Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24283516
CITATIONS READS
15 70
5 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Julio Cesar Pieczarka on 12 February 2015.
Cytogenet Genome Res 2009;124:37–43 Accepted after revision: October 15, 2008
by M. Schmid
DOI: 10.1159/000200086
For multicolor FISH we used the Carollia brevicauda probes ic region of the X chromosome, while chromosome Y1 is
previously described by Pieczarka et al. (2005). The neo-X, Y1, and heterochromatic and Y2 does not present any sign of pos-
Y2 chromosomes were sorted by flow cytometry and the DNA
amplified by DOP-PCR. Here we designate the neo-X probe as itive C-banding. In the species C. brevicauda, silver ni-
PXCBR (probe for X from Carollia brevicauda) and, in a similar trate staining identified a NOR only in the interstitial sec-
way, the Y1 probe as PY1CBR and the Y2 probe as PY2CBR. For ondary constriction of the long arm of the X chromo-
tricolor experiments PXCBR was labeled with FITC (green) and some (Fig. 1c).
PY2CBR with Cy3 (red), both by direct labeling. The Y1 probe was Specific probes for the sex chromosomes of C. brevi-
directly labeled with Cy5 (pink). Both PXCBR and PY2CBR paint-
ed the homologous regions of the neo-X and Y2, producing a yel- cauda (CBR) were hybridized to mitotic cells of the same
low signal on each (due to the combination of red and green). For species in order to identify the morphology of the origi-
two-color experiments PXCBR was labeled with FITC (green) nal X and Y sex chromosomes and of the autosome trans-
and PY1CBR with Cy3 (red). In situ hybridization of painting located to the X. As explained in Materials and methods,
probes was performed as previously described (Wienberg et al., on the neo-X chromosome the original X portion re-
1990, 1992; Scherthan et al., 1994; Yang et al., 1995). Briefly, 14 !l
of the hybridization mixture (50% formamide, 1! SSC, 10% dex- mains green while the autosomal portion is yellow, as is
tran sulfate, 5 mg salmon sperm DNA, 2 mg mouse Cot-1 DNA) Y2. The Y1 is pink because the PY1CBR probe was labeled
and 1 !l of labeled PCR product were denatured at 65 ° C, dropped with Cy5 (Fig. 1b). The PY1CBR also labels heterochro-
onto denatured chromosome preparations, and mounted with 22 matic regions of some autosomes, while in the neo-X it
! 22 mm cover slips. Slides were denatured in 70% formamide, labels only the extremity of the short arm and the centro-
2! SSC at 65 ° C for 1 min. In situ hybridization was performed
for 48–72 h at 37 ° C. The hybridization signal was detected as de- mere (Fig. 1d). DAPI staining was negative at the second-
scribed earlier (Yang et al., 1995). Digital images were obtained ary constriction on the long arm of the composite neo-X
using a cooled CCD camera (Photometrics NU200 series equipped chromosome.
with a Kodak KAF 1400 chip) coupled to a Zeiss Axiophot micro-
scope. The software SmartCaptureVP (Digital Scientific) was Conventional meiotic analysis: XY1Y2 system
used for camera control, digital image acquisition (8-bit grey
scale), and the merging of DAPI and the fluorochrome images of The C-banding technique labels several heterochro-
the paints. matic blocks in pachytene cells (Fig. 2a), but the location
of the neo-XY body (XY1Y2) cannot be determined. In
diplotene the formation of chiasmata was observed along
Results the entire extension of the nine autosome bivalents
(Fig. 2b). In the sex trivalent the formation of chiasmata
Classical and molecular cytogenetic analyses were was seen in the distal half of the long arm of the neo-X
performed on the sex chromosomes in mitotic and mei- with the Y2, and an end-to-end pairing of the Y1 with the
otic cells of C. perspicillata and C. brevicauda, which have extremity of the short arm of the X (Fig. 2b). In meta-
an XX/XY1Y2 chromosomal sex determination system. phase II, cells with n = 11 were found containing the Y1
Figure 1a shows the sex chromosomes of C. perspicillata and Y2 chromosomes (Fig. 2c) and with n = 10 containing
after C-banding. The constitutive heterochromatin is lo- the neo-X chromosome (Fig. 2d).
calized in the distal short arm and in the pericentromer-
X-Y1
Fig. 2. Classical meiotic analysis of Carollia perspicillata. (a) C-banding pattern of a pachytene cell. (b) Diplo-
tene cell with nine autosomal bivalents presenting chiasmata all along their length and one sex trivalent with
chiasmata between Xq and the distal part of Y2 (arrow) and end-to-end pairing between Xp and Y1 (solid ar-
row). (c) Metaphase II with n = 11 (Y1Y2) and (d) Metaphase II with n = 10 (X).
Fig. 3. Meiotic analysis of species Carollia perspicillata. (a, b) Mul- of the X, where the X-autosome segment binds to it (grey arrow).
ticolor FISH sequential to DAPI in pachytene cells. (c, d) Pachy- (f) Diplotene cell with multicolor FISH on the sex trivalent (ST);
tene cells in which the sex bodies are dislocated to the periph- in green a segment of the original X paired end-to-end with Y1
ery of the cells, accurately identified after in situ hybridization (pink), and at the other extremity the original X is bound to the
with fluorochromes (colors: pink: Y1, green: X, and yellow: Y2). autosome, which is paired to Y2 (yellow). (g) Multicolor FISH on
(e) Two-color FISH in pachytene cell enhancing the original XY the ST in a diplotene cell; the arrow indicates the region of the
axes (yellow arrow), and the region of the secondary constriction secondary constriction localized on the X chromosome (green).
In situ hybridization using whole sex chromosome sex chromosomes and to accurately describe their behav-
probes (XY1Y2): meiosis ior in prophase I. Figures 3c and d show pachytene cells
Specific probes for the sex chromosomes of Carollia with the neo-XY body located at the cell periphery, drag-
brevicauda were hybridized to meiotic cells of the species ging the X-autosome bivalent with it. The neo-X chromo-
Carollia perspicillata. The results reveal the behavior of some pairs at one extremity with the Y1, and their ten-
the sex trivalent in the meiosis of Carollia. Figure 3a dency toward self-pairing can be noted (Fig. 3c green and
shows a pachytene cell with DAPI staining, without iden- pink axes); however, at the other end, the neo X-Y2 pair-
tification of the trivalent (MSCI-AX). After labeling with ing region shows the same degree of decondensation as
multicolor FISH (Fig. 3b), it was possible to identify the the autosomal bivalents, probably with meiotic activity.
Discussion
References
Ashley T: An integration of old and new perspec- Howell WM, Black DA: Controlled silver-stain- Solari AJ, Pigozzi MI: Fine structure of the XY
tives of mammalian meiotic sterility, in ing of nucleolar organizer regions with pro- body in the XY1Y2 trivalent of the bat Arti-
McElreavey K (ed): The Genetics Basis of tective colloidal developer: a 1-step method. beus lituratus. Chromosome Res 2: 53–58
Male Infertility, pp 131–174 (Springer, Experientia 36:1014–1015 (1980). (1994).
2000). Hsu TC, Baker RJ, Utakoji T: The multiple sex Solari S, Baker RJ: Mitochondrial DNA se-
Baker RJ, Hood CS, Honeycutt RL: Phylogenetic chromosome system of American leaf-nosed quence, karyotypic, and morphologic varia-
relationships and classification of the higher bats (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae). Cytoge- tion in the Carollia castanea species complex
categories of the New World bat family netics 7:27–38 (1968). (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) with descrip-
Phyllostomidae. Syst Zool 38: 228–238 Kasahara S, Dutrillaux B: Chromosome banding tion of a new species. Occasional Papers, The
(1989). patterns of four species of bats, with special Museum, Texas Tech University 254: 1–16
Delobel B, Djlelati R, Gabriel-Robez O, Cro- reference to a case of X-autosome transloca- (2006).
quette MF, Rousseauxprevost R, et al: Y-au- tion. Ann Génét 26:197–201 (1983). Stock AD: Chromosome banding pattern ho-
tosome translocation and infertility: useful- McKee BD, Handel MA: Sex chromosomes, re- mology and its phylogenetic implications in
ness of molecular, cytogenetic and meiotic combination, and chromatin conformation. the bat genera Carollia and Choeroniscus.
studies. Hum Genet 102:98–102 (1998). Chromosoma 102:71–80 (1993). Cytogenet Cell Genet 14:34–41 (1975).
Dobigny G, Ozouf-Costaz C, Bonillo C, Volo- Noronha RCR, Nagamachi CY, Pieczarka JC, Sumner AT: A simple technique for demonstrat-
bouev V: Viability of X-autosome transloca- Marques-Aguiar S, Barros RMS: Sex-auto- ing centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell
tions in mammals: an epigenomic hypothe- some translocations: meiotic behavior sug- Res 75:304–306 (1972).
sis from a rodent case-study. Chromosoma gests an inactivation block with permanence Turner JM: Meiotic sex chromosome inactiva-
113:34–41 (2004). of autosomal gene activity in Phyllostomid tion. Development 134:1823–1831 (2007).
Eicher E: An improved air-drying technique for bats. Caryologia 54:267–277 (2001). Turner JM, Aprelikova O, Xu X, Wang R, Kim S,
recovery of all stages of meiosis in the mam- Noronha RCR, Nagamachi CY, Pieczarka JC, et al: BRCA1, histone H2AX phosphoryla-
malian testis. Mammal Chrom Newsl 20: 74 Marques-Aguiar S, Barros RMS: Meiotic tion, and male meiotic sex chromosome in-
(1966). analyses of the sex chromosomes in Carol- activation. Curr Biol 14: 2135–2142 (2004).
Ford CE, Hamerton JL: A colchicine, hypotonic- liinae-Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera): NOR Wienberg J, Jauch A, Stanyon R, Cremer T: Mo-
citrate, squash sequence for mammalian separates the XY1Y2 into two independent lecular cytotaxonomy of primates by chro-
chromosomes. Stain Technol 31: 247–251 parts. Caryologia 56 (2004). mosomal in situ suppression hybridization.
(1956). Pieczarka JC, Nagamachi CY, O’Brien PC, Yang Genomics 8:347–350 (1990).
Goodpasture C, Bloom SE: Visualization of nu- F, Rens W, et al: Reciprocal chromosome Wienberg J, Stanyon R, Jauch A, Cremer T: Ho-
cleolar organizer regions in mammalian painting between two South American bats: mologies in human and Macaca fuscata
chromosomes using silver staining. Chro- Carollia brevicauda and Phyllostomus hasta- chromosomes revealed by in situ suppres-
mosoma 53:37–50 (1975). tus (Phyllostomidae, Chiroptera). Chromo- sion hybridization with human chromosome
Graves JAM, Wakefield MJ, Toder R: The origin some Res 13:339–347 (2005). specific DNA libraries. Chromosoma 101:
and evolution of the pseudoautosomal re- Scherthan H, Cremer T, Arnason U, Weier H, 265–270 (1992).
gions of human sex chromosomes. Hum Mol Lima de Faria A, Frönicke L: Comparative Yang F, Carter NP, Shi L, Ferguson-Smith MA:
Genet 7:1991–1996 (1998). chromosome painting discloses homologous A comparative study of karyotypes of munt-
Handel MA: The XY body: a specialized meiotic segments in distantly related mammals. Nat jacs by chromosome painting. Chromosoma
chromatin domain. Exp Cell Res 296: 57–63 Genet 6:342–347 (1994). 103:642–652 (1995).
(2004). Solari AJ: Sex Chromosomes and Sex Determi-
nation in Vertebrates (CRC Press, Boca Ra-
ton 1994).