You are on page 1of 20

Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related

Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

Final EIR
Project type City Lead Agency Project Title
(pgs.)

Buildings and Seismic Life Safety, Modernization, and Replacement


Berkeley University of California 12
real estate of General Purpose Buildings, Phase 2 Project

Buildings and
Seaside Seaside, City of The Projects at Main Gate
real estate

Buildings and
Auburn Placer County Bohemia Retail Project
real estate

Buildings and
West Hollywood West Hollywood, City of Monarch Fountain and La Brea Project
real estate
Buildings and
Salinas, Monterey Monterey County Harper Canyon / Encina Hills Subdivision RDEIR
real estate

Buildings and
Sonora Sonora, City of Sonora Walmart Expansion Project
real estate

Buildings and
N/A Placer County Rancho Del Oro Estates
real estate

Buildings and Sutter Medical Center of Santa Rosa/Luther Burbank


Santa Rosa Sonoma County
real estate Memorial Foundation Joint Master Plan

Buildings and Los Angeles Community Los Angeles Southwest College Facilities Master Plan
Los Angeles, City of
real estate College District Update

Buildings and Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan Amendment/Staples


Pleasanton Pleasanton, City of 49-51
real estate Ranch

Buildings and
Fairfield Solano County Middle Green Valley Specific Plan
real estate

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 1 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

Buildings and Alta Bates Summit Medical Center (ABSMC), Summit


Oakland Oakland, City of 17
real estate Campus Seismic Upgrade and Master Plan

Buildings and
Newport Beach Newport Beach, City of Marina Park 31-8
real estate

Buildings and
Oakland Oakland, City of Fruitvale Transit Village Phase 2 27-36
real estate

Buildings and Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan and Port Master Plan
Chula Vista Port of San Diego 879-93
real estate Amendment

Buildings and
Santa Clara Santa Clara, City of Santa Clara de Asis Project
real estate

Buildings and
Menlo Park Menlo Park, City of Menlo Gateway Project 82-88
real estate

Buildings and
N/A Amador County Pine Acres North
real estate

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 2 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

Buildings and
Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, City of Beach Edinger Corridors Specific Plan
real estate

Buildings and Sunnyvale, Santa


Santa Clara, City of Yahoo! Santa Clara Campus
real estate Clara

Buildings and
Torrance Torrance, City of Rockefeller Group Professional Center Development 214
real estate

Buildings and
Rohnert Park Rohnert Park, City of Rohnert Park Walmart Expansion Project
real estate

Buildings and El Segundo, California State Board of


Formation of Wiseburn Unified School District 100-3
real estate Hawthorne Education

Buildings and Los Angeles Community


South Gate South Gate Educational Center
real estate College District

Buildings and
Oxnard Oxnard, City of Ormond Beach Specific Plans 42-4
real estate

Buildings and
Newport Beach Newport Beach, City of Newport Beach City Hall and Park Development Plan 22-44
real estate

Buildings and Los Angeles Community 2009 Los Angeles Mission College (LAMC) Facilities
Los Angeles, City of
real estate College District Master Plan

Buildings and
San Bernardino San Bernardino, City of Highland Avenue Walmart Expansion Project
real estate

Buildings and
San Marcos San Marcos, City of University District Specific Plan 20-6
real estate

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 3 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

Buildings and
Eureka Eureka, City of Marina Center 11-2
real estate

Buildings and
Manteca Manteca, City of Evans Estates-Pillsbury Estates
real estate

Buildings and
N/A Riverside County The Villages of Lakeview
real estate

Buildings and
N/A Los Angeles, City of Columbia Square
real estate

Buildings and
Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, City of The Village at Playa Vista Project 43-7
real estate

Buildings and
N/A Kern County Tejon Mountain Village by TMV, LLC 169-70, 259-68
real estate

Buildings and
Clovis Clovis, City of Clovis Research & Technology Park
real estate

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 4 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

Buildings and
Merced Merced, City of Wal-Mart Distribution Center 71-5
real estate

EIR 03-07 Specific Plan Amendment No 66 Map 101


Buildings and
Bakersfield Kern County Adoption of Specific Plan Line for Reina Road (SPA
real estate
No67 Map101v. ZCNo160 Map101 Exclusion)

Buildings and
San Diego San Diego, Port of 2701 N. Harbor Drive Demolition Project
real estate
Buildings and
Malibu Malibu, City of 23915 Mailbu Road 10-2
real estate
Buildings and
Santa Barbara Santa Barbara County Santa Barbara Botanic Garden Vital Mission Plan 12-4
real estate
Power Inn Road,
Electric generating -- Fruitridge Road, Sacramento Natural Gas Storage Project, CPCN
Public Utilities Commission 36-8
fossil Junipero Street, Elder Application No. 07-04-013
Creek Road

Electric generating -- Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) Central Utility


Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles World Airports 77-9
fossil Plant (CUP) Replacement Project

Electric generating -- Sacramento Municipal


Rio Vista Solano Wind Project Phase 3 85-6, 90
renewable Utility District

Valley-Ivyglen Subtransmission Line and Fogarty


Electric transmission Lake Elsinore Public Utilities Commission 1
Substation Project

Palm Springs, Rancho


Southern California Edison Devers-Mirage 115 kV
Electric transmission Mirage, Cathedral Public Utilities Commission
Subtransmission System Split
City, Palm Desert, ...

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 5 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

Electric transmission Temecula Public Utilities Commission Triton Substation Project 42-5

Electric transmission Visalia, Farmersville Public Utilities Commission San Joaquin Cross Valley Loop Transmission Project

Hughson-Grayson 115-kV Transmission Line &


Electric transmission Hughson, Ceres Turlock Irrigation District
Substation Project

Fishery management Redding Fish & Game #1 Shasta River Watershed-Wide Permitting Program

Fishery management N/A Fish & Game #1 Scott River Watershed-wide Permitting Program

Santa Clara Valley Water Alviso Slough Restoration Project-Recirculated DEIR


Forestry San Jose 642-5
District Section 3.2 (Water and Sediment Quality)

Taft Sanitary Landfill Permit Revision (GPA 2, CUP 1,


General Plan Taft Kern County
Map 138; SWFP Revision; WDRs)

General Plan Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, City of Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update

General Plan Santa Monica Santa Monica, City of City of Santa Monica Land Use and Circulation Element 768-71

Sierra Vista Specific Plan, Annexation, General Plan


General Plan Roseville Roseville, City of 30-2, 37-8
Amendment and Sphere of Influence Amendment

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 6 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

General Plan Arroyo Grande Grover Beach, City of City of Grover Beach Land Use Element Update

Mining (non-coal) Ukiah Mendocino County Kunzler Terrace Mine Project

EIR 01-08 SFD, Soledad Mountain Project by Golden


Mining (non-coal) Mojave Kern County
Queen Mining Co., Inc.

Santa Fe Aggregates, Inc. Snelling Tailings Project Use


Mining (non-coal) N/A Merced County
Permit and Reclamation Plan

San Rafael Rock Quarry Amended Quarry Permit and 81, 89-91, 345-
Mining (non-coal) San Rafael Marin County
Amended Reclamation Plan 8, 351-2

Three Rivers Levee


Public infrastructure Marysville Upper Yuba Levee Improvement Project
Improvement Authority

City of Santa Maria Intergrated Waste Management


Public infrastructure Santa Maria Santa Maria, City of 27-33
Facilities Project

Carrizo Plain National Monument Proposed Resource


Resource Bureau of Land 295, 385-7,
N/A Management Plan & Final Environmental Impact
Management Plan Management 625-6, 668-9
Statement
Transportation --
Petaluma, Novato Caltrans #4 Marin-Sonoma Narrows HOV Widening Project 27-9
Highways

Transportation -- Rambla Pacifico Road Reconstruction Project - 3565


Malibu Malibu, City of 3
Highways Rambla Pacifico

Transportation -- Modesto, Riverbank, North County Corridor State Route 108 East Route
Caltrans #6
Highways Oakdale Adoption

Transportation -- South Placer Regional


Roseville Placer Parkway Corridor Preservation Tier 1 EIS/EIR 49-56
Highways Transportation Authority

Stanislaus Council of
Transportation Plan Modesto StanCOG 2011 Regional Transportation Plan
Governments

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 7 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

Association of Monterey
Transportation Plan N/A 2010 Monterey Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation 16-8, 128-30
Bay Area Governments

Transportation -- Rail Pleasanton, Dublin, Bay Area Rapid Transit


BART to Livermore Extension Draft Program EIR 12-5(Energy)
and bus Livermore District

Regional Water Quality


Water and Channel Rehabilitation and Sediment Management for
N/A Control Board, Region 1
wastewater Remaining Phase 1 and Phase 2 Sites
(North Coast), Santa Rosa
Water and Otay Mesa Recycled Water System Capital
Chula Vista Otay Water District
wastewater Improvement Program

Water and City of Vacaville Easterly Wastewater Treatment Plant


Vacaville Vacaville, City of
wastewater Tertiary Project

Water and
Byron, Brentwood Contra Costa Water District Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Project 20-1
wastewater

Water and Buena Vista Water Storage


N/A Buena Vista Water Management Program
wastewater District

Water and East Bay Municipal Utility


N/A Estates Reservoir Replacement Project
wastewater District

Water and San Francisco, City and Sunol Valley Water Treatment Plant (SVWTP)
San Francisco
wastewater County of Expansion and Treated Water Reservoir

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 8 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

Water and Department of Water


Yucaipa East Branch Extension Phase I Improvements Project 57-65
wastewater Resources

Water and East Bay Municipal Utility


N/A Water Supply Management Program 2040
wastewater District

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 9 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

Draft EIR Impacts Analyzed


Description
(pgs.) 1 2 3 4 5
This report lists the expected increase in GHG emissions from new building
operations based on electricity and natural gas use, as well as the emissions
135-40 X X from construction. The Final EIR corrects the earlier table of GHG emissions
from construction.
This report estimates GHG emissions from construction, project-generated
98, 107-10 X X X X vehicle trips, on-site area source emissions (such as fossil fuel combustion
and wood burning), and off-site electricity generation.
This report estimates the CO2 emissions generated from area sources (such
53-9 X X X as landscaping and architectural coatings), utility usage, and increased
vehicle traffic.
This report lists the projected CO2e emissions from the project's operations,
166-173 X X X X electricity consumption, vehicle travel, and construction.
This report estimates the project's emissions of CO 2, CH4, and N2O from the
119-20 X X X direct area source (landscaping), energy usage, and vehicle usage.
The report lists the CO2 and CO2e emissions expected from the building's
operations, energy use, induced vehicle trips, and construction, as well as the
149-50, 162-5 X X X X X impacts of climate change (particularly increased flooding and wildfires) on
the project.

This report calculates the likely CO2 emissions from area sources (fireplaces,
31-2 X X X X wood burning stoves, etc.), utility usage, vehicle sources, and construction.

This report lists the CO2 emissions predicted from operational and area
48-9 X X X sources, electricity use, emergency generator testing, natural gas use, and
helicopter trips.
This report lists the grand total of the project's GHG emissions inventory in
70 X X X terms of CO2e for mobile operational sources, natural gas usage, and
electricity generation.
This report lists the project's anticipated CO2e emissions in detail from direct
area sources (natural gas, hearth, and landscape), electricity consumption,
X X X X mobile emissions, and water processing. It also mentions the quantity of
CO2e emissions expected from construction.
This report lists predicted CO2 emissions from direct area sources, electricity
13-7 X X X X consumption, mobile sources, and construction.

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 10 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

This report's Final EIR revises earlier assessments and lists the project's
impact on climate change as "significant." The Draft EIR lists the GHG
49 X X X emissions in CO2e for Phase 1 of the project with and without MOB and for
subsequent build out. It includes operational (vehicle) emissions, space and
water heating, indirect electricity, and generator testing.
This report projects CO2 emissions from construction and operations,
X X X X including water transport for building uses and landscaping, indirect electricity,
natural gas, refrigerants, motor vehicles, and boats.
This Final EIR updates the report with a table containing construction-
generated GHG emissions and it updates prior estimates of emissions from
operations. The Draft EIR lists the CO2, CH4, N2O, and total CO2e emissions
115-6, 226-32 X X X X from area sources, solid waste generation, indirect electricity generation,
motor vehicle trips, and construction under the worst case scenario and
different emissions reduction alternatives.

This report estimates the operational emissions of CO 2, N2O, and CH4 from
electricity use, natural gas use, water consumption, and vehicular use for a
"business as usual" scenario and scenario with emission reduction measures
X X X X X for the Resort and Conference Center (RCC), Pacifica Residential and Retail
Development, and Bayfront Park and Shoreline. It also lists the annual CO 2
emissions from construction of each project through 2015. Lastly, it considers
the impact of sea level rise from climate change on the project.

This report projects "metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions" from area
sources, electricity and water use, mobile sources, and construction. It also
52-7 X X X X X considers the impact of sea level rise and increased droughts from climate
change on the project.

This report's Final EIR corrects earlier tables and language. The Draft EIR
lists the GHG emissions in terms of CO2e from direct sources, indirect
19-24 X X X X sources, vehicular sources, solid waste, and water and wastewater. It also
discusses the quantity of emissions expected from construction. Lastly, it lists
the total emissions reductions expected from the mitigation strategies.

This report mentions the total CO2 emissions expected to be generated by


24 X the project. It says that the main emissions source is transportation and
calculates emissions in an appendix.

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 11 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

This report lists the predicted GHG emissions in terms of CO 2e from solid
18-24 X X X waste, water use, natural gas use, electricity use, and transportation. It
discusses these main sources in depth.
This report lists the CO2 emissions expected from area sources (including
natural gas use and landscape equipment), electricity usage, and mobile
169-73 X X X X sources. It discusses these sources in depth. It also considers the impact of
climate change on the project.
This report briefly lists the CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions expected from
X X X mobile sources, natural gas, electricity use, and water use.
This report projects the CO2, N2O, CH4, hydrofluorocarbons, and total CO2e
139-42 X X X X emissions from vehicles, natural gas, electricity, water transport and
treatment, refrigeration system, air conditioning, and construction.
This report lists the annual CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions anticipated from
mobile sources, natural gas use, electricity use, and water use. It also
X X X X estimates the total GHG emissions from construction. Because the school will
save vehicle miles traveled by enabling nearby students to travel short
distances, it is projected to avoid GHG emissions overall.
This report lists the total GHG emissions expected in terms of CO 2e from
46-7 X X X X mobile sources, natural gas usage, and electricity generation. It also
mentions the total GHG emissions expected from construction.
This report lists the annual CO2, N2O, and CH4 emissions projected from
X X X area sources and motor vehicles. It also estimates the total CO 2 emissions
from construction.
This report lists the annual CO2, CH4, N2O, and total CO2e emissions
predicted from vehicles, electricity production, natural gas combustion, solid
X X X X waste, and other area sources. It later considers the peak daily CO 2
emissions for various phases of construction.
This report lists the peak daily CO2 emissions expected from construction and
11-26 X X from operations.
The report lists the CO2 and CO2e emissions projected from the building's
operations, energy use, induced vehicle trips, and construction, as well as the
129-41 X X X X X impacts of climate change (particularly increased flooding and wildfires) on
the project.
This report lists the CO2, CH4, N2O, and total CO2e emissions expected from
construction, including construction equipment, truck trips, and worker trips,
X X X X and operations, from vehicle use, electricity use, natural gas use, and water
consumption.

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 12 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

The Final EIR corrects a prior table. The Draft EIR lists the CO 2, CH4, N2O,
19-22 X X and total CO2e emissions from motor vehicle trips, natural gas usage, and
landscape maintenance.
This report lists the annual total unmitigated and mitigated CO 2 emissions
112-24, 133 X X X X projected from construction and operational emissions, including area
sources and mobile sources, for 2009 through 2014.
This report discusses in depth annual CO2e emissions from area sources,
construction, energy use, transportation and vehicle use, and utilities. It also
244-8, 292-
312, 502-3 X X X X X considers positive and negative GHG emissions from vegetation change.
Lastly, it discusses the impact of climate change, particularly increased
wildfires, on the project.
This report lists the CO2e emissions expected from mobile sources, electricity
62-4 X X X use, and natural gas use.
The Final EIR amends the previous proposal to include consideration of
climate change. It discusses and estimates sources expected to generate
X X X GHG emissions, including construction (mass grading and infrastructure
improvements), vehicle trips, natural gas consumption, and potable water
usage.

The Final EIR adds a table listing annual CO 2, CH4, N2O, and total CO2e
emissions anticipated from school bus trips. It also addresses comments
criticizing the analysis of climate change at length. The Draft EIR lists CO 2,
CH4, N2O, other GHGs, and total CO2e emissions from construction (off-road
and on-road sources), residential and commercial buildings (electricity use,
567-90, 693-
709 X X X X propane use, and area sources), municipal sources (water supply, water
distribution, waste generation, wastewater treatment, and public lighting),
mobile sources, and other sources (helipad use as well as refrigeration and
air conditioning). It also considers GHG emissions after mitigation measures.
Additionally, it analyzes land use change and embodied emissions, though it
does not include these in the GHG inventory.

This report discusses sources of GHG emissions and quantifies likely GHG
111-3 X X X emissions in terms of CO2e from transportation, area sources, and electrical
energy consumption.

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 13 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

This report lists the annual CO2 emissions expected from construction (off-
road diesel exhaust, worker trips, and vendor trips) and operations (natural
X X X X gas usage, landscaping, architectural coatings, employee commute trips,
outbound delivery truck trips, inbound receivable truck trips, on-site truck
activity, and electricity consumption).

This report lists the projected CO2, NO2, CH4, hydroflurocarbon, and total
265-76 X X X X CO2e emissions from construction (exhaust), motor vehicles, natural gas,
indirect electricity, hearth, water transport, landscape, and refrigerants.

This report lists the CO2 emissions projected from demolition equipment and
120-5 X X truck trips to haul debris.
This report's Appendix C lists CO2 emissions projected from stationary
X X sources, mobile sources, and area sources.
This report discusses the likely major sources of CO 2 emissions, including
X X vehicle use and energy use.

This report details the annual CO2e emissions expected from operation of
X X X compressors (in electrical generation), glycol reboilers, and an emergency
generator, as well as from worker vehicle trips and construction.

The Final EIR corrects a prior table. The Draft EIR lists CO 2 emissions from
construction components from 2009 through 2013. It then lists CO 2, CH4,
210-25 X X X NO2, and total CO2e emissions from operations compared with operations for
the existing CUP. It also discusses potential climate change impacts on the
project.
This report lists the amount of GHGs its operations will avert and it briefly
X includes the daily CO2 emissions expected during construction.
The Final EIR revises the earlier standards of impact on climate change,
taking a "net zero" GHG threshold approach such that any activity resulting in
18-20 X X X GHG emissions is considered significant. The Draft EIR report lists the GHG
emissions as CO2e for project operation (from breaker leakage), vehicle
operation, and construction.

This report briefly lists the GHG emissions projected in terms of CO 2e from
37 X X operational emissions and amortized construction emissions.

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 14 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

This report lists relevant GHG emissions expected from operations (including
X X X leaks), vehicle use, and construction. It includes a one-paragraph discussion
for each emissions source.
This report briefly lists the GHG emissions predicted in terms of CO 2e from
24-6 X X operational emissions and amortized construction emissions.
This report discusses the proposed project's relationship with climate change
180-3 X X in qualitative terms, and mentions specific quantitative estimates of GHG
emissions in terms of CO2e for operations and construction.
This report lists annual CO2 emissions expected from power consumption
and diesel pump usage, and CO2e emissions from construction equipment,
9-17 X X X X vehicles, and pumps. It also lists emissions reductions and offsets expected
from riparian revegetation and fencing and water use efficiency and optional
mitigation measures.
This report lists annual CO2 emissions expected from power consumption
and diesel pump usage, and CO2e emissions from construction equipment,
12-20 X X X X vehicles, and pumps. It also lists emissions reductions and offsets expected
from riparian revegetation and fencing and water use efficiency and optional
mitigation measures.
This report discusses the project's relationship with climate change in
X X qualitative terms, and mentions specific estimates of CO 2 emissions from
construction, operations and maintenance, and vegetation removal.
This report lists projections of the area's direct methane emissions, natural
132-9 X X X gas usage, electricity imported, haul vehicle usage, off-road equipment, light
duty vehicles, and reductions from waste diversification.
This report lists CO2 emissions projected under the current general plan and
the newly proposed plan from residential, retail, office, industrial, and school
288 X X X electricity consumption, residential and commercial water consumption,
residential and commercial solid waste disposal, natural gas, hearth, and
landscape maintenance, and vehicle trips.
This report lists the expected GHG emissions in terms of CO 2, N2O, N2O in
X X X CO2e, CH4, CH4 in CO2e, and total CO2e emissions from electricity use,
natural gas use, vehicle use, and solid waste.
This report lists likely operational emissions under build out in 2025 of CO2,
CH4, N2O, and total CO2e from area sources, water, wastewater, solid
X X X X waste, electricity and transportation. It then projects CO2 emissions annually
through 2024. It also considers the impact of climate change on the water
supply in the Sacramento Valley.

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 15 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

This report has a brief qualitative discussion of the likely impact of the project
140-4 X X on vehicle use, and thus GHGs, as well as some effects of climate change on
the project.
This report lists the anticipated GHG emissions in CO 2e from mining
46-9 X X X operations, including off-road equipment and on-road haul truck exhaust,
employee vehicles, and indirect emissions from electricity generation.
This report lists the projected CO2 emissions from mining, construction, and
327-332 X X reclamation. It also includes an informative bar graph depicting emissions for
thirty-six years of the project.

This report calculates likely CO2 emissions from mining operations and
347-9, 575 X X vehicles use in Appendix A, and briefly discusses the results in the proposal.

This report lists the CO2, CH4, N2O, and total CO2e emissions expected from
X X exhaust emissions (on-site excavation and transportation equipment), worker
vehicle trips, and quarry operational emissions.
This report lists CO2 emissions predicted from construction under two
73-6 X scenarios.
This report lists the GHG emissions anticipated in terms of CO2e from landfill
gas emissions, on-site energy use, on-site equipment emissions, disposal
X X X vehicle/transportation emissions. It also lists the emission sources within each
of these components in detail individually.
This report discusses in general terms some of project's components that will
X X release or sequester GHGs. It also documents the forecasted impact of
climate change on the project's vegetation and resources.
This report discusses climate change in general terms, but briefly lists total
X GHG emissions projected for the different alternatives.
This report says the proposed roadway will reduce vehicle miles traveled, but
X X will contribute GHGs during its construction. The emissions from grading,
paving, and construction vehicles are quantified.
This report compares projections of CO2 emissions from vehicle use for the
208-9 X No-Project alternative, Alternative A, and Alternative B.
This proposal's FEIS corrects earlier figures to detail daily CO 2 emissions for
each alternative in 2040. The DEIS conservatively forecasts that the
26-8 X parkway's "CO2 emissions would increase by a maximum of 1.37 percent in
the 2020 and 2.02 percent in 2040."
This report projects vehicle miles traveled for the business as usual and build
87-8 X scenario to estimate the project's decline in GHG emissions.

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 16 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

The Final SEIR revises earlier tables. The Draft SEIR lists vehicle miles
traveled and resulting CO2, CH4, N2O, and CO2e emissions for
105-6, 118-24 X X representative years from 1990 to 2035. It also details the various ways
climate changes will impact the operations and infrastructure. The plan
includes a "GHG Reduction" alternative.
This report's "Energy" section lists the reductions in vehicle miles traveled
and energy use that will result from the BART's expansion, though it does not
32(Air Quality) X X X quantify GHG emissions. The "Air Quality" section considers the impact of
climate change on heat waves and flooding, which impact BART
performance.

This report discusses likely sources of GHG emissions from the project, and
241-3 X mentions a specific quantity of CO2 emissions projected from construction.

The report lists GHG emissions in CO2e projected for construction of the
88 X project's three roads.

This report lists projected GHG emissions in terms of CO 2e from electricity,


24-6 X X X natural gas, diesel fuel, digester gas, nitrification / de-nitrification.

The Final EIR corrects earlier tables estimating each proposed alternative's
total GHG emissions. The Draft EIR considers GHG emissions from
33-6 X X X X operations, energy use, transportation, and construction. It discusses the
main sources in depth and compares the aggregate emissions for each
alternative.
This report lists CO2, CH4, N2O, and total CO2e emissions expected from
diesel powered pumps, electric pumps, vehicle travel, and construction. It
54-70 X X X X discusses the sources and calculations in great depth, and uses equations
explicitly rather than modeling software.
This report lists CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions expected from on-site and
off-site sources during demolition and construction, indirect electric power
179-83 X X X consumed due to water loss and delivery, and direct emissions from fountain
and reservoir water losses.
This report lists the annual CO2 emissions anticipated from tests of backup
212-4 X X X generators, as well as the annual CO2e emissions from mobile sources,
stationary sources, and purchased electricity.

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 17 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Environmental Impact Statements Submitted Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that Discuss Climate Change-Related Impacts
Dates Covered: 7/1/2009 - 7/7/2010

The Final EIR updates earlier language regarding impacts on climate change.
The Draft EIR lists daily average CO2 emissions projected from mitigated and
89-90, 94-5 X unmitigated construction for 2009 through 2011. It also mentions the total
sum of CO2 emissions.
This report discusses likely sources of GHG emissions qualitatively, then lists
576-88 X X tentative comparisons of total CO2e emissions from the proposed portfolios'
electricity usage.

Center for Climate Change Law


Page 18 of 20 www.columbiaclimatelaw.com
Columbia Law School
Code

5
Impacts Analyzed
Direct operational impacts. Smokestack emissions from the facility; fugitive emissions such as methane escaping from oil and ga
emissions of methane and nitrous oxide from agricultural operations; methane from landfills and wastewater treatment plants; and i
on carbon "sinks," such as forests, agricultural soils, and wetlands.

Purchased electricity. The GHGs emitted in generating the electricity that is produced off-site and purchased by the facility.

Induced trips. Employee, customer, and vendor travel; the transport of raw materials, manufactured goods, and other freight to an
the facility.
Construction impacts. The GHG emissions from extracting and fabricating the construction materials, and from the equipment at
servicing the construction site.
Impact of climate change on project. Among the topics here could be the effects of rising sea levels and water tables, increased
greater temperature variations, water shortages, reduced snowpack, and activities needed to adapt to climate changes.

Source: Michael Gerrard, SEQRA and Climate Change, NYSBA Government, Law and Policy Journal (Summer 2008)

You might also like