Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Apparatus
1. 120 or 160 mL serum glass bottle, gas-tight septum and its corresponding screw cap or aluminium
3. 1 mL micropipette.
8. 25 mL crucibles.
1. Deionised water.
2. Sodium acetate stock solution (200 g acetate L-1). Dissolve 69.47 g of sodium acetate anhydrous into
3. Inoculum dilution. Determine the VS concentration of the as-received inoculum and dilute it to reach
1
granules be diluted with treated process effluent after removing debris using centrifugation (10 min
at 2500 g).
5. Determine the VS concentration and the inhibitor concentration of the diluted inoculum, since this is
Procedure
1. Add, by volume addition or weighting, the required amount of chemical needed to reach the desired
concentration of inhibitor.
5. Flush the headspace of the bottle with inert gas (e.g. 99.99% N2, 80/20% N2/CO2, 99.99% He).
6. Seal the bottles with a rubber stopper and fix it with a screw cap or aluminium crimp.
7. Place the serum bottles at the temperature-controlled incubator set at mesophilic conditions.
8. Measure the methane production at approximately 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 days, after the beginning of the
assay. Although the suggested timing of sample events is applicable to most digester samples,
measurement timing can be shortened (0.25, 0.5 and 1 day) for very active samples (e.g. anaerobic
granules) or extended (1, 2 and 3 days) for poorly active samples (e.g. pond samples after
desludging).
9. Plot the accumulated specific methane production in COD-basis (g COD g-1 VSinoculum) in the course
of time. Remember that 350 mL of methane at standard conditions (0 °C, 1 bar) is 1 gram of COD.
2
Table I. Details of some methodologies used to quantify compounds inhibition/toxicity
Pre-treatment co- none 1.5 g L-1 acetate & 0.53 yes 5 (Owen et al., 1979)
Phenolic compounds degassed with N2 0.56 g L-1 acetate & yes 35 (O’Connor and
Na Inoculum centrifugation, 2 g L-1 HAc, 0.5 g L-1 yes 2.5 – 16.5 (Soto et al., 1993)
N-substituted aromatics 3 days exposure to the target 2.5 g COD L-1 of yes 0.25 – 1/3 (Donlon et al.,
Surfactants, pesticides Filtered (1 mm mesh) & 0.3% yeast extract yes 7 days (Madsen and
Warfare compounds 24 h incubation in medium & 1 g COD L-1 of acetate no n.d. (Sklyar and
compound
Warfare compounds Centrifugation & washed with 1 g COD L-1 of acetate yes n.d. (Sklyar and
solution 2000)
Linear alkylbenzene none 0.5 g L-1 acetate or 0.5 g yes 5 - 10 (Gavala and
Oleate Washed with tap water, 24 h 1 g COD L-1 of acetate yes 1/3 (Hwu and Lettinga,
target compound
3
A
Fig. I Cumulative methane production profiles of the experiments carried out to select the best carbon
source and its dose on DSS inoculum. (A) Experiments carried out with acetic acid: (♦) 1, (●) 2, (■) 3, and
(▲) 4 g Ac L-1. (B) Experiments carried out with sodium acetate: (◊) 1, (○) 2, (□) 3, and (∆) 4 g Ac L-1.
4
Fig. II Cumulative methane production profiles of the experiment carried out with 2 g Ac L-1 and three
undiluted inoculums: (♦) digested sludge from a conventional WWTP, (○) digested sludge from a WWTP
equipped with a thermal hydrolysis process, and (×) digested manure from a piggery lagoon.
5
Fig. III Cumulative methane production profiles of the experiments carried out to select the best inoculum
to substrate ratio on DSS inoculum: (♦) 10.5, (○) 5.2, (□) 3.4, (+) 2.5, (×) 1.7, (▲) 1.2, (∆) 0.9, (●) 0.7, and
6
A
7
C
Fig. IV Cumulative methane production profiles of the experiments carried out to select the simplified
sampling scheme on DSS inoculum. (A) Reference. (B) Addition of 5 g NH4+ L-1. (C) Addition of 10 g
NH4+ L-1. (○) 3 sampling events; (□) 2 sampling events at 1.0 and 1.5 days; (∆) 2 sampling events at 0.5