Two Way Repeated Measures ANOVA (One Factor Repetition)domingo, febrero 25, 2018, 02:18:48 a.

m.

Data source: CF_SSI VS PBS in Notebook5

Balanced Design

Dependent Variable: TEMPERATURA COLONAL

Normality Test (Shapiro-Wilk) Passed (P = 0.768)

Equal Variance Test: Passed (P = 0.203)

Source of Variation DF SS MS F P
TRATAMIENTO 1 75.031 75.031 9.560 0.011
SUJETO(TRATAMIENTO)10 78.487 7.849
TIEMPO 5 124.526 24.905 18.539 <0.001
TRATAMIENTO x TIEMPO 5 46.851 9.370 6.975 <0.001
Residual 50 67.171 1.343
Total 71 392.067 5.522

Main effects cannot be properly interpreted if significant interaction is determined. This is because the size
of a factor's effect depends upon the level of the other factor.

The effect of different levels of TRATAMIENTO depends on what level of TIEMPO is present. There is a
statistically significant interaction between TRATAMIENTO and TIEMPO. (P = <0.001)

Power of performed test with alpha = 0.0500: for TRATAMIENTO : 0.759

Power of performed test with alpha = 0.0500: for TIEMPO : 1.000
Power of performed test with alpha = 0.0500: for TRATAMIENTO x TIEMPO : 0.993

Least square means for TRATAMIENTO :

Group Mean
SSI 37.014
PBS 34.972
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.467

Least square means for TIEMPO :

Group Mean
0.000 38.158
10.000 37.342
20.000 35.717
30.000 34.483
40.000 35.233
50.000 35.025
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.450

Least square means for TRATAMIENTO x TIEMPO :

Group Mean
SSI x 0.000 38.017
SSI x 10.000 37.600
SSI x 20.000 36.400
SSI x 30.000 35.983
SSI x 40.000 37.283
SSI x 50.000 36.800
PBS x 0.000 38.300
PBS x 10.000 37.083
PBS x 20.000 35.033
PBS x 30.000 32.983
PBS x 40.000 33.183
PBS x 50.000 33.250
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.636

All Pairwise Multiple Comparison Procedures (Student-Newman-Keuls Method) :

Comparisons for factor: TRATAMIENTO

Comparison Diff of Means p q P P<0.050
SSI vs. PBS 2.042 2 4.373 0.012 Yes

Comparisons for factor: TIEMPO

Comparison Diff of Means p q P P<0.050
0.000 vs. 30.000 3.675 6 10.984 <0.001 Yes
0.000 vs. 50.000 3.133 5 9.365 <0.001 Yes
0.000 vs. 40.000 2.925 4 8.742 <0.001 Yes
0.000 vs. 20.000 2.442 3 7.297 <0.001 Yes
0.000 vs. 10.000 0.817 2 2.441 0.091 No
10.000 vs. 30.000 2.858 5 8.543 <0.001 Yes
10.000 vs. 50.000 2.317 4 6.924 <0.001 Yes
10.000 vs. 40.000 2.108 3 6.301 <0.001 Yes
10.000 vs. 20.000 1.625 2 4.857 0.001 Yes
20.000 vs. 30.000 1.233 4 3.686 0.057 No
20.000 vs. 50.000 0.692 3 2.067 0.318 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 40.000 0.483 2 1.445 0.312 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 30.000 0.750 3 2.242 0.262 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 50.000 0.208 2 0.623 0.662 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 30.000 0.542 2 1.619 0.258 Do Not Test

Comparisons for factor: TIEMPO within SSI

Comparison Diff of Means p q P P<0.05
0.000 vs. 30.000 2.033 6 4.297 0.041 Yes
0.000 vs. 20.000 1.617 5 3.417 0.128 No
0.000 vs. 50.000 1.217 4 2.571 0.277 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 40.000 0.733 3 1.550 0.521 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 10.000 0.417 2 0.881 0.536 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 30.000 1.617 5 3.417 0.128 No
10.000 vs. 20.000 1.200 4 2.536 0.289 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 50.000 0.800 3 1.691 0.461 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 40.000 0.317 2 0.669 0.638 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 30.000 1.300 4 2.747 0.224 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 20.000 0.883 3 1.867 0.391 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 50.000 0.483 2 1.021 0.474 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 30.000 0.817 3 1.726 0.447 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 20.000 0.400 2 0.845 0.553 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 30.000 0.417 2 0.881 0.536 Do Not Test

Comparisons for factor: TIEMPO within PBS

Comparison Diff of Means p q P P<0.05
0.000 vs. 30.000 5.317 6 11.236 <0.001 Yes
0.000 vs. 40.000 5.117 5 10.813 <0.001 Yes
0.000 vs. 50.000 5.050 4 10.672 <0.001 Yes
0.000 vs. 20.000 3.267 3 6.904 <0.001 Yes
0.000 vs. 10.000 1.217 2 2.571 0.075 No
10.000 vs. 30.000 4.100 5 8.665 <0.001 Yes
10.000 vs. 40.000 3.900 4 8.242 <0.001 Yes
10.000 vs. 50.000 3.833 3 8.101 <0.001 Yes
10.000 vs. 20.000 2.050 2 4.332 0.004 Yes
20.000 vs. 30.000 2.050 4 4.332 0.018 Yes
20.000 vs. 40.000 1.850 3 3.910 0.021 Yes
20.000 vs. 50.000 1.783 2 3.769 0.010 Yes
50.000 vs. 30.000 0.267 3 0.564 0.916 No
50.000 vs. 40.000 0.0667 2 0.141 0.921 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 30.000 0.200 2 0.423 0.766 Do Not Test

Comparisons for factor: TRATAMIENTO within 0

Comparison Diff of Means p q P P<0.05
PBS vs. SSI 0.283 2 0.445 0.755 No

Comparisons for factor: TRATAMIENTO within 10

Comparison Diff of Means p q P P<0.05
SSI vs. PBS 0.517 2 0.812 0.570 No

Comparisons for factor: TRATAMIENTO within 20

Comparison Diff of Means p q P P<0.05
SSI vs. PBS 1.367 2 2.149 0.139 No

Comparisons for factor: TRATAMIENTO within 30

Comparison Diff of Means p q P P<0.05
SSI vs. PBS 3.000 2 4.716 0.002 Yes

Comparisons for factor: TRATAMIENTO within 40

Comparison Diff of Means p q P P<0.05
SSI vs. PBS 4.100 2 6.446 <0.001 Yes

Comparisons for factor: TRATAMIENTO within 50

Comparison Diff of Means p q P P<0.05
SSI vs. PBS 3.550 2 5.581 <0.001 Yes

A result of "Do Not Test" occurs for a comparison when no significant difference is found between two
means that enclose that comparison. For example, if you had four means sorted in order, and found no
difference between means 4 vs. 2, then you would not test 4 vs. 3 and 3 vs. 2, but still test 4 vs. 1 and 3 vs. 1
(4 vs. 3 and 3 vs. 2 are enclosed by 4 vs. 2: 4 3 2 1). Note that not testing the enclosed means is a
procedural rule, and a result of Do Not Test should be treated as if there is no significant difference between
the means, even though one may appear to exist.