik writers relying heavily on Vedic texts like Taittiriya Aranyaka and
describing their scriptures as continuation of the Upanishadic traditions. The Vedic
rituals adopted numerous Tantrik details and the Tantra abandoned its cruder
ideology in favour of the austere aspiration of the Upanishads48.
Although later authors of Tantric texts and commentators on these texts sought to
base their doctrines and commentaries on the Vedas, Tantra remained a separate
branch of knowledge quite outside the pale of Vedic tradition. This was due to the
fact that in the ideological conflict between the two tradition, the Veda and Tantra,
the latter held its own although many of its theoreticians mostly Brahmins covertly
or openly supported the Vedic tradition and fabricated the Tantra in the Vedic lines.
In spite of all sorts of Brahmanical interpolations, grafting and handling, Tantra
clearly rejects the varna system and patriarchy and in the field of religion, all
external formalities in regard to spiritual quests49.
At Mohenjodaro a seal have been discovered with a figure in yogic posture and
surrounded by animals and is identified with Shiva. Also a number of conical stone,
shell and clay pieces have been found which is identified as a Linga. Similarly a
number of terracotta figurines of a female figure have been found which is
identified with mother goddess50. All these show that Shiva and mother goddess
were worshipped during the time when the urban civilization at Harappa and
Mohenjodaro were flourishing. This implies that Tantra flourished during that period
as Shaivism and Shaktism are the two aspects of Tantra. Shaktism represents the
beginning of Tantra sadhana and Shaivism is the culminating point of the spiritual
march51. The urban civilization which flourished at Harappa is identified with the
Atharavan phase of the Vedic civilization and this has led scholars to believe that
the Atharva Veda as the basis of all the tantras, especially those connected with
the worship of the mother goddess. The Sammohana Tantra asserts that without
the worship of Kali or Tara there can be no practical application of Atharvan charms
and spells52.
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2018/01/ 15/19
26.02.2018 January | 2018 | Ithihas
Among the followers of Vaishnavas and Shaivas were a section of Brahmins who
while believing in the worship of Vishnu and Shiva as a means to attain salvation
also looked upon the Vedas as authorities, attached great importance to
varnashrama dharma and the smrti rules and did not like to give them up. The
Puranic Dharma originated from these classes of people who were also the
authors of the various Puranas58. As the Trantrics preached ideas and practices
which often went against the Brahmanical ones, the early Puranas denounced the
Tantras as Mohana Sastra59 and the Tantra scriptures as inferior and tamasi. They
agreed that Shiva had revealed the Tantras but his reason for doing so was to
delude the apostate and distract him from the true path. In Varaha Purana Rudra
himself denounces the Pashupatas and the other followers of the Shaivagamas as
given to mean and sinful acts and as addicted to meat, wine and women60. In
chapter 15 of Kurma Purana it is said that the great sinners the Pancaratrins were
produced as a result of killing cows in some other birth, that they are absolutely
non-Vedic and that the literature of the Shaktas, Shaivas and the Pancaratras are
for the delusion of mankind61.
But from about the end of eighth century or the beginning of ninth century A.D. the
Puranas began to recognize the Tantras as one of the authorities on religious
matters. Tantric mantras and performance of Nyasas and Mudras were introduced
in diksha (initiation ceremony), consecration of images, performance of
sandhyavandana, and the Yantra as a medium of worship was also recognized.
This recognition must have been effected by the great spread of Tantricism among
the people including even the Buddhist62 The Devi, Devibhagavata and the Kalika
and large portions of Narada Purana are extensively Tantric63
Both Tantras and Puranas are didactic and sectarian. As a rule Tantras contains
less historical and legendary matter and more directions as to ritual. While the
Puranas approve of Vedic rites as well as other, for which they give directions, the
Tantras insist that ceremonies other than theirs prescribed are useless64
Tantras do not believe in caste and creed. Tantric social system runs counter
to the rigid Vedic system of caste and creed. There is no place for a Brahmin
priest in tantric sadhana. That is why Brahmins started a tirade against
tantras and declared the followers of tantras as outcaste65.
Another main cause for the apathy towards Tantra was the baseless Aryan
bias. Earlier scholars equated Tantra with the so called degraded forms of
Hinduism supposed to be the legacies of uncivilized aboriginal cultures. To
these learned western scholars just as the Englishmen came to India with a
civilizing mission, so also in the past aboriginal Indians were civilized by the
Aryans who came from outside. To them whatever is noble and praiseworthy
in Hinduism is found in the so called Aryan tradition that is the Vedic texts
and Brahmanical literature and all the barbarous and degraded aspects
attributed to Tantras are derived from the uncivilized non-Aryans. This idea
was also shared by the learned Indians who belonged mostly if not
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2018/01/ 16/19
26.02.2018 January | 2018 | Ithihas
Contributions of Tantra
Tantra is the oldest and the most scientific religion of the world. It is the first
spiritual faith laying down ethical norms to be strictly observed for the
spiritual enlightenment and integrated development of society68.
Tantras endeavored to provide a common platform for differing and
wrangling sects of Vaishnavas, Shaivas and others by putting forward Devi
as the object of worship for all69.
The Tantra placed women on a footing of equality with men and accorded
them an exalted position. She could play the role of a guru and in certain
tantric rites was worshiped as Shakti70.
The orthodox Brahmanical scriptures by compartmentalization of society into
four castes and by rigorous divisions of the people into higher and lower
classes fostered animosity among them. There was an upsurge for leveling
down this invidious discrimination. Tantra came forward to reduce the rigours
of the caste system and put more premium on merit than the accident of
birth71.
The murder of a woman is regarded as a heinous crime by Tantrists and they
denounced prostitution and burning of widows and allowed remarriage of girl
widows72.
The popularity of Tantra compelled the orthodox Brahmanical sastra to
incorporate Tantra practices. For instance the Tantric concepts of mandala,
mudra, yantra, the mystic bija mantras like hrim, krim, kumara puja, etc.
crept into the traditional works of the Brahmanas. Similarly Buddhism was
also deeply influenced by Tantras73.
Tantra developed a system of medical treatment for diseases affecting men,
women and children. As the human body was considered essential for
Tantric sadhanas, various drugs both herbal and chemical were prescribed
for the preservation of youth and virility and for the treatment of diseases; so
also medicines for rejuvenation and destroying the effects of various kinds of
poisons74.
Art and architecture was also influenced by Tantra. There are many images
of various Tantric deities particularly of Kali in her different forms. Many
temples sculptures particularly of Orissa and south India show an
abundance of tantric motifs. Several temples in south India worship Sri
Chakra, the yantra associated with the Sri Vidya cult. There are also painting
of Kali and other tantric deities as also of mandalas, mudras, yantras and
Kundalini75.
The rational and liberal outlook of Tantras made it popular in foreign
countries like Tibet, Nepal and Cambodia. Thus Tantras played an important
role in the spread of Indian religious concepts abroad76.
The living Hindu religion of today is essentially Tantric. Even a few genuine
Vedic rites that are preserved and are supposed to be derived straight from
the Vedas, i.e. the Sandhya have been modified by the addition of tantric
practices.77 The rituals of the temples based on Agamas have replaced the
Vedic yajnas.78
To be continued
Bibliography
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2018/01/ 17/19
26.02.2018 January | 2018 | Ithihas
1. Victor M. Fic- The Tantras- Its Origin, Theories, Art and Diffusion from India
to Nepal, Tibet, Mongolia, China, Japan and Indonesia, Abhinav
Publications, 2003, pp: 23,24
2. Lalan Prasad Singh- Tantra- Its Mystic and Scientific Basis, Concept
Publishing Company Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, 2010, p.6
3. Sures Chandra Banerji- The Cultural Glory of Ancient India, D.K.Printworld
(P) Ltd, New Delhi, 2000, pp: 112,113
4. N.Bose & Hiralal Haldar- Tantras – Their Philosophy and Occult Secrets,
Firma KLM Private Ltd, Calcutta, 1981,p.20
5. Gaurinath Sastri, A Concise History of Classical Sanskrit Literature, Motilal
Banarsidass Publisher Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, p.47
6. N.N.Battacharyya- History of the Tantric Religion, Manohar, 2005, p.20
7. P.V.Kane –History of Dharmashastra, Vol V, part –II, Bhandarkar Oriental
Research Institute, Poona, 1962, p.1049
8. Ibid, p.1057
9. Prabuddha Bharata, vol-115, no.6, June 2010, p.373
10. Kamalakar Mishra- Kashmir Shaivism– The Central Philosophy of Tantrism,
Sri Satguru Publications, Delhi, 1999, p.36
11. Prabuddha Bharata– cit, pp:372,373
12. Nando Lall Kundu- Constructive Philosophy of India, Vol-II (Tantra),
Published by Nando Lall Kundu, Calcutta, p.24
13. Ibid, p.31
14. Gaurinath Sastri- cit, p.47
15. Manoranjan Basu- Tantras- A General Study, Published by Shrimati Mira
Basu, Calcutta, 1976, p.1
16. Prabuddha Bharata– cit, pp:372,373
17. P.V.Kane- Op.cit, p.1033
18. Ibid, pp:1039,1040
19. Ibid, p.1038
20. Earnest A Payne- The Shaktas: An Introduction and Comparative Study,
Cosmos Publication, New Delhi, 2004, pp:52,53
21. Kamalakar Mishra- cit, p.14
22. Lalan Prasad Singh- cit, p.8
23. N.Bose & Hiralal Haldar- Op.cit, pp:26-29
24. Babu Dhanapati Banerji- The Evolution of Rudra or Mahesha in Hinduism,
QJMS, Vol-X, April 1920, No.3, pp:221,222
25. Ibid
26. Manoranjan Basu- cit, p.25
27. Ramakant Sharma Angiras- Trilogy of Tantra, Natraj Publishing House,
Karnal, Haryana, 1989,p.3
28. Victor M. Fic- cit, p.27
29. Lalan Prasad Singh- cit, p.43
30. S.K.Ramachandra Rao- Tantra Mantra Yantra, The Tantra Psychology, Sri
Satguru Publication, New Delhi, 2008, p.57
31. Studies on the Tantras– Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture, Calcutta,
1989, p.10
32. Subodh Kapoor- Short Introduction to Shakta Philosophy, Cosmo
Publication, New Delhi, 2008, p.68
33. Sures Chandra Banerji- The Cultural Glory of Ancient India, D.K.Printworld
(P) Ltd, New Delhi, 2000, p.121 and P.V.Kane-cit, p.1077
34. Victor M. Fic- cit, p.42
35. S.C.Banerji- A Companion to Tantra, Abhinav Publications, New Delhi, p13
36. S.K.Ramachandra Rao- Tantra Mantra Yantra, The Tantra Psychology, p.19
37. S.Suryanarayana Sastri- The Sivadvaita of Srikantha, University of Madras,
1930, p.1
38. Surendranath Dasgupta- History of Indian Philosophy, vol- III, Cambridge
University Press, 1952, pp: 19,20
39. S.Suryanarayana Sastri- Op.cit, p.1
40. Mark S.G. Dyczkowski- The Canon of the Shaivagama and the Kubjika
Tantras of the Western Kaula Tradition, Motilal Banarasidass, New Delhi,
1989, p.9
41. Earnest A Payne- cit, pp:50,51
42. P.V.Kane- Op.cit, p.1083
43. S.Suryanarayana Sastri- Op.cit, pp:5,7,8
44. Vishwa Nath Drabu- A Study in the Socio Economic Ideas and Institutions of
Kashmir (200 B.C. – A.D.700), Indus Publishing Company, New Delhi, 1990,
p.233
45. Lalan Prasad Singh- cit, p.12
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2018/01/ 18/19
26.02.2018 January | 2018 | Ithihas
Blog at WordPress.com. | .
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2018/01/ 19/19