Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mechanical
Science and
Technology
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 23 (2009) 3153~3160
www.springerlink.com/content/1738-494x
DOI 10.1007/s12206-009-1009-9
(Manuscript Received November 14, 2008; Revised June 4, 2009; Accepted August 19, 2009)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract
The autofrettage process enhances the carrying capacity and fatigue lifetime of pressure vessels by increasing their
residual stress. A compound cylinder was introduced in order to increase residual stress. An autofrettaged compound
cylinder can resist a higher pressure than a single cylinder having the same dimension. This residual stress can be
measured through experimental or calculation processes. In this study, residual stress analysis of an autofrettaged com-
pound cylinder was conducted. The elastic-perfectly plastic and strain hardening models were investigated. The resid-
ual stress distribution of the autofrettaged compound cylinder with shrink fit tolerance was predicted. Shrink fit is a
very efficient way to extend compressive residual stress. The compressive residual stress of the strain-hardening model
is smaller than that of the elastic-perfectly plastic model because of the Bauschinger effect. The compressive residual
stress of the strain hardening model decreased by up to 80% overstrain level.
Keywords: Autofrettage process; Compound cylinder; Elastic-perfectly plastic model; Strain hardening model
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2)
⎛ r 2 ⎞⎡ r 2 r ⎛ r r 2 − r 2 ⎞⎤
σr A = σ y ⎜⎜⎜1 − o2 ⎟⎟⎟ ⎢⎢ c 2 + i ⎜⎜⎜ln i − o 2 c ⎟⎟⎟⎥⎥ rc ≤ r ≤ ro
⎝ ⎟
r ⎠ ⎣⎢ 2ro ro − ri ⎜⎝ rc 2ro ⎠⎟⎦⎥
(3)
⎛ r 2 ⎞⎡ r 2 r ⎛ r r 2 − r 2 ⎞⎤
σθ A = σ y ⎜⎜1 + o2 ⎟⎟⎟ ⎢⎢ c 2 + i ⎜⎜⎜ln i − o 2 c ⎟⎟⎟⎥⎥ rc ≤ r ≤ ro
⎜⎝ r ⎠⎟ ⎣⎢ 2ro ro − ri ⎝⎜ rc 2ro ⎠⎟⎦⎥
(4)
2.3 Strain hardening analysis [11] Fig. 5. Simplified stress-strain curve of the strain hardening
model.
The simplified stress-strain curve of the strain
hardening model as shown in Fig. 5 is similar to the
actual stress-strain curve. Therefore, the Bauschinger
effect and strain hardening can be reflected in residual
stress analysis using the strain hardening model. The
cross-section of an autofrettaged single cylinder of the
strain hardening model is shown in Fig. 6. Here a, c,
ρ L , ρU are the inner radius, outer radius, loading
zone radius, and unloading zone radius, respectively.
Many parameters that are needed for calculating re-
sidual stress are obtained through curve fitting. Table
2 shows the parameters of AISI 4340 that are used for
calculation. Residual stress was calculated by using
Fig. 6. Cross-section of an autofrettaged single cylinder using
these parameters. the strain hardening model.
3156 E.-Y. Lee et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 23 (2009) 3153~3160
L1 = 2 ⎛ r ⎞ σ − A1 2 B ⎛⎜ 1 1 ⎞⎟⎟
σr A ln ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟⎟ + y ρ 1⎜ − 2 B1 ⎟⎟
− pa Fig. 7. Residual stress distribution of an autofrettaged single
3 1 ⎝⎜ a ⎠⎟ 3B1 L ⎜⎜⎝ a 2 B1 r ⎠ cylinder with 35.7% overstrain level.
(5)
⎡ ⎛r⎞ ⎤ σ −A ⎡ ⎛ ⎞ ⎤ σ −A
A3 ⎢⎢ln ⎜⎜⎜ r ⎟⎟⎟⎟ +1⎥⎥ + D
2 2
σθ L1 = A1 ⎢⎢ln ⎜⎜⎜ ⎟⎟⎟⎟ +1⎥⎥ + y 1
ρ 2 B1 σθU 1 = 3 ρ 2 B2
3 ⎢⎣ ⎝ a ⎠ ⎥⎦ 3B1 L (6) 3 ⎢⎣ ⎜⎝ a ⎠ ⎥⎦ 3B2 U
(10)
⎡ 1 1 ⎤⎥ ⎡ ⎤
( ) ⎢ 1 + 2 B −1 1 ⎥ − p
⎢
⎢ 2 B1 + 2B1 −1 2 B1 ⎥ − pa
⎣⎢ a r ⎦⎥
⎢ 2B ( 2 ) 2 B ⎥ a
⎣⎢ a r 2 ⎦⎥
2
σy ⎛1 1 ⎞⎟ σD ⎛
σr L 2 = ρL 2 ⎜⎜⎜ − ⎟ (7) 1 1 ⎞⎟⎟
3 ⎝c 2
r 2 ⎠⎟⎟ σ rU 2 = ρU 2 ⎜⎜⎜ − ⎟ (11)
3 ⎜⎝ c 2 r 2 ⎠⎟
σy ⎛1 1 ⎞⎟⎟ σD ⎛1 1 ⎞⎟⎟
σθ L 2 = ρL 2 ⎜⎜⎜ + ⎟ (8) σθU 2 = ρU 2 ⎜⎜⎜ + (12)
3 ⎜⎝ c 2 r 2 ⎠⎟ 3 ⎜⎝ c 2 ⎟
r 2 ⎠⎟
2.3.2 Unloading stress analysis (σU) 2.4 Residual stress of a single cylinder using
Unloading stress analysis is based on the Cartesian 30CrNiMo8 [7]
coordinate system (ε*-O-σ*) in Fig. 2. In the unload-
ing phase, the radius of the elasto-plastic zone is ex- Huang [7] conducted an autofrettage experiment
pressed as ρU in the unloading stress zone. The using 30CrNiMo8. A single cylinder was autofret-
procedure of unloading stress analysis is the same as taged with 35.7% overstrain level. The autofrettage
that of loading stress analysis. The formulation for pressure was 740 MPa. The calculations were based
calculating loading stress is expressed below. on the following geometrical properties: a = 19.3
mm; c = 43.7 mm; ρU = 28 mm; and ρL = 20.6 mm.
(1) Plastic zone ( a ≤r≤ ρU ) Table 3 shows the parameters of 30CrNiM8 that were
used for calculation. Residual stress was calculated by
⎛ ⎞ σ −A using these parameters.
σrU 1 =
2
A3 ln ⎜⎜⎜ r ⎟⎟⎟⎟ + D 3 ρ 2 B2
Fig. 7 shows the tangential residual stress along the
3 ⎜⎝ a ⎠ 3B2 U
(9) wall thickness of an autofrettaged single cylinder.
⎛ ⎞⎟
⎜⎜ 1
⎜⎜ 2 B − 21B ⎟⎟⎟⎟ − pa This single cylinder was autofrettaged with 35.7%
⎜⎝ a 2 r 2 ⎠⎟ overstrain level. The maximum compressive residual
E.-Y. Lee et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 23 (2009) 3153~3160 3157
σ r A = σ r L 2 − σ r U 2 + σ r S 1 , σθ A = σθ L 2 − σ θ U 2 + σ θ S 1
(20)
σr A = σr L 2 − σrU 2 + σr S 2 , σθ A = σθ L 2 − σθU 2 + σθ S 2
(21)
Fig. 8. Cross-section of an autofrettaged compound cylinder
using the strain hardening model. When the plastic zone is in the outer cylinder
3158 E.-Y. Lee et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 23 (2009) 3153~3160
( b < ρ L < c ), residual stress is expressed by Eqs. (22- cylinder ( ρ L < r < c )
25).
σr A = σr L 2 − σrU 2 + σr S 2 , σθ A = σθ L 2 − σθU 2 + σθ S 2
(5) Residual stress of the unloading stress zone
(25)
( a < r < ρU )
1000
1000
800
Elastic-perfectly plastic analysis 800
600 Elastic-perfectly plastic analysis
Strain hardening analysis 600 Strain hardening analysis
400
Tangential stress(MPa)
400
Tangential stress(MPa)
200 200
0 0
-200 -200
-400 -400
-600 -600
-800 -800
-1000 -1000
-1200 -1200
1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
r/a r/a
1000 1000
Elastic-perfectly plastic analysis Elastic-perfectly plastic analysis
800 800
Strain hardening analysis Strain hardening analysis
600 600
400 400
Tangential stress(MPa)
Tangential stress(MPa)
200 200
0 0
-200 -200
-400 -400
-600 -600
-800 -800
-1000 -1000
-1200 -1200
1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
r/a r/a
Fig. 9. Residual stress distribution of an autofrettaged compound cylinder with 0.1 mm shrink fit tolerance under various over-
strain levels.
E.-Y. Lee et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 23 (2009) 3153~3160 3159