Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270886073
CITATIONS READS
6 898
1 author:
Ratna Kapur
Queen Mary, University of London
39 PUBLICATIONS 386 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Ratna Kapur on 15 January 2015.
versality.wordpress.com/2011/11/26/the-tactics-of-occupation-becoming
-cockroach/.
Kambouri, Nelli, and Alexandra Zavos. 2010. “On the Frontiers of Citizenship:
Considering the Case of Konstantina Kuneva and the Intersections between
Gender, Migration and Labour in Greece.” Feminist Review, no. 94: 148–55.
Lorey, Isabell. 2011. “Governmental Precaritization.” Trans. Aileen Deriego.
Transversal ðJanuaryÞ. http://eipcp.net/transversal/0811/lorey/en.
Povinelli, Elizabeth A. 2011. Economies of Abandonment: Social Belonging and
Endurance in Late Liberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
y
Ratna Kapur
[Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 2014, vol. 40, no. 1]
© 2014 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 0097-9740/2014/4001-0002$10.00
10 y Symposium: Gendered Bodies in the Protest Sphere
1
Criminal Law ðAmendmentÞ Act, no. 13 of 2013, April 2.
12 y Symposium: Gendered Bodies in the Protest Sphere
praved, which was one of the specific objectives of the marchers ðBorah
and Nandi 2012Þ. The marches signaled a deep discomfort with the no-
tion that dress could serve as a justification for rape. The SlutWalkers de-
fied the normative boundaries of gender by embodying sexual speech.
While the performance of gender in the Indian SlutWalks was not radi-
cally transgressive insofar as the dress of the protesters was more muted
and less flamboyant than the sexy dressing of SlutWalk marchers outside
of South Asia, it was nevertheless controversial and served as evidence that
an alternative, more disruptive body was available within postcolonial India.
In the process the performance troubled representations of the gendered
third-world other as more victimized, vulnerable, and in need of protection
than her Western counterpart ðMohanty 1991, 70; Kapur 2005, 91–100Þ.
Yet this body could not operate fully outside the prevailing discourses
in which sexuality and violence are tightly interwoven with notions of
shame, honor, and chastity ðSarkar 2001Þ. The renaming of the protest
as besharmi morcha ðshameless protestÞ exemplifies the difficulty of march-
ing under the “slut” banner while simultaneously drawing attention to
the discourses of shame and honor within which the sexualized body in
India continues to be incarcerated.
Conclusion
In both protests, sexed and gendered bodies momentarily reconfigured
the public and the space of politics. Not unlike the Arab Spring, the pro-
tests opened up a disruptive “time and space outside and against the tem-
porality and established architecture” of official authority ðButler 2011Þ.
These seemingly ephemeral moments have left traces of material and dis-
cursive change. With varying degrees of success, the gendered body pulled
away from the tightly knit constellation of prevalent norms that confer
recognition. At the same time, in both instances gender and sex also re-
emerged in official discourse as part of a regulatory practice, which pro-
duces and effaces the bodies it governs ðButler 1993, xiÞ. While gender is
something that can be improvised, it is always operating within a system
of politically, culturally, and socially established norms and discursive con-
straints ðButler 2004, 2Þ. It is within this arrangement that the rights of
women are articulated and the demand for recognition in law is taken up
and formulated.
The outcomes compel several challenging questions that require deeper
reflection: Can gendered bodies in the protest sphere ever be an exercise
in moving toward freedom? In other words, can gender be a force for pro-
gressive change given that it is shaped by and embedded in histories and
S I G N S Autumn 2014 y 13
political contexts that ensure it never moves in only one direction, toward
only one political goal or one progressive end? If, as Butler argues, “I am
someone who cannot be without doing, then the conditions of my do-
ing are, in part the conditions of my existence” ðButler 2004, 3Þ. We might
therefore explore what possibilities of being are opened up through the
refusal to protest in this always already colonized and regulated space
ðAhmed 2010Þ.
Jindal Law School
References
Ahmed, Sara. 2010. The Promise of Happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Anagol-McGinn, Padma. 1994. “Sexual Harassment in India: A Case Study of
Eve-Teasing in Historical Perspective.” In Rethinking Sexual Harassment, ed.
Clare Brant and Yun Lee Too, 220–34. London: Pluto.
Bagilhole, Barbara. 1997. “Sexual Violence in India: ‘Eve-Teasing’ as Backlash.” In
Sexual Harassment: Contemporary Feminist Perspectives, ed. Alison M. Thomas
and Celia Kitzinger, 188–97. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Borah, Rituparna, and Subhalakshmi Nandi. 2012. “Reclaiming the Feminist Pol-
itics of ‘SlutWalk.’” International Feminist Journal of Politics 14ð3Þ:415–21.
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity.
New York: Routledge.
———. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York:
Routledge.
———. 2004. Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.
———. 2011. “Bodies in Alliance and the Politics of the Street.” Transversal
ðOctoberÞ. http://eipcp.net/transversal/1011/butler/en.
Chamberlain, Gethin. 2013. “‘If Girls Look Sexy, Boys Will Rape.’ Is This What
Indian Men Really Believe?” Observer, March 23. http://www.guardian.co.uk
/world/2013/mar/24/india-rape-disturbing-attitudes-men.
Cossman, Brenda. 2002. “Gender Performance, Sexual Subjects and International
Law.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 15ð2Þ:281–96.
Cousins, Margaret. 1941. Indian Womanhood Today. Allahabad: Kitabistan.
Dhillon, Amrit. 2011. “SlutWalk Mocks Indian Women, Real Issues.” Hindu-
stan Times, June 19. http://www.hindustantimes.com/SlutWalk-mocks-Indian
-women-real-issues/Article1-711363.aspx.
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan
Sheridan. New York: Vintage.
Jack, Ian. 2013. “India’s Current Outpouring of Anger Is Unprecedented.
Can It Bring Change?” Guardian, January 11. http://www.guardian.co.uk
/commentisfree/2013/jan/12/anger-india-unprecedented-ian-jack.
Kapur, Ratna. 2005. Erotic Justice: Law and the New Politics of Postcolonialism.
London: Cavendish.
14 y Symposium: Gendered Bodies in the Protest Sphere
———. 2012. “Pink Chaddis and SlutWalk Couture: The Postcolonial Politics
of Feminism Lite.” Feminist Legal Studies 20ð1Þ:1–20.
Misri, Deepti. 2011. “‘Are You a Man?’ Performing Naked Protest in India.” Signs:
Journal of Women in Culture and Society 36ð3Þ:603–25.
Mohanty, Chandra. 1991. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Co-
lonial Discourses.” In Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, ed.
Chandra Talpade Mohanty, Ann Russo, and Lourdes Torres, 51–80. Indianap-
olis: Indiana University Press.
Parmeswaran, P., ed. ð1975Þ 2010. “Indian Womanhood through the Ages.”
Special issue of Vivekananda Kendra Patrika 39, no. 1. http://prakashan
.vivekanandakendra.org/node/400.
Purves, Libby. 2012. “Indian Women Need a Cultural Earthquake.” Times, De-
cember 31. http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/opinion/columnists/article3643810
.ece.
Sarkar, Tanika. 2001. Hindu Wife and Hindu Nation: Gender, Religion and the
Prehistory of Indian Nationalism. London: Hurst.
Sinha, Mrinalini. 1995. Colonial Masculinity: The ‘Manly Englishman’ and the
‘Effeminate Bengali’ in the Late Nineteenth Century. Manchester: Manchester
University Press.
Wente, Margaret. 2011. “Embrace Your Inner Slut? Um, Maybe Not.” Globe
and Mail, May 12. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/embrace
-your-inner-slut-um-maybe-not/article624631.
y
Zakia Salime
1
The picture can be accessed through Femen’s website at http://femen.org/en/news/id
/294.
2
See Femen’s statement at http://femen.org/about.
[Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 2014, vol. 40, no. 1]
© 2014 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 0097-9740/2014/4001-0003$10.00