Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Kinship and Social Organisation
    Kinship and Social Organisation
    Kinship and Social Organisation
    Ebook110 pages1 hour

    Kinship and Social Organisation

    By W. H. R. Rivers

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    Kinship and Social Organisation is a work by W.H.R. Rivers. Rivers was an anthropologist, neurologist, ethnologist and psychiatrist, known for treating combatants experiencing shell shock. In this work he analyzes marriage and kinship as sociocultural phenomena.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherGood Press
    Release dateMay 19, 2021
    ISBN4057664576392
    Kinship and Social Organisation

    Read more from W. H. R. Rivers

    Related to Kinship and Social Organisation

    Related ebooks

    Reference For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Body Politic

      Jan 23, 2020

      In this ambitious study, Julie Peakman examines how sex, gender and empire interacted in imperial contact zones that range from the first ‘New World’ of the Americas to Polynesia and Oceania, Africa, post-colonial America and the Caribbean, India, th

      1 min read

    • Article

      On The Politics Of Italics

      Aug 28, 2019

      On The Politics Of Italics
      9 min read

    • Article

      Constructed Ecologies: Critical Reflections on Ecology with Design

      May 6, 2019

      Landscape architecture needs a wake-up call. And Margaret Grose’s book Constructed Ecologies: Critical Reflections on Ecology with Design1 offers a vigorous shake-up that is unflinching in its challenges to the profession. The chapter headings alone

      3 min read

    • Article

      Can Literature Make Us Better People?

      Nov 7, 2017

      If we take seriously the claims of goodness that works of literature make—claims that needn’t divert from ugliness, and indeed often illuminate systems of injustice—then our time spent in fictional spaces is hardly wasted. The post Can Literature Ma

      12 min read

    • Article

      Gossiping Is Good

      Jun 12, 2018

      Gossiping Is Good
      2 min read

    • Article

      Annotate This: On Marginalia

      Jan 17, 2020

      When Shylock gives his celebrated soliloquy—“If you prick us, do we not bleed?”—the previous owner approvingly added in the margins “Bring your own BOOYEA!” The post Annotate This: On Marginalia appeared first on The Millions.

      12 min read

    • Article

      Gender Is What You Make of It

      Aug 5, 2020

      In July 1925, Margaret Mead, a doctoral student at Columbia University, set off on a cross-country train journey with a young faculty member, Ruth Benedict. Mead was bound for the west coast and then American Samoa, her first fieldwork expedition as

      12 min read

    • Article

      Failing the Grade

      Aug 11, 2021

      Failing the Grade
      8 min read

    • Article

      Seeing and Knowing

      Sep 9, 2018

      Seeing and Knowing
      2 min read

    • Article

      American Novelist Philip Roth, Author Of 'Portnoy's Complaint,' Dies At 85

      May 23, 2018

      Roth, one of the most influential novelists of the later part of the 20th Century, is the author of American Pastoral, which won the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction, and 1969's Portnoy's Complaint.

      3 min read

    • Article

      Why Does a Language Die?

      Jun 18, 2019

      Why Does a Language Die?
      7 min read

    • Article

      Tone Matters For Trusting People With Different Accents

      Sep 21, 2018

      A new study shows that we tend to believe speakers who sound the same as us, although much depends on their tone of voice. Imagine you’re in a strange neighborhood, your cell phone’s dead, and you desperately need to find the closest garage. A couple

      3 min read

    • Article

      Encounters With the Posthuman: As Bodies Meld With Machines, Are We Leaving Ourselves Behind?: As bodies meld with machines, are we leaving ourselves behind?

      Apr 29, 2013

      On the second balmy day of the year in New York, Neil Harbisson, a Catalan artist, musician, and self-professed “cyborg,” walked into a café in the Nolita district of Manhattan. The actor Gabriel Byrne was sitting at a table in the corner. Harbisson

      12 min read

    • Article

      Why Do Pronouns Matter?

      Oct 15, 2021

      THEY THEM The cultural conversation surrounding pronouns has been a strung out one. Whether it’s a heated debate unfolding on social media, a certain Canadian professor loudly proclaiming his unwillingness to respect students’ pronouns, or a gimmicky

      7 min read

    • Article

      The Search For Answers

      Apr 30, 2020

      The Search For Answers
      12 min read

    • Article

      To Rescue Democracy, Go Outside: Real spaces, not digital ones, will fix our politics.

      Oct 13, 2016

      When I see a liberal writer’s description of Donald Trump, or a conservative writer’s views of Hillary Clinton, I am embarrassed for them both. I wouldn’t let a 5-year-old child make such impolite and obviously extreme statements—and yet, today, extr

      6 min read

    • Article

      How ISIS Broke My Questionnaire

      Mar 29, 2018

      I walk into Starbucks in Achrafieh, Beirut and feel all eyes on me. I tug at my top self-consciously, probably making things worse, and wonder a) do I look like an easy Westerner; b) do I look like a ragamuffin (in comparison to the groomed Lebanese)

      13 min read

    • Article

      How ISIS Broke My Questionnaire: I felt the impact of an attack by the terrorist group. So why didn’t my research data?

      Feb 5, 2015

      I walk into Starbucks in Achrafieh, Beirut and feel all eyes on me. I tug at my top self-consciously, probably making things worse, and wonder a) do I look like an easy Westerner; b) do I look like a ragamuffin (in comparison to the groomed Lebanese)

      13 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Kinship and Social Organisation

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Kinship and Social Organisation - W. H. R. Rivers

      W. H. R. Rivers

      Kinship and Social Organisation

      Published by Good Press, 2022

      goodpress@okpublishing.info

      EAN 4057664576392

      Table of Contents

      PREFACE.

      LECTURE I

      LECTURE II

      LECTURE III

      INDEX

      LIST OF STUDIES IN ECONOMICS & POLITICAL SCIENCE.

      PREFACE.

      Table of Contents

      These lectures were delivered at the London School of Economics in May of the present year. They are largely based on experience gained in the work of the Percy Sladen Trust Expedition to Melanesia of 1908, and give a simplified record of social conditions which will be described in detail in the full account of the work of that expedition.

      A few small additions and modifications have been made since the lectures were given, some of these being due to suggestions made by Professor Westermarck and Dr. Malinowski in the discussions which followed the lectures. I am also indebted to Miss B. Freire-Marreco for allowing me to refer to unpublished material collected during her recent work among the Pueblo Indians of North America.

      W. H. R. Rivers.

      St. John’s College,

      Cambridge.

      November 19th, 1913.

      KINSHIP AND SOCIAL

      ORGANISATION

      LECTURE I

      Table of Contents

      The aim of these lectures is to demonstrate the close connection which exists between methods of denoting relationship or kinship and forms of social organisation, including those based on different varieties of the institution of marriage. In other words, my aim will be to show that the terminology of relationship has been rigorously determined by social conditions and that, if this position has been established and accepted, systems of relationship furnish us with a most valuable instrument in studying the history of social institutions.

      In the controversy of the present and of recent times, it is the special mode of denoting relationship known as the classificatory system which has formed the chief subject of discussion. It is in connection with this system that there have arisen the various vexed questions which have so excited the interest—I might almost say the passions—of sociologists during the last quarter of a century.

      I am afraid it would be dangerous to assume your familiarity with this system, and I must therefore begin with a brief description of its main characters. The essential feature of the classificatory system, that to which it owes its name, is the application of its terms, not to single individual persons, but to classes of relatives which may often be very large. Objections have been made to the use of the term classificatory on the ground that our own terms of relationship also apply to classes of persons; the term brother, for instance, to all the male children of the same father and mother, the term uncle to all the brothers of the father and mother as well as to the husband of an aunt, while the term cousin may denote a still larger class. It is, of course, true that many of our own terms of relationship apply to classes of persons, but in the systems to which the word classificatory is usually applied, the classificatory principle applies far more widely, and in some cases even, more logically and consistently. In the most complete form of the classificatory system there is not one single term of relationship the use of which tells us that reference is being made to one person and to one person only, whereas in our own system there are six such terms, viz., husband, wife, father, mother, father-in-law and mother-in-law. In those systems in which the classificatory principle is carried to its extreme degree every term is applied to a class of persons. The term father, for instance, is applied to all those whom the father would call brother, and to all the husbands of those whom the mother calls sister, both brother and sister being used in a far wider sense than among ourselves. In some forms of the classificatory system the term father is also used for all those whom the mother would call brother, and for all the husbands of those whom the father would call sister, and in other systems the application of the term may be still more extensive. Similarly, the term used for the wife may be applied to all those whom the wife would call sister and to the wives of all those whom the speaker calls brother, brother and sister again being used in a far wider sense than in our own language.

      The classificatory system has many other features which mark it off more or less sharply from our own mode of denoting relationship, but I do not think it would be profitable to attempt a full description at this stage of our enquiry. As I have said, the object of these lectures is to show how the various features of the classificatory system have arisen out of, and can therefore be explained historically by, social facts. If you are not already acquainted with these features, you will learn to know them the more easily if at the same time you learn how they have come into existence.

      I will begin with a brief history of the subject. So long as it was supposed that all the peoples of the world denoted relationship in the same way, namely, that which is customary among ourselves, there was no problem. There was no reason why the subject should have awakened any interest, and so far as I have been able to find, it is only since the discovery of the classificatory system of relationship that the problem now before us was ever raised. I imagine that, if students ever thought about the matter at all, it must have seemed obvious that the way in which they and the other known peoples of the world used terms of relationship was conditioned and determined by the social relations which the terms denoted.

      The state of affairs became very different as soon as it was known that many peoples of the world use terms of relationship in a manner, and according to rules, so widely different from our own that they seem to belong to an altogether different order, a difference well illustrated by the confusion which is apt to arise when we use English words in the translation of classificatory terms or classificatory terms as the equivalents of our own. The difficulty or impossibility of conforming to complete truth and reality, when we attempt this task, is the best witness to the fundamental difference between the two modes of denoting relationship.

      I do not know of any discovery in the whole range of science which can be more certainly put to the credit of one man than that of the classificatory system of relationship by Lewis Morgan. By this I mean, not merely that he was the first to point out clearly the existence of this mode of denoting relationship, but that it was he who collected the vast mass of material by which the essential characters of the system were demonstrated, and it was he who was the first to recognise the great theoretical importance of his new discovery. It is the denial of this importance by his contemporaries and successors which furnishes the best proof of the credit which is due to him for the discovery. The very extent of the material he collected[1] has probably done much to obstruct the recognition of the importance of his work. It is a somewhat discouraging thought that, if Morgan had been less industrious and had amassed a smaller collection of material which could have been embodied in a more available form, the value of his work would probably have been far

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1