OTA & PTA PERFORMANCE-BASED LAB EVALUATION: GLOBAL RATING SCALE
January 11, 2018
Ashleigh Cole
Student:
Durham College OTA/PTA Program
5 – Very Good Delivery …………..…
4 – Good Delivery ……………………
3- Satisfactory Delivery ……. ……..
2 – Needs Improvement…………….
1 – Unsatisfactory/ Unsafe …......….
Lee, P., Koseck, K., Mirco, C., Dickinson, D. & Tavares, W. (2014). OTA & PTA Performance-Based Global Rating Scale. unpublished.
Date: ___________________________
6 (SCI)
Scenario# Rater: Susan Teengs
Course Code: PTA______________________
Skills II 3303
Performs to standard consistently. Consistently demonstrates a high standard of performance that is consistently safe
and effective. Could be used as a positive example for others. Highly recommended for progression.
Most often performs to standard. Performance has very minor error(s) or omission(s) that did not detract from the
safety and effectiveness of the activity/exercise. Ready for progression.
Performance meets minimum standards. Errors or omissions do not compromise safety or effectiveness. Meets
minimum standards for progression. A few areas could be improved.
Performance does not meet minimum standards. Errors or omissions compromised the effectiveness of
activity/exercise. Inconsistently performed, performance does not meet standards. Significant improvement is needed
before consideration for supervised patient care practice or progression.
Performance indicated cause for concern. Performance is unsafe, ineffective and/or inappropriate. Errors or omissions
compromise safety and/or significantly reduces treatment effectiveness. A potential for compromised patient
outcome or patient harm. Considerable improvement and remediation is needed. Is not ready for supervised patient care
practice or progression.
 OTA & PTA PERFORMANCE-BASED LAB EVALUATION: GLOBAL RATING SCALE

ACCOUNTABILITY & Needs Unsatisfactory or

Very Good Good Satisfactory
PROFESSIONALISM Improvement Unsafe

Individual’s overall ability to behave in a professional manner. Personal presentation: student wears appropriate attire with name identifier and is well groomed. Greets
client and confirms their identity. Obtains informed consent by introducing self (name and discipline), explaining what treatment will be provided and why, and receives
permission. Client is treated with respect and dignity (e.g. draping). Performs assigned duties as instructed within capabilities.
Squatted down to patients level (lying supine on large mat) to introduce self and discuss treatment and consent - good.
Reviewed the treatment activity and its relationship to the goal.
All issued well addressed and professional.

PREPARATION Needs Unsatisfactory or

Very Good Good Satisfactory
Client and Environment Improvement Unsafe

Performs environmental scan of treatment area and ensures personal and client safety. Uses standard precautions and general sanitization techniques. All treatment
materials are well planned, prepared and organized. Uses effective time management in preparing client, self and environment. Client is well positioned for treatment.
Uses good body mechanics. Good flow throughout the session.

Excellent body mechanics - at the head of the bed, close to patient, provided support appropriate to the case with good
position.
Removed pillow once no longer required.
Session flowed well
Very good preparation.

TREATMENT Needs Unsatisfactory or

Very Good Good Satisfactory
IMPLEMENTATION Improvement Unsafe

Explanation and rationale is provided for treatment activities. Selection of treatment tasks are linked to client’s condition and goals. Treatment components are carried
out using safe, effective and efficient techniques. Client is the focus throughout treatment, not just the task itself. Monitors client performance and response to
treatment. Provides reinforcement, support and constructive feedback.

Described and facilitated rolling starting with head, moving to arms and then activity but lacking momentum and optimal
patient participation
Good protection of tenodesis grip
Good weight shift to alter arm position but limited emphasis on use of shoulder external rotation to facilitate stability and
movement of arms during weight shifting

Lee, P., Koseck, K., Mirco, C., Dickinson, D. & Tavares, W. (2014). OTA & PTA Performance-Based Global Rating Scale. unpublished.
 OTA & PTA PERFORMANCE-BASED LAB EVALUATION: GLOBAL RATING SCALE

CRITICAL THINKING Needs Unsatisfactory or

Very Good Good Satisfactory
PROBLEM SOLVING & JUDGEMENT Improvement Unsafe
Demonstrates awareness of the need to grade or modified activities to provide “just the right challenge”. Identifies problems as they arise. Determines options
recognizing risks and benefits, and implements strategies to correct problems. Re-evaluates and revises strategies as required.

Graded activity - head, arms, explanation elbows - stopped for comfort and adjustment then moved to extended arms.
Allowed the patient to define the arm placement
Allowed the patient to experience sitting once achieved - good

COMMUNICATION Needs Unsatisfactory or

Very Good Good Satisfactory
Verbal and Non-Verbal Improvement Unsafe

Clearly and accurately exchanges information. Engages in conversation to build rapport. Uses communication techniques and language suited the client. Checks on
the client’s understanding of information and adjusts strategies to meet client’s needs. Responds to client’s questions and concerns using effective listening skills,
empathy. Verbal and non-verbal are congruent. Brings session to a close (asks for questions and describes next steps).

Excellent - constantly checked in with the patient to ensure understanding.

Good ongoing rapport and encouragement.

5 – Very Good Delivery …………..…
4 – Good Delivery ……………………
3- Satisfactory Delivery ……. ……..
2 – Needs Improvement…………….
1 – Unsatisfactory/ Unsafe …......….
Performs to standard consistently. Demonstrates a high standard of performance that is consistently safe and effective.
Could be used as a positive example for others. Highly recommended for progression.
Most often performs to standard. Performance has very minor error(s) or omission(s) that did not detract from the
safety and effectiveness of the activity/exercise. Ready for progression.
Performance meets minimum standards. Errors or omissions do not compromise safety or effectiveness. Meets
minimum standards for progression. A few areas could be improved.
Performance does not meet minimum standards. Errors or omissions compromised the effectiveness of
activity/exercise. Inconsistently performed, performance does not meet standards. Significant improvement is needed
before consideration for supervised patient care practice or progression.
Performance indicates cause for concern. Performance is unsafe, ineffective and/or inappropriate. Errors or omissions
compromise safety and/or significantly reduces treatment effectiveness. A potential for compromised patient
outcome or patient harm. Considerable improvement and remediation is needed. Is not ready for supervised patient care
practice or progression.

Lee, P., Koseck, K., Mirco, C., Dickinson, D. & Tavares, W. (2014). OTA & PTA Performance-Based Global Rating Scale. unpublished.
 OTA & PTA PERFORMANCE-BASED LAB EVALUATION: GLOBAL RATING SCALE
On the chart below: Enter the corresponding numerical value earned for each category.

ACCOUNTABILITY & PREPARATION TREATMENT CRITICAL THINKING COMMUNICATION

PROFESSIONALISM IMPLEMENTATION
Client and Judgement & Problem Verbal and Non-Verbal TOTAL
Environment Solving

5 5 4 4 5 23/25

Other Comments:
Student has demonstrated consistent growth in skills and knowledge in neurological skills this semester.
Encourage her to continue practicing facilitation skills to increase her confidence and abilities.

5 min and 50 sec.

Susan Teengs
Instructor Name ____________________________________

Instructor Signature__________________________________

Lee, P., Koseck, K., Mirco, C., Dickinson, D. & Tavares, W. (2014). OTA & PTA Performance-Based Global Rating Scale. unpublished.